SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Biggest Trade ever

Créé par: Prison_Goalie_Rick
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 11 août 2023
Publié: 11 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Don’t even say this would be selling the future. The jackets have more prospects than could ever make the roster. Besides, the future would now be Bedard and Fantilli.

Even with this deal, they still have Jordan Dumias, Denton Mateychuk, Corson Ceulemans, Stanislav Svozil, James Malatesta, and Gavin Brindley all coming up in the next 2 to 3 years.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $74 670 833 $0 $7 550 000 $8 829 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 août 2023 à 11 h 58
#1
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,320
Mentions "j'aime": 4,613
Come on.
Snowhawk18, JK74, Garak and 2 others a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 59
#2
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,505
Mentions "j'aime": 3,594
Stan Bowman don’t work here anymore.
JK74, Civil_Eng_PE, SociallyHawkward and 6 others a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 12 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 1,568
Mentions "j'aime": 3,259
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Stan Bowman don’t work here anymore.


Comment of the day! Strike that. Comment of the year!
Snowhawk18, Panic76, Prison_Goalie_Rick and 3 others a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 12 h 25
#4
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,754
Mentions "j'aime": 12,423
Shouldn't it be Fantilli going to Chicago?
Snowhawk18, Garak, Hawksguy81 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 12 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 93
Mentions "j'aime": 53
Biggest trade ever? You must forget that Gretzky was traded in his prime 😂
Snowhawk18 et RicXX a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 20
#6
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Stan Bowman don’t work here anymore.


Haha! I actually had this same thought go through my head when making this tears of joy

Quoting: Dink32788
Biggest trade ever? You must forget that Gretzky was traded in his prime 😂


As far as value of pieces traded, this one is bigger.
Snowhawk18 a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 22
#7
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Modifié 11 août 2023 à 13 h 34
Quoting: squashmaple
Come on.


What don’t you like? Other than the fact it is a complete fantasy scenario that would obviously never happen because it’s too risky for both sides...

Value wise, I think it’s pretty even, but I would be happy to hear what you might feel needs to be changed.

CBJ are giving a lot, and it’s certainly a high risk move for both sides, but imagine that Bedard pans out and is the next generational player in the NHL, and having him and Fantilli down the middle for the next 15 years. I’ll wait while you go change your pants.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
to get a closer trade to the getzky one, it probably would be jiricek, fantilli, 3 first round pick unprotected and (whatever is the equivalent of 15m?) would you do that trade? if the answer is no, then what you are offering right now is probably less than the gretzky trade value wise!
11 août 2023 à 13 h 32
#9
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: drambui
to get a closer trade to the getzky one, it probably would be jiricek, fantilli, 3 first round pick unprotected and (whatever is the equivalent of 15m?) would you do that trade? if the answer is no, then what you are offering right now is probably less than the gretzky trade value wise!



For Gretzky vs. for Bedard:
Carson (2OA pick) = Laine (2OA pick)
Gelinas (7OA pick) < Jiricek (6OA pick)
3 late 1sts < Johnson (5OA), Sillinger (12OA) and a ‘24 1st
$15m < taking Jones $9mx7 and sending back a great contract, leader and centerman in Jenner.

Conclusion: Gretzky deal < Bedard deal
CaseyFlyman et Turbo_Duncan a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 38
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: Prison_Goalie_Rick
For Gretzky vs. for Bedard:
Carson (2OA pick) = Laine (2OA pick)
Gelinas (7OA pick) < Jiricek (6OA pick)
3 late 1sts < Johnson, Sillinger and a 24 1st
$15m < taking Jones $9mx7 and sending back a great contract, leader and centerman in Jenner.

Conclusion: Gretzky deal < Bedard deal


the big thing i disagree is the carson part, age wise fantilli is way closer to to carson than laine. laine was a second overall 7 years ago as opposed to 2 years for carson.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 47
#11
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: drambui
the big thing i disagree is the carson part, age wise fantilli is way closer to to carson than laine. laine was a second overall 7 years ago as opposed to 2 years for carson.


Fair argument but they aren’t that far off. Both had 50 goal potential. Carson really dropped off after his first three years. Yes he was younger at the time of the trade with huge upside, but I’d say Laine has equal upside even if he’s older, he’s still only 25.

Even if you give that comparable slightly to Carson because of his age at the time of trade, I think the aggregate still comes out in favor of being greater for Bedard due to Kent Johnson and Boone Jenner being included. Every other comparable besides Carson/Laine outweighs the Gretzky trade.
11 août 2023 à 13 h 49
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,842
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: Prison_Goalie_Rick
Fair argument but they aren’t that far off. Both had 50 goal potential. Carson really dropped off after his first three years. Yes he was younger at the time of the trade with huge upside, but I’d say Laine has equal upside even if he’s older, he’s still only 25.

If you give that comparable slightly to Carson because of his age at the time of trade, I think the aggregate still comes out in favor of being greater for Bedard due to Kent Johnson and Boone Jenner being included.


yeah, could be more in the end. I was just trying to come up with a comparable that his as close to the gretzky trade as possible. at the time Carson was seen as one of the best prospect in the game. Dont think people will talk about laine as a prospect anymore. 5 years ago it would have been perfect for him for sure!
11 août 2023 à 16 h 31
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,021
Mentions "j'aime": 10,911
I've gotta think any Bedard to CBJ deal this off season starts w/ Fantilli, Jiricek and a 1st.
Snowhawk18 et RicXX a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 20 h 6
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,203
Mentions "j'aime": 1,910
Intriguing....

It would obviously take a massive haul to get Bedard, but I can't see Jenner being part of it, or Jones coming the other way. Fantilli, Jiricek, and a 1st, probably more. The issue isn't sacrificing the future, it's sacrificing a few potentially elite pieces for one potentially generational piece. I'm not sure that's a wise decision in today's NHL, where even the best players only play 25-30 minutes a night.

I think if it were to happen, the trade would have had to have happened at the draft, before those picks turned into the actual players. If you're trading Jiricek, 3OA, next year's first, etc. for 1OA, that's one thing. Once you put faces to those picks and get them into the organization, it's way harder to justify a trade.
11 août 2023 à 21 h 42
#15
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: drambui
yeah, could be more in the end. I was just trying to come up with a comparable that his as close to the gretzky trade as possible. at the time Carson was seen as one of the best prospect in the game. Dont think people will talk about laine as a prospect anymore. 5 years ago it would have been perfect for him for sure!


Sure, but there is also Jiricek and Johnson here, who are two of the best prospects in the league right now. The side by side comparison is as for value sake, if you still just want to look at future upside and youth, this trade has that also with Jiricek Johnson, Sillinger and the unprotected pick - which still has a chance of being high since our top two centers (albeit are studs) are rookies.
11 août 2023 à 21 h 44
#16
Démarrer sujet
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Intriguing....

It would obviously take a massive haul to get Bedard, but I can't see Jenner being part of it, or Jones coming the other way. Fantilli, Jiricek, and a 1st, probably more. The issue isn't sacrificing the future, it's sacrificing a few potentially elite pieces for one potentially generational piece. I'm not sure that's a wise decision in today's NHL, where even the best players only play 25-30 minutes a night.

I think if it were to happen, the trade would have had to have happened at the draft, before those picks turned into the actual players. If you're trading Jiricek, 3OA, next year's first, etc. for 1OA, that's one thing. Once you put faces to those picks and get them into the organization, it's way harder to justify a trade.


I wouldn’t trade Fantilli. Dead stop.

This is as close to a legit trade as I think could be made for Bedard. Yes losing Jenner is incredibly painful, and taking back Jones is a big risk, but reuniting him with Werenski is probably a better situation for him than any other
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage