SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Question for every hockey fan and ACGM out there

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2021-22 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 13 avr. 2021
Publié: 13 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Where do you have Luke Hughes ranked in your 2021 Mock Draft?

IMO, he should be ranked 1st overall.

You're getting a virtually guaranteed NHL player in a draft that is a complete crapshoot.

This pandemic has ruined the ability to scout high-quality prospects because you can't go and see these players play.

Many hockey games in leagues around the world have been cancelled and postponed, which really limits the sample size that can be used to judge these prospects and rank them accordingly.

One thing that Luke Hughes has, which none of the other prospects do have, is a family that is known for turning their sons into bona fide elite players in the NHL.

Jack Hughes and Quinn Hughes.

I'm pretty sure the Hughes family will do everything they can to make it happen for Luke as well.

What I find interesting about Luke Hughes is that there are quite a few similarities to his brother Quinn.

- Defenceman
- Shoots Left
- Fast and Fluid skater
- Can play offence or defence
- Eerily similar stats between Luke's current tenure with USNTDP and Quinn's tenure with USNTDP between 2015 - 2017.
- Quinn went to the University of Michigan before playing in the NHL and that's exactly what Luke plans to do as well.

I see a lot of Quinn Hughes in Luke Hughes.

I love for there to be a brotherly rivalry between the Canucks and the Sens over Quinn and Luke, just like between the Flames and the Sens over Brady and Matthew.

Like I said, there is so much uncertainty and this draft is a crapshoot.

I remember from the 2018 draft when people were screaming for us to pick Filip Zadina but we picked Brady Tkachuk instead and we took a lot of unfair criticism for it.

Picking Brady Tkachuk worked out beautifully for us :)

If you are choosing between another Quinn Hughes and every other draft eligible prospect that might turn into a bust, then the choice is obvious :D
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3894 167 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 000 000 $
24 800 000 $
3750 000 $
1750 000 $
33 150 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Hughes, Luke
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
MTL
  1. Tierney, Chris (1 750 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Traded to any team that would pay a low 2nd or a combination of draft picks that is equal to a low second.
2.
OTT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Brown, Logan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Traded away to any team that would pay the equivalent of a low 2nd, similar to the Lias Andersson trade.
3.
OTT
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Brown, Joshua
Détails additionnels:
Hopefully, we trade him for a low pick, maybe for a 4th round pick, which we spent on him.

If he has no trade value, put him on waivers.

If he clears waivers, buy him out.
4.
OTT
  1. Hughes, Quinn [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Another brotherly rivalry I'm hoping to see, just like between Brady and Matthew Tkachuk.
VAN
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
A pick that must be used to draft Luke Hughes, even if it's 1st overall.
5.
OTT
  1. Tkachuk, Matthew
Détails additionnels:
:)
CGY
  1. Tkachuk, Brady
Détails additionnels:
:D
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de OTT
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de MTL
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de FLA
Logo de OTT
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
Logo de SJS
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CBJ
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $62 129 250 $0 $4 932 500 $19 370 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
747 500 $747 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
749 250 $749 250 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
894 167 $894 167 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 46
#1
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
I'm sure he'll get picked and make the NHL soon. As for whether having two successful brothers gets him picked first overall, just look at whether Marc Staal still has the same trade value as Eric Staal.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,816
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
Quoting: Eli
I'm sure he'll get picked and make the NHL soon. As for whether having two successful brothers gets him picked first overall, just look at whether Marc Staal still has the same trade value as Eric Staal.


I guess the main point I was trying to make is that by picking Luke Hughes, you're getting certainty in a draft that is a complete crapshoot.
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 123
Mentions "j'aime": 14
That Quinn Hughes trade is miles off.
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,816
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
Quoting: CptMuffin
That Quinn Hughes trade is miles off.


That's not the point.
Radu47 a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,734
Mentions "j'aime": 586
brady is much better than matt
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 53
#6
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,816
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
Quoting: Vermathex
brady is much better than matt


That's great but that's not the point of my post.
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,009
Mentions "j'aime": 12,013
I'd probably have him 5-8. To me there's a pretty solid top 4, with some combination of Power, Beniers, Guenther and Ckarke. It widens from there, but I'd have Hughes at the top of the next tier of guys like Johnson, Hughes and Edvinsson.
sensonfire et Borocop a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,315
Mentions "j'aime": 19,556
Ok well this is a very common misconception with the 2021 draft. What makes it a "crapshoot" is the lack of scouting that could be done this year for the later rounds, not the top end prospects. And what makes it a "weak draft" is the lack of superstar projected talent at the top. There is still a solid group of young players that will all very likely be NHLers in the top half of the 1st round. To elaborate, Matt Beniers (who I rank the clear #1) is still a better prospect than most of last years top 10, If he was eligible last year I would expect he goes somewhere around 4th to 6th, maybe even before Stutzle at 3rd.

Hughes will very likely be drafted in the top 5 but I don't see him going 1st OA
sensonfire, LeafsFanForSomeReason, Borocop and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 17 h 58
#9
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,816
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I'd probably have him 5-8. To me there's a pretty solid top 4, with some combination of Power, Beniers, Guenther and Ckarke. It widens from there, but I'd have Hughes at the top of the next tier of guys like Johnson, Hughes and Edvinsson.


In your opinion, what are the odds that either Power, Beniers, Guenther or Clarke become busts?

In my opinion, if you can't decide who is the best player available (BPA), you should pick the safest player available (SPA).

I appreciate your thoughts though smile
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 0
#10
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,816
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Ok well this is a very common misconception with the 2021 draft. What makes it a "crapshoot" is the lack of scouting that could be done this year for the later rounds, not the top end prospects. And what makes it a "weak draft" is the lack of superstar projected talent at the top. There is still a solid group of young players that will all very likely be NHLers in the top half of the 1st round. To elaborate, Matt Beniers (who I rank the clear #1) is still a better prospect than most of last years top 10, If he was eligible last year I would expect he goes somewhere around 4th to 6th, maybe even before Stutzle at 3rd.

Hughes will very likely be drafted in the top 5 but I don't see him going 1st OA


I appreciate your thoughts smile
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,315
Mentions "j'aime": 19,556
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I'd probably have him 5-8. To me there's a pretty solid top 4, with some combination of Power, Beniers, Guenther and Ckarke. It widens from there, but I'd have Hughes at the top of the next tier of guys like Johnson, Hughes and Edvinsson.


Clarke IMO has taken a bit of a fall, I would definitely take Hughes over him. Beniers and Power to me are the clear #1 and #2. After that you have a group of Lysell, Eklund Guenther, and Hughes. Followed by a group of Clarke, Johnson, Edvinsson, and Wallstedt
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,887
Mentions "j'aime": 6,391
I have him 3rd he's not gonna be like Quinn
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,770
Mentions "j'aime": 5,263
The narrative that this draft is a crapshoot is incredibly overblown. The majority of draft eligible/caliber players (certainly the higher end ones) have been playing in some capacity and NHL teams have the means to view them. Hughes being ranked #1 is a reasonable opinion, I certainly think he belongs in that conversation, but the main reasoning for that in the description, I think is absurd.
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 23
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,162
Mentions "j'aime": 18,353
Edvinsson has higher upside. Power has high ceiling, but for a 6’6” kid, he has to start playing like he is 6’6”. Clarke is kind of a mess, and probably long way from top-5. Hughes is pretty safe bet to be top pair guy.

For forwards, Eklund, Beniers, Guenther all appear to be top tier...and only forward candidates I see for #1 overall. Beniers gets the nod since he is only center in top-10.

1. Beniers
2. Edvinssson
3. Hughes
4. Lucius
5. Power
6. Eklund
7. Guenther
8. Wallstedt
9. Coronato
10. Sillinger
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 24
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,009
Mentions "j'aime": 12,013
Quoting: sensonfire
In your opinion, what are the odds that either Power, Beniers, Guenther or Clarke become busts?

In my opinion, if you can't decide who is the best player available (BPA), you should pick the safest player available (SPA).


Safe picks bust too.when it comes to drafting in the 1st round, especially at the top of the draft, you pick the piece you think is best and you have faith in your ability to develop him to the player he needs to be. Outside of getting a McDavid/Eichel/Matthews, nothing is a sure thing. You have to accept that there's going to be some level of risk, and that that level of risk is worth the ultimate goal of drafting an impact talent. Nothing ventured nothing gained as they say.

As far as this actual case I don't necessarily think any one player at the top of draft considerations is more likely to be a "bust" than any other (with the exception of Raty, who has really fallen off a cliff this year). As far as Luke Hughes is concerned, I see why you would consider him as a "safe pick" but I don't think he's that much more likely than anyone else to reach his full potential. If you're advocating for him because of downside, not upside, I think you're going to miss out on too much talent.
sensonfire et Radu47 a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 54
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,315
Mentions "j'aime": 19,556
Quoting: sensonfire
In your opinion, what are the odds that either Power, Beniers, Guenther or Clarke become busts?

In my opinion, if you can't decide who is the best player available (BPA), you should pick the safest player available (SPA).

I appreciate your thoughts though smile


Power is a very safe bet, worst case you are looking at a Tyler Myers with him
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 18 h 58
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,009
Mentions "j'aime": 12,013
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Clarke IMO has taken a bit of a fall, I would definitely take Hughes over him. Beniers and Power to me are the clear #1 and #2. After that you have a group of Lysell, Eklund Guenther, and Hughes. Followed by a group of Clarke, Johnson, Edvinsson, and Wallstedt


Clarke is definitely a little raw, but his upside is one of the highest in the draft imo.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 19 h 30
#18
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,919
Mentions "j'aime": 2,489
I have Beniers #1 after that I am currently leaning towards Hughes #2.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 19 h 41
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,162
Mentions "j'aime": 18,353
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Clarke is definitely a little raw, but his upside is one of the highest in the draft imo.


The skill set is raw. It’s the undisciplined approach that has hurt him. He is one where his time in Europe may have hurt him. He needs OHL restart.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
13 avr. 2021 à 20 h 18
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,535
Mentions "j'aime": 618
Luke Hughes was in my top three but I heard he had a pretty bad foot injury - right now Beniers, Edvinssson, Raty - but to put this draft in prospective Beniers has been described as almost as good as Lundell who was a 12th pick last year.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
14 avr. 2021 à 1 h 17
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,375
Mentions "j'aime": 868
I think the biggest bust potential is Kent Johnson. Something about his game just makes me believe he won’t be the impact player people think he would be. Biggest sleeper to me is Sillinger. Best player is probably Beniers but honorable mention to Guenther.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage