ARCHIVES ▾

CBA ▾

CALCS ▾

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾

OUTILS ▾

JOUEURS ▾

INTERACTIF ▾

Éditer l'avatar

thesaadfather

Membre depuis

31 mai 2015

Équipe favorite

Blackhawks de Chicago

Deuxième équipe favorite

Islanders de New York

Anniversaire

23 oct 1996

Messages dans les forums

405

Messages par jour

0.18

Sujets de discussion

4

MENTIONS "J'AIME"

ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG

Forum: Armchair-GM30 jui à 13 h 17

Sujet: Lets end this off-season with some finishing moves

If Chicago was willing to pay that for a 3C they would have re-signed Suter.

Forum: Armchair-GM30 jui à 9 h 35

Sujet: FLEURY IS COMING BACK BABY

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IconicHawk</b></div><div>Please we aren’t taking Petterson’s bad contract</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ye_</b></div><div>you got him for literally nothing.

otherwise he wil just retire he doesnt wanna play for you anyway</div></div>

Yeah, if MP’s contract is coming back, we’re fine with him just retiring. Like you said, we got him for nothing.

Forum: Armchair-GM29 jui à 15 h 25

Sujet: Fleury

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Imagine875948</b></div><div>Except hes gonna retire If hes not traded to PIT which means you'll have no goalie</div></div>
Lankinen was our started last year and was fine.

Forum: Armchair-GM28 jui à 14 h 43

Sujet: realistic

Hawks aren’t paying a 3rd for Engvall.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 19 h 56

Sujet: Flower and Landeskog

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Arom5477</b></div><div>You’re not retaining $3.5MM.</div></div>

Regardless of retention, I wouldn’t want to take on MP’s full contract, personally.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 16 h 12

Sujet: Send Flower home

This trade looks fine for this year, but I’d be worried about taking on MP’s contract for that long. He would need to be a strong 2nd pairing guy for us, and even then it could make the cap tight once the raises kick in for guys like Dach and Kubalik.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 11 h 33

Sujet: Young RFAs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>exo2769</b></div><div>It's a bit ironic that you trade Kerfoot to the Hawks for a 3rd...only to be replaced by a Hawk they could have had for free if it weren't for the contract demands....AND THEN Suter has a lower contract than Kerfoot.</div></div>
This.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 10 h 43

Sujet: Bottom to top

No thanks from this Chicago fan.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 10 h 41

Sujet: Taking on money

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GenW</b></div><div>You said it was overpay, nothing about liking or disliking it. And youll need cap if you want to compete in a few years, which a 30+ Jones will limit you on. All im saying lol</div></div>
If I don’t want to pay that in a trade for Jones, logic dictates I probably don’t want to pay him 9.5 a year. Yeah, if we try to compete, we’ll need cap space in a few years. But we don’t now, and in a few years when we do, Connolly’s contract will be off the books. Your own logic is working against you lol.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 10 h 23

Sujet: Taking on money

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GenW</b></div><div>cant wait for you to explain the jones contract in like 3 years lol</div></div>
What are you talking about? I already said I don’t like the trade, I obviously don’t like the contract, but from the Hawks perspective, there’s at least a reason for it. They wanted a #1 Dman, and they got it, even if the price sucks. They don’t need cap space right now.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 9 h 23

Sujet: Taking on money

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GenW</b></div><div>Explain Jones, and Suter</div></div>
Jones gets them a #1 Dman. The trade was an overpay, but they still filled a need. Suter was arbitration eligible if he was qualified. Arbiters look a lot at points when awarding contracts, and Suter spent most of last year centering Kane and Debrincat, which he probably won’t be doing again soon. There’s a good chance his points were inflated and he’d be overpaid if he went to arbitration. The Hawks already have a lot of guys competing for those middle 6 spots, it doesn’t make any sense to overpay for a guy there.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 9 h 15

Sujet: Taking on money

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GenW</b></div><div>have you seen their recent moves? Dont count anything out lmao</div></div>
There was at least a reason behind the moves they made. There’s no reason for this move. It just doesn’t make sense.

Forum: Armchair-GM27 jui à 9 h 04

Sujet: Taking on money

The Hawks have like 15 million in cap space right now, they’re not going to pay someone to take a cap dump.

Forum: Armchair-GM26 jui à 14 h 52

Sujet: Big Trade SZN 2

Forum: Armchair-GM26 jui à 12 h 16

Sujet: Leafs Reasonable Offseason

I highly doubt Suter makes it to UFA, they’re likely just trying to get a contract done before they have to qualify him and he can go to arbitration.

Forum: Armchair-GM22 jui à 16 h 07

Sujet: Trying some different ideas

I wouldn’t be willing to move Boqvist in a Jones trade, personally.

Forum: Armchair-GM21 jui à 18 h 23

Sujet: AZAZA

Yeah, no thanks from Chicago.

Forum: Armchair-GM15 jui à 20 h 52

Sujet: Here It Is

Forum: Armchair-GM14 jui à 16 h 16

Sujet: GOODBYE MR JONES

Chicago declines very easily. This isn’t what EF said at all.

Forum: Armchair-GM14 jui à 12 h 24

Sujet: Lou has probably already signed Parise

No thanks from Chicago.

Forum: Armchair-GM13 jui à 17 h 44

Sujet: Trading for a dynamic forward and some D men

Why would the Hawks do that?

Forum: Armchair-GM12 jui à 18 h 18

Sujet: Trades

No thanks from Chicago. We can’t afford to give up Murphy now.

Forum: Armchair-GM12 jui à 0 h 01

Sujet: Edmonton Oilers

That Chicago deal just isn’t realistic at all.

Forum: Armchair-GM11 jui à 23 h 54

Sujet: Oilers take on 12M from NYI

Hawks would want an actual asset coming back if they’re retaining that much.

Forum: Armchair-GM10 jui à 23 h 06

Sujet: Oilers Offseason Dream Team

Uh, why would Chicago make that trade? That sucks for them.

Page 1

Remerciements à Guillaume Lambert-Héon pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français

Conditions d’utilisationPolitique de confidentialitéRèglements du forumÀ propos de nousFAQ - Convention collectiveNous contacter

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2021 CapFriendly.com