SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

zhengbangstu

Membre depuis
9 janv. 2024
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
191
Messages par jour
1.1
Forum: Armchair-GM16 juin à 18 h 18
Sujet: thoughts be realistic not braindead read desc first
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>zhengbangstu</b></div><div>Just focusing on the edmonton part of this, I think if Boston got these two guys for ullmark people would consider it a fleece, for edmonton. Ullmark for a barely 4th line forward and a 3rd pairing dman is a brutal return for boston considering that ullmark is projected to be valued the same as chychrun.</div></div>

i mean holloway is 22 and everytime he goes back to the AHL he dominates. Hes clearly NHL level and has plenty of room to grow. 14th overall pick just 4 years ago and already has almost 100 nhl games (not including playoffs). broberg is 22 yearold LD who would slot behind lorhei and lindholm would be fairly cheap for the next 3-4 years for them and is a former 8th overall pick. similar to holloway everytime he goes to the AHL he is clearly far above everyone else and has really stepped up this year and still has massive room to grow. at worst u get a cheap 3LD and 3/4C who both can improve significantly and has RFA rights for the next few years that you could flip. I dont think trading for chyc is smart for boston. 1 year rental who would be there 3LD who will most likely be gone. imo just a 10oa/ future first + 2/3rd is really the only other option if ur moving him. hes not going to be enough to get an elite player. maybe laine being available and Cbj building like they want to win within the next few years it could be close to value but U would still have to give up and all u need is 1 of broberg or holloway to reach there potential and u get a top4D/top6C/LW and a role player for ullmark and 2-3M in cap space to resign sway + march and coyle next year
Forum: Armchair-GM7 juin à 17 h 40
Sujet: BRUINS missing LD is Chychrun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>zhengbangstu</b></div><div>Im curious about the same thing, I'm not a fan of lohrei on the bottom pair. I understand the appeal of getting chychrun but the timeline doesnt make sense with lohrei turning 24 next january. It almost feels like if Boston gets chychrun they'd being quietly telling lohrei hes on the way out. He'd get wasted being on the third pair and they'd likely use chychrun over him on one of the powerplays. I have been struggling to find a reason why Boston would need chychrun and it's laid out pretty well by the other people here but I still dont fully understand how the timeline would work. Also wheres poitras on the centre depth.</div></div>

I think for how young Poitras is, him being the 3C during his ELC is probably best for his development. I'm fine if BOS gets E. Lindholm as the 1C for example, Coyle is then the 2C and Zacha moves to LW.

In the longterm, Poitras eventually passes Coyle on the depth chart given Coyle's age, so it works out.

If somehow Draisaitl makes it to free agency next year, have to move Coyle.
Forum: Trade Machine Proposals7 juin à 14 h 21
Sujet: Would this be enough for Ullmark
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>zhengbangstu</b></div><div>Coming from a bruins fan, from what I read on here devils fans struggle to justify getting ullmark for their 10th overall pick so this deal is almost an instant no for most people, I would probably say no if im the devils GM as well. Siegenthaler is such an underrated defenseman, nolan foote i think is dealing with the allegations right now so he would not fit well with the culture the bruins are trying to build, also hes likely to never play hockey again and boqvist just isnt enough to give up along with ullmark to get the first and siegenthaler. The devils are desperate for a goalie so i could see boqvist and ullmark for the pick, maybe, but I think ultimately the bruins would have to give up something closer to ullmark and lysell to get that pick, knowing who can go at that draft position.</div></div>

Wrong Foote but otherwise pretty good.

Lysell just bunches in with Clarke and Holtz. 3 guys for 1 spot, maybe 2. I don’t think he moves the needle for NJD.
Forum: Armchair-GM6 juin à 23 h 50
Forum: Armchair-GM4 juin à 9 h 16
Sujet: How bout a different trade
Jenner's value is hard to pinpoint so you'll usually see Jackets fans on this site (and apparently Flyers fans, hi Hammerwise) inflating it or shortcutting to say he's simply not available. Which is true based on public statements from ownership down to the player himself last season. He's franchise leader in games played. Captain on a very young, chaotic team. His internal value just exceeds what any other team would rightfully pay to acquire him (in a vacuum that's a first and a prospect, maybe a little more considering how cheap his contract is, but again, you have to convince the team to let him go). Like in a vacuum is a goalie a season removed from a Vezina a good start for a larger Jenner trade? Of course. But Columbus certainly isn't adding a pick along with Jenner to acquire a soon-to-be UFA goalie with a NMC he isn't waiving for Columbus while they're rebuilding. Plus there's the extra opportunity cost here in having to move Elvis or lose Tarasov, and then to pay Ullmark next year.