Modifié 22 mars 2020 à 22 h 15
Because paying $6M for a fourth-line power play asset is absurd.
If the cap is going down and Edmonton wants to improve their roster, Neal's the exact place you look at finding the savings. Betting on the Oilers to run a 30% power play over the next three years is silly. Power play opportunities drop come playoff time and you need to start relying on even-strength production to get anything done. Neal offers no solution to how the majority of the game is played, and finding room for him - even on the second PP unit - is a challenge.
If some other team wants to pay him the equivalent of what you think this years' numbers represent, then by all means let that team do so. Neal has been discussed as a buyout candidate for the Oilers well before talks of compliance buyouts were on the table. Edmonton needs the savings to improve their roster: if the power play is clicking at comparable levels without Neal and the goal is 5v5 improvement, there is no better candidate on this roster.
Russell can be moved. Chiasson can be moved. Khaira can be moved. Koskinen showed enough utility this year to at least play for another season and the FA market for starters beyond Lehner this year is horrible.
The only other player I'd consider for a CBO is Kassian - his deal is phenomenally stupid - but given that Holland just signed it, I'd consider that likelihood to be nil.