SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Scorched Earth PIT side

Créé par: claysbar
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 19 avr. 2019
Publié: 20 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know it's a "bit" EA Sports GM mode but...None of the trades are outrageous, all teams get a need(s) (picks, cap space, team depth etc.). The only one I am having trouble with is the BUF trade. How can they have been so bad, picked so high multiple times and really have no depth? Even EDM has good player depth even it has been misused/abused. If Arthur Kaliyev is still available around the 10-12th pick, would like to see Pens package their 1st and ARI and CBJ 2nd's to pick him. So with that folks, tear away....
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3809 166 $
3755 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 850 000 $
2825 000 $
42 750 000 $
2925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
59 000 000 $
2800 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Kaliyev, Arthur
1925 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
PIT
  1. Fischer, Christian
  2. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Kessel, Phil (800 000 $ retained)
3.
PIT
  1. Fleury, Cale
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (CBJ)
MTL
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. Pavlychev, Nikita [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (BUF)
4.
PIT
  1. McCabe, Jake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Smith, C.J. [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Aston-Reese, Zach [Droits de RFA]
  2. Jarry, Tristan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (DAL)
5.
PIT
  1. Brown, Dustin
  2. Villalta, Matt
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (LAK)
LAK
  1. Fischer, Christian
  2. Rust, Bryan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $76 205 416 $132 500 $132 500 $6 794 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
811 667 $811 667 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
710 000 $710 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
833 750 $833 750 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
771 666 $771 666 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 avr. 2019 à 19 h 46
#1
god like
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 993
Mentions "j'aime": 149
you cant be a pens fan those are awful for the pens
awesome a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 19 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Care to expand on that?
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 19 h 48
#3
Glep
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 911
Dallas can’t trade their first until the conditions of the zuccarello trade aren’t met
20 avr. 2019 à 19 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: t2a2e9j12k2
you cant be a pens fan those are awful for the pens


Sorry, forgot to link you, care to expand on that?
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 20 h 18
#5
I like Eich
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,591
Mentions "j'aime": 336
Love Buffalo trade, but that’s because it’s a little favored for buffalo lol. If pens just traded us a 3rd without the picks you mentioned I think it would be more fair
20 avr. 2019 à 20 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
No thanks to all of them.

That Dallas trade, Malkin could get all that in his own and it still probably wouldn’t be enough. Add a solid 3rd liner and the pens should get a lot more. The problem with trading malkin is you either need to get an elite player back, or the other team pretty much has to blow up their depth.
In terms of the AZ trade, take off the retention and it’s closer. Might even have to make it a 1st instead of a 2nd too.
The Montreal trade, I’m not trading Pavlychev. Maatta for a 2nd is good enough for a trade.
The buffalo trade is absolutely unnecessary. Trading Jarry, a bottom 9 versatile and cheap forward, and a 1st for a giant pile of nothing.
The LA trade we are taking on a guy that could be a cap dump or could be a decent middle 6 forward for 2 cheaper decent middle 6 forwards. And we upgrade our pick a round. Not worth it.
claysbar a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 20 h 38
#7
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: Pensfan89
No thanks to all of them.

That Dallas trade, Malkin could get all that in his own and it still probably wouldn’t be enough. Add a solid 3rd liner and the pens should get a lot more. The problem with trading malkin is you either need to get an elite player back, or the other team pretty much has to blow up their depth.
In terms of the AZ trade, take off the retention and it’s closer. Might even have to make it a 1st instead of a 2nd too.
The Montreal trade, I’m not trading Pavlychev. Maatta for a 2nd is good enough for a trade.
The buffalo trade is absolutely unnecessary. Trading Jarry, a bottom 9 versatile and cheap forward, and a 1st for a giant pile of nothing.
The LA trade we are taking on a guy that could be a cap dump or could be a decent middle 6 forward for 2 cheaper decent middle 6 forwards. And we upgrade our pick a round. Not worth it.


Totally see your points on this. All of these trades are the kinda, least case scenario. With the cap and league team saturation, NO ONE is gonna blow it all up for 1 player much less most (if not all) of those players have movement clauses that would negate those trades anyway. By the way, THANK YOU for your intelligent input on this. Have a good Holiday if it's yours to celebrate.
Billy739 et Pensfan89 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 20 h 50
#8
god like
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 993
Mentions "j'aime": 149
Quoting: claysbar
Totally see your points on this. All of these trades are the kinda, least case scenario. With the cap and league team saturation, NO ONE is gonna blow it all up for 1 player much less most (if not all) of those players have movement clauses that would negate those trades anyway. By the way, THANK YOU for your intelligent input on this. Have a good Holiday if it's yours to celebrate.


malkin kessel rust all are more valuable than that. brown isslow and over paid, kings wont give up young players or picks.
The buffalo trade is absolutely unnecessary. Trading Jarry, a bottom 9 versatile and cheap forward, and a 1st for a giant pile of nothing.
This sums up sabres trade quite well
20 avr. 2019 à 20 h 58
#9
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: t2a2e9j12k2
malkin kessel rust all are more valuable than that. brown isslow and over paid, kings wont give up young players or picks.
The buffalo trade is absolutely unnecessary. Trading Jarry, a bottom 9 versatile and cheap forward, and a 1st for a giant pile of nothing.
This sums up sabres trade quite well


Jarry has to play in the bigs next year or has to pass thru waivers... get something for him or keep him and lose DeSmith for nothing (leading to the Vilatta trade). Jarry and Reese are both known quantities to JB and to add a 1st to a depth ravaged team is a no brainer for them. The Pens adding a SOLID 2nd pair D and a very intriguing CJ is a no brainer.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 21 h 1
#10
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
i think the dallas trade is the only one that's just got to much going on to make sense i'd keep Malkin if Kessels going .
(honestly he shoulda got a 1st as he's lead PPP league wide for 4 seasons )
Buf trade isnt necessary because you forget to sign RFA Rikola who's better then Mccabe .
take out those 2 trades and i think you got a contender again .

the MTL trade works as Fleury's WAY more likely and currently closer to making it as a NHL player then Pavlychev is to make it as a 4th line Center and
no one's giving up anything more then a 2nd for Maata thats for sure
(lucky for PIT our coach loves having a huge 4th line so we see it as worth the gamble)
claysbar a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 21 h 9
#11
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: Billy739
i think the dallas trade is the only one that's just got to much going on to make sense i'd keep Malkin if Kessels going .
(honestly he shoulda got a 1st as he's lead PPP league wide for 4 seasons )
Buf trade isnt necessary because you forget to sign RFA Rikola who's better then Mccabe .
take out those 2 trades and i think you got a contender again .

the MTL trade works as Fleury's WAY more likely and currently closer to making it as a NHL player then Pavlychev is to make it as a 4th line Center and
no one's giving up anything more then a 2nd for Maata thats for sure
(lucky for PIT our coach loves having a huge 4th line so we see it as worth the gamble)


I just don't see Rikkola staying if he's not "guaranteed" more playing time. I don't see that happening in PIT. Don't agree on the McCabe comparison but such is life.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 21 h 19
#12
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: mikeyscav
Love Buffalo trade, but that’s because it’s a little favored for buffalo lol. If pens just traded us a 3rd without the picks you mentioned I think it would be more fair


If you guys wanna add the "other" Rasmus, I'm OK with that.
20 avr. 2019 à 21 h 22
#13
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: claysbar
I just don't see Rikkola staying if he's not "guaranteed" more playing time. I don't see that happening in PIT. Don't agree on the McCabe comparison but such is life.


well if you move out Maata and dont bring in Mccabe he'd get that ice time .

Mccabe's hit his full potential with maybe a little room for growth as an all around player as he becomes a veteran .
Rikola on the other hand has potential to become a 3rd-4th D getting his ice time on 2nd PP unit and 2nd pair.

honestly i'd 100% rather Rikola then Maata if he's just floating around somewhere hahaha :P
claysbar a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 21 h 26
#14
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: Billy739
well if you move out Maata and dont bring in Mccabe he'd get that ice time .

Mccabe's hit his full potential with maybe a little room for growth as an all around player as he becomes a veteran .
Rikola on the other hand has potential to become a 3rd-4th D getting his ice time on 2nd PP unit and 2nd pair.

honestly i'd 100% rather Rikola then Maata if he's just floating around somewhere hahaha :P


But McCabe is exactly what they need. Stay at home, stay at home, stay at home...OM needs a fresh scene (oddly enough the biggest unknown quantity is if he could survive MON). Riikola is more a Oleksiak type player. A tweener between O and D.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 21 h 33
#15
god like
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 993
Mentions "j'aime": 149
you are way overvaluing mccbae nd smith a 3rd pairing d thats a rfa and a 4th liner thats a rfa woud not trade a 1st aone for them. jarry hold more value to other teams
claysbar a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 21 h 46
#16
Démarrer sujet
claysbar
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 747
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: t2a2e9j12k2
you are way overvaluing mccbae nd smith a 3rd pairing d thats a rfa and a 4th liner thats a rfa woud not trade a 1st aone for them. jarry hold more value to other teams


But who? Every team either cannot take Jarry without risk of losing him to waivers because they have either goalie depth or signed players. Ullmark isn't even a back-up at this point so it fits for BUF. Ideally I would have moved Jarry to CHI for Edjsell but Dalia got in the way...
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
20 avr. 2019 à 22 h 32
#17
god like
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 993
Mentions "j'aime": 149
Quoting: claysbar
But who? Every team either cannot take Jarry without risk of losing him to waivers because they have either goalie depth or signed players. Ullmark isn't even a back-up at this point so it fits for BUF. Ideally I would have moved Jarry to CHI for Edjsell but Dalia got in the way...


oilers, panthers,canes, kkings if they move quick, flames, jackets red wings wild off the top of mmy head
20 avr. 2019 à 22 h 49
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: Billy739
i think the dallas trade is the only one that's just got to much going on to make sense i'd keep Malkin if Kessels going .
(honestly he shoulda got a 1st as he's lead PPP league wide for 4 seasons )
Buf trade isnt necessary because you forget to sign RFA Rikola who's better then Mccabe .
take out those 2 trades and i think you got a contender again .

the MTL trade works as Fleury's WAY more likely and currently closer to making it as a NHL player then Pavlychev is to make it as a 4th line Center and
no one's giving up anything more then a 2nd for Maata thats for sure
(lucky for PIT our coach loves having a huge 4th line so we see it as worth the gamble)


It’s not about who is closer, it’s just the fact that we have Letang, Schultz, Gudbranson, Addison, Prow. Prow is ready to make the jump now, Ruhwedel/Trotman can be re-signed too as extra Dmen. And as the pens are kinda cap strapped, it’s not beneficial to have a 4 million dollar healthy scratch. Plus Petterson and Gudbranson work well as the third pair. Schultz and Riikola should be 2nd pair. Letang and Dumo as 1st pair. Prow and maybe Ruh or Trotman can be serve as the extra defensemen.
We need a younger and faster bottom 6. That’s where pavlychev, Blueger, Hallander,A. Johnson, etc come in.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage