all of those are significant overpays, the rangers, panthers and leafs all decline

The leafs are dying for a terrible jones contract

the amount the hawks would need to add for the leafs to take that horrible contract would bankrupt the team

Rangers don't even take that phone call. A better trade is Kane to the Islanders for Dobson and 2 years of 1st round picks.

Ranger aren't giving up Lafreniere for a rental in Patrick Kane. Rangers don't have the cap space to take on Kanes full value.

Knight value alone is higher than Toews by quite a margin. And once again Florida doesn't have the cap to take on Toews full contract.

And the very last thing Toronto needs is a RHD making slightly over $9,000,000 per for the next 8 years or so.

Florida doesn't even need Toews. They need a Dman.

And ehh where is Toronto finding all this extra cap?

Before you even posted it, you had to know that Ranger trade had no chance of being even remotely considered.

In general I would rather have Holl then Jones as one of them costs 2mill and isnt afraid of blocking a Ovie one timer. The other makes 9.5mill and gets yelled at by Kane

The usual "teardown", dumping contracts on teams that don't have the cap for the need

Can you believe this site is free?

Do not underestimate Dubas lol

All three trades would be declined by NHL as no one has enough cap space.
To start, Blackhawks would have to eat contracts or retain salary.
Second, all three players have full No Movement Clauses, so they would likely be picking their destinations (limiting the return Chicago would get)

Then the values probably need some adjusting as first two are rentals, Toews has not been himself recently, and Jones has huge cap hit.

LOL

Dobson>Lafreniere

You miss the point of the post. Laffy for Kane is a RIDICULES trade posted by an Islander fan, just as ridicules as Dobson for Kane. Was not comparing Laffy to Dobson, guys that play very different positions.

id rather the leafs not add another player making that much money without any retention