Trevorchef

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 8 heures

Sujet: They just say screw it and roll 3 lines

That ship has sailed man.

The Av's win that trade hands down. Time to move on.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 10 heures

Steep price but the value is close IMO.

If the Stars included Thomas Harley instead of Eriksson I'd be very tempted.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 11 heures

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafsFan1996</b></div><div>how is it immeasurable? the leafs got Calle Rosen (7th D) for Hutch at the TDL. Malgin is way closer in value than Johnsson, who is a bonifide middle 6 forward.

I'd trade one of Petan or Agistino instead of Malgin, but Malgin is younger and seemed like fair value</div></div>

Apples and oranges.

Arizona won't move a lower pairing RHD asset for an AHL'er.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 13 heures

Sujet: Blockbuster Maple Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gordon_Bombay</b></div><div>Would you add one of the bad contracts as well in return to make it work? (assuming the Stars would say yes)</div></div>

I just don't see any reason for Dallas to consider trading Heiskanen. He is a legit star in the making. Why move off of a player like that? It just doesn't make sense to me. Those are the kinds of guys that you build around.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 14 heures

Sujet: Blockbuster Maple Leafs

I would make this trade in a heartbeat as a Leafs fan.

I doubt Dallas would though. The Stars cannot take on that cap either so... that makes it even more unrealistic.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 14 heures

Sujet: Sabres

Montour for Hanifin one for one?

Jesus Murphy. That is laughable.

Flames easily say bugger off.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 14 heures

Sujet: A new thought

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nhl_oilers</b></div><div>What’s all leafs fans obsession with trading Kerfoot?? I’m just curious because I see it everywhere..</div></div>

I think that in most cases people are trying to cut some salary. The entire time ignoring the fact that there is an excess of similar salaries on the wings. (A position of clear and obvious depth for this organization), and a complete lack of NHL quality centre depth.

I too shake my head every time I see these suggestions.

Engvall as a 3C is a joke IMO.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 14 heures

Sujet: A new thought

This is another one of these suggestions where the centre depth just drops off a cliff, the D core has not dramatically improved and there is STILL no cap space.

This group has not improved enough as you have it here to ever consider these trades IMO.

100% no from me.

Forum: Armchair-GMil y a 14 heures

Sujet: steady the rudder

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafsFan1996</b></div><div>Why? it's a 7th d for a 13th forward.</div></div>

The value of a 7th RHD who can be an NHL regular over a spare wheel AHL forward is immeasurable in this day and age.

That's why.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 7:08 pm

Sujet: Henrik Lundqvist to Toronto

Nope.

Nothing to see here.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 7:07 pm

Sujet: Nylander

Start a Facebook page.

This is absolutely useless information.

I want the last 14 seconds back.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 6:25 pm

Sujet: Canucks vs Wild PLZ VOTE

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TanSor</b></div><div>If we get into a track race with lots of transition, Canucks will run all over the Wild. They are simply way more talented up front with their offensive studs. The Wild have a much deeper roster up front and I think the key for us will be our 3rd line and defense trying to ware them down and shutting down track races.

Canucks in 4.</div></div>

Gotta' bang the **** out of them. That is the only way that the Wild will win IMO.

Even then... slim chance in a short series with veteran legs.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 5:02 pm

Sujet: Canucks vs Wild PLZ VOTE

With a healthy team, the Canucks should win this handily IMO.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 3:32 pm

Sujet: Liquid Nitrogen

Nope.

Hard pass on this one.

If one of 88 or 16 are ever traded there has to be a top pairing RHD coming back.

This package just isn't good enough.

Forget Hall. No interest there at all.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 1:31 pm

Sujet: steady the rudder

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>EnvironmentalTwister</b></div><div>I'd give up Johnsson for Lubshynksin</div></div>

So would I. Most wouldn't, (from the reactions the last time I suggested it).

If the Leafs were in a better position cap wise, I may not but, a trade like that helps with the cap crunch and addresses a need for depth on the blue line.

I expect a lot of homers would argue otherwise.

Such is life.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 11:48 am

Sujet: steady the rudder

I really doubt that Arizona would have ANY interest in this at all.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 10:28 am

Sujet: 3 way trade between COL TOR ARI

Minimum salaries have increased to 750K. You'll need to adjust that.

Some interesting ideas here.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 10:26 am

Sujet: Lafreniere and an Offer Sheet

Insane overpay.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 1:39 pm

Sujet: Crazy St

Ugh. I hate everything about this.

You'd be lucky to get a full season out of the 4th line combined.

Ristolainen is one of the worst contracts in hockey for what he provides, (which is barely above replacement level if you look at the metrics).

Kerfoot, Johnsson, Kapanen and Rielly all gone??? C'mon.

I'll stop there... this is a mess.

No thanks.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 11:58 am

Sujet: Strictly Offense

The trade would never happen and even if it did, I'm not entirely sure this scenario makes the team better TBH.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 11:56 am

Sujet: Mango for RHD

Kings decline 100%.

This is not a realistic trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 11:55 am

Sujet: Alexs

I'm all for signing a guy like AP. Not at that price point though. The Leafs are not in a position to be signing another UFA for 11 million dollars.

The cap will not be that high. It is set at 81.5 million dollars for the next two years. That fact alone invalidates the entire concept.

Your roster is also too thin and you have no cap space left to do anything anyways.

Nope.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 11:31 am

Sujet: Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boomer125</b></div><div>If I was to move Kerfoot, I'd be signing Johan Larsson to a 1.8-2.2 x 2/3 year deal and be rolling the bottom 6 C's of Larsson Spezza and Brooks which also gives space to leave Marincin and Korshvov on the roster for a 23 man roster</div></div>

Like I said.... Bottom six becomes much weaker. Centre depth becomes weaker and more uncertain. D may improve moderately but, the cap space left does not justify the moves.

Too many unknowns. Not juice just isn't worth the squeeze.

There will be a cap move for sure.

The team has better internal options over this in regards to the D IMO. (And much cheaper ones).

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 10:07 am

Sujet: Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boomer125</b></div><div>I politely disagree</div></div>

Thats fine.

Montour would be a decent add if things were different with the salary cap. They aren't.

This is a lateral move that not only does not provide cap relief, it adds to the already existing cap problem.

Removing even more young and controllable centre depth to rely on aging veterans like Spezza to play up in the lineup without a backup plan just to find cap relief to a problem you've just created by trading for Montour isn't worth the risk and not a smart option IMO.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 9:57 am

Sujet: Dubas acquires more stellar 6th and 7th round picks

LOL.

I just can't.

PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE

LANGUE

ARCHIVES

CBA

CALCS

OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY

OUTILS

JOUEURS

CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST

CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST

OUTILS INTERACTIFS

Membre depuis

Équipe préférée

Localisation

Messages dans les forums

Messages par jour

Sujets de discussion

Biographie