SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

2nd line

Créé par: pmorin21
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2024
Publié: 14 juin 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 150 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
37 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Beck, Owen
  2. Dach, Kirby
  3. Harris, Jordan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (MTL)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (MTL)
2.
ANA
  1. Anderson, Josh (2 250 000 $ retained)
  2. Farrell, Sean
  3. Newhook, Alex
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
3.
PHI
  1. Kovacevic, Johnathan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2188 000 000 $80 183 750 $1 022 500 $4 670 000 $7 816 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juin à 6 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,322
Mentions "j'aime": 2,280
Reinbacher or the ‘24 MTL 1st as the base piece for Zegras. To move a core player, we need a core asset
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin à 6 h 47
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Modifié 14 juin à 6 h 54
Quoting: Jded
Reinbacher or the ‘24 MTL 1st as the base piece for Zegras. To move a core player, we need a core asset


Zegras isn't a core peice to the Ducks, if he was there wouldn't be a counter proposal at all. Look at the Leafs, they aren't moving Mathews or Nylander for anything, Florida isn't moving Barkov or Tkachuk for anything. Core peices are those you would absolutely not move.

Edit*** Do I think the offer is weak? Of course it is but that is not what you said, hence my response.

Also I do not think the Habs will do any of Guhle or Reinbacher for Zegras unless they also get back the 3rd pick (where we include the 5th pick and an additional piece or two) since we would need to pick one of the top D men in this draft as a replacement.

Something like

3rd + Zegras for Reinbacher + 5th + Mesar + Jets 1st
14 juin à 7 h 5
#3
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 6,064
Mentions "j'aime": 2,397
Don’t you think you are overpaying a bit?
14 juin à 7 h 7
#4
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 6,064
Mentions "j'aime": 2,397
Quoting: Jded
Reinbacher or the ‘24 MTL 1st as the base piece for Zegras. To move a core player, we need a core asset


Zegras is 5th on Anaheim forwards depth chart. In Montreal, the fifth player on our forward depth chart is Newhook
14 juin à 7 h 34
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,719
This is an absolutely WILD amount to pay for Laine.
14 juin à 7 h 38
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 131
Mentions "j'aime": 73
that Laine trade is probably the worst ive ever seen on here

Has Laine secretly been a constant 60 goal scorer this whole time or am I missing something
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin à 7 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,322
Mentions "j'aime": 2,280
Quoting: Campabee
Zegras isn't a core peice to the Ducks, if he was there wouldn't be a counter proposal at all. Look at the Leafs, they aren't moving Mathews or Nylander for anything, Florida isn't moving Barkov or Tkachuk for anything. Core peices are those you would absolutely not move.

Edit*** Do I think the offer is weak? Of course it is but that is not what you said, hence my response.

Also I do not think the Habs will do any of Guhle or Reinbacher for Zegras unless they also get back the 3rd pick (where we include the 5th pick and an additional piece or two) since we would need to pick one of the top D men in this draft as a replacement.

Something like

3rd + Zegras for Reinbacher + 5th + Mesar + Jets 1st


You know Nylander rumors were running rampant for years up until just this season, right? And that Marner was considered a core piece just a few months ago, and now his name is on the block? For your FLA example, Huberdeau was 100% considered a core piece. And then he was traded for.. a core piece.

As of now, Zegras is absolutely a part of the team’s core. A player or asset of similar ilk would be needed to even consider a trade.

As for 3rd for 5th, that all comes down to who mgmt values in the draft. Personally, I’d rather just keep Zegras, use the 3rd, and go on my merry way
GeneralLandro et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin à 7 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2024
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Did you mistake Laine for McDavid or something?
14 juin à 7 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,322
Mentions "j'aime": 2,280
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Zegras is 5th on Anaheim forwards depth chart. In Montreal, the fifth player on our forward depth chart is Newhook


I appreciate you sharing some fun facts, lol. Not totally sure how you're defining depth chart, nor what point you’re trying to make though.

I’ll share 3 more fun facts for you that might be a bit more relevant. Zegras led Anaheim in scoring just last season, he was 2nd the year before, and for the final 8 games of this year when he was finally healthy, scored at a point per game pace. We keep Zegras unless there’s an offer too good to refuse. This ain’t it
GeneralLandro et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin à 7 h 59
#10
Yall gotta Chill
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,170
Mentions "j'aime": 234
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Zegras is 5th on Anaheim forwards depth chart. In Montreal, the fifth player on our forward depth chart is Newhook


The trades here probably were triple over paid because he wanted to have less comments like that from Jded.. But Jded seems to be living in a land where Zegras just came off 3 back to back seasons with 50 goals, and 70 assists.... LOL!

He always think ANA players are worth 10 times more..
14 juin à 8 h 9
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,391
Mentions "j'aime": 13,319
Columbus accepts LOL
14 juin à 8 h 54
#12
Boris Bagel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 3,063
Mentions "j'aime": 679
Habs make le pass tabberwette
14 juin à 9 h 12
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,322
Mentions "j'aime": 2,280
Quoting: WhoCares_ItsAFantasyGame
The trades here probably were triple over paid because he wanted to have less comments like that from Jded.. But Jded seems to be living in a land where Zegras just came off 3 back to back seasons with 50 goals, and 70 assists.... LOL!

He always think ANA players are worth 10 times more..


Sure. Or maybe people just aren’t very keen to trade a completely locked top 6 forward who’s 23 years old and proven capable of leading the team in scoring fora bunch of mid level stuff in return.

How about a Slaf trade to show why. We’ll give you the ‘24 EDM 1st, ‘24 ANA 2nd, 3 ‘24 3rds, Max Jones, Isaac Lundestrom, and Vatrano. Thoughts?
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin à 9 h 16
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 17,834
Mentions "j'aime": 7,798
Not enough to dump Anderson.
14 juin à 11 h 26
#15
Ducks and Kings Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 26,705
Quoting: Campabee
Zegras isn't a core peice to the Ducks, if he was there wouldn't be a counter proposal at all. Look at the Leafs, they aren't moving Mathews or Nylander for anything, Florida isn't moving Barkov or Tkachuk for anything. Core peices are those you would absolutely not move.

Edit*** Do I think the offer is weak? Of course it is but that is not what you said, hence my response.

Also I do not think the Habs will do any of Guhle or Reinbacher for Zegras unless they also get back the 3rd pick (where we include the 5th pick and an additional piece or two) since we would need to pick one of the top D men in this draft as a replacement.

Something like

3rd + Zegras for Reinbacher + 5th + Mesar + Jets 1st

The most important point in your comment is that this offer is weak, for which we Anaheim stalwarts thank you.

I'm not sure why you're defining "core piece" as "untouchable" when we define it as "player who is deemed essential to our future success." By our lights, Carlsson and McTavish and Matthews and Nylander and Suzuki and Slafkovsky are untouchable and Marner and Zegras and Caufield are core pieces whose trade would require an equivalent high-value asset in return.

At fifth overall you'll have a choice among most if not all of Silayev, Buium and Dickinson (as well as Parekh and Yakemchuk) because Celebrini, Demidov and Levshunov will almost certainly be three of the first four. (Of course, if Demidov is still on the board at #5 I think that you'll overcome your desire for a defenseman, and you may feel that way about Lindstrom, too.) So I don't see your need to move up, but if Chicago picks Levshunov at #2, I can see Anaheim trading back with you and your proposal is eminently fair and reasonable.

Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
Zegras is 5th on Anaheim forwards depth chart. In Montreal, the fifth player on our forward depth chart is Newhook

Zegras is #1 on our LW depth chart.

The fact that you think that Zegras is our fifth most valuable forward (he's not) and that Newhook is your fifth most valuable forward doesn't mean that they are comparable. You wouldn't trade Suzuki for Carlsson and we wouldn't dream of trading McTavish for Slafkovsky. Nor would we want Caufield or Dach (or Newhook) for their opposite numbers, either.
14 juin à 11 h 45
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: OldNYIfan
The most important point in your comment is that this offer is weak, for which we Anaheim stalwarts thank you.

I'm not sure why you're defining "core piece" as "untouchable" when we define it as "player who is deemed essential to our future success." By our lights, Carlsson and McTavish and Matthews and Nylander and Suzuki and Slafkovsky are untouchable and Marner and Zegras and Caufield are core pieces whose trade would require an equivalent high-value asset in return.

At fifth overall you'll have a choice among most if not all of Silayev, Buium and Dickinson (as well as Parekh and Yakemchuk) because Celebrini, Demidov and Levshunov will almost certainly be three of the first four. (Of course, if Demidov is still on the board at #5 I think that you'll overcome your desire for a defenseman, and you may feel that way about Lindstrom, too.) So I don't see your need to move up, but if Chicago picks Levshunov at #2, I can see Anaheim trading back with you and your proposal is eminently fair and reasonable.


Zegras is #1 on our LW depth chart.

The fact that you think that Zegras is our fifth most valuable forward (he's not) and that Newhook is your fifth most valuable forward doesn't mean that they are comparable. You wouldn't trade Suzuki for Carlsson and we wouldn't dream of trading McTavish for Slafkovsky. Nor would we want Caufield or Dach (or Newhook) for their opposite numbers, either.


I think we just view "core pieces" differently and I only gave my definition in response to a previous comment, since we have different views on what "core" means then by the previous commenters definition, yes Zegras is a core piece for Anaheim. IMO I wouldn't consider CC a core since there are players I would trade him for (M. Tkachuk for example) anyone who is relatively easy to replace IMO is not a core player, I am just old school in that regard lol.

Absolutely there will be D available but the issue is we don't just want any D we want one that fits as well as Reinbacher with a similar ceiling (much the same as what you want for Zegras). If we move Reinbacker then we need to fill that hole, which means we either make a move for Hronek or we move up in the draft to grab Levshunov, hence the reason for the pick swap if we include Reinbacher.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin à 11 h 57
#17
Ducks and Kings Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 26,705
Quoting: Campabee
I think we just view "core pieces" differently and I only gave my definition in response to a previous comment, since we have different views on what "core" means then by the previous commenters definition, yes Zegras is a core piece for Anaheim. IMO I wouldn't consider CC a core since there are players I would trade him for (M. Tkachuk for example) anyone who is relatively easy to replace IMO is not a core player, I am just old school in that regard lol.

Absolutely there will be D available but the issue is we don't just want any D we want one that fits as well as Reinbacher with a similar ceiling (much the same as what you want for Zegras). If we move Reinbacker then we need to fill that hole, which means we either make a move for Hronek or we move up in the draft to grab Levshunov, hence the reason for the pick swap if we include Reinbacher.

Don't be so piggy. We need Levshunov more than you do. You have Reinbacher and Mailloux and it looks as if Guhle can play his off side, too. If Levshunov is there at #3 we won't be trading back and you can just decline to trade either #5 or Reinbacher for Zegras.

I see Martin Necas as a better "home-run" target for you than Zegras. He won't cost as much to acquire and he's better defensively. Or you could just sign Marchessault.
14 juin à 11 h 59
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,942
Mentions "j'aime": 6,650
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Don't be so piggy. We need Levshunov more than you do. You have Reinbacher and Mailloux and it looks as if Guhle can play his off side, too. If Levshunov is there at #3 we won't be trading back and you can just decline to trade either #5 or Reinbacher for Zegras.

I see Martin Necas as a better "home-run" target for you than Zegras. He won't cost as much to acquire and he's better defensively. Or you could just sign Marchessault.


LOL not being piggy, in my scenario you get Reinbacher + 5th + a sweetener or 2 for Zegras + 3rd both teams end up with a top 6 forward and potential top pairing RD
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin à 12 h 40
#19
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 6,064
Mentions "j'aime": 2,397
Quoting: OldNYIfan

Zegras is #1 on our LW depth chart.

The fact that you think that Zegras is our fifth most valuable forward (he's not) and that Newhook is your fifth most valuable forward doesn't mean that they are comparable. You wouldn't trade Suzuki for Carlsson and we wouldn't dream of trading McTavish for Slafkovsky. Nor would we want Caufield or Dach (or Newhook) for their opposite numbers, either.


No he isn’t your #1 LW on your depth chart. Gauthier is. And Zegras is a Center (#3 on the depth chart at that position).

It’s just to show that Zegras isn’t a big core player. He is behind McTavish, Carlsson, Gauthier and Terry. Players who are fifth on the depth chart usually don’t get insane return like some of y’all are suggesting.

Zegras’s value is about 10 OA. You aren’t getting a higher pick than 8th in a trade without adding
14 juin à 12 h 47
#20
Ducks and Kings Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 42,152
Mentions "j'aime": 26,705
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
No he isn’t your #1 LW on your depth chart. Gauthier is. And Zegras is a Center (#3 on the depth chart at that position).

It’s just to show that Zegras isn’t a big core player. He is behind McTavish, Carlsson, Gauthier and Terry. Players who are fifth on the depth chart usually don’t get insane return like some of y’all are suggesting.

Zegras’s value is about 10 OA. You aren’t getting a higher pick than 8th in a trade without adding

Thank you for the instructive lecture on the structure of my favorite team, of whom I've been a fan for more than 25 years. It's no less accurate than the rest of your evaluations.
14 juin à 13 h 41
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2024
Messages: 186
Mentions "j'aime": 78
The amount of Habs fans on this site who genuinely believe Reinbacher and Guhle have more value than Zegras is just astounding.
dim. à 8 h 46
#22
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 4,685
Mentions "j'aime": 1,500
Quoting: Campabee
Zegras isn't a core peice to the Ducks, if he was there wouldn't be a counter proposal at all. Look at the Leafs, they aren't moving Mathews or Nylander for anything, Florida isn't moving Barkov or Tkachuk for anything. Core peices are those you would absolutely not move.

Edit*** Do I think the offer is weak? Of course it is but that is not what you said, hence my response.

Also I do not think the Habs will do any of Guhle or Reinbacher for Zegras unless they also get back the 3rd pick (where we include the 5th pick and an additional piece or two) since we would need to pick one of the top D men in this draft as a replacement.

Something like

3rd + Zegras for Reinbacher + 5th + Mesar + Jets 1st


Before cap friendly ends, just wanted to reach out & let you know take my prize for the biggest fk’n moron on this site. Spew garbage & illogical takes yet report people when they push back on your nonsense. A truly moronic, idiotic snowflake. congratulations 🫡
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage