SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kings 2022-2023

Créé par: DanteB6642
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 13 juin 2022
Publié: 13 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 900 000 $
21 575 000 $
34 275 000 $
21 500 000 $
31 125 000 $
44 500 000 $
2875 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2875 000 $
2750 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Sandin, Rasmus [Droits de RFA]
TOR
  1. Vilardi, Gabriel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
2.
LAK
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
OTT
  1. Clarke, Brandt
  2. Madden, Tyler
  3. Walker, Sean
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
3.
CHI
  1. Byfield, Quinton
  2. Kempe, Adrian
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
4.
LAK
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
5.
LAK
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
NJD
  1. Lemieux, Brendan [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de NYI
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $74 735 000 $637 500 $2 050 000 $7 765 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 575 000 $1 575 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance262 500 $$262K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juin 2022 à 9 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 444
Mentions "j'aime": 557
Thats a no from colorado. i like ****emo as a prospect but not going to spend a first for him. The Avs are a win now team.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 9 h 55
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,147
Mentions "j'aime": 12,174
Quoting: Will27
Thats a no from colorado. i like ****emo as a prospect but not going to spend a first for him. The Avs are a win now team.


So funny that Capfriendly thinks his name is a slur
newballcoach, Garak, turtlemountain and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 9 h 57
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 127
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Will27
Thats a no from colorado. i like ****emo as a prospect but not going to spend a first for him. The Avs are a win now team.


You like what now?
13 juin 2022 à 9 h 59
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,802
Mentions "j'aime": 564
That Chicago trade is rough. LA should not do that.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 6
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,612
Mentions "j'aime": 9,222
This is spectacularly awful. What in the world is that CHI trade? And that’s not even the worst one. The odds of COL trading a 1st rd pick for that pile of junk is on par with me entering and winning the Kentucky derby running as a horse.
OldNYIfan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Isn’t Lemieux a locker room cancer…?
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 14
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,668
Mentions "j'aime": 772
I think OTT would take this trade if they are not gonna commit to Branstromm in the 2nd pairing more. The Return is good prospects and the 1st is value at what is it 17th OA.

That Chicago trade thou, ouch. Your selling way way too low on Byfield. I know it has been slow for him to put up numbers last year, but he is a future 1C when Kopitar retires and that isn't worth Debrinkcat now, and then the first as well. Horrible trade for the KIngs.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 16
#8
BW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 98
Hawks decline. Kempe doesn't make sense for the rebuild, Byfield has an injury problem, and seeing as the Kings made the playoffs this year and have the best prospect pool in the league that 1st round draft pick will probably be in the later half of the 1st round.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 103
Quoting: brw5000
Hawks decline. Kempe doesn't make sense for the rebuild, Byfield has an injury problem, and seeing as the Kings made the playoffs this year and have the best prospect pool in the league that 1st round draft pick will probably be in the later half of the 1st round.


if you were the GM and you declined that hawks fans would break into your office and skin you alive
OldNYIfan et Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 23
#10
BW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 98
Quoting: Joey_mar_cur
if you were the GM and you declined that hawks fans would break into your office and skin you alive


I've seen a ton of Devils fans offer Holtz and 2nd overall as a start, I think fans would rather have that. Kempe is older than DeBrincat and will probably be in his 30s by the time the hawks are contenders again. I'd rather have Holtz and Slafkovsky/Cooley over Byfield who cant stay healthy and a 30+ year old Kempe. It's about other offers rather than just the package itself.
Garak a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 37
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,969
Mentions "j'aime": 25,766
Vilardi for Sandin is iffy. The idea that Los Angeles would add a second is ridiculous.

The Brannstrom trade is much worse. His value is the first-round pick; the idea that you would get Clarke even up for him is insane.

The Chicago trade makes no sense for the Kings, either. DeBrincat is undeniably an upgrade (but an expensive one) on Kempe, but not worth the cost of Byfield and the first.

And the idea that canny Joe Sakic would trade a first for two prospects who weren't even chosen in the first round and haven't done much since is unrealistic.
13 juin 2022 à 10 h 44
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,281
Mentions "j'aime": 3,604
Quoting: NDoody
I think OTT would take this trade if they are not gonna commit to Branstromm in the 2nd pairing more. The Return is good prospects and the 1st is value at what is it 17th OA.

That Chicago trade thou, ouch. Your selling way way too low on Byfield. I know it has been slow for him to put up numbers last year, but he is a future 1C when Kopitar retires and that isn't worth Debrinkcat now, and then the first as well. Horrible trade for the KIngs.


Lol I'd probably take a 2nd for Brannstrom at this point. Brandt Clarke alone has way more value than him.
NDoody a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 11 h 22
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,668
Mentions "j'aime": 772
Quoting: sens65
Lol I'd probably take a 2nd for Brannstrom at this point. Brandt Clarke alone has way more value than him.


Yah, I forgot about him after last year's draft, local boy comes home and plays with Sanderson for 10 years. That would be nice.
Doubt LA is willing to give him up thou, but I would 100% do that straight up for Branstrom.
sens65 a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 12 h 10
#14
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 13 juin 2022 à 16 h 25
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Vilardi for Sandin is iffy. The idea that Los Angeles would add a second is ridiculous.

The Brannstrom trade is much worse. His value is the first-round pick; the idea that you would get Clarke even up for him is insane.

The Chicago trade makes no sense for the Kings, either. DeBrincat is undeniably an upgrade (but an expensive one) on Kempe, but not worth the cost of Byfield and the first.

And the idea that canny Joe Sakic would trade a first for two prospects who weren't even chosen in the first round and haven't done much since is unrealistic.


I liked the trade. Sandin is an nhl defencemen ready for top 4 minutes and vilardi is interesting but hasn't hit his stride yet at the nhl level. I figure he will be moved to the wing as I'm not sure he will be able to make it as a centre. Certainly not right away.

A 2nd might be a bit rich. I would be willing to do a 3rd this year and the later of the two 3rds you have in 23. Or maybe Toronto adds a forward prospect to the deal kings have benefited so far from young players that didn't fit in Toronto.


But I guess the whole thing hinges on the keafs long term plan. Personally I would keep Sandin. But this trade made me think about it.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 12 h 46
#15
Iglesias
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 494
Mentions "j'aime": 294
Horrible for the Kings.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
13 juin 2022 à 17 h 6
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,657
Quoting: brw5000
I've seen a ton of Devils fans offer Holtz and 2nd overall as a start, I think fans would rather have that. Kempe is older than DeBrincat and will probably be in his 30s by the time the hawks are contenders again. I'd rather have Holtz and Slafkovsky/Cooley over Byfield who cant stay healthy and a 30+ year old Kempe. It's about other offers rather than just the package itself.

Byfield was injured once this year and that was in pre season. What are you talking about. He was also being sheltered on 3rd/4th lines when playing. He’ll be fine.

You assessment of Cooley/slaf might be true. Time will only tell. People need to replace on byfield. He’s still learning to play against men and guys who are more like his size then playing against kids in junior who he towered over and has no legit reason to use his size unless he needed to.

Oh, he’s also 19
13 juin 2022 à 17 h 12
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 208
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: KINGS67
Byfield was injured once this year and that was in pre season. What are you talking about. He was also being sheltered on 3rd/4th lines when playing. He’ll be fine.

You assessment of Cooley/slaf might be true. Time will only tell. People need to replace on byfield. He’s still learning to play against men and guys who are more like his size then playing against kids in junior who he towered over and has no legit reason to use his size unless he needed to.

Oh, he’s also 19


Yeah it’s too early to tell on him. I like his size but need to see more. Interesting trade. I don’t know that Kempe would sell the deal maybe a different piece?
13 juin 2022 à 17 h 15
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 208
Mentions "j'aime": 108
Quoting: Cincod1
Yeah it’s too early to tell on him. I like his size but need to see more. Interesting trade. I don’t know that Kempe would sell the deal maybe a different piece?


Btw that first line, woof. They’d be tough to stop.
13 juin 2022 à 17 h 56
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 2,047
Mentions "j'aime": 1,054
man idk how to tell you this but Erik Brannstrom is NOT that good lmao
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage