SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Crazy idea to really upset CGY

Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 2 mai 2024
Publié: 2 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is based off a few assumptions:
1. CGY really wants Tij (pronounced 'TIE' ffs) Ignila
2. He still available at 8 overall, at Seattle's pick,
3. CGY picks 9 overall.
4. The last trade happens just after #7 pick is taken, to really surprise CGY

I rly want Iginla

EDIT: SEATTLE PICK IS #8 OVERALL, not #7..oups
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
20 overall
CHI
  1. Harris, Jordan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
Détails additionnels:
27 overall
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
14 overall
SJS
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
20 overall
3.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
Détails additionnels:
#7 overall
SEA
  1. Evans, Jake
  2. Mesar, Filip
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
14 overall
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $71 957 916 $1 170 000 $3 920 000 $11 542 084 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mai à 14 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,591
Mentions "j'aime": 3,347
Chicago is not trading down in the draft to acquire a position they have absolutely zero need to address. They have younger and better LD already on the roster.
thesaadfather, Shanesaw9, Hawksguy81 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 14 h 47
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 736
Quoting: JK74
Chicago is not trading down in the draft to acquire a position they have absolutely zero need to address. They have younger and better LD already on the roster.


oh yea, Vlasic is 'better'. Yes you need D, they suck lol.
JokiStan a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 14 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,591
Mentions "j'aime": 3,347
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
oh yea, Vlasic is 'better'. Yes you need D, they suck lol.


You're joking, right?
2 mai à 14 h 51
#4
2285 Stanley Cup Cha
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,625
Mentions "j'aime": 591
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
oh yea, Vlasic is 'better'. Yes you need D, they suck lol.


Facts
2 mai à 14 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 3,863
Mentions "j'aime": 3,358
That final trade is wild. Those players do not make up that difference at all.
The other trades are a maybe depending if those teams think their guy will fall to them.
2 mai à 14 h 55
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,412
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Barron, Harris, Evans and Mesar aren't valuable enough to move up that many spots. If you want Tij take him at 5th.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 14 h 59
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 736
Quoting: Shaun80
Barron, Harris, Evans and Mesar aren't valuable enough to move up that many spots. If you want Tij take him at 5th.
Quoting: Friendly_Cannon
That final trade is wild. Those players do not make up that difference at all.
The other trades are a maybe depending if those teams think their guy will fall to them.




But I want Celebrini @ 1 lol tears of joy
I think Friendly Cannon is right, maybe have to add CGYs 2025 1st rounder for that pick
2 mai à 15 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,412
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
But I want Celebrini 1 lol tears of joy
I think Friendly Cannon is right, maybe have to add CGYs 2025 1st rounder for that pick


The 1st two trades are jut as bad, I see Montreal ACGMs trading away Harris and Barron for 3rd round picks all the time, so adding a 3rd doesn't move you up 7 or 6 positions in the first round.
2 mai à 15 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: Shaun80
The 1st two trades are jut as bad, I see Montreal ACGMs trading away Harris and Barron for 3rd round picks all the time, so adding a 3rd doesn't move you up 7 or 6 positions in the first round.


barron would be worth more than a 3rd thought
2 mai à 15 h 6
#10
Phase 3 Profit
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 122
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Sharks will take Barron for NJD 2nd (#42 OA). Final offer.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 15 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 552
Mentions "j'aime": 398
The Hawks have Vlasic and Korchinski as their top 2 at LD and have several promising prospects competing for the 3rd pairing LD spot. It just doesn't make any sense for them to downgrade a pick to add at their strongest position.
JK74, LivingAnew et Patches a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 15 h 10
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 736
Quoting: Shaun80
The 1st two trades are jut as bad, I see Montreal ACGMs trading away Harris and Barron for 3rd round picks all the time, so adding a 3rd doesn't move you up 7 or 6 positions in the first round.


The problem is they're worth more than 3rd round picks....that's undervaluing them. They're both young Dmen, who will be staple 3rd pair for a while, and I think Barron will be Petry 2.0, and age well into his late 20s.
Sometimes I think people rly overvalue draft picks. A 3rd round pick has like a 10% chance of turning into an NHL player of 4+ seasons. A 2nd round pick is like 25%. Both these guys are showing they will have 10 years +/-
I get what you're saying but I disagree with how ppl value them
2 mai à 15 h 10
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,412
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Quoting: drambui
barron would be worth more than a 3rd thought


You look at all the draft pick value charts and to move from 20th to 14th the cost would be around the 30th overall pick, is Barron worth that?
2 mai à 15 h 11
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 736
Quoting: kohnsharkosz
Sharks will take Barron for NJD 2nd (#42 OA). Final offer.


Ok, then no thank you
2 mai à 15 h 12
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 736
Quoting: Shaun80
You look at all the draft pick value charts and to move from 20th to 14th the cost would be around the 30th overall pick, is Barron worth that?


Yes I think so, especially in this draft
2 mai à 15 h 12
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,412
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
The problem is they're worth more than 3rd round picks....that's undervaluing them. They're both young Dmen, who will be staple 3rd pair for a while, and I think Barron will be Petry 2.0, and age well into his late 20s.
Sometimes I think people rly overvalue draft picks. A 3rd round pick has like a 10% chance of turning into an NHL player of 4+ seasons. A 2nd round pick is like 25%. Both these guys are showing they will have 10 years +/-
I get what you're saying but I disagree with how ppl value them


There are going to be dozens of 3rd pair d men available for free on July 1st how valuable do you think they really are?
2 mai à 15 h 15
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 736
Quoting: Shaun80
There are going to be dozens of 3rd pair d men available for free on July 1st how valuable do you think they really are?


UFAs? Who are 28 years old + and are looking for big pay days?
These guys are 22/23/24 years old and cost controlled, Barron doesn't even have Arb rights yet.
Cmon dude every GM would prefer RFAs with potential to improve compared to that.
Look at teams against the Cap like TML, TBL, Winnipeg who cant attract UFAs. Of course these guys are worth more than that
2 mai à 15 h 16
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: Shaun80
You look at all the draft pick value charts and to move from 20th to 14th the cost would be around the 30th overall pick, is Barron worth that?


i just said he is worth more than a third. could be used to move up a.bit
2 mai à 15 h 19
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 736
Quoting: thesaadfather
The Hawks have Vlasic and Korchinski as their top 2 at LD and have several promising prospects competing for the 3rd pairing LD spot. It just doesn't make any sense for them to downgrade a pick to add at their strongest position.


It is a really bad and risky idea to bank any top4 dspot on dmen who haven't even played 100 games in the big leagues.
Vlasic contract is bad IMO. I know everyone disagrees. But imagine Korchinski and Vlasic coming to training camp next ear thinking they have a top4 spot in the bag. Makes for horrible competition in the lineup and doesn't spur growth
2 mai à 15 h 23
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,412
Mentions "j'aime": 575
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
UFAs? Who are 28 years old + and are looking for big pay days?
These guys are 22/23/24 years old and cost controlled, Barron doesn't even have Arb rights yet.
Cmon dude every GM would prefer RFAs with potential to improve compared to that.
Look at teams against the Cap like TML, TBL, Winnipeg who cant attract UFAs. Of course these guys are worth more than that


Then trade them to Toronto, Tampa or Winnipeg. San Jose could draft a potential top 2d like yakemchuk at 14th, why would they give that up for Barron?
2 mai à 15 h 26
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,760
Mentions "j'aime": 8,329
I'm sure both Chicago and San Jose rather just make those picks. Alot of teams have guys like Harris and Barron, they aren't a hard to come by commodity. I'm not knocking them as I think they can both be players it's just they aren't hard to find. There are UFAs that yes will be more expensive but they are also better, if the team wants to compete now than that's probably the direction.
When talking about 20th overall, there may very well be some players rated top 15 fall to that pick. That's not as likely to happen at 27. So if they like a player at that spot, they take that player.
Similar with 14 overall. Alot of good players in the top 15 but someone who that team feels is top 10 might fall to them. Again they take that player.
Same same with The Seattle pick, top 5 could fall to 8.
The biggest flaw is the fact you have teams trading their picks before they even know who is available. So no chance that happens at all. The teams will have to know who's available at their pick before trading it and know that a player that value is likely going to be available at that later pick.
Ste_Catherine_Street, LivingAnew, JK74 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 15 h 28
#22
Phase 3 Profit
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 122
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
Ok, then no thank you


If the Sharks are trading that Pit #14 OA, it will be to move up for a Buium or Parekh. Barron doesn't move the needle enough for the rebuild time line.
JK74 a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 15 h 48
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,123
Mentions "j'aime": 11,094
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
oh yea, Vlasic is 'better'. Yes you need D, they suck lol.


What sucks is that trade offer. Hawks definitely aren't trading back to acquire another LD.
JK74 et Patches a aimé ceci.
2 mai à 16 h 7
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,591
Mentions "j'aime": 3,347
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
oh yea, Vlasic is 'better'. Yes you need D, they suck lol.


https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/frozenpool_compare.php?players%5B%5D=5541&players%5B%5D=5498&period=2023-2024%3AR%3A99
3 mai à 14 h 47
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,275
Mentions "j'aime": 1,585
Quoting: Friendly_Cannon
That final trade is wild. Those players do not make up that difference at all.
The other trades are a maybe depending if those teams think their guy will fall to them.


Take value of trades out of equation. Neither Chicago nor SJ are trading back from those positions when the draft is still at pick #7.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage