SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If they buy

Créé par: Boggsauce
Équipe: 2023-24 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 13 janv. 2024
Publié: 13 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I’d be happy if they stand Pat too. Team is unbelievable this year
Transactions
WPG
  1. Monahan, Sean (980 000 $ retained)
  2. Savard, David (1 750 000 $ retained)
MTL
  1. Kupari, Rasmus
  2. Stanley, Logan
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2026
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $82 487 858 $0 $865 000 $1 012 142 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 437 500 $3 437 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 005 000 $1 005 000 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 janv. à 14 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,758
Mentions "j'aime": 7,004
Winnipeg should not be adding a 2nd to downgrade twice. They're a top team in the league right now, there's no need to add castoffs from one of the worst teams at an exorbitant price.
CanMerc a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 28
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,674
Mentions "j'aime": 719
ok. I dont want to be flippant, but please understand Habs already have 8 dmen, with others coming through.
Savard wont be traded for a younger dman.
Jupari and Stanley have no value to the Habs (but stanley would be good elsewhere).
Monahan is getting a first round pick hands down
Campabee et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,674
Mentions "j'aime": 719
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg should not be adding a 2nd to downgrade twice. They're a top team in the league right now, there's no need to add castoffs from one of the worst teams at an exorbitant price.


Monahan is a 3c being paid 2M a year.
He's the best piece in this deal.
Who's downgrading exactly?
Sure keep Stanley, we'll trade Savard elsewhere.
Keep kupari too, give up your 1st rder, not your 2d
Campabee et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 34
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,758
Mentions "j'aime": 7,004
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
Monahan is a 3c being paid 2M a year.
He's the best piece in this deal.
Who's downgrading exactly?
Sure keep Stanley, we'll trade Savard elsewhere.
Keep kupari too, give up your 1st rder


On Montreal Monahan might be a 3C, but Namestnikov, Scheifele and Lowry are all far better than Monahan. At best Monahan competes for a 4th line spot, but he's terrible defensively, so isn't well suited for a bottom 6 roll. Keep him. Zero interest.

The Jets have 6 defenseman better than Savard now and another one that's better on IR. Zero interest.
13 janv. à 14 h 35
#5
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,185
Mentions "j'aime": 20,496
I think both would be fantastic adds for Winnipeg and they’d be interested. Thing is, they only have 1 retention spot and they’d get more by trading them separately as Kupari and Stanley both hold no value.
Campabee, BorisBagel et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 35
#6
MakingHistory
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 4,862
Mentions "j'aime": 447
Monahan is getting a first round pick
Campabee et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 36
#7
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 6,959
Mentions "j'aime": 3,040
Habs don't have 2 retentions
Campabee et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 540
Mentions "j'aime": 426
Oh my god this sucks for WPG
No interest in either player and neither does anything worthwhile for the Jets
This would be a fail on Chevys part
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 46
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,510
Mentions "j'aime": 6,438
Habs counter with Conner (retained) for Armia

See we can make useless nonsense trades too
CBA et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 14 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,624
Mentions "j'aime": 1,672
Quoting: Ste_Catherine_Street
Monahan is a 3c being paid 2M a year.
He's the best piece in this deal.
Who's downgrading exactly?
Sure keep Stanley, we'll trade Savard elsewhere.
Keep kupari too, give up your 1st rder, not your 2d


Windjammer is a noted troll pay him no mind
13 janv. à 15 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,697
Mentions "j'aime": 667
Quoting: Windjammer
On Montreal Monahan might be a 3C, but Namestnikov, Scheifele and Lowry are all far better than Monahan. At best Monahan competes for a 4th line spot, but he's terrible defensively, so isn't well suited for a bottom 6 roll. Keep him. Zero interest.

The Jets have 6 defenseman better than Savard now and another one that's better on IR. Zero interest.


Come on dude, you might not like the trade but Monahan is much better then Namesnikov. Namesnikov is having one of career high pace year, can’t win faceoff, doesn’t play defense at all ( ratio of 63% of offensive start) and have a hundred less goal in approximately the same amount of game played in the NhL. Don’t say stupid thing. Lowry is a great defensive center who is also on career high season. Different players for different role. I like Lowry a lot. Bit Namesnikov come on dude, you know better then that.
13 janv. à 15 h 32
#12
Wpgman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,072
Mentions "j'aime": 452
Unless Winnipeg has injuries, Monahan is not needed. Both Mtl and Wpg fans should stop trading him to Wpg.
Ste_Catherine_Street a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 15 h 35
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,674
Mentions "j'aime": 719
Quoting: Wpgman
Unless Winnipeg has injuries, Monahan is not needed. Both Mtl and Wpg fans should stop trading him to Wpg.


Agreed
13 janv. à 15 h 38
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,758
Mentions "j'aime": 7,004
Quoting: Joblow
Come on dude, you might not like the trade but Monahan is much better then Namesnikov. Namesnikov is having one of career high pace year, can’t win faceoff, doesn’t play defense at all ( ratio of 63% of offensive start) and have a hundred less goal in approximately the same amount of game played in the NhL. Don’t say stupid thing. Lowry is a great defensive center who is also on career high season. Different players for different role. I like Lowry a lot. Bit Namesnikov come on dude, you know better then that.


Well the stats don't lie. I know you want Monahan to be better, but he's simply not. Saying he is, is just being ignorant of facts. No one cares if Monahan was good at one point in his career. The Jets aren't trading for Monahan 7 or 8 years ago, they're trading for him now. Only what Monahan currently is matters and that's a low end 4C.

Namestnikov scores at the same rate as Monahan except Namestnikov does is at even strength instead of being totally reliant on PP time like Monahan. PP time that Monahan won't get on a good team.

Namestnikov is better ES, PK, better defensively, a better skater, faster, everything outside of face offs Namestnikov is better.

So while you want Monahan to be better it isn't supported by any objective evaluations or stats. Saying otherwise is just denying factual reality on basing it on your biased emotions.
13 janv. à 15 h 43
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,510
Mentions "j'aime": 6,438
Quoting: Windjammer
Well the stats don't lie. I know you want Monahan to be better, but he's simply not. Saying he is, is just being ignorant of facts. No one cares if Monahan was good at one point in his career. The Jets aren't trading for Monahan 7 or 8 years ago, they're trading for him now. Only what Monahan currently is matters and that's a low end 4C.

Namestnikov scores at the same rate as Monahan except Namestnikov does is at even strength instead of being totally reliant on PP time like Monahan. PP time that Monahan won't get on a good team.

Namestnikov is better ES, PK, better defensively, a better skater, faster, everything outside of face offs Namestnikov is better.

So while you want Monahan to be better it isn't supported by any objective evaluations or stats. Saying otherwise is just denying factual reality on basing it on your biased emotions.


How many "low end 4C" put up 50 points?! Like come on use the little Frey matter between your ears before making such ridiculous comments
Joblow a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 15 h 55
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,758
Mentions "j'aime": 7,004
Quoting: Campabee
How many "low end 4C" put up 50 points?! Like come on use the little Frey matter between your ears before making such ridiculous comments


Quoting: Campabee
How many "low end 4C" put up 50 points?! Like come on use the little Frey matter between your ears before making such ridiculous comments


You just can't help yourself from your heavy biases. Monahan has 8 even strength points, comparable to a low end 3rd line player, playing first line minutes. So when he plays 10 minutes a game on a good team, he'll struggle to get even those 8 points making him a 4th liner.

Remember he's not getting PP1 time on a playoff team. No PP time for Monahan, means no points.

Just once in your life, try to look at something with objectivity and evaluate players on a level playing field and you won't come off sounding so ignorant.
13 janv. à 16 h 1
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,697
Mentions "j'aime": 667
Quoting: Windjammer
Well the stats don't lie. I know you want Monahan to be better, but he's simply not. Saying he is, is just being ignorant of facts. No one cares if Monahan was good at one point in his career. The Jets aren't trading for Monahan 7 or 8 years ago, they're trading for him now. Only what Monahan currently is matters and that's a low end 4C.

Namestnikov scores at the same rate as Monahan except Namestnikov does is at even strength instead of being totally reliant on PP time like Monahan. PP time that Monahan won't get on a good team.

Namestnikov is better ES, PK, better defensively, a better skater, faster, everything outside of face offs Namestnikov is better.

So while you want Monahan to be better it isn't supported by any objective evaluations or stats. Saying otherwise is just denying factual reality on basing it on your biased emotions.


Biased emotion ahahahshshsh you are the one who is acting like a 8 years old little spoil brat. There a reason why Namesnikov for 7 teams. He is just a replaceable guy’s because he is easily replaceable. Namesnikov had the luxury of playing with high end players for most of the season, players such as Vilardi, Perfetti, Ehlers, Connor and Scheifele.
Monahan had as winger Gallagher who can’t skate no more, Anderson who took 30 games to score a goal, Jake Evans, Ylonen, Armia and Pearson who might be the beat of the lot. So cut the crap up, Monahan would have 30+ point centering a line with Perfetti and Ehlers.

So mister Emotion, next time you try to be a smart ass just make sure you put the fact right.

Having a grand total of 5 goals while being surrounded by such talent is hilarious, trying to justify that Namesnikov is a better player without analyzing the environment that the players is in is just showing that you don’t watch hockey game other then your Jets.
Campabee et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 16 h 10
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,510
Mentions "j'aime": 6,438
Quoting: Windjammer
You just can't help yourself from your heavy biases. Monahan has 8 even strength points, comparable to a low end 3rd line player, playing first line minutes. So when he plays 10 minutes a game on a good team, he'll struggle to get even those 8 points making him a 4th liner.

Remember he's not getting PP1 time on a playoff team. No PP time for Monahan, means no points.

Just once in your life, try to look at something with objectivity and evaluate players on a level playing field and you won't come off sounding so ignorant.


LMAO, Monahan doesn't get 1st line minutes those are reserved for Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky. Monahan is on the PP because his skill level permits him to be used there. Jets would also use him on the PP and love to have him there. If Monahan started the season on the Jets he would be their 2C, having 2 of Connor, Perfetti, Ehlers or Vilardi on his wings would increase his scoring (both at 5vs5 and on the PP) to between .75 and 1.0 ppg. Everyone on this site knows you hate Montreal and all our players and that you are the real biased emo freak here, don't worry your title is still safe by a long shot
13 janv. à 16 h 23
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,758
Mentions "j'aime": 7,004
Quoting: Joblow
Biased emotion ahahahshshsh you are the one who is acting like a 8 years old little spoil brat. There a reason why Namesnikov for 7 teams. He is just a replaceable guy’s because he is easily replaceable. Namesnikov had the luxury of playing with high end players for most of the season, players such as Vilardi, Perfetti, Ehlers, Connor and Scheifele.
Monahan had as winger Gallagher who can’t skate no more, Anderson who took 30 games to score a goal, Jake Evans, Ylonen, Armia and Pearson who might be the beat of the lot. So cut the crap up, Monahan would have 30+ point centering a line with Perfetti and Ehlers.

So mister Emotion, next time you try to be a smart ass just make sure you put the fact right.

Having a grand total of 5 goals while being surrounded by such talent is hilarious, trying to justify that Namesnikov is a better player without analyzing the environment that the players is in is just showing that you don’t watch hockey game other then your Jets.


Exactly. Don't use your emotions try and watch someone outside of Montreal play. Namestnikov is unquestionably better in almostevery single way.

The Jets are a good team, they don't need to add bad players from one of the NHL'S worst teams.
13 janv. à 16 h 29
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,758
Mentions "j'aime": 7,004
Modifié 13 janv. à 16 h 35
Quoting: Campabee
LMAO, Monahan doesn't get 1st line minutes those are reserved for Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky. Monahan is on the PP because his skill level permits him to be used there. Jets would also use him on the PP and love to have him there. If Monahan started the season on the Jets he would be their 2C, having 2 of Connor, Perfetti, Ehlers or Vilardi on his wings would increase his scoring (both at 5vs5 and on the PP) to between .75 and 1.0 ppg. Everyone on this site knows you hate Montreal and all our players and that you are the real biased emo freak here, don't worry your title is still safe by a long shot


So you just choose to remain ignorant and can't base evaluations objectively on facts.

Monahan plays over 18 minutes a night. First line minutes. Namestnikov plays 3 minutes a game less and has more even strength points in less games than Monahan.

Monahan couldn't play in Bowness' system, he's a bad skater, slow, not physical, poor defensively and bad at even strength.

So explain if Monahan is this great 2C, how does he only have 8 ES points?

Montreal only has one 2C and that's Suzuki.

Yes, everyone that doesn't agree with your biased evaluations hates Montreal. That must mean everyone, because no one, outside of Montreal fans, agree with you.
13 janv. à 16 h 36
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,697
Mentions "j'aime": 667
Quoting: Windjammer
Exactly. Don't use your emotions try and watch someone outside of Montreal play. Namestnikov is unquestionably better in almostevery single way.

The Jets are a good team, they don't need to add bad players from one of the NHL'S worst teams.


Ok albert Einstein
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 16 h 51
#22
Wpgman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,072
Mentions "j'aime": 452
Winnipeg's TDL deals were getting Namestnikov and Neiderrieter last year. Namestnikov's play was one of the reasons the Jets made the playoffs. I don't think the Jets would of made the playoffs without him. This year he took his play to the next level and has helped the Jets to the top of the league right now. He fits in the style the Jets play right now. Monahan is not an improvement over Namestnikov right now. The Jets won't keep the pace they are playing right now but Namestnikov will continue to bring it. If injuries happen then the Jets will have to either put Vilardi or Perfetti at center or make a trade but I can't see our GM giving up a 1st for Monahan.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
13 janv. à 17 h 11
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 5,094
Mentions "j'aime": 2,372
Quoting: Wpgman
Winnipeg's TDL deals were getting Namestnikov and Neiderrieter last year. Namestnikov's play was one of the reasons the Jets made the playoffs. I don't think the Jets would of made the playoffs without him. This year he took his play to the next level and has helped the Jets to the top of the league right now. He fits in the style the Jets play right now. Monahan is not an improvement over Namestnikov right now. The Jets won't keep the pace they are playing right now but Namestnikov will continue to bring it. If injuries happen then the Jets will have to either put Vilardi or Perfetti at center or make a trade but I can't see our GM giving up a 1st for Monahan.


And the Habs have no reason to trade Monahan for anything less than a 1st so there we are! The trade deadline you always overpay as teams aren't banking on some unproven late 1st that might not even make the nhl or even become a staple in your teams window. Monahan will be traded and he is certainly more valuable to a contender than a late 1st. Since when dont late 1sts get flipped? Whos better than Monahan at his price tag of under 1m AAV with retention? If you cant answer those questions then it's simple, he is very valuable on the market whether to the Jets or the 30 other teams that can bid.
13 janv. à 17 h 17
#24
Wpgman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,072
Mentions "j'aime": 452
Quoting: Andy_Dick
And the Habs have no reason to trade Monahan for anything less than a 1st so there we are! The trade deadline you always overpay as teams aren't banking on some unproven late 1st that might not even make the nhl or even become a staple in your teams window. Monahan will be traded and he is certainly more valuable to a contender than a late 1st. Since when dont late 1sts get flipped? Whos better than Monahan at his price tag of under 1m AAV with retention? If you cant answer those questions then it's simple, he is very valuable on the market whether to the Jets or the 30 other teams that can bid.


The point is that Monahan isn't better than our top 3 centers right now. Why give up a 1st or really anything for him?
13 janv. à 17 h 46
#25
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,576
Mentions "j'aime": 723
Quoting: Windjammer
On Montreal Monahan might be a 3C, but Namestnikov, Scheifele and Lowry are all far better than Monahan. At best Monahan competes for a 4th line spot, but he's terrible defensively, so isn't well suited for a bottom 6 roll. Keep him. Zero interest.

The Jets have 6 defenseman better than Savard now and another one that's better on IR. Zero interest.


7 teams in 11 years says otherwise
Average of 10minutes of Icetime in the Playoffs with 13 pts in 53 games with a 47% win rate in the faceoff circle
Overall when the going gets tough Namestenkovs a no show on 7 teams including in Draft team who dumped him to immediately win a Cup

I agree with the other 2 hands down you're right
But i call Bs on Namestenkov
Monahan doesnt have the same hang ups with 10 goals 21 points in 30 playoff games with a 50% win rate playing 19 minutes
But play him 4th line if you want , come playoffs it'll be him not namestenkov who's logging minutes as a 3rd C
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage