SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Seth Jones and depth

Créé par: Jack_
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2020
Publié: 23 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
21 850 000 $
31 700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Bracco, Jeremy [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. Kerfoot, Alexander
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Jankowski, Mark [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
3.
TOR
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Liste de réserve]
EDM
  1. Korshkov, Yegor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 959 783 $0 $400 000 $1 540 217 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juin 2020 à 16 h 57
#76
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Like I understand the entire post is troll, i knew from the beginning but there has to be some realism if you want to be persistent on arguing some things.
For example:
Jones had a Corsi Player Rating (CPR) of 78.31 this year, which is 4th amoung RD league wide, Rielly had a CPR of 75.31 this year for 14th amoung LD.
Jones had a GAR of 4.5 and WAR of 0.8 this year and Rielly had a GAR of 4.4 and WAR of 0.8, so according to EW they were roughly equally as relevant this year


rielly also played a long time with a broken foot before he officially sat out but i agree with your point. I also believe morgan rielly is very overrated because he puts up a lot of points
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 0
#77
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,350
Mentions "j'aime": 3,351
Quoting: Viqsi
JFresh's article, despite the seriously clickbaity headline, comes to almost reasonable conclusions - he argues merely that Jones shouldn't be considered elite because he feels there's deficiencies in Jones' game whose existence is hinted at by advanced statistics. The OP, by contrast, is insisting Jones "has the potential" to become a second-pairing guy. Not that he's presently a second-pairing guy - that he might be that someday if he improves. JFresh got piled on a little excessively. This guy is a pathetic troll who deserves every bit of scorn and dismissal he's getting and more besides.


Did not see the potential part while scrolling through the replies ......that's a bad take
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 1
#78
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Viqsi
That depends. On the topic of Bjorkstrand versus Marner earlier, were we discussing Marner, or Marner's reputation?


Marner has a reputation of being a very good player and backs that up. People who watch Bjorkstrand know hes a very good player so i dont understand your point. Jones has a reputation of being a superstar even though he isnt. Marner has a reputation of being a very good player and actually backs that up.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 2
#79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Jack_
kapanen is a middle 6 player on almost all nhl teams and kerfoot is a good 3c.


And when has that package ever been traded for a top pairing 25 year old all-star RHD??? I'd like to see some examples please.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 7
#80
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Jack_
of course im trolling people. on CF people think Jones is Baby Jesus 2.0 for some reason when its very clear he isnt. ive never said he isnt talented but besides one extremly good season Jones hasnt been that good and it bugs me that people think hes a top 10 defenseman because of 17-18


You've gone down a few rungs on the respect ladder after this insanity rant Jack.

I'm starting to think that you have already drank too much of the blue koolaid.

Your favouritism for the team that you support is severely clouding your judgment.

In this particular instance.... You are dead wrong in your analysis.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 10
#81
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: GMs
Poehling + Lehkonen + 2nd rd pick vs Morgan Reilly, Reilly isn’t that good, a solid #3


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Like I understand the entire post is troll, i knew from the beginning but there has to be some realism if you want to be persistent on arguing some things.
For example:
Jones had a Corsi Player Rating (CPR) of 78.31 this year, which is 4th amoung RD league wide, Rielly had a CPR of 75.31 this year for 14th amoung LD.
Jones had a GAR of 4.5 and WAR of 0.8 this year and Rielly had a GAR of 4.4 and WAR of 0.8, so according to EW they were roughly equally as relevant this year


Rielly was better then Jones based off xWAR. rielly is atrocious defensively but he more then makes up for it offensively. Rielly was also better in transition this season and they were both extremely close the previous 3 seasons. while both are very close in on ice results Rielly ranks better in expected results
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 13
#82
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Trevorchef
You've gone down a few rungs on the respect ladder after this insanity rant Jack.

I'm starting to think that you have already drank too much of the blue koolaid.

Your favouritism for the team that you support is severely clouding your judgment.

In this particular instance.... You are dead wrong in your analysis.


you to bud. youre just like everyone else by saying Jones is good and not using any sort of evidence or knowledge to prove your point. Just saying a player is good because everyone else is saying so doesnt mean its true. at least i have facts behind my analysis
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 17
#83
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Trevorchef
And when has that package ever been traded for a top pairing 25 year old all-star RHD??? I'd like to see some examples please.


in this case a 26 year old defenseman who has no reason to be an allstar based off his play on the top pair
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 18
#84
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Jack_
you to bud. youre just like everyone else by saying Jones is good and not using any sort of evidence or knowledge to prove your point. Just saying a player is good because everyone else is saying so doesnt mean its true. at least i have facts behind my analysis


I base my analysis on logic, stats, eye test, team needs, and reality. I am NEVER swayed by what "other" people are saying.

You've made a really ****ty proposal here that is completely one sided in favour of the Leafs.

Seth Jones for the players that you have in that package is an absolute joke. That is where it starts and ends. That is the point that I have been arguing the entire time.

Your trade proposal is laughable. And the CBJ's, both teams fan bases and the entire NHL community would laugh at it as I do now.

It is just silly. Accept that.
Viqsi, brocklesnar et Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 18
#85
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,588
Mentions "j'aime": 6,728
I got a better idea?

How about realizing that value, or at least a good chunk of it, relies on what someone is willing to pay for it. YOU may think Jones is overrated or whatever and heck even if you were right, that doesn't stop the troves of other fans, analysts and hockey people who think he is ELITE and worthy of ELITE value. As long as there is a sizable amount people who believe this, his value will be that high, regardless of what you think.

Jones is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for him. Its not a "Price" as so many on here like to use.
Viqsi, Trevorchef, Ajp_18 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 21
#86
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Jack_
in this case a 26 year old defenseman who has no reason to be an allstar based off his play on the top pair


You are really grasping at straws now. Please stop this nonsense. That trade proposal is laughable.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 21
#87
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Trevorchef
I base my analysis on logic, stats, eye test, team needs, and reality. I am NEVER swayed by what "other" people are saying.

You've made a really ****ty proposal here that is completely one sided in favour of the Leafs.

Seth Jones for the players that you have in that package is an absolute joke. That is where it starts and ends. That is the point that I have been arguing the entire time.

Your trade proposal is laughable. And the CBJ's, both teams fan bases and the entire NHL community would laugh at it as I do now.

It is just silly. Accept that.


based off what his on ice value is its more then fair.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 29
#88
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Trevorchef
You are really grasping at straws now. Please stop this nonsense. That trade proposal is laughable.


Im grasping for straws? Your point in that comment was literally confirming my point. The majority of players that make the all star game are there for past performances or because someone on their team has to go. Holtby, Andersen, Bertuzzi, Weber and many other guys make it because what theyve done in the past. that describes Jones extremly well. He hasnt really been great for a few years now but lets send him there for something he did in 17-18 am I right?
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 31
#89
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,669
Mentions "j'aime": 3,152
Quoting: Jack_
Marner has a reputation of being a very good player and backs that up. People who watch Bjorkstrand know hes a very good player so i dont understand your point. Jones has a reputation of being a superstar even though he isnt. Marner has a reputation of being a very good player and actually backs that up.

How does he back that up? There's no advanced stats that show that Marner backs that up.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 32
#90
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Jack_
based off what his on ice value is its more then fair.


At this point, I just think you are after the attention because your argument does not back up the reality of the trade.

On ice value based on what exactly? His analytics? LOL... Jesus Christ man.... I thought you were smarter than that. Perhaps I have given you too much credit.

When was the last time that a team traded two 3rd line players, a bust prospect and a draft pick for a top pairing 25 year old RHD on a great contract AAV?

If you can answer me that... maybe I will let it go. Until then... the offer is absolutely sub par in every way.
23 juin 2020 à 17 h 55
#91
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Viqsi
How does he back that up? There's no advanced stats that show that Marner backs that up.


Tons of things. Hockeyviz, Evolving Hockey, tons more. Where are you even looking?
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 1
#92
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Trevorchef
At this point, I just think you are after the attention because your argument does not back up the reality of the trade.

On ice value based on what exactly? His analytics? LOL... Jesus Christ man.... I thought you were smarter than that. Perhaps I have given you too much credit.

When was the last time that a team traded two 3rd line players, a bust prospect and a draft pick for a top pairing 25 year old RHD on a great contract AAV?

If you can answer me that... maybe I will let it go. Until then... the offer is absolutely sub par in every way.


Based off what value he brings to the table he isnt that great. Dom Lusziu3jgdion has a thing that creates a market value based off what he does and it says he should be making 4.6 million. It's not perfect but it's still something so we know he isnt on that great of a contract. His isolated threat isnt very good at all meaning hes not a very good play driver. He wasnt that good in transition this season. His GAR, xWAR and WAR isnt spectacular- again war and gar isnt perfect but it's better then the eye test. His RAPM is very pedestrian too. His on ice value isnt that great because he and his team dont accomplish much when he is on the ice. Playing on the 2nd pair would be far better for him and his on ice results meaning he isnt a top pair norris defenseman
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 4
#93
Dead inside
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 97
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: Jack_
in this case a 26 year old defenseman who has no reason to be an allstar based off his play on the top pair


Literally everyone disagrees with you. I only recently got into CapFriendly but you’re the leafs fan they talk about overvaluing our players and undervaluing others.
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 23
#94
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,669
Mentions "j'aime": 3,152
Quoting: Jack_
Tons of things. Hockeyviz, Evolving Hockey, tons more. Where are you even looking?

Tons of things back up Jones' value. GAR and WAR already were mentioned here. Where are you even looking?
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 30
#95
Best In The World
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,272
Mentions "j'aime": 658
Not even close for Jones. CBJ are not even looking to move the face of there franchise either.
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 34
#96
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Jack_
Based off what value he brings to the table he isnt that great. Dom Lusziu3jgdion has a thing that creates a market value based off what he does and it says he should be making 4.6 million. It's not perfect but it's still something so we know he isnt on that great of a contract. His isolated threat isnt very good at all meaning hes not a very good play driver. He wasnt that good in transition this season. His GAR, xWAR and WAR isnt spectacular- again war and gar isnt perfect but it's better then the eye test. His RAPM is very pedestrian too. His on ice value isnt that great because he and his team dont accomplish much when he is on the ice. Playing on the 2nd pair would be far better for him and his on ice results meaning he isnt a top pair norris defenseman


Quoting: Jack_
Based off what value he brings to the table he isnt that great. Dom Lusziu3jgdion has a thing that creates a market value based off what he does and it says he should be making 4.6 million. It's not perfect but it's still something so we know he isnt on that great of a contract. His isolated threat isnt very good at all meaning hes not a very good play driver. He wasnt that good in transition this season. His GAR, xWAR and WAR isnt spectacular- again war and gar isnt perfect but it's better then the eye test. His RAPM is very pedestrian too. His on ice value isnt that great because he and his team dont accomplish much when he is on the ice. Playing on the 2nd pair would be far better for him and his on ice results meaning he isnt a top pair norris defenseman


Thank you. You have just proved my point.

You are basing your point on statistical analytics exclusively.

Dom L ...has never played a game of professional hockey in his life. He is a stats nerd. His models are theory. Somewhat qualified and somewhat mathematically quantified but, theory based on data.

If that is your knowledge and the genesis of a trade like this... you are absolutely missing the point. If you make an analysis on a player base solely on these theories... you have missed the point.

You are trash IMO now dude. Way to go from insightful to regretful in less than two hours.

Brutal.
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 42
#97
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Viqsi
Tons of things back up Jones' value. GAR and WAR already were mentioned here. Where are you even looking?


Micah blake Mccurdy's stuff, transition data. I'm all ears to hear what you're looking at
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 45
#98
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,669
Mentions "j'aime": 3,152
Quoting: Jack_
Micah blake Mccurdy's stuff, transition data. I'm all ears to hear what you're looking at

EbNFYaGXkAIAKSa?format=jpg&name=900x900
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 49
#99
Démarrer sujet
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,768
Mentions "j'aime": 1,626
Quoting: Trevorchef
Thank you. You have just proved my point.

You are basing your point on statistical analytics exclusively.

Dom L ...has never played a game of professional hockey in his life. He is a stats nerd. His models are theory. Somewhat qualified and somewhat mathematically quantified but, theory based on data.

If that is your knowledge and the genesis of a trade like this... you are absolutely missing the point. If you make an analysis on a player base solely on these theories... you have missed the point.

You are trash IMO now dude. Way to go from insightful to regretful in less than two hours.

Brutal.


Quoting: Trevorchef
Thank you. You have just proved my point.

You are basing your point on statistical analytics exclusively.

Dom L ...has never played a game of professional hockey in his life. He is a stats nerd. His models are theory. Somewhat qualified and somewhat mathematically quantified but, theory based on data.

If that is your knowledge and the genesis of a trade like this... you are absolutely missing the point. If you make an analysis on a player base solely on these theories... you have missed the point.

You are trash IMO now dude. Way to go from insightful to regretful in less than two hours.

Brutal.


Damn dude that hurts. My whole world revolves around what some random people on a hockey salary cap page think lmfao. My point is that Jones isnt a 1st pairing defenseman and based off of on ice value that deal is fair. You keep citing age and all star games which generally mean nothing. At this point he pretty much is what he is and that is a defenseman who plays on the top pair and doesnt do well.
23 juin 2020 à 18 h 50
#100
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,669
Mentions "j'aime": 3,152
Quoting: Jack_
Damn dude that hurts. My whole world revolves around what some random people on a hockey salary cap page think lmfao. My point is that Jones isnt a 1st pairing defenseman and based off of on ice value that deal is fair. You keep citing age and all star games which generally mean nothing. At this point he pretty much is what he is and that is a defenseman who plays on the top pair and doesnt do well.

My point is that Marner isn't a top-line winger and based off of on ice value it's a fair assessment. You haven't cited anything beyond naming random places where there might be information, which shows absolutely nothing. At this point he pretty much is what he is and that is a winger who plays alongside superstars and is carried by them.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage