SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Losing eight out of eleven leads us to this

Créé par: Pens3lieve
Équipe: 2023-24 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2024
Publié: 27 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Lekkerimäki, Jonathan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Guentzel, Jake (3 000 000 $ retained)
  2. White, Colin
Détails additionnels:
3rd team could retain 25% meaning JG would be $1.5M on the cap
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
3.
PIT
  1. Clarke, Graeme
  2. Málek, Jakub [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
3rd is conditional. upgrades to a 2nd if NJD advances to the ECF.
NJD
  1. Nedeljkovic, Alex (750 000 $ retained)
  2. Nieto, Matt
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $77 102 675 $0 $0 $6 397 325 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
785 000 $785 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance475 000 $$475K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 janv. à 15 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,082
Mentions "j'aime": 9,342
You aren’t getting Lekkerimaki
27 janv. à 15 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,372
Mentions "j'aime": 2,239
Devils don't need the retention. Probably wouldn't go with the ECF condition. Don't need Nieto either.
SomeonesOffended et Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 16 h 15
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,576
Mentions "j'aime": 732
I don't believe Lekkerimäki is completely off the table, but if he is traded it will be for a younger player with term or RFA status, not UFA.
27 janv. à 16 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,288
Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
Deadline rentals don't get the kind of return you have here for Guentzel, even the best players available.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 16 h 29
#5
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,877
Mentions "j'aime": 3,127
1st+2nd+3rd for Pettersson+Ned
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 16 h 32
#6
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,009
Mentions "j'aime": 1,484
Quoting: mv21227
You aren’t getting Lekkerimaki


Quoting: Reason
I don't believe Lekkerimäki is completely off the table, but if he is traded it will be for a younger player with term or RFA status, not UFA.


If VAN (or any team honestly) acquires Guentzel, they’ll probably try to resign him

Quoting: Byrr
Deadline rentals don't get the kind of return you have here for Guentzel, even the best players available.


Go back and check last deadlines…as I’ve done… there are several lesser quality players that got most of that… plus Guentzel is the only major winger available
27 janv. à 16 h 32
#7
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,009
Mentions "j'aime": 1,484
Quoting: dgibb10
1st+2nd+3rd for Pettersson+Ned


Ahh old friend… I liked the last offer better even tho I can’t remember it all lol 😂
27 janv. à 16 h 37
#8
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,877
Mentions "j'aime": 3,127
Quoting: Pens3lieve
Ahh old friend… I liked the last offer better even tho I can’t remember it all lol 😂


I’ve made a lot of offers for Pettersson lol so I don’t really remember either. All in the same range/approximate value. Really just about finding pieces that work for both Pitt and Jersey tbh (of course I’m not the GM so it all means nothing but oh well
SomeonesOffended et Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 16 h 49
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,288
Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
Modifié 27 janv. à 17 h 2
Quoting: Pens3lieve
If VAN (or any team honestly) acquires Guentzel, they’ll probably try to resign him



Go back and check last deadlines…as I’ve done… there are several lesser quality players that got most of that… plus Guentzel is the only major winger available


By all means list them here. What you might notice is that the best players available in any given season all fetch around the same price across seasons, it doesn't matter how good they are compared to each other just that they are the best available. The only ones who fetch this kind of price are ones who have either term or extensions in place upon being traded. The idea that Guentzel is the only 'major winger' available is non-sense too. Tarasenko and Toffoli aren't all that far behind him in scoring while playing a lot less ice time. Pacioretty has had a good start in Washington too after not playing for 2 seasons. He should be expected to keep on improving.
27 janv. à 17 h 51
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,631
Mentions "j'aime": 547
Quoting: Byrr
By all means list them here. What you might notice is that the best players available in any given season all fetch around the same price across seasons, it doesn't matter how good they are compared to each other just that they are the best available. The only ones who fetch this kind of price are ones who have either term or extensions in place upon being traded. The idea that Guentzel is the only 'major winger' available is non-sense too. Tarasenko and Toffoli aren't all that far behind him in scoring while playing a lot less ice time. Pacioretty has had a good start in Washington too after not playing for 2 seasons. He should be expected to keep on improving.


That is not true at all lol. Giroux was a pending UFA and got a 1st, a 3rd, and top prospect. And that was with Giroux having a NMC and picking where he went.
SomeonesOffended et Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 18 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,288
Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
Modifié 27 janv. à 19 h 15
Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
That is not true at all lol. Giroux was a pending UFA and got a 1st, a 3rd, and top prospect. And that was with Giroux having a NMC and picking where he went.


Which would be significantly less than what is shown here. Calling Tippett a 'top prospect' at that point is a stretch. It was his 3rd NHL season and he had never had much success. He wasn't even eligible for Calder consideration anymore. To turn this into the Giroux trade, you'd be dropping the 2nd to a 3rd and taking Lekkerimäki, who might be the biggest piece of the trade on the Vancouver side, out entirely and delaying the 1st round pick. That's the gap and it's a very significant leap.
27 janv. à 20 h 5
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,789
Mentions "j'aime": 1,208
This might sound depressing but I have a feeling Canucks might do this deal with the Penguins.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 1 h 4
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,631
Mentions "j'aime": 547
Quoting: Byrr
Which would be significantly less than what is shown here. Calling Tippett a 'top prospect' at that point is a stretch. It was his 3rd NHL season and he had never had much success. He wasn't even eligible for Calder consideration anymore. To turn this into the Giroux trade, you'd be dropping the 2nd to a 3rd and taking Lekkerimäki, who might be the biggest piece of the trade on the Vancouver side, out entirely and delaying the 1st round pick. That's the gap and it's a very significant leap.


Because Giroux had significantly less value for a multitude of reasons. Giroux was 34 at the time of the trade, Jake would be 29. Giroux had a full NMC so the flyers had very little leverage. Jake has a 12 team NTC so there would absolutely be bidding war for him. Jake already has more goals and more points in 12 less games than Giroux has at the time of trade. Tippet absolutely was a top prospect. He was only 21 or just turned 22 at the time of the trade and was already getting significant nhl time. It was also only his 2nd nhl season. He played 7 games, which doesn’t count as an nhl season. Then he played 40 something games the following season which was considered his rookie season. So to sum it up, the reason there’s a significant leap in this trade to the Giroux trade is because you’re getting a better player with much more trade value.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
28 janv. à 1 h 17
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,288
Mentions "j'aime": 3,037
Modifié 28 janv. à 1 h 33
Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
Because Giroux had significantly less value for a multitude of reasons. Giroux was 34 at the time of the trade, Jake would be 29. Giroux had a full NMC so the flyers had very little leverage. Jake has a 12 team NTC so there would absolutely be bidding war for him. Jake already has more goals and more points in 12 less games than Giroux has at the time of trade. Tippet absolutely was a top prospect. He was only 21 or just turned 22 at the time of the trade and was already getting significant nhl time. It was also only his 2nd nhl season. He played 7 games, which doesn’t count as an nhl season. Then he played 40 something games the following season which was considered his rookie season. So to sum it up, the reason there’s a significant leap in this trade to the Giroux trade is because you’re getting a better player with much more trade value.


And the part you ignored completely is that better players don't necessarily get more from season to season at the deadline. The best players available are always worth in the same ballpark regardless of how they might compare to each other across seasons. Short of having term or an extension in place Guentzel is just the best winger available, not a player who is better than XYZ from part seasons. Use the Giroux example and then go back and look for players who got significantly more than him at the deadline, like this trade, who didn't have term of some fashion in place when traded.

To give you an example this trade highly resembles the Timo Meier trade to New Jersey last season. Meier was the top winger and a player of Guentzel's caliber, etc. He was traded as an RFA, with a minimum of 2 seasons, to the Devils. Term is what pushed his value up to this level.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage