SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving up

Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 5 mai 2024
Publié: 12 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
A long term core this team can run with is incredible

Slaf - Suzuki - Caufield
Newhook - Dach - Demidov
Roy - Beck - Robo
Harvey Pinard - Armia/Evans - Gallagher

Hudson - Reinbacher
Guhle - Wifi
Matheson - Liljegren

Liljegren can slot up one over Xhekaj but Guhle - Wifi has more experience with one another so I went with what I knew.

I'm also not convinced Newhook is a 2nd line guy on a contending team, but maybe I'm just hating, plus the Dach/Demidov duo would be nasty.

You also might notice that there's a couple players listed in scratched, including Harris, Kovacevic, and Anderson. None of these guys make sense as long term fits in this lineup. Either of the young D can be kept around as the 7th D, but neither have a ceiling that places them above the guys in the lineup. For Anderson, he's still NHL caliber and you can probably scratch RHP for a few games, but ideally you trade his contract elsewhere to avoid spending over 5 mil on a 4th liner and who doesn't fit your long term plans.

You can take a 2nd off the Dvorak deal and the points remain the same
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
33 500 000 $
22 300 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Demidov, Ivan
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Liljegren, Timothy [Droits de RFA]
  2. Robertson, Nicholas [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Montreal gets two guys who fit the timeline and immediately join the roster and fit as long term role players. Liljegren would be a Savard replacement while Robo is like Caufield lite.
TOR
  1. Dvorak, Christian (1 200 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (MTL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
Dvorak fits the 3c role that the Leafs currently let Pontus Holmberg occupy. Dvorak would be a good fit as a forechecker and two way presence that makes sense along side the teams top stars, and the retention brings some much needed cap flexibility. The picks, along with closing the gap in value between players, are important to the Leafs as future trade chips.
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
2nd OA

Montreal has tons of young talent and few roster spots, and with an obvious lack of top end wingers, moving up to grab the Michkov clone after you skipped on the real thing last draft makes the most sense. Having excess young talent is cool until you have to give them all ice time to develop, and this move opens up a spot for all the guys with a long term role on the team doesn't give anything away that Montreal would miss too bad.

In case it wasn't clear already, Montreal grabs Demidov here
CHI
  1. Mailloux, Logan
  2. Mesar, Filip
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
5th OA + 27th OA

Chicago has a generational talent to build around, and as tempting as it is to use the 2nd overall oa pick to get him his forever linemate to flash shades of the Toews/Kane duo of old, this team has waaaaay less prosects than they'd need to feel confident about this team going forward. Even if you include unsigned prospects, the amount of long term prospects, especially on the wings and RHD are lacking, something this trade adds immediately, letting Chicago to pick up an ex first round wing and ex first round RHD, plus the 5th oa still grabs them one of Eiserman or Lindstrom.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $74 921 250 $1 022 500 $4 670 000 $8 578 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Demidov, Ivan
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
12 mai à 14 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,324
Mentions "j'aime": 7,520
So the leafs get a worse, more expensive player than robertson and also now have to find another top 4 defender, didnt know they were tanking next season
12 mai à 14 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 869
Mentions "j'aime": 792
‘this team has waaaaay less prosects than they'd need to feel confident about this team going forward’

Not accurate.
Patches et Garak a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 14 h 59
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 565
Mentions "j'aime": 277
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
So the leafs get a worse, more expensive player than robertson and also now have to find another top 4 defender, didnt know they were tanking next season


Liljegren was never a top 4 defender
Ryminister_92 a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 15 h 2
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,324
Mentions "j'aime": 7,520
Quoting: dh91
Liljegren was never a top 4 defender


He literally is one right now. A number 4 guy is a top 4 defender. This isnt like when habs fans pretend savard isnt a 7th defenceman on any team that's half decent
12 mai à 15 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 565
Mentions "j'aime": 277
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
He literally is one right now. A number 4 guy is a top 4 defender. This isnt like when habs fans pretend savard isnt a 7th defenceman on any team that's half decent


Top 4 defenders usually don't get scratched come playoff time. He's incredibly weak defensively
Ryminister_92 a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 15 h 5
#6
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,376
Mentions "j'aime": 4,557
Respectfully, **** off
exo2769, Random_internet_guy_1967, RicXX and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 15 h 6
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Waaayyy too much of an overpay to both Chicago and Toronto. The difference between Robertson and Dvorak (retained) is a 3rd from Toronto, centers have more value than wingers. A 2nd for Liljegren is fair value but Hughes already said he is not trading for D that block Mailloux and Reinbacher from developing in the NHL in the next year or two. All this to say you are a 2nd + 3rd too high from the Habs and missing a 3rd from the Leafs.

As for the Chicago trade, the cost to move up 3 spots in the draft (even in the top 5) is a 2nd, an overpayment would be Mesar. Therefor you are 2 1st round picks too high for that one (Mailloux and the Flames 1st)
12 mai à 15 h 11
#8
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 16,231
Mentions "j'aime": 10,774
I don't know Logan Mailloux and barely know of what he did. BUT I do know the Hawks as an organization can't handle it even if you paid us the 5th OA. I personally believe in 2nd chances. But it's possible for two things to be true at the same time. You couldn't pay the Hawks enough to take him off your hands.
Hawksguy81, Patches, RicXX and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 15 h 18
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 4,685
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Leafs aren’t trading in division.
12 mai à 15 h 19
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,324
Mentions "j'aime": 7,520
Quoting: dh91
Top 4 defenders usually don't get scratched come playoff time. He's incredibly weak defensively


Yeah, that coach who just got fired for being terrible and making all sorts of terrible roster decisions all the time totally had it right. And you do realize that offensive leaning defenders can be top 4 guys right? And that there are different ways to play defence, right? Liljegren is fine at some, good at others and bad at others still. But he's the very definition of 4th defender. IE a flawed guy who cant carry a 2nd pairing but is good with a guy who can.
12 mai à 15 h 30
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 10,005
Mentions "j'aime": 12,592
Hawks decline. Rather just take Demidov or Levshunov. Mailloux in Chicago would be an image and PR disaster.
Patches, RicXX et Garak a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 15 h 32
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,207
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yeah, that coach who just got fired for being terrible and making all sorts of terrible roster decisions all the time totally had it right. And you do realize that offensive leaning defenders can be top 4 guys right? And that there are different ways to play defence, right? Liljegren is fine at some, good at others and bad at others still. But he's the very definition of 4th defender. IE a flawed guy who cant carry a 2nd pairing but is good with a guy who can.


Liljegren has never been a top 4 defender. If he was, the team wouldn’t be constantly looking for a top 4 right handed guy.
You can’t blame Keefe for Liljegren’s poor performance. Keefe gave him tons of chances to take the spot and run with it and he never has.
Liljegren couldn’t crack the top 4 on a defence core with the likes of Brodie, Benoit, Giordano, Edmundson, and Lybushkin. All those guys are #6 defenders at best, but mostly #7 guys all year and Liljegren couldn’t consistently stay ahead of them.

Timothy Liljegren is a #6/7 defender. Argue all you want with your usual incredibly bias opinion, but it still doesn’t make it right.
gmurrayt a aimé ceci.
12 mai à 15 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,324
Mentions "j'aime": 7,520
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Liljegren has never been a top 4 defender. If he was, the team wouldn’t be constantly looking for a top 4 right handed guy.
You can’t blame Keefe for Liljegren’s poor performance. Keefe gave him tons of chances to take the spot and run with it and he never has.
Liljegren couldn’t crack the top 4 on a defence core with the likes of Brodie, Benoit, Giordano, Edmundson, and Lybushkin. All those guys are #6 defenders at best, but mostly #7 guys all year and Liljegren couldn’t consistently stay ahead of them.

Timothy Liljegren is a #6/7 defender. Argue all you want with your usual incredibly bias opinion, but it still doesn’t make it right.


Yes he has been, and they are looking for a top pairing rhd, not a 2nd pairing one, or at least a 3rhd who can carry a 4th defender lhd like,oh i dunno ,mccabe.
Instead they keep bringing in bottom pairing rhd who are worse than liljegren and keefe kept playing them because he is a bad coach, you cant blame liljegren for keefes bad performance.
You can argue with that all you want, but your incredible bias doesnt make you right
12 mai à 15 h 48
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,207
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yes he has been, and they are looking for a top pairing rhd, not a 2nd pairing one, or at least a 3rhd who can carry a 4th defender lhd like,oh i dunno ,mccabe.
Instead they keep bringing in bottom pairing rhd who are worse than liljegren and keefe kept playing them because he is a bad coach, you cant blame liljegren for keefes bad performance.
You can argue with that all you want, but your incredible bias doesnt make you right


Lmao.
12 mai à 15 h 50
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,324
Mentions "j'aime": 7,520
Quoting: Ryminister_92
Lmao.


Yeah, you're argument does sound really dumb when it's used against you, doesnt it?
13 mai à 21 h 21
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 1,051
Mentions "j'aime": 441
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Yes he has been, and they are looking for a top pairing rhd, not a 2nd pairing one, or at least a 3rhd who can carry a 4th defender lhd like,oh i dunno ,mccabe.
Instead they keep bringing in bottom pairing rhd who are worse than liljegren and keefe kept playing them because he is a bad coach, you cant blame liljegren for keefes bad performance.
You can argue with that all you want, but your incredible bias doesnt make you right


Quoting: Ryminister_92
Liljegren has never been a top 4 defender. If he was, the team wouldn’t be constantly looking for a top 4 right handed guy.
You can’t blame Keefe for Liljegren’s poor performance. Keefe gave him tons of chances to take the spot and run with it and he never has.
Liljegren couldn’t crack the top 4 on a defence core with the likes of Brodie, Benoit, Giordano, Edmundson, and Lybushkin. All those guys are #6 defenders at best, but mostly #7 guys all year and Liljegren couldn’t consistently stay ahead of them.

Timothy Liljegren is a #6/7 defender. Argue all you want with your usual incredibly bias opinion, but it still doesn’t make it right.


GNgH0dgWYAAAKIo?format=png&name=small

Liljegren is not really a top 4 defender. He's only ever there because we lack genuine top 4 RD. While I have advocated for Keefe's firing for years now, he's given Lily ample opportunity in bigger roles throughout the last two seasons. There's a reason he's never been able to crack the top line with Mo, he's not that good.

On a true contending team with a D core NOT comprised of bottom 6 defenders, he's a bottom 6 defender himself.

And as for the "looking for someone to carry McCabe" comment, it's actually McCabe who's carried Lily the majority of this season. Lily has always needed someone better than him to boost his metrics and make him look better than he is.

I'm 100% down to move Lily, but only if it's for a genuine upgrade.
Ryminister_92 a aimé ceci.
14 mai à 15 h 44
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,207
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Carleton
GNgH0dgWYAAAKIo?format=png&name=small

Liljegren is not really a top 4 defender. He's only ever there because we lack genuine top 4 RD. While I have advocated for Keefe's firing for years now, he's given Lily ample opportunity in bigger roles throughout the last two seasons. There's a reason he's never been able to crack the top line with Mo, he's not that good.

On a true contending team with a D core NOT comprised of bottom 6 defenders, he's a bottom 6 defender himself.

And as for the "looking for someone to carry McCabe" comment, it's actually McCabe who's carried Lily the majority of this season. Lily has always needed someone better than him to boost his metrics and make him look better than he is.

I'm 100% down to move Lily, but only if it's for a genuine upgrade.


Can’t disagree with a single thing you said and none of it is opinion it’s all fact.. but I can bet you that the other guy will still argue you! 🙄
Carleton a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage