SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

not Zegras but Mctavish

Créé par: Jackaille
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 24 avr. 2024
Publié: 24 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2683 500 000 $73 632 500 $0 $5 807 500 $9 867 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance550 000 $$550K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 avr. à 11 h 45
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
you're maybe a quarter of the way there.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 11 h 47
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,980
Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
Reinbacher was a reach at 5, McTavish was a steal at 3, start adding.
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 11 h 49
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 25,389
No, thanks, we're not trading Mason McTavish or Trevor Zegras or Leo Carlsson or Cutter Gauthier or Troy Terry.
24 avr. à 11 h 54
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
Quoting: OldNYIfan
No, thanks, we're not trading Mason McTavish or Trevor Zegras or Leo Carlsson or Cutter Gauthier or Troy Terry.


you should trade zegras. he's nothing special
LondonNight911 a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 11 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 169
Mentions "j'aime": 26
would you do Barron for Gaucher?
24 avr. à 11 h 58
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 25,389
Quoting: Bcarlo25
you should trade zegras. he's nothing special

I disagree. Yes, he's no Matt Boldy, and we might do better over the long run with Martin Necas, but flash is important in this market.

Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Reinbacher was a reach at 5, McTavish was a steal at 3, start adding.

In his D+1 (age 20) year, Pavel Mintyukov played 63 games and recorded 4 goals and 28 points. It will be interesting to see what Reinbacher does this season by comparison.
GiggywithGibby et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 11 h 59
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,980
Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
Modifié 24 avr. à 12 h 6
Quoting: Jackaille
would you do Barron for Gaucher?


No. Barron is fringe NHL at this point and about to loose waivers protection, I'd give you a mid round pick for him tops.
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 12 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: Jackaille
would you do Barron for Gaucher?


I would avoid trading with Ducks. They have a lot of depth. When I designed their ACGM, I was like. They need flashy signings like Stamkos + Chandler Stephenson, while keeping Zegras and McTavish makes way more sense. Maybe a good RD would entice them, but they can also sign another UFA. It really does not make a lot of sense. (Maybe they do Kovacevic for a fourth round pick, lol, other than that, would not try trading with them this offseason.)
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 12 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
Yeah Mason is going nowhere

Where is your 1st?
24 avr. à 12 h 10
#10
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,188
Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Reinbacher was a reach at 5, McTavish was a steal at 3, start adding.


I mean, I get your point but McTavish was also a massive reach at 3 when the draft happened.
Andy_Dick et Jackaille a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 12 h 40
#11
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,439
Mentions "j'aime": 3,402
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
No. Barron is fringe NHL at this point and about to loose waivers protection, I'd give you a mid round pick for him tops.


He's not a fringe NHLer, he's shown he can play in the league. MTL only sent him down because of his waiver exemption status. Next year he'll be in the league full time
24 avr. à 12 h 51
#12
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,980
Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
Quoting: Subbanator7667
He's not a fringe NHLer, he's shown he can play in the league. MTL only sent him down because of his waiver exemption status. Next year he'll be in the league full time


Out of necessity perhaps, not because he played himself onto a roster spot.

Let me ask the question this way, would you knowingly give up Barron to acquire a Beck today? Because that's what Gaucher is, our Owen Beck future 3C.
24 avr. à 12 h 59
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 5,094
Mentions "j'aime": 2,375
Quoting: SevenLeg
I mean, I get your point but McTavish was also a massive reach at 3 when the draft happened.


I’ve noticed Ducks fans logic goes as follows.. only take into account every positive part of a Ducks player and focus solely on the bad of the opposing player.

You see Zegras didn’t have a bad year this season but he was hurt, out of rhythm and you must ignore every part of his 200 foot game this season. Think of the past, only.

Josh Anderson is terrible because of only this year and not because he’s been on a bad team trying to adjust his style with MSL giving weekly videos lessons. Don’t think of him scoring consistently at over a 20 goal pace per year as a power forward.

Rules for thee not for me should be their slogan on this forum,
Jackaille a aimé ceci.
24 avr. à 13 h 13
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,187
Mentions "j'aime": 9,411
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Reinbacher was a reach at 5, McTavish was a steal at 3, start adding.


While McTavish > Reinbacher, I wouldn’t exactly call McTavish a steal at 3. If a redraft happened right now I’m not sure he’d still go top 3
24 avr. à 13 h 33
#15
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,980
Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
Modifié 24 avr. à 13 h 47
Quoting: mv21227
While McTavish > Reinbacher, I wouldn’t exactly call McTavish a steal at 3. If a redraft happened right now I’m not sure he’d still go top 3


I'd say he still goes at least three. I could see Hughes jumping him, but I can also see Beniers falling off as he suffered from the sophmore slump while McTavish improved upon his rookie performance.
24 avr. à 13 h 36
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,187
Mentions "j'aime": 9,411
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I'd say he still goes at least three. I could see Hughes jumping him, but I can also see Beniers falling off as he suffered from the soft more slump while McTavish improved upon his rookie performance.


I’d keep Beniers slightly above him personally. I’d also put Johnston ahead of him as well
24 avr. à 13 h 40
#17
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: Andy_Dick
I’ve noticed Ducks fans logic goes as follows.. only take into account every positive part of a Ducks player and focus solely on the bad of the opposing player.

You see Zegras didn’t have a bad year this season but he was hurt, out of rhythm and you must ignore every part of his 200 foot game this season. Think of the past, only.

Josh Anderson is terrible because of only this year and not because he’s been on a bad team trying to adjust his style with MSL giving weekly videos lessons. Don’t think of him scoring consistently at over a 20 goal pace per year as a power forward.

Rules for thee not for me should be their slogan on this forum,


Josh Anderson has been bad for awhile. Also Zegras was fine this season when he was on the ice. You guys just don’t watch him and look only at box scores.
24 avr. à 17 h 20
#18
Prime Primeau
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,173
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Reinbacher was a reach at 5, McTavish was a steal at 3, start adding.


McTavish was a massive reach at 5 (bigger than Reinbacher). Reinbacher has looked like a solid pick so far. You can’t ignore that.

The difference between them is probably our first this year, who should be 5th OA, and Winnipeg’s first
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage