SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moving Krug

Créé par: Beauterham
Équipe: 2024-25 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 11 avr. 2024
Publié: 11 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hi!

As the name suggests I'm looking for possibilities to move Krug without buying him out or retaining on him (or, at least, the fewest amount possible).
ATM Krug is a 3rd pairing PPQB and he's more than fine in that role, however the problem is that he is currently a 3-3.5 million player on a 6.5 million contract while we also have a similar player to him in Perunovich who's younger and cost controlled.

I'd like to explore options to move him for another 'bad contract'; preferably a forward who is still useful but weighs too much towards the cap, although I wouldn't rule out a defenseman who's a better fit to the Blues (AKA the Sanheim - Krug trade that didn't went through last season).

Why not retain on his contract or buy him out? Retaining is an option, but I'd rather not as he still has 3 more years on his contract. Buying him out is a no-go as that might hamstring our development in the long haul.

Just looked for some options for a contract swap and would like your opinion on them. Is there a fit? Does one side need to add? Is there another player on your mind who we could move Krug for?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Krug, Torey
36 500 000 $
Krug, Torey
36 500 000 $
Krug, Torey
36 500 000 $
Krug, Torey
36 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
STL
  1. Killorn, Alex
Détails additionnels:
waives NTC
ANA
  1. Krug, Torey
Détails additionnels:
waives NTC
2.
STL
  1. Lee, Anders
Détails additionnels:
waives NTC
NYI
  1. Krug, Torey
Détails additionnels:
waives NTC
3.
PIT
  1. Krug, Torey
Détails additionnels:
waives NTC
4.
STL
  1. Palat, Ondrej
Détails additionnels:
waives NMC
NJD
  1. Krug, Torey
Détails additionnels:
waives NTC
5.
DET
  1. Krug, Torey
Détails additionnels:
waives NTC
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de NYI
2025
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2026
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1683 500 000 $89 395 595 $0 $412 500 $-5 895 595 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
835 833 $835 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 avr. à 9 h 31
#1
Blues4Life
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 232
Mentions "j'aime": 40
Not a bad idea to look into bad contract swaps but as always, the NTC likely plays the biggest part in most of these. DET seems most feasible due to Krug's family being there and STL's need for C depth in the short-term until Dvorsky is ready.
11 avr. à 9 h 32
#2
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
laugh Krug won't return any of those players, Palat and Killorn won't waive. The only real destination on that list for Krug is hometown Detroit and we don't want him..

You only have two options, Either keep him or buy him out. Because very few teams are touching that contract.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 9 h 37
#3
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
Quoting: Blues4Life
Not a bad idea to look into bad contract swaps but as always, the NTC likely plays the biggest part in most of these. DET seems most feasible due to Krug's family being there and STL's need for C depth in the short-term until Dvorsky is ready.


I dont really get why people keep saying detriot tbh.

They have there own LHD problems and they dont have a reason to add krug to that problem
aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 9 h 58
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: xercuses
I dont really get why people keep saying detriot tbh.

They have there own LHD problems and they dont have a reason to add krug to that problem


To be fair, I didn't look up Detroit to see 'who's their bad contract'. I just tried to find some bad forward contracts who have a similar-ish caphit to Krug and have a similar-ish term left on their deal. There are not a lot of players who fit that discription, but coincidentally there was one contract from Detroit.
xercuses a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 9 h 59
#5
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh Krug won't return any of those players, Palat and Killorn won't waive. The only real destination on that list for Krug is hometown Detroit and we don't want him..

You only have two options, Either keep him or buy him out. Because very few teams are touching that contract.


Honestly i think we should just bury him at this point

send him a message
MoSeider53 et aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 10 h 1
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh Krug won't return any of those players, Palat and Killorn won't waive. The only real destination on that list for Krug is hometown Detroit and we don't want him..

You only have two options, Either keep him or buy him out. Because very few teams are touching that contract.


We will probably keep him as it is hard to find a fit in this specific situation (similar-ish cap/term). The Rakell option is nice (slightly cheaper, but one more year), although I don't think PIT will have a use for Krug.
Buying him out is not an option IMO. Will cost us way too much.
MoSeider53 et aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 10 h 4
#7
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Quoting: xercuses
Honestly i think we should just bury him at this point

send him a message


I think that would make the most sense, He'll be turning 33 tomorrow and injuries are only going to continue to pile up. Though he has had a pretty healthy season this year.
xercuses et aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 10 h 6
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,042
Mentions "j'aime": 738
The Ducks signed Killorn for a few very good resaons - secondary scoring, veteran leaderships, etc. None of those reasons include being trade bait for an unwanted and undersized defenseman.
11 avr. à 10 h 13
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,145
Mentions "j'aime": 5,953
Fowler, Zellweger, Mintyukov, LaCombe

Ducks have no real need, want or room for Krug
11 avr. à 10 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,563
Mentions "j'aime": 11,947
Quoting: Salzy
Fowler, Zellweger, Mintyukov, LaCombe

Ducks have no real need, want or room for Krug


Vaaks!
GiggywithGibby, OldNYIfan et Salzy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 10 h 28
#11
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,837
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Modifié 11 avr. à 10 h 36
Quoting: xercuses
Honestly i think we should just bury him at this point

send him a message


Quoting: MoSeider53
I think that would make the most sense, He'll be turning 33 tomorrow and injuries are only going to continue to pile up. Though he has had a pretty healthy season this year.


What message is he supposed to be receiving? Don't get old and injured? If someone stupidly offers you 6.5 million until you're 36 you should say no? His on-ice struggles are not effort or buy-in related, at least the way I see it, so he's not going to be jumpstarted by a trip to Springfield. He's just a guy in his 30s who doesn't have 6.5 million dollars a year value anymore. This was a very apparent risk when Armstrong signed him.

I said this yesterday but I don't really see the upside for the Blues on going scorched Earth on Krug- whether that means buying him out or burying him in the minors. The buyout penalty is inherently not worth it, and while Krug might waive his NTC if the alternative is playing in the AHL, I don't think it becomes an easier sell to other teams that he's at all worth acquiring if this bubble playoff team feels he's not good enough to be on their roster.
xercuses a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 10 h 38
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: CHAR
The Ducks signed Killorn for a few very good resaons - secondary scoring, veteran leaderships, etc. None of those reasons include being trade bait for an unwanted and undersized defenseman.


Okay, Killorn isn't an option. Thanks. smile
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 10 h 47
#13
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
Quoting: TheEarthmaster
What message is he supposed to be receiving? Don't get old and injured? If someone stupidly offers you 6.5 million until you're 36 you should say no? His on-ice struggles are not effort or buy-in related, at least the way I see it, so he's not going to be jumpstarted by a trip to Springfield. He's just a guy in his 30s who doesn't have 6.5 million dollars a year value anymore. This was a very apparent risk when Armstrong signed him.

I said this yesterday but I don't really see the upside for the Blues on going scorched Earth on Krug- whether that means buying him out or burying him in the minors. The buyout penalty is inherently not worth it, and while Krug might waive his NTC if the alternative is playing in the AHL, I don't think it becomes an easier sell to other teams that he's at all worth acquiring if this bubble playoff team feels he's not good enough to be on their roster.


That’s fair but it’s less about the injury and being old

It’s about making moronic plays
TheEarthmaster a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 11 h 0
#14
Good Opinion Haver
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,837
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: xercuses
That’s fair but it’s less about the injury and being old

It’s about making moronic plays


Well he certainly does that, I'm guess I'm just thinking less about the current quality of the team- I don't know that simply nuking Torey Krug off the roster really changes much of how competitive this roster is in the short term, would really depend on how they replace him- and more about what's the best strategy to turn all these contracts over. I feel like it becomes easier to move him every year the term goes down and the cap goes up, but harder to move him if he's not playing in the NHL at all.
xercuses a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 11 h 21
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,343
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
I dont think Pens would want someone like Krug, but if we are just spitballing for fun, what about like Krug/Hayes for Graves/Rakell.
11 avr. à 11 h 30
#16
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,978
Mentions "j'aime": 6,766
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Vaaks!


Think he was more specifically going with "LHD we already have who can run a PPQB better than Krug"

Vaaks ain't QBing not Power Plays.
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 11 h 43
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,595
Mentions "j'aime": 6,734
Krug like Gallagher in MTL is an untradeable asset at this point in their careers. Buyout or a very limited role for remainder of contract is all you can do at this point.

He clearly can still play PP so might as well give him all those minutes and play him as a 5-6th dman 5v5. Hopefully the PP points outweigh the defensive ineptitude.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 11 h 55
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,122
Mentions "j'aime": 164
Modifié 11 avr. à 12 h 11
Yes make the Devils SMALLLLLLER good idea. you guys just post anything that you think is smart without thinking eh. Palat for Krug is a do nothing trade.
11 avr. à 12 h 42
#19
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,495
Mentions "j'aime": 25,387
Anaheim wouldn't want Torey Krug for free. Aside from the objection to moving Killorn specifically illuminated by my esteemed friend @CHAR, we're overstocked at LhD already as noted by my esteemed friend @Salzy.
GeneralLandro, aedoran et Salzy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 14 h 58
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: TyeZerker
Yes make the Devils SMALLLLLLER good idea. you guys just post anything that you think is smart without thinking eh. Palat for Krug is a do nothing trade.


As I told someone else, I just tried looking for players with a similar-ish caphit and term and haven't been looking at specific teams at all. I don't know anything what other teams needs are, hence the topic asking for feedback. In this case with the Devils, it doesn't fit... so we can scratch them from the list.
11 avr. à 15 h 9
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: Marcsnack
I dont think Pens would want someone like Krug, but if we are just spitballing for fun, what about like Krug/Hayes for Graves/Rakell.


Oof... I would have to really think about that one, although I wouldn't say no directly. Graves (also) has it's wharts but stylistically he fits the Blues a lot better than Krug. Rakell can also be a useful player for us in a third line role. So for us, it sounds like an interesting swap, I feel like the Blues get the slightly better players, Pens get shorter contracts.

Other Blues fans want to chime in?
11 avr. à 15 h 12
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,343
Mentions "j'aime": 1,184
Quoting: Beauterham
Oof... I would have to really think about that one, although I wouldn't say no directly. Graves (also) has it's wharts but stylistically he fits the Blues a lot better than Krug. Rakell can also be a useful player for us in a third line role. So for us, it sounds like an interesting swap, I feel like the Blues get the slightly better players, Pens get shorter contracts.

Other Blues fans want to chime in?


I feel the same. I do think Graves is a good player in the right system. I really do think his style of play is much better suited to play with Letang/Karlsson than Krug is, but this was just a random idea.
Beauterham a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 16
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: Marcsnack
I feel the same. I do think Graves is a good player in the right system. I really do think his style of play is much better suited to play with Letang/Karlsson than Krug is, but this was just a random idea.


If it was up to me, I think I'd do it. The Rakell/Graves contracts are both front loaded which should make it easier to move them when they have just a couple of years term left.
Marcsnack a aimé ceci.
11 avr. à 15 h 51
#24
SkateOrDie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 2,236
Mentions "j'aime": 375
PIT wants nothing to do with Krug, the last thing they need is a purely offensive defenseman who can't handle his own zone.

For the record.
ATM Krug is a 3rd pairing ..... he is currently a 3-3.5 million player

Those two statements don't jive.
No one wants to pay a 3rd pairing guy 3-3.25 million per.
No one.
He's not worth 3 million per. Maybe 1-1.5
It's the real problem with him and why STL is stuck with him. Even if they were to retain him at 50% he's not worth it to another team.
This is what happens when one moment in one game becomes the definition of a player. The illegal launch himself into another player hit that made STL think he could play defense when there was a whole history of him frankly sucking.
No you are stuck on that contract. I think the best option is to buy it out.
11 avr. à 15 h 53
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,748
Mentions "j'aime": 1,781
Zero chance ANA adds a LHD and Killer isn’t going anywhere 1 year after they signed him. All around that one just isn’t happening
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage