SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What would it cost for Dvorak

Créé par: gpmack95
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 17 mars 2022
Publié: 17 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Dvorak, Christian
Détails additionnels:
Is this fair for Dvorak?
MTL
  1. Greenway, Jordan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
2.
MIN
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Talbot, Cam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 950 254 $0 $682 500 $6 549 746 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
0 $0 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
825 833 $825 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 26
#1
Mods have power egos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,691
Mentions "j'aime": 1,279
Probably more than fair I see Habs fans complaining all the time about hin
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Seems like a huge overpay from the Wild for Dvorak.
Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 28
#3
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,887
Mentions "j'aime": 4,463
At the very least, the Habs should want a complete refund.

That means a late 1st and a 2nd.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,430
Mentions "j'aime": 3,154
I wouldn't trade Greenway for Dvorak 1v1... let alone add.

Easy no.
Nhl_oilers et MNBassman a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 29
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,430
Mentions "j'aime": 3,154
Quoting: sensonfire
At the very least, the Habs should want a complete refund.

That means a late 1st and a 2nd.


They won't get it.
Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 34
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: sensonfire
At the very least, the Habs should want a complete refund.

That means a late 1st and a 2nd.


imagine buying pair of shoes wearing them for 6 months getting them all dirty and stinky and trying to get a full refund?
Ritzy, Nhl_oilers, sensonfire and 3 others a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 36
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,292
Mentions "j'aime": 4,938
A 1st for MAF instead of a 2nd in that trade. Talbot has 0 value to the hawks, better off moving him somewhere else if you think you can get better value for him. Or maybe mcbain and a 2nd or MAF and tou guys can move talbot elsewhere
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 141
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: RazWild
They won't get it.


based on? Janrok just got a 2nd 3rd and 7th. Dvorak is 4 years younger and not a rental similar offensive production but Dvorak brings a bit more defensively. Also habs dont have to move him twhey will go looking for something close to what they gave for him, given the market out there seems like they could find that. If they dont then he stay with MTL for now.
Em3ch et Marchy6363 a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 37
#9
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,887
Mentions "j'aime": 4,463
Quoting: RazWild
They won't get it.


Then they'll keep Dvorak.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 38
#10
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,187
Mentions "j'aime": 20,498
Habs pass. If they're going to trade Dvorak right now for a roster player, it's not going to be a winger where they're already loaded. Center is a far bigger need.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 38
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 141
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: vr1995
imagine buying pair of shoes wearing them for 6 months getting them all dirty and stinky and trying to get a full refund?


so you draft a player play him for a few years and hes now worth less? lol We got chiarot for free and turned that into a first a prospect and a 4th. Your analogy doesnt worked since players value are a bell curve not a straight decline.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 39
#12
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,118
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Habs don't need another winger. A couple of offer I'd be interested in,
Addison + Dewar
McBain + 2nd + Dewar / 3rd
Kahkonen + 2nd / McBain + 5th
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 40
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: RocketHabs
so you draft a player play him for a few years and hes now worth less? lol We got chiarot for free and turned that into a first a prospect and a 4th. Your analogy doesnt worked since players value are a bell curve not a straight decline.


why would a team pay the same price you did when hes been waay worse than when you got him? now with less term also. chiarot was a massive overpay and everyone knows it
RazWild a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 44
#14
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,187
Mentions "j'aime": 20,498
Quoting: NYRxLundqvist
Probably more than fair I see Habs fans complaining all the time about hin


They think he hasn't lived up to the expectations and, while it's true, there's some context to it. The only games he's played were when the roster was completely depleted. He was sidelined twice and was starting to get going before his latest injury. I'd be disappointed if they trade him before they even give him a real chance under St-Louis.
NYRxLundqvist et drambui a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 45
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 141
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: vr1995
why would a team pay the same price you did when hes been waay worse than when you got him? now with less term also. chiarot was a massive overpay and everyone knows it


thats beside the point. I was making the point that a player isnt worth less now simple because its been 6 months since he was traded. Habs dont have to move him, i'd be fine with him staying so why would they move him for a less? He also hasnt been wayyy worse he has been injuried and his numbers are on an almost identical track to what he put up last year if he had played a full season.

Couple that with how dysfunctional the habs start to the season was and i think most teams would still see him as the player he was last summer. Anyways dont need to jump into the same rabbit hole for each habs player.

Chiarot's return was almost bang on to what Hughes was reportedly asking for. So its irrelevant if you think its an overpay or not, the only way Dvorak gets traded is for a solid package, theres no reason to just give him away.
SevenLeg et Em3ch a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 10 h 59
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,825
Mentions "j'aime": 2,509
i cant see them moving him for less than what we got him for a few months ago. doesnt mean thats what his worth is, just that it doesnt make sense. they will keep him instead since they dont have any reason to move him.
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 3
#17
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,588
Mentions "j'aime": 3,067
Quoting: RocketHabs
based on? Janrok just got a 2nd 3rd and 7th. Dvorak is 4 years younger and not a rental similar offensive production but Dvorak brings a bit more defensively. Also habs dont have to move him twhey will go looking for something close to what they gave for him, given the market out there seems like they could find that. If they dont then he stay with MTL for now.


Jarnkrok was a $1m cap hit rental, he's not even remotely a comparable for Dvorak. lol
RazWild a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 8
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 141
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: JayTea
Jarnkrok was a $1m cap hit rental, he's not even remotely a comparable for Dvorak. lol


youre right hes a 30 year old rental. Not at all the same.
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 12
#19
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,588
Mentions "j'aime": 3,067
Quoting: RocketHabs
youre right hes a 30 year old rental. Not at all the same.


Perfect for Calgary's playoff run. Whether it's stupid or not, teams always pay more for rentals they see as being the missing piece than they'd pay for a guy with multiple years of term. Teams trading guys with term are usually doing so because they need the cap space to make other moves (which Montreal doesn't) so there's no real reason to trade Dvorak and the Wild aren't paying a premium for a guy that doesn't really move the needle on making them much better. He also carries term they probably won't be able to afford without making a lot of other moves.
RazWild a aimé ceci.
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 20
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: RazWild
They won't get it.




Then why the fucc would you trade him?
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 22
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: vr1995
imagine buying pair of shoes wearing them for 6 months getting them all dirty and stinky and trying to get a full refund?


Wtf was that horrible metaphor…
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 28
#22
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,864
Mentions "j'aime": 992
Dvorak has less and less value
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 31
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 202
Mentions "j'aime": 63
Replace Greenway with Tyson Jost and the Wild make the trade.
17 mars 2022 à 11 h 46
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: Marchy6363
Wtf was that horrible metaphor…


new shoes hold alot more value than used shoes that have gotten worse, pretty simple concept to grasp
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage