SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

celebrate the dream scenario

Créé par: zk97
Équipe: 2024-25 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 7 avr. 2024
Publié: 7 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Laval Rocket opening night lines:

Heineman-Gignac-Farrell
Anderson-Andersson-Mesar
Condotta-Beck-Simoneau
Cederqvist-Kidney-Perreault

Trudeau-Mailloux
Bisson-Reinbacher
Engstrom-Tourigny

Dobes
Petruzzelli
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2880 833 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
31 875 000 $
32 750 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Celebrini, Macklin
3975 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Petruzzelli, Keith [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Backup to Dobes (or tandem goalie)
TOR
  1. Norlinder, Mattias [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Marlies LD help
2.
MTL
  1. Celebrini, Aiden [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
Hoglander-Pettersson-Garland
Joshua-Miller-Boeser
Mikheyev-Blueger-Podkolzin
Ylonen-Suter-Lafferty
VAN
  1. Ylönen, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Bottom 6 reinforcements for Canucks
3.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Moser-Durzi
Valimaki-Kesselring
Harris-whoever
ARI
  1. Harris, Jordan
Détails additionnels:
They have a ridiculous amount of second round picks so swapping one for Harris who has second pair upside isn't a bad idea imo
4.
MTL
  1. Sillinger, Cole [Droits de RFA]
CBJ
  1. Barron, Justin
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
Sillinger nor Barron have spots in their team's future (most likely), so they get swapped to find a place in said future. Sillinger > Barron so Habs add the Jets 1st and a 4th
5.
MTL
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie
Détails additionnels:
Matheson-Andersson
Kylington-Miromanov
Okhotiuk-Pachal
CGY
  1. Matheson, Michael
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
I do wonder about a swap like this. Matheson and Weegar are both the same age, Matheson plays LD which the Flames lack, Weegar plays RD which the Habs lack. Weegar is probably better tho so the Habs would add, question is how much?
Also there's no issue of a logjam for the Flames, all their up and coming defensemen aren't something super special so they can be packaged and traded if need be
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 675 000 $74 144 583 $1 022 500 $3 977 500 $13 530 417 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Celebrini, Macklin
975 000 $975 000 $
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 avr. à 14 h 22
#1
Pain@suffering
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 234
Mentions "j'aime": 43
Toronto accepts
7 avr. à 14 h 29
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,451
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
LOL extreme lowball offer for Weegar.
7 avr. à 14 h 30
#3
Habswest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 22
I’ve never really thought about weegar or a similar swap but it would certainly solve a lot of our problems. I think I’d try to get Johnson over Sillinger though and I definitely think it’s possible especially with a new GM coming into Columbus.
7 avr. à 14 h 31
#4
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,643
Mentions "j'aime": 5,268
What gives you the idea that Sillinger does not have a place in the CBJ's future? They don't even have a GM right now so who knows what their future is? I'd have a hard time believing any team wouldn't have a spot in their lineup for the kind of player Sillinger is developing into though.
CaseyFlyman, squashmaple et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 14 h 52
#5
Démarrer sujet
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,933
Mentions "j'aime": 8,572
Quoting: MoxNix
LOL extreme lowball offer for Weegar.


Matheson is a better offensive player and Weegar is probably a better defensive player. Flames have Andersson as their two way presence and Matheson should mesh well with him on the first pair plus I'm not too sure about the difference in value between the two
7 avr. à 14 h 53
#6
Démarrer sujet
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,933
Mentions "j'aime": 8,572
Quoting: westcoasthabslifer
I’ve never really thought about weegar or a similar swap but it would certainly solve a lot of our problems. I think I’d try to get Johnson over Sillinger though and I definitely think it’s possible especially with a new GM coming into Columbus.


Johnson is probably more expensive, we have to remember Sillinger was picked 10th (I think) as well so he has upside, we just have to unlock it by getting him back with Tate McRae
7 avr. à 14 h 57
#7
Démarrer sujet
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,933
Mentions "j'aime": 8,572
Quoting: dk325
What gives you the idea that Sillinger does not have a place in the CBJ's future? They don't even have a GM right now so who knows what their future is? I'd have a hard time believing any team wouldn't have a spot in their lineup for the kind of player Sillinger is developing into though.


How I see it right now:

Gaudreau-Fantilli-Laine
Johnson-Catton*-Marchenko

* I have a good feeling they're picking a C this draft, whether it's Catton or Lindstrom
7 avr. à 15 h 5
#8
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,643
Mentions "j'aime": 5,268
Quoting: zk97
How I see it right now:

Gaudreau-Fantilli-Laine
Johnson-Catton*-Marchenko

* I have a good feeling they're picking a C this draft, whether it's Catton or Lindstrom


Sillinger still slots in as an exceptional defensive 3C if he continues down the path he's headed.
CaseyFlyman et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 15 h 20
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,163
Mentions "j'aime": 9,389
Quoting: zk97
Matheson is a better offensive player and Weegar is probably a better defensive player. Flames have Andersson as their two way presence and Matheson should mesh well with him on the first pair plus I'm not too sure about the difference in value between the two


The difference between Weegar and Matheson’s offensive ability is significantly lower than the difference between their defensive abilities. Weegar is an elite 2 way dman, probably a top ~20 dman in the whole league. Matheson is all offense and not very good defensively yet only has 7 more points (despite having more than double the PP points and playing 3 more minutes per game than Weegar does)
canucksfan43 a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 15 h 44
#10
Habswest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 66
Mentions "j'aime": 22
Quoting: mv21227
The difference between Weegar and Matheson’s offensive ability is significantly lower than the difference between their defensive abilities. Weegar is an elite 2 way dman, probably a top ~20 dman in the whole league. Matheson is all offense and not very good defensively yet only has 7 more points (despite having more than double the PP points and playing 3 more minutes per game than Weegar does)


It’s a nice theory (and I know it’s popular opinion) but Matheson plays among the toughest minutes in the league. Weegar doesn’t even make the list.
7 avr. à 15 h 55
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 1,748
Quoting: zk97
How I see it right now:

Gaudreau-Fantilli-Laine
Johnson-Catton*-Marchenko

* I have a good feeling they're picking a C this draft, whether it's Catton or Lindstrom


Quoting: dk325
Sillinger still slots in as an exceptional defensive 3C if he continues down the path he's headed.


Seconding this. Sillinger looks like he could be a perfect 3C for the next 15+ years already, and that looks like the floor. Definitely not a guy you trade, especially considering he's only 20 and has already played 215 NHL games with our club (more than Barron and Harris combined).
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
7 avr. à 17 h 15
#12
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,342
Mentions "j'aime": 10,666
Weegar has been playing LD for most of the year. Most of his time in CGY actually.
7 avr. à 17 h 39
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,475
Mentions "j'aime": 19,636
Quoting: zk97
Matheson is a better offensive player and Weegar is probably a better defensive player. Flames have Andersson as their two way presence and Matheson should mesh well with him on the first pair plus I'm not too sure about the difference in value between the two


Lmao Matheson is not better offensively, and to say Weegar is probably better defensively is like saying Suzuki is probably better than Mike Hoffman defensively.

As for pairing with Andersson, that would be terrible, Andersson is serviceable defensively but nothing amazing.

And as for value, Matheson is worth at most a 3rd, Whereas Weegar is a top 20 defenseman in the league
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage