SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big Off Season Changes

Créé par: TMLBRIAN
Équipe: 2024-25 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 2 avr. 2024
Publié: 2 avr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Still a young team. I can see Lindholm being a great fit. Jenner with 50% retention would have a lot of value to a competitor.

Thoughts?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 250 000 $
23 500 000 $
33 000 000 $
11 250 000 $
32 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
56 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Ritchie, Calum [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (COL)
COL
  1. Jenner, Boone (1 875 000 $ retained)
2.
CBJ
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
OTT
  1. Gudbranson, Erik (2 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de COL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de COL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NYR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PIT
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $85 218 333 $0 $4 200 000 $2 481 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 avr. à 4 h 6
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,664
Mentions "j'aime": 4,607
Huge no from the Avs.
MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 6 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,463
Mentions "j'aime": 964
Quoting: TJTwolf
Huge no from the Avs.


I don’t know why. Jenner fits their style and can put them over the top and have multiple yrs of a very friendly contract. But the Jackets are unlikely to trade him anyways so.
2 avr. à 6 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,107
Mentions "j'aime": 12,129
Trading a good 3rd pair D for a bad one seems bad for Ottawa
athrin a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 6 h 34
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,038
Mentions "j'aime": 1,576
ya no chance OTT trade a 24 yo for a 32 yo
2 avr. à 6 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 264
Mentions "j'aime": 117
Quoting: athrin
ya no chance OTT trade a 24 yo for a 32 yo


Unless their goal is to get heavier and some vet leadership. Bran is a bit on the lighter side for a D man while Guddy brings some time to answer the bell. Two very different players. Guddy would let brady be even more well brady lol
2 avr. à 6 h 59
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,038
Mentions "j'aime": 1,576
Quoting: Bricher33
Unless their goal is to get heavier and some vet leadership. Bran is a bit on the lighter side for a D man while Guddy brings some time to answer the bell. Two very different players. Guddy would let brady be even more well brady lol


trading a good D for a crap one is always a bad idea.
2 avr. à 7 h 11
#7
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,525
Mentions "j'aime": 4,452
Modifié 2 avr. à 10 h 42
- Boone is not, nor will be, available.

- Gudbranson is quietly having one of his best seasons. He’s overpaid, sure, but CBJ aren’t in a cap crunch, he’s been a good 3P guy, and yes - he’s big and provides some vet presence. Brannstrom doesn’t really move the needle too much as another B6 guy.

- At that price, I’d take Lindholm; but, he’s getting more money and term from someone else.

- KJ is going to get more. Besides that, more or less around where the RFA’s are going to be.

- One way or another, I highly doubt Elvis will be here next year.
Viqsi et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 8 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,633
Mentions "j'aime": 1,223
Can’t see Lindholm signing with the Blue Jackets; there is a group of 8 teams league wide (including Jackets) that I just don’t see being competitive anytime soon
2 avr. à 8 h 26
#9
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,360
The only possible reason to trade Gudbranson would be to remove his cap hit. Trade him with retention and we just lose that cap signing his replacement - and no, Brannstrom is not an adequate replacement for him, not defensively.

The only possible reason to trade Jenner at all would be if he's an absolute prerequisite for getting back a franchise player. He's too vital to this franchise's future otherwise - not directly, but as the platonic ideal of a mentor for those kids that are themselves the future.

That Lindholm contract would be great for the Jackets, but I would assume he's looking for more than that.
2 avr. à 8 h 28
#10
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,360
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
Trading a good 3rd pair D for a bad one seems bad for Ottawa

Good thing for Ottawa that that's not what's being proposed, then. Gudbranson's season of overworked misery here last year cast him in the role of a bad 2nd pair D; as a 3rd pair D he's surprisingly effective.

It doesn't make sense for Columbus regardless; we already have too many Brannstroms.
2 avr. à 8 h 37
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,107
Mentions "j'aime": 12,129
Quoting: Viqsi
Good thing for Ottawa that that's not what's being proposed, then. Gudbranson's season of overworked misery here last year cast him in the role of a bad 2nd pair D; as a 3rd pair D he's surprisingly effective.

It doesn't make sense for Columbus regardless; we already have too many Brannstroms.


He played here lmao Sens fans know how ineffective he is.
2 avr. à 8 h 42
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,664
Mentions "j'aime": 4,607
Quoting: Jacketsman61
I don’t know why. Jenner fits their style and can put them over the top and have multiple yrs of a very friendly contract. But the Jackets are unlikely to trade him anyways so.


2 years of a guy they really don't need for their top forward prospect (that they do need), a first and a second. That's why.
MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
2 avr. à 8 h 47
#13
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,360
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
He played here lmao Sens fans know how ineffective he is.

All I can say is that he's done better than that here, this year.
2 avr. à 9 h 56
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,201
Mentions "j'aime": 1,907
I'm actually all for moving Jenner, and that's a great return, but we all know it's not going to happen. Colorado probably doesn't have the interest; they've got their 2C now and in the future with Mittelstadt.

Gudbranson is more valuable to us internally, so until we need the cap space there's no reason to move him. I'd be happy with either trade, I just think they're unlikely. The leadership vacuum would be...interesting. Maybe that's a good thing?
squashmaple et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage