SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Who says No

Créé par: Kozy87
Publié: 26 janv. à 16 h 25
Plafond salarial: 83 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 83/192 (43%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a rempli les différents critères exigés par le registraire central de la LNH.

Logo de Canadiens de MontréalCanadiens de Montréal

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Monahan, SeanCanadiens de MontréalLNH-1 985 000 $011---48132134--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Stanley, LoganJets de WinnipegLNH-1 000 000 $011---7000--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial4 504 167 $2346734916
Variation985 000 $000000
Final5 489 167 $ (↑)2346734916-13-21-34

Logo de Jets de WinnipegJets de Winnipeg

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Stanley, LoganJets de WinnipegLNH-432 292 $011---7000--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Monahan, SeanCanadiens de MontréalLNH-858 099 $011---48132134--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial1 186 376 $2345603611
Variation-425 807 $000000
Final760 569 $ (↓)2345603611132134
26 janv. à 16 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 24
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Montreal, That’s almost no value for Montreal.
BigOlJetAirliner, Dutchies, Campabee and 2 others a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 16 h 44
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,276
Mentions "j'aime": 413
Montreal don't need any defense prospect or player and will look for forward so this is an no.
Campabee et Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 16 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2023
Messages: 885
Mentions "j'aime": 292
missing a first round pick
Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 17 h 31
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,934
Mentions "j'aime": 7,080
Winnipeg says no. Stanley is depth. Monahan serves no purpose for Winnipeg.
26 janv. à 17 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 39
Mentions "j'aime": 17
any chance ur stuff was laced with pcp?
26 janv. à 18 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 9,421
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg says no. Stanley is depth. Monahan serves no purpose for Winnipeg.


I know your schtick is to decline everything involving Winnipeg, but Monahan at worst is much better depth than a horrible AHL caliber dman like Stanley
BigOlJetAirliner, Campabee, Just_A_Guess and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 18 h 28
#7
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,188
Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
No way the homer Winnipeg guy said no to that.
Campabee et Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 18 h 36
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,934
Mentions "j'aime": 7,080
Quoting: mv21227
I know your schtick is to decline everything involving Winnipeg, but Monahan at worst is much better depth than a horrible AHL caliber dman like Stanley


Winnipeg has Stanley to use as a healthy scratch. They have no incentive to replace him with another healthy scratch for Winnipeg, in Monahan.
26 janv. à 18 h 40
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,200
Mentions "j'aime": 9,421
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg has Stanley to use as a healthy scratch. They have no incentive to replace him with another healthy scratch for Winnipeg, in Monahan.


Monahan would help improve the Jets 23rd ranked PP, and can still be a solid 3rd liner for them. Absolute worst case scenario he’s an infinite times better depth option than Stanley, who’s absolutely awful
Kozy87, Dom1422, Campabee and 2 others a aimé ceci.
26 janv. à 18 h 54
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,934
Mentions "j'aime": 7,080
Quoting: mv21227
Monahan would help improve the Jets 23rd ranked PP, and can still be a solid 3rd liner for them. Absolute worst case scenario he’s an infinite times better depth option than Stanley, who’s absolutely awful


No, Monahan can't. He's not a play driver at 5 on 5 or on the PP. He's a net front guy on the PP, that relies on others to do the work for him. That isn't Winnipeg's problem on the PP.

He also isn't good enough defensively to play on the 3rd line or in the bottom 6 for that matter. Winnipeg uses their 3rd line to play against the opposition's top line quite a bit. Something Monahan isn't at all suited for. All of Winnipeg's current 3rd line, Lowry, Niederreiter and Appleton are better in that role than Monahan could ever hope to be and produce about the same points even strength.

Leaving Monahan fighting for 4th line time.

Stanley isn't much, but the Jets already know how to shelter him. Why mess with one of the best teams with one of the best defenses in the league to add a player that is worthless to them.

The Jets just stick with the devil they know.
26 janv. à 20 h 16
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 285
Quoting: Windjammer
No, Monahan can't. He's not a play driver at 5 on 5 or on the PP. He's a net front guy on the PP, that relies on others to do the work for him. That isn't Winnipeg's problem on the PP.

He also isn't good enough defensively to play on the 3rd line or in the bottom 6 for that matter. Winnipeg uses their 3rd line to play against the opposition's top line quite a bit. Something Monahan isn't at all suited for. All of Winnipeg's current 3rd line, Lowry, Niederreiter and Appleton are better in that role than Monahan could ever hope to be and produce about the same points even strength.

Leaving Monahan fighting for 4th line time.

Stanley isn't much, but the Jets already know how to shelter him. Why mess with one of the best teams with one of the best defenses in the league to add a player that is worthless to them.

The Jets just stick with the devil they know.


You didn’t actually write a paragraph trying to explain your terrible take did you? Btw nobody reading that.
Campabee et Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
27 janv. à 21 h 6
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg has Stanley to use as a healthy scratch. They have no incentive to replace him with another healthy scratch for Winnipeg, in Monahan.


Quoting: Windjammer
No, Monahan can't. He's not a play driver at 5 on 5 or on the PP. He's a net front guy on the PP, that relies on others to do the work for him. That isn't Winnipeg's problem on the PP.

He also isn't good enough defensively to play on the 3rd line or in the bottom 6 for that matter. Winnipeg uses their 3rd line to play against the opposition's top line quite a bit. Something Monahan isn't at all suited for. All of Winnipeg's current 3rd line, Lowry, Niederreiter and Appleton are better in that role than Monahan could ever hope to be and produce about the same points even strength.

Leaving Monahan fighting for 4th line time.

Stanley isn't much, but the Jets already know how to shelter him. Why mess with one of the best teams with one of the best defenses in the league to add a player that is worthless to them.

The Jets just stick with the devil they know.


My friend… I’ve never seen such a delusional fan in my life. Any GM who says no to monahan for Logan goddamn Stanley is getting fired on the spot.
28 janv. à 13 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,539
Mentions "j'aime": 3,205
This has to be a first for capfriendly. A Monahan deal that actually undervalues him rather than grossly overvaluing him.
26 févr. à 20 h 0
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg says no.
Quoting: Windjammer
No, Monahan can't. He's not a play driver at 5 on 5 or on the PP. He's a net front guy on the PP, that relies on others to do the work for him. That isn't Winnipeg's problem on the PP.

He also isn't good enough defensively... All of Winnipeg's current 3rd line, Lowry, Niederreiter and Appleton are better in that role than Monahan could ever hope to be and produce about the same points even strength.

Leaving Monahan fighting for 4th line time.



Monahan serves no purpose for Winnipeg.


I've been thinking about you my friend, how do you feel about Monahan now?
26 févr. à 20 h 4
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,934
Mentions "j'aime": 7,080
Quoting: ThundyBlundy
Monahan serves no purpose for Winnipeg.

I've been thinking about you my friend, how do you feel about Monahan now?


I'm still not sold on him. The Jets haven't improved really since they got him, so he's about what I expected. Not much of an improvement over anything the Jets didn't already have.
26 févr. à 20 h 16
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: Windjammer
I'm still not sold on him. The Jets haven't improved really since they got him, so he's about what I expected. Not much of an improvement over anything the Jets didn't already have.


brother he scored 25% of the Jets goals since joining the team... 21% if you count last game where he was out sick... I don't believe you don't think he's made the jets any better.
26 févr. à 22 h 2
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,934
Mentions "j'aime": 7,080
Quoting: ThundyBlundy
brother he scored 25% of the Jets goals since joining the team... 21% if you count last game where he was out sick... I don't believe you don't think he's made the jets any better.


Well I'm just looking at record. The Jets aren't any better since he arrived, not that it is his fault, but he hasn't made the Jets better yet, which is as I said.

On the plus side, It took him a few games to get going, but I have been impressed with his scoring so far.

It's still early, early days though.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage