PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
Compensation maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports d’entrée en vigueur du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Coût par point
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
Historique des masses salariales
Compensation maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Jah1722
Jah1722
Membre depuis
3 janv. 2018
Équipe favorite
Ducks d'Anaheim
Messages dans les forums
4730
Messages par jour
2.6
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
dim. à 17 h 6
Sujet:
Finns and Toews
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Davidson</b></div><div>A third round pick is a bit much to give up for the cash being retained. A 4th or 5th is more inline with historical values.</div></div>
It’s not about the cash it’s about the retention slot, especially with the ducks. They’ll probably move a handful of guys and they may need all 3 retention slots. Klingberg is getting retained. If Henrique is moved he is too. Then Shattenkirk might need it depending on the suitors. Same with Kulikov.
Other teams might not have as much of a need to keep their retention slots tho.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 janv. à 13 h 17
Sujet:
Thoughts on these weird deals
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CapFriendlysFinest</b></div><div>Yes Mctavish has the upside of a 60-70 point player while Nylander is already there with an upside of 90-100 playing beside Z. Sure ;)</div></div>
McTavish is a 19 year old rookie averaging .6 PPG. Can’t say he’ll never get to 1 PPG. Nylander has just barely gotten there himself in his 7th season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 janv. à 23 h 49
Sujet:
Playoff success and futures for the other
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BCGuy</b></div><div>Kuzmenko just scored by the way! 19 goals on season half way through.. but what were you guys saying? Lol</div></div>
He’s not getting Morrow and a 1st. He’ll get a first and maybe another asset but won’t be of Morrow’s status. His stats are good but the most valuable thing about him is that every contender can afford his cap hit. It should drive his price up but not high end prospect and 1st. Drop the prospect to someone of lesser value and it’s closer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 janv. à 23 h 43
Sujet:
Subban for Weber
Where’d you get that idea? Lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 janv. à 18 h 21
Sujet:
TOR fixed 3rd liner
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>You don't want a 45 pt guy (with the Ducks no less) who would be 2nd on the team in face off % (for guys who are in the dot with any frequency) and is great defensively, plays on both the PP and PK, for under $3 mil against the cap?
Not to mention that he can slot anywhere into the top 9 on Left wing or at center, so if one of either Matthews or Tavares goes down with injury, you have a competent stand in.</div></div>
He doesn’t want anyone. There’s always something wrong with any player TOR acquires in a ACGM.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 janv. à 1 h 56
Sujet:
Meier McCabe
Teams will have to pay a premium to have ANA be the retention team. Their retention slots are more valuable than the actual retention money.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 janv. à 20 h 16
Sujet:
Let a fool dream Bedard Puljujarvi Cap Space for more
Puljujarvi for Zadina seems like a decent idea. 2 former high picks that could use a change of scenery. The rest of that trade idk about tho.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 janv. à 17 h 22
Sujet:
Practice Run
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Is the team acquiring Klingberg giving up a 1st? Then he is returning a 1st. You can argue Klingberg+, but a mid to late 2nd doesn't hold much value for a team that would be interested in acquiring him. Nothing involving Klingberg and that 3.5 million is worth giving up a 1st right now unless he's coming with like Troy Terry.</div></div>
Lol what a weak argument.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 janv. à 3 h 7
Sujet:
All in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>capsleafs447</b></div><div>Rielly is far better than Klingberg, and Fowler for that matter.
That seems like not close to enough for Domi.
The Willy-Willy deal is a lose-lose, and I don’t think either side would say yes. Definitely an interesting concept, though.</div></div>
You overrate Rielly. He is basically the left handed Klingberg. Awful defensively but he’s a bit better offensively. Fowler is light years better defensively but only average offensively. So like I said, adding Rielly to the ducks does not make them better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 22 h 26
Sujet:
All in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Matthewslover</b></div><div>Not surprised, Anaheim needs all the help they need to get Bedard. Cant be making any deals that vastly improve the team.</div></div>
Rielly is the left handed Klingberg. He doesn’t improve ANA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 15 h 38
Sujet:
Comtois klingberg
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nathaniel</b></div><div>Liljegren > Klingberg
Robertson > Comtois
And then we are also adding? Klingberg has been maybe the single worst defenseman this season with a baffling 0% EV defense, and Comtois is severely overrated. Liljegren is already one of our best defenseman and Robertson has shown flashes of brilliance. If he get's moved, it's for a more impactful player. Just an awful deal for the Leafs</div></div>
Robertson is just as overrated as Comtois if not more.
But this trade is bad for TOR.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 janv. à 11 h 22
Sujet:
They need to do something like this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Arizona is playing in a college arena, they aren't adding cap for an older player. Come on</div></div>
This gotta be the dumbest rhetoric out there. They don’t lose any ticket sales by being in that arena while they wait for their new one.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. à 23 h 42
Sujet:
They need to do something like this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MitchJr</b></div><div>Genuinely curious - why would Yotes entertain Chycrun for Chabot trade? I thought they were trading Chycrun for assets (picks, prospects) that are better suited to help them in 3-5 years when their competitive window opens (in theory). Plus Chabot has higher cap hit for longer term. Doesn't make sense?</div></div>
He’s signed long term at a decent age. The higher cap hit won’t matter as much when their window opens as the cap will go up. Chabot might be worth more too because of the long term contract.
And if we’re getting picky, does LAK want to pay 2 Dmen 11M and 8M respectively long term?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. à 23 h 15
Sujet:
They need to do something like this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I’d rather get more pieces and fill up like 3-4 spots</div></div>
With the 1st you have to take the trade you proposed.
But just for thought, Chychrun and Boyd/Fischer for Chabot and maybe something minor. Then you could use the extra money to fill out the other spots.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. à 22 h 48
Sujet:
They need to do something like this
Why not Chabot for Chychrun as a base trade? Seems like Chabot for Durzi is a bit lateral with play style but I get the other stuff is good too.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. à 20 h 6
Sujet:
Hurricanes Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>backpacker10</b></div><div>I think you’re chasing your tail on this. A player who is under contract for 8 years, which is the case in the above scenario, is far more valuable than one who can walk to free agency in 12 months.
Put another way, let’s say this ACGM had DeBrincat going to the Canes with no contract extension, instead of an eight year guarantee. Then yes, a 1st, 2nd, 3rd pick would be great compensation. But in the entirely fictional scenario that I proposed on this site, because after all that is the purpose of this site, the trade involved a superstar being signed and traded the Carolina on an eight year deal, in exchange for 2 players with no extension. Sounds a lot like Tkachuk for Huberdeau and Weegar. As a matter of fact, Huberdeau and Weegar are better than your guys.
My fingers are getting tired, but I’ll try one last stab at this to see if we can find common ground. If I am the Canes, I would never trade for 1 year of DeBrincat for the package I proposed. However, on an eight year sign and trade, the Sens can back up the Brinks truck, be it with the Canes or with the 30 other teams that will be making a call.
And in closing, in real life I hope we re-sign and keep DeBrincat for 8 years. And then sign Teravainen and Pesce as UFAs for free in 2024.
Have a great weekend.</div></div>
Except he’s not a UFA at the end of this season and current contract. He’s RFA. OTT still retained his rights for at least another season. Him signing an 8 year deal wouldn’t make his value sky rocket to Tkachuk value when he was just traded for less. His past trade is closer to current value than comparing him to Tkachuk because of the previously mentioned RFA status.
No matter how you want to frame it Debrincat’s value doesn’t skyrocket with an 8 year deal. It may rise some but not to the degree you’re trying to push.
Also Pesce is probably the best RHD (I could be forgetting someone) in the NHL behind Makar, there’s no reason to move him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. à 14 h 36
Sujet:
Go Ducks Go
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WranglerWranglin</b></div><div>Whats the biggest difference between 2020-21 Comtois and the last two seasons? I think he's a good enough player I think the Flames have too many like him already.</div></div>
He’s not allowed to play anymore.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. à 14 h 34
Sujet:
Hurricanes Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>backpacker10</b></div><div>Respectfully, there is no correlation between the Sens-Hawks trade and this one. In this scenario, DeBrincat comes with an 8-year extension Vs. being 1 year from RFA and 2 from UFA. This scenario is precisely the one that Calgary and Florida faced. An RFA who was one year from free agency in exchange for two very high end players on expiring contracts. The only exception is that Calgary also got a 1st round pick.
Using that logic, the Senators should be able to trade Brannstrom and a 2nd round pick for a #1 right winger because that’s what we got for Mark Stone.
If Pesce and Teravainen had term on their contracts then this would be a ridiculous offer. But in reality, they can both walk 18 months from now.
Finally, as mentioned in an earlier post, my preference would be to sign and keep the Cat long term.</div></div>
You mean there’s no correlation in a player being traded again after one season when he was still under contract control by the acquiring team? Makes zero sense.
Now you’ve gone even further down the hole with the Brannstrom comparison. It’s been multiple seasons since that trade and Bransstrom doesn’t even play in the NHL. But good one.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. à 13 h 12
Sujet:
Hurricanes Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>backpacker10</b></div><div>Both on expiring deals next year and set for free agency. This is the same model and assumption that was used for Florida-Calgary last year. Certainly I don’t think it’ll happen, but the value is more than fair. My preference is to resign DeBrincat to be honest, vs. Trading for 2 pending UFAs.</div></div>
Pesce and Tuevo are only worth a 1st 2nd and 3rd together? Can’t compare Debrincat to a Tkachuk trade when he was just traded himself in the offseason.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 janv. à 20 h 33
Sujet:
laf trade i would do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bogdown</b></div><div>Schneider is way better than Drysdale, Zegras is horrible defensively. Rather keep Laf and especially Schneider.</div></div>
Schneider is better than Drysdale? He plays about 3-4 minutes less a night vs lesser opponents. Schneider’s CF% is is worse than Drysdale’s. And he’s older.
And then when it comes to Laf and Z it’s not even close. Zegras is the better player be a pretty good margin.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. à 21 h 34
Sujet:
Panther blockbuster
3 years of Bennett gets less than half a season of Severson?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. à 19 h 7
Sujet:
Is Teuvo on the block
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>I guess its semantics but the upcoming summer could be classified as this summer as well meaning 2024 summer would be next summer.</div></div>
Tuevo is also up the same offseason so trading him because they have to pay those players isn’t the argument to move him. If they want to upgrade 2C maybe they move him to make money work and also not lose too many assets ie use the assets from a Tuevo trade to get the 2C.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 janv. à 16 h 2
Sujet:
If the lottery cashes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>I don't even think it's an Eakins or a system problem, the issue is lack of depth scoring. We have one scoring line in Zegras Terry Henrique right now. Dallas blender with the lines is trying to spread out the talent guys in an effort to get them better matchups. When you've got one line that gets all the Goals, and the Centers name isn't McDavid, it's easy to play against them because if you shut down that one line, you shut down the team.
Now maybe Dallas is hitting the random button too often and there's no chemistry being formed, but for whatever reason, Strome, Vatrano, Comtois, Silfverberg, Kling, etc are not scoring goals.</div></div>
The system is bad. They struggle in the Dzone which drains their energy for the Ozone. Neutral zone is pretty easy to get thru most nights too. Yes the depth is poor but it’s not this bad.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 janv. à 15 h 3
Sujet:
If the lottery cashes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>I didn't say he can't, I said it's a waste of talent, huge difference there my friend. Also where specifically did I say it wasn't a waste having him play wing in the WJC?</div></div>
Quote “And….”
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 janv. à 15 h 2
Sujet:
If the lottery cashes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Yes, true. I loathe the idea of moving either Zellweger or Mintyukov until they are KNOWN quantities, call it PTSD from the Shea Theodore debacle. Warren I would also be furious about loosing. The other two I could move.
I'm wondering though, IF we win 1OA and select Bedard, does it make sense to do a hockey trade, Chychrun for Zegras? Our center core would be Bedard, McTavish, Strome/Lundestom, (Insert 4th line C here) with a few good C prospects still in the tank.
The reason I say this is I am really not happy with what I am seeing from Zegras right now, and neither is the team. The bench was glaring daggers at him last night when he took the illegal equipment penalty at the end of the 2nd. The kid is starting to take a lot of bad penalties, and I think the team is getting rather fed up with his ****. I think being the cover athlete of NHL23 went to his head and he is more interested in being a star than part of the team right now. He started mouthing off to Benn in the third and got elbowed and yelled at by Benn, he looked shook, and no one on the bench even batted an eyelash at it. Letting him hear the branch creak underneath him might scare him straight again. It would be a young star for a young star, similar to the Drouin trade back in the day.</div></div>
They’re not trading Zegras. This is what happens when you take a young ultra competitive person and put him on an awful team. It’s part of why I’ve said from the beginning that actively tanking this season was a bad idea. Bringing back Eakins was an awful decision it’s showing. I will give Verbeek a little bit of slack because he wasn’t trying to actively tank with the roster tho.
As for Zellweger and Minty, neither of those guys are moved unless it’s for an elite player. They’ll be ducks I imagine. Zellweger probly at the end of the season. The other guys listed plus the couple of NCAA guy could be moved for roster improvements tho.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1