SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Finding a trade for Barron

Créé par: jonh514
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 13 févr. 2024
Publié: 13 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Not sure the Habs feel the same, but I think the Habs should explore a trade. What's a fair deal?
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
DAL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
J. Barron
3.
WPG
    J Barron
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de COL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de WSH
    2025
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de DET
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    2026
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2683 500 000 $78 547 916 $1 170 000 $4 285 000 $4 952 084 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    835 000 $835 000 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Stars de Dallas
    894 167 $894 167 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    812 500 $812 500 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
    918 333 $918 333 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    766 667 $766 667 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    890 000 $890 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    828 333 $828 333 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 févr. à 6 h 23
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 147
    Mentions "j'aime": 26
    Why would Dallas trade one of their top prospects for a 2nd? That makes no sense
    13 févr. à 6 h 34
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Jim_N1ll
    Why would Dallas trade one of their top prospects for a 2nd? That makes no sense


    And a young two way RHD...
    13 févr. à 6 h 50
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2016
    Messages: 147
    Mentions "j'aime": 26
    Ok, I think I get it now. These are just three possible trades for him. My bad, way I read it was this was some crazy four team trade with Montreal making out like bandits.

    I think the Stars trade is a pretty good one then. Helps fill each teams needs for sure.
    13 févr. à 7 h 6
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Jim_N1ll
    Ok, I think I get it now. These are just three possible trades for him. My bad, way I read it was this was some crazy four team trade with Montreal making out like bandits.

    I think the Stars trade is a pretty good one then. Helps fill each teams needs for sure.


    Thanks! Yeah these kinda posts are tricky. Bourque would be my #1 of the 3 options here
    13 févr. à 7 h 11
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 3,171
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,339
    Quoting: Jim_N1ll
    Ok, I think I get it now. These are just three possible trades for him. My bad, way I read it was this was some crazy four team trade with Montreal making out like bandits.

    I think the Stars trade is a pretty good one then. Helps fill each teams needs for sure.


    The Marcel Aubut school of trading -- trade the same player to multiple places. wink
    Jim_N1ll et jonh514 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 7 h 12
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
    The Marcel Aubut school of trading -- trade the same player to multiple places. wink


    Kent Hughes traded Jeff Petry twice!
    Mr_Canoehead a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 7 h 23
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 3,171
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,339
    Quoting: jonh514
    Kent Hughes traded Jeff Petry twice!


    But not at the same time to two different teams like Marcel.
    jonh514 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 7 h 29
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 3,171
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,339
    Separately, I doubt the Jets would trade Lambert though I do like the Barron brothers reunion storyline. They need good forwards on ELCs, as there are some big extensions kicking in during 24-25.
    jonh514 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 7 h 51
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 5,067
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,354
    Why is there an obsession lately with trading Barron?
    jonh514 et Blazingbat11 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 7 h 55
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,654
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,510
    Quoting: Just_A_Guess
    Why is there an obsession lately with trading Barron?


    Barron isn't part of the Habs long term future, may as well trade him now before he gets pushed down the lineup
    Aaron_Dell_Pickle et jonh514 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 1
    #11
    Tony Ferguson Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 547
    Mentions "j'aime": 348
    Winnipeg declines
    jonh514 et Windjammer a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 6
    #12
    Go Habs Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 10,667
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,092
    Quoting: Just_A_Guess
    Why is there an obsession lately with trading Barron?


    People have no patience and don't understand that time in the AHL can actually help a player develop.

    Matheson had 17 points in his first 84 games and was averaging over 20 minutes a game.
    Barron has 29 points in his first 87 games and is averaging over 17 minutes a game.

    We have the opportunity to develop an improved version of Matheson/Petry and get him to peak earlier in his career.
    We just need to keep working with him so he continues progressing.
    Shanesaw9, Just_A_Guess et jonh514 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 7
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 4,070
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
    I'd say brad lambert is an untouchable at this point. Just the fact that he's right shot with the speed and skill he has is just a non starter for 95% of trades. He likely has a shot to make the roster next year or year after and I don't think the jets would trade him without having a similar player to Lamberts skill in the system. He is a rare find for the jets in the system and they aren’t going to trade him before they know what they have at the nhl level.
    jonh514 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 13
    #14
    Habs 2010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 1,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 993
    I don't understand MTL's usage of Barron. Actually I don't understand their usage of their entire D-core really. I've been watching some questionable defensive efforts for some time now, so I wanted to dig into the numbers using natural stat trick and see what could be learned.

    MTL D pairings GF% + xGF% @ 5v5 (>150 min)
    1. Guhle - Kovacevic, 58.82 + 54.69 = 113.51%
    2. Struble - Kovacevic, 60 + 49.66 = 109.66%
    3. Xhekaj - *** , 55.56 + 48.59 = 104.59
    4. Matheson - Barron, 58.33 + 43.75 = 102.08%
    5. Guhle - Barron, 50 + 48.92 = 98.92%
    6. Harris - *** , 47.22 + 50.23 = 97.45
    7. Matheson - Savard, 50 + 47.32 = 97.32%
    8. Matheson - Guhle*, 50 + 44.18 = 94.18%

    *Playing on off side.
    ***Individual numbers, hasn't played >150 min on one pair.

    Of course this doesn't take into consideration things like matchups, usage, etc. however MTL in general is a negative goal differential team so I consider > 100% to be good no matter what your role is. That said, I have a few observations.

    1. Guhle - Kovacevic / Struble - Kovacevic / Xhekaj - Kovacevic have been MTL's best defensive pairs. Kovacevic is very underrated by fans and management.

    2. What is St. Louis' beef with Xhekaj this year? He barely gets used but he's done just fine other than some bad penalties (which other vets have been more guilty of).

    3. Matheson's best D partner is Barron, who isn't even playing in the NHL. Guhle - Barron also put up respectable results and is the most common pairing this season so they did this in the largest sample size. Why is Barron in Laval? What is management's plan for him exactly? Mailloux and Reinbacher are coming shouldn't we be getting a really good look at him in the NHL?

    4. Savard puts up some decent results with Matheson (no better than Barron) playing some tough matchups no doubt, however he is abysmal with anyone else on the team. I'd be trading him if he holds any value.

    5. Matheson - Guhle is not it, why are we forcing Guhle to play on his offside when there are RHD options that work just fine?

    Anyways all this to say based on these results, my healthy lineup without any trades next year would be:

    Guhle - Barron
    Matheson - Savard
    Xhekaj - Kovacevic
    Harris

    Struble - Mailloux
    Hutson - Reinbacher
    Trudeau - Tourigny
    Norlinder
    Just_A_Guess et ricochetii a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 21
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 5,067
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,354
    Quoting: Campabee
    Barron isn't part of the Habs long term future, may as well trade him now before he gets pushed down the lineup


    How is he not? There are 3 RD positions to fill... Reinbacher, Mailloux, Barron. We trade him now, we get to start the search for his replacement. Or we keep him and work on filling the other gaps in the roster.
    ricochetii et KentMcNally a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 25
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 5,067
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,354
    Quoting: ricochetii
    People have no patience and don't understand that time in the AHL can actually help a player develop.

    Matheson had 17 points in his first 84 games and was averaging over 20 minutes a game.
    Barron has 29 points in his first 87 games and is averaging over 17 minutes a game.

    We have the opportunity to develop an improved version of Matheson/Petry and get him to peak earlier in his career.
    We just need to keep working with him so he continues progressing.


    I think rather highly of him tbh. Reinbacher, Mailloux, Barron on the right side for the next 5-10 looks great to me. In fact, our D core is basically set for the next 5-10 on both sides. A splashy & flashy top 6 offensive forward addition (Zegras-type for example), with the current depth of middle-bottom 6 prospects, and this team is looking wonderful imo.
    ricochetii et KentMcNally a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 46
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Mr_Canoehead
    Separately, I doubt the Jets would trade Lambert though I do like the Barron brothers reunion storyline. They need good forwards on ELCs, as there are some big extensions kicking in during 24-25.


    It's a fair point, but you have a few good young forwards like Barlow coming up, so... maybe? The average age of the jets seems to be like 29-30, so I would expect they can more easily attract some free agents for the bottom 5. Top 7 forwards seems pretty set.
    Mr_Canoehead a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 47
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Just_A_Guess
    Why is there an obsession lately with trading Barron?


    I'm not obsessed. I just think we need some forwards with top 6 potential more than we need defenders, and if I'm honest I want them to call Mailloux up, more than I want Barron to get another shot.
    Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 48
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Campabee
    Barron isn't part of the Habs long term future, may as well trade him now before he gets pushed down the lineup


    I'm not 100% there, but I AM getting there. I don't like how he's responded since being sent down. He should be hungrier than this.
    Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 8 h 48
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Aaron_Dell_Pickle
    Winnipeg declines


    OK.
    13 févr. à 8 h 52
    #21
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: ricochetii
    People have no patience and don't understand that time in the AHL can actually help a player develop.

    Matheson had 17 points in his first 84 games and was averaging over 20 minutes a game.
    Barron has 29 points in his first 87 games and is averaging over 17 minutes a game.

    We have the opportunity to develop an improved version of Matheson/Petry and get him to peak earlier in his career.
    We just need to keep working with him so he continues progressing.


    Like I said in another exchange, I am not opposed to keeping him, I am just trying to balance the fact that:

    1) I see the Habs calling up Mailloux over Barron if Guhle is out
    2) I see Reinbacher coming over after the TDL
    3) I see the Habs seriously considering drafting a D at the draft if that's the BPA, and trading one of your prospect defenders for a forward like Bourque, makes that more palatable

    Be honest. Would you call up Mailloux or Barron if Guhle is out?
    13 févr. à 8 h 55
    #22
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Howie
    I'd say brad lambert is an untouchable at this point. Just the fact that he's right shot with the speed and skill he has is just a non starter for 95% of trades. He likely has a shot to make the roster next year or year after and I don't think the jets would trade him without having a similar player to Lamberts skill in the system. He is a rare find for the jets in the system and they aren’t going to trade him before they know what they have at the nhl level.


    OK. To be fair I don't know that much about him, except that he slipped a whole lot in the draft. Glad to hear he put it back on the rails. I see him as a lower value prospect than Bourque, but that may be my own lack of info and bias. I am trying to trade for a 2nd line forward, if I am asking for a clear 1st line superstar, I apologize!
    13 févr. à 8 h 57
    #23
    Démarrer sujet
    HuGo is a Boss GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2021
    Messages: 7,160
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,130
    Quoting: Just_A_Guess
    How is he not? There are 3 RD positions to fill... Reinbacher, Mailloux, Barron. We trade him now, we get to start the search for his replacement. Or we keep him and work on filling the other gaps in the roster.


    Levshunov & Parekh look pretty good and at least one should be available... just saying.
    Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 9 h 2
    #24
    Go Habs Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 10,667
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,092
    Quoting: Shanesaw9
    I don't understand MTL's usage of Barron. Actually I don't understand their usage of their entire D-core really. I've been watching some questionable defensive efforts for some time now, so I wanted to dig into the numbers using natural stat trick and see what could be learned.

    MTL D pairings GF% + xGF% 5v5 (>150 min)
    1. Guhle - Kovacevic, 58.82 + 54.69 = 113.51%
    2. Struble - Kovacevic, 60 + 49.66 = 109.66%
    3. Xhekaj - *** , 55.56 + 48.59 = 104.59
    4. Matheson - Barron, 58.33 + 43.75 = 102.08%
    5. Guhle - Barron, 50 + 48.92 = 98.92%
    6. Harris - *** , 47.22 + 50.23 = 97.45
    7. Matheson - Savard, 50 + 47.32 = 97.32%
    8. Matheson - Guhle*, 50 + 44.18 = 94.18%

    *Playing on off side.
    ***Individual numbers, hasn't played >150 min on one pair.

    Of course this doesn't take into consideration things like matchups, usage, etc. however MTL in general is a negative goal differential team so I consider > 100% to be good no matter what your role is. That said, I have a few observations.

    1. Guhle - Kovacevic / Struble - Kovacevic / Xhekaj - Kovacevic have been MTL's best defensive pairs. Kovacevic is very underrated by fans and management.

    2. What is St. Louis' beef with Xhekaj this year? He barely gets used but he's done just fine other than some bad penalties (which other vets have been more guilty of).

    3. Matheson's best D partner is Barron, who isn't even playing in the NHL. Guhle - Barron also put up respectable results and is the most common pairing this season so they did this in the largest sample size. Why is Barron in Laval? What is management's plan for him exactly? Mailloux and Reinbacher are coming shouldn't we be getting a really good look at him in the NHL?

    4. Savard puts up some decent results with Matheson (no better than Barron) playing some tough matchups no doubt, however he is abysmal with anyone else on the team. I'd be trading him if he holds any value.

    5. Matheson - Guhle is not it, why are we forcing Guhle to play on his offside when there are RHD options that work just fine?

    Anyways all this to say based on these results, my healthy lineup without any trades next year would be:

    Guhle - Barron
    Matheson - Savard
    Xhekaj - Kovacevic
    Harris

    Struble - Mailloux
    Hutson - Reinbacher
    Trudeau - Tourigny
    Norlinder


    If I'm giving MSL the benefit of the doubt, I see the deployment as a form of stress test. Increase usage and responsibility slowly until a player breaks, then address what was revealed during that time.
    If I'm looking at it in a less positive light, MSL (and staff) have a propensity to make decisions based on visible errors, in some kind of a "3 strikes and you're out" methodology.

    Barron saw increased usage this year and actually had a long leash. He was showing improvement. Miscues did pile up (as should be expected), but was he pulled to address them or punish them?
    Same with Xhekaj, only he seemed to have a shorter leash, but that may simply be because there were less expectations for him beyond controlling his aggression.

    Kovacevic is indeed underrated. With only 125 games of experience and improved performance despite less favorable deployment, I'd like to see him rewarded with more playing time. I feel like he's being dismissed too easily as a potential mainstay after Savard's departure.
    It's a numbers game with his age and our depth coming up, but he deserves more opportunity.

    Struble is in a similar position. He's excelling but the numbers don't necessarily support it. He's passing the eye test with flying colors though. The St Louis game might have been his first real noticeable blunder of the season, and he'll learn from that.

    Harris on the other hand has slipped this year. Injuries have been a factor but he's getting less usage and better deployment and still producing worse results.

    We need to clear room on our blue line to give these players more time to develop. Savard out. One of Struble, Harris, Xhekaj out. More minutes and less rotation for everyone else.
    Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
    13 févr. à 9 h 8
    #25
    Go Habs Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 10,667
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,092
    Quoting: jonh514
    Like I said in another exchange, I am not opposed to keeping him, I am just trying to balance the fact that:

    1) I see the Habs calling up Mailloux over Barron if Guhle is out
    2) I see Reinbacher coming over after the TDL
    3) I see the Habs seriously considering drafting a D at the draft if that's the BPA, and trading one of your prospect defenders for a forward like Bourque, makes that more palatable

    Be honest. Would you call up Mailloux or Barron if Guhle is out?


    Barron should be brought up, but I wouldn't be opposed to Mailloux. The only reason for that however, is that I don't want there to be a media circus if Mailloux makes the team next season. Get it out of the way this year.

    Matheson - Kovacevic
    Xhekaj - Savard
    Struble - Barron

    Let Kovacevic play more either to evaluate him or showcase him for a trade.
    Savard babysits Xhekaj.
    Struble can be a reliable partner for Barron that does the heavy defensive work.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage