SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Laine News

Créé par: Tbrew
Équipe: 2024-25 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 12 juin 2024
Publié: 12 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
All this retention is so unrealistic, but this site is going away anyway so may as well throw some crap like this into the caps’ algorithm when they scrape all these ACGMs
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1900 000 $
33 800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
34 600 000 $
21 800 000 $
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Laine, Patrik (4 350 000 $ retained)
CBJ
  1. Stillman, Chase
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
2.
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob (3 000 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Bastian, Nathan
  2. Holtz, Alexander
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
3.
OTT
  1. Siegenthaler, Jonas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de WPG
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de DAL
Logo de WPG
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2388 000 000 $85 982 230 $1 538 897 $5 100 000 $2 017 770 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
RFA
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 juin à 20 h 35
#1
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 7,505
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Yeah, that’s not getting you Markström

Take out the retention and swap Bastian for Bahl and Flames might consider it. Happy to swap Bastian for either Rooney or Duehr if they want too though. The preference would a Waivers Exempt Prospect over the 3rd as well. Would help to speed up the re-tool
12 juin à 20 h 37
#2
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 12,455
Mentions "j'aime": 4,790
Ottawa accepts.
athrin a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 20 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,510
Mentions "j'aime": 19,676
CBJ-No
CGY-Yes
OTT-No
SK101, Tbrew et JacketsComrade a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 21 h 1
#4
YARRRR!!!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2024
Messages: 220
Mentions "j'aime": 100
Quoting: sensonfire
Ottawa accepts.


Do we though?

Another LHD to add to our pool of LHD's.

Id like having another 1st.
12 juin à 21 h 10
#5
Colby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 675
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yeah, that’s not getting you Markström

Take out the retention and swap Bastian for Bahl and Flames might consider it. Happy to swap Bastian for either Rooney or Duehr if they want too though. The preference would a Waivers Exempt Prospect over the 3rd as well. Would help to speed up the re-tool


why are u on this train of Markstrom being worth the same or even more then ullmark? hes a 34 yearold goalie who has a huge cap hit and hasnt had a good season in 2 years let alone an elite season. if ullmark is struggling to get the 10oa or holtz then what on earth makes u think a struggling aging goalie is worth more? lower ur expectations. ull get a first if u eat some cap and maybe a bad prospect.
Smitty426 a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 21 h 16
#6
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 12,455
Mentions "j'aime": 4,790
Quoting: Adir4
Do we though?

Another LHD to add to our pool of LHD's.

Id like having another 1st.


Siegenthaler is an NHL-ready two way defenceman with term and a smaller cap hit than Chychrun's.

He buys time for Kleven to continue developing in the minors if necessary.

Once Kleven is ready to make the jump, we just trade Siegenthaler to a third team.



We originally gave up the #12 overall pick in 2023 + two seconds for Chychrun.

Here, we are getting the #10 overall pick in 2024 + Siegenthaler for Chychrun.

This is very close in value to what we originally gave up.



Ottawa accepts.
Adir4 et Pdubs98 a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 21 h 31
#7
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 7,505
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: colby
why are u on this train of Markstrom being worth the same or even more then ullmark? hes a 34 yearold goalie who has a huge cap hit and hasnt had a good season in 2 years let alone an elite season. if ullmark is struggling to get the 10oa or holtz then what on earth makes u think a struggling aging goalie is worth more? lower ur expectations. ull get a first if u eat some cap and maybe a bad prospect.

Markstrom & Ullmark are relatively equally skilled and matched statistically, but Markstrom come with an additional year term, whereas Ullmark is a Pending UFA set for a rich contract extension

Note: there’s more stats than just GAA & Sv% to compare and on that note, Ullmark’s haven so 💩 hot in the playoffs the last 2 seasons. I highly doubt any goalie who goes to NJD, especially Ullmark, does well given their weak & leaky d-corps

$6mil is less than the $8mil/yr Markstrom’s probably worth as bona fide elite 90-1A Goalie already

Eating Cap for 2 full seasons is night and day different than at the trade deadline with 20 games ~25% remaining in the season on an expiring contract. It’s huge $$$ out of pocket which is worth a ton in trade consideration alone

NJD should get Ulllmark if they can. Don’t matter to me, there’s 5-7 other teams in the goalie market, so I’m confident we’ll net a great return without retention or an amazing return with it
12 juin à 21 h 42
#8
Colby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 675
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: KingofRnR
Markstrom & Ullmark are relatively equally skilled and matched statistically, but Markstrom come with an additional year term, whereas Ullmark is a Pending UFA set for a rich contract extension

Note: there’s more stats than just GAA & Sv% to compare and on that note, Ullmark’s haven so 💩 hot in the playoffs the last 2 seasons. I highly doubt any goalie who goes to NJD, especially Ullmark, does well given their weak & leaky d-corps

$6mil is less than the $8mil/yr Markstrom’s probably worth as bona fide elite 90-1A Goalie already

Eating Cap for 2 full seasons is night and day different than at the trade deadline with 20 games ~25% remaining in the season on an expiring contract. It’s huge $$$ out of pocket which is worth a ton in trade consideration alone

NJD should get Ulllmark if they can. Don’t matter to me, there’s 5-7 other teams in the goalie market, so I’m confident we’ll net a great return without retention or an amazing return with it


theres more to goalie stats then save% but markstrom the known streaky and hit or miss goalie is not getting a good/great return unless ur eating 2+m on his deal. that isnt that valueable as is considering his last 2 years and hes 34. hes not going to magically return to an elite goalie and hes probably the 4/5th goalie on the market. if u think markstrom is an 8M goalie then ur already lost. hes been a bottom starter the last 2 years. ullmark hasnt even played bad in the playoffs. u would know that if u actually know anything about goalies. played very well in the only starting game he got and came in halfway through a blowout cold. 2 years ago he played great until he was very clearly hurt and they played him an extra game n 1/2. markstrom over his time in calg had 1 elite season 2 pretty poor seasons a terrible season and a pretty pissy playoff run. thats not an elite 1A goalie. thats a solid 1B/2A goalie whos being overpaid at 6m
U will get a first for him from a goalie hungry team and maybe midish prospect. nothing more no matter how much cap u eat. there are 2 better goalies teams can give up = assets for. markstrom is for sure not even close to saros or ullmarks value btw hes easily an entire tier below them.
Smitty426 a aimé ceci.
12 juin à 21 h 51
#9
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 7,505
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Modifié 12 juin à 22 h 15
Quoting: colby
theres more to goalie stats then save% but markstrom the known streaky and hit or miss goalie is not getting a good/great return unless ur eating 2+m on his deal. that isnt that valueable as is considering his last 2 years and hes 34. hes not going to magically return to an elite goalie and hes probably the 4/5th goalie on the market. if u think markstrom is an 8M goalie then ur already lost. hes been a bottom starter the last 2 years. ullmark hasnt even played bad in the playoffs. u would know that if u actually know anything about goalies. played very well in the only starting game he got and came in halfway through a blowout cold. 2 years ago he played great until he was very clearly hurt and they played him an extra game n 1/2. markstrom over his time in calg had 1 elite season 2 pretty poor seasons a terrible season and a pretty pissy playoff run. thats not an elite 1A goalie. thats a solid 1B/2A goalie whos being overpaid at 6m
U will get a first for him from a goalie hungry team and maybe midish prospect. nothing more no matter how much cap u eat. there are 2 better goalies teams can give up = assets for. markstrom is for sure not even close to saros or ullmarks value btw hes easily an entire tier below them.

Goalies by nature are “streaky” and can go Hot or Cold at any time, regardless of their age

If you don’t understand what I pointed out in my last post about the difference between retaining an an expiring contract for the last 25% of a season after bonuses have already been paid out vs. for 2 entire seasons (tying up 2 retention spots btw) and can’t do the math, I really can’t help you

If you knew anything about Markström and his circumstances and could take the teams in front of them into consideration over the last 2 seasons, you might understand

Both Saros & Ullmark are Rentals = Pending Free Agents seeking huge new contracts that likely don’t, but could become boat anchors, just like Husso, Forsberg & Campbell have for DET, OTT & EDM. It’s amazing how change affects some Goalies

Best of Luck to NJD and all the Teams, but we know what we have in Markström and $6mil over a short-term contract is more ideal than having to commit long-term contracts for $8-12mil/yr till they’re 37-38 like Ullmark & Saros will be wanting and signing for

Sounds like Saros and the Predators are working hard on a contract extension, so he’s probably not even available
12 juin à 23 h 43
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,680
Mentions "j'aime": 2,432
That probably gets close to Laine with no retention, but no one is retaining $4M+ a year without getting heavy compensation.
squashmaple a aimé ceci.
13 juin à 7 h 59
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,802
Mentions "j'aime": 1,128
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
That probably gets close to Laine with no retention, but no one is retaining $4M+ a year without getting heavy compensation.


I don’t think Laine without retention is costing anyone more than a mid round pick and maybe a throw in prospect at this point
13 juin à 8 h 11
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 308
Mentions "j'aime": 248
this is very very far off on laine's fully retained value

a non-lotto first a year away and a completely uninteresting prospect?
13 juin à 8 h 52
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 237
Mentions "j'aime": 91
Quoting: Adir4
Do we though?

Another LHD to add to our pool of LHD's.

Id like having another 1st.


Move Siegenthaler to another team if they would rather have Kleven play next year - there's far too much value in this trade to pass up. Not a chance the actual trade that ends up happening comes close to this.
13 juin à 8 h 55
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,802
Mentions "j'aime": 1,128
Quoting: JacketsComrade
this is very very far off on laine's fully retained value

a non-lotto first a year away and a completely uninteresting prospect?


That is in fact the offer i put down
13 juin à 12 h 36
#15
Chukbombs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2024
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Quoting: KingofRnR
Markstrom & Ullmark are relatively equally skilled and matched statistically, but Markstrom come with an additional year term, whereas Ullmark is a Pending UFA set for a rich contract extension

Note: there’s more stats than just GAA & Sv% to compare and on that note, Ullmark’s haven so 💩 hot in the playoffs the last 2 seasons. I highly doubt any goalie who goes to NJD, especially Ullmark, does well given their weak & leaky d-corps

$6mil is less than the $8mil/yr Markstrom’s probably worth as bona fide elite 90-1A Goalie already

Eating Cap for 2 full seasons is night and day different than at the trade deadline with 20 games ~25% remaining in the season on an expiring contract. It’s huge $$$ out of pocket which is worth a ton in trade consideration alone

NJD should get Ulllmark if they can. Don’t matter to me, there’s 5-7 other teams in the goalie market, so I’m confident we’ll net a great return without retention or an amazing return with it



I commend you for trying to up Markstroms value but in reality his value is not there and Ullmark is a much better deal for every team looking for an upgrade in nets.
Tbrew a aimé ceci.
13 juin à 13 h 1
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 420
Mentions "j'aime": 176
Calgary doesn't want/need Bastian as we need to make room for our own forwards graduating from the A. I like Holtz as a sniper to try to pair to Huberdeau to get them both to take a step forward. Less retention and a straight swap is probably preferred from the Flames perspective as ownership is probably going to be looking to save real $ without playoff revenue.
13 juin à 13 h 13
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,680
Mentions "j'aime": 2,432
Quoting: Tbrew
I don’t think Laine without retention is costing anyone more than a mid round pick and maybe a throw in prospect at this point


When he's playing, he's a 0.8 ppg player. That's the production of players like Tage, Giroux, McCann, Buchnevich, and Tuch last year. He's a $6M player making too much, I think it's a given we retain about $2M, but that kind of production costs a lot.

Throw conditions on there related to Laine's production, and I'd expect a 1st plus. When he's not taking headshots, slewfoots, or losing his father...he's good for about 50 games and 50 points a season.
13 juin à 13 h 28
#18
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 7,505
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: Pdubs98
I commend you for trying to up Markstroms value but in reality his value is not there and Ullmark is a much better deal for every team looking for an upgrade in nets.

Unless Ullmark won’t move there or you don’t project to have the Cap Space available for his next contract or how bout if you believe you already have your Future Goaltender within the organization and just need a bridge mentor like OTT has with Sogaard, TOR has with Woll and DET has with Cossa
13 juin à 13 h 35
#19
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 7,505
Mentions "j'aime": 2,085
Quoting: CN10
Calgary doesn't want/need Bastian as we need to make room for our own forwards graduating from the A. I like Holtz as a sniper to try to pair to Huberdeau to get them both to take a step forward. Less retention and a straight swap is probably preferred from the Flames perspective as ownership is probably going to be looking to save real $ without playoff revenue.

The benefit of Bastian is he can play Centre and in all situations including a Front Net Presence on the PP or on the PK if need be. Add he’s ultra physical and he’s a good guy to have as a 4th line Winger or 13th/14th Forward. Teams typically keep Vets in the press box over their AHL’ers who are better served continuing to develop with game action. That said, Flames already have Hunt, Rooney & Duehr and could re-sign AJ Greer or see if Cole Schwindt or Adam Klapka is ready to make the leap

Huberdeau does better with a Big Fast Power Forward or two as his linemates, which Holtz is not, not to mention we already have Coronato. Anthony Duclair, Martin Pospisil, Vasiky Podkolzin type players would likely do much better on a line with Huberdeau than Holtz would imo
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage