SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Between cleanout day and draft day

Créé par: awesome
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 17 avr. 2019
Publié: 19 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
doesn't include any outside free agent signings that might happen. But Rutherford tends to not have a great track record when it comes to UFA signings. Im not even sure if they will resign Wilson or Prow(for different reasons) but I have them both listed on the roster here, obviously the roster size isn't correct.

We know one high cap defenseman has to go, it would make the most sense to be Maatta because it moves enough cap and also the left side has more people capable of replacing somebody. Otherwise I would say maybe move Schultz if they cant resign him since they could get a decent return but it would be tougher to replace him. If they do get rid of Schultz Prow would be more likely to be kept imo.

The kessel deal, I really am not a person who wants to trade kessel. On top of that it is difficult because of team and value. Arizona seems to be one of the ones that would make some sense, value wise this might not be perfect, might have to adjust the draft picks quite a bit.

Also these aren't the exact lines it would be.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 250 000 $
32 000 000 $
1900 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
could be a different team, since its just draft picks it doesn't really matter. A few teams should be interested.
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
could be another team, Jarry could have a solid future but is out of options, so either him or DeSmith would have to be traded.
3.
PIT
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Grabner, Michael
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (ARI)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
removed conditional from the 2020 pick
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 000 000 $76 557 500 $132 500 $0 $6 442 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 avr. 2019 à 17 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
not enough for kessel.
19 avr. 2019 à 17 h 12
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: mhockey91
not enough for kessel.


originally I had the two players, and two firsts going to Pittsburgh for just Phil. But I ended up making the second pick conditional on something that is reasonable so its still likely two firsts but could be a second.(although maybe im underestimating how much more rare points are for the coyotes as opposed to penguins). and added the picks coming from Pittsburgh(with a relatively reasonable conditional, so it could be just the fifth but also maybe a third)
19 avr. 2019 à 21 h 22
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: awesome
originally I had the two players, and two firsts going to Pittsburgh for just Phil. But I ended up making the second pick conditional on something that is reasonable so its still likely two firsts but could be a second.(although maybe im underestimating how much more rare points are for the coyotes as opposed to penguins). and added the picks coming from Pittsburgh(with a relatively reasonable conditional, so it could be just the fifth but also maybe a third)


changed it back to my original idea now. Two firsts without any conditions attached.
20 avr. 2019 à 2 h 37
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
I don't see a team giving up 2 1st round picks for Kessel.

My guess is it's a 1st and a player. But the player has to have decent potential.
20 avr. 2019 à 13 h 44
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: pharrow
I don't see a team giving up 2 1st round picks for Kessel.

My guess is it's a 1st and a player. But the player has to have decent potential.


that's why I kinda adjusted it to begin with so it wasn't as much unless Kessel had a very good season still.

The problem with doing one where its just one pick and a player is teams trading for kessel are gonna be teams interested in competing either now or very soon. So unless they are trading away from immense depth for a need(for example, Nashville trading defense for Phil) its tough to make happen. There are only a few situations where that would work. There are some teams that wouldn't be able to do that type of deal but could give up picks instead. Then there is the fact of where Phil would or wouldn't want to go. So the number of potential trade partners (IF he is traded) isn't too high.
24 avr. 2019 à 15 h 1
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: awesome
that's why I kinda adjusted it to begin with so it wasn't as much unless Kessel had a very good season still.

The problem with doing one where its just one pick and a player is teams trading for kessel are gonna be teams interested in competing either now or very soon. So unless they are trading away from immense depth for a need(for example, Nashville trading defense for Phil) its tough to make happen. There are only a few situations where that would work. There are some teams that wouldn't be able to do that type of deal but could give up picks instead. Then there is the fact of where Phil would or wouldn't want to go. So the number of potential trade partners (IF he is traded) isn't too high.


I have never once stated trading Phil would be easy. But they aren't moving him unless there is a real return and how to quantify that return is the problem.
A bubble team like AZ isn't going to give up two 1st. Even a trade to a team like Nashville, isn't likely. Most of the ACGM trades on here between the two really don't give a great return.
And that's the problem in trading Kessel. You got a PPG player, on a very low contract (thanks again toronto the curse of the hotdog still lives on), and there is a NMC, while he's a aging player.

There is really one 1 "bad" year on that contract. The last year. The rest of the years shouldn't be all to bad. Good players can play well in their early 30s so the next two years are just fine He'll only be 33.
He's got at least two high scoring quality years left. The question is what is that worth and to whom.
awesome a aimé ceci.
25 avr. 2019 à 0 h 22
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 247
Quoting: pharrow
I have never once stated trading Phil would be easy. But they aren't moving him unless there is a real return and how to quantify that return is the problem.
A bubble team like AZ isn't going to give up two 1st. Even a trade to a team like Nashville, isn't likely. Most of the ACGM trades on here between the two really don't give a great return.
And that's the problem in trading Kessel. You got a PPG player, on a very low contract (thanks again toronto the curse of the hotdog still lives on), and there is a NMC, while he's a aging player.

There is really one 1 "bad" year on that contract. The last year. The rest of the years shouldn't be all to bad. Good players can play well in their early 30s so the next two years are just fine He'll only be 33.
He's got at least two high scoring quality years left. The question is what is that worth and to whom.


im not even certain if he will be traded at all, if he does get traded I think there is a few likely destinations with Arizona or Nashville being higher on the list. I agree most of the deals I have seen for Kessel isn't nearly enough coming back. He is a star player who has a few very good seasons left and as you pointed out Toronto is still paying part of his salary which wasn't too outrageous at todays cap hits anyway.
wherever he goes the return should be high, what form it takes(more current players with only a bit of futures, or more futures with a bit less current players) is to be seen.
25 avr. 2019 à 1 h 18
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: awesome
im not even certain if he will be traded at all, if he does get traded I think there is a few likely destinations with Arizona or Nashville being higher on the list. I agree most of the deals I have seen for Kessel isn't nearly enough coming back. He is a star player who has a few very good seasons left and as you pointed out Toronto is still paying part of his salary which wasn't too outrageous at todays cap hits anyway.
wherever he goes the return should be high, what form it takes(more current players with only a bit of futures, or more futures with a bit less current players) is to be seen.


I mean when you think about it, you are looking at the cost of basically a 2 year rental. Which I would say is worth 2 1st, but they would be low round and frankly underwhelming of a return.
Maybe the value of Stone is a fair comparable. But that doesn't seem like a trade any team would have made unless they absolutely had to.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage