SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Friedman says Kings add a goalie

Créé par: Wreckless
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2024
Publié: 19 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
2.
MTL
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
Avs pay more to get rid of Johansen contract.
Basing an early 2nd rounder.
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
Lottery protected 1st and 3rd.
See the Dach and Newhook trades from the previous 2 years.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2583 500 000 $78 945 416 $1 170 000 $4 277 500 $4 554 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 janv. à 13 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,322
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Too much for Allen and not enough for zegras
HabsCanucks et noted a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 34
#2
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
LA can't afford jake Allen at full value, They can barely afford him at 50% retained. And no backup is getting a 2nd round pick in return.
19 janv. à 13 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,082
Mentions "j'aime": 822
Quoting: MoSeider53
LA can't afford jake Allen at full value, They can barely afford him at 50% retained. And no backup is getting a 2nd round pick in return.


The goalie market is extremely high right now. Don’t be shocked to see guys like Allen traded for 2nd round picks.
The need of a position determines the value. Goalies didn’t return a lot in previous years because not many teams were looking to acquire them via trade. But now a there’s probably at least 10 teams in need of a goalie so the market changes.
19 janv. à 13 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
I think Monahan can at least pass the puck well but its not enough of an upgrade over RyJo to spend a 1st on.
M96N29, Newgod77 et Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 45
#5
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Quoting: Ryminister_92
The goalie market is extremely high right now. Don’t be shocked to see guys like Allen traded for 2nd round picks.
The need of a position determines the value. Goalies didn’t return a lot in previous years because not many teams were looking to acquire them via trade. But now a there’s probably at least 10 teams in need of a goalie so the market changes.


Most teams looking for a goalie are also up against the cap. Jake Allen makes $3,850,000 for one more year. There's a strong possibility of teams taking on James Reimer for $750,000 or Alex Lyon $900,000 for one more year then Jake Allen at full alue.
19 janv. à 13 h 48
#6
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,422
Mentions "j'aime": 2,903
So if we compare the Dach and Newhook trades to a Zegras like you said that would mean you’d have to combine their value to get Zegras. You take the 2 best seasons of Dach and Newhook you get around 50 points. Zegras has two 65 point seasons.

But you already know that’s not even close to getting Zegras.
GeneralLandro et GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 48
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,916
Mentions "j'aime": 12,249
Joke of an offer for a guy who isn’t being shopped nor asked for a trade

Anaheim never answers a Montreal number again
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 50
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,711
Mentions "j'aime": 6,215
Jake Allen is not the goaltender the Kings will be targeting. He's worse than both guys the Kings have already.
19 janv. à 13 h 50
#9
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
I think Monahan can at least pass the puck well but its not enough of an upgrade over RyJo to spend a 1st on.


Getting off the $4mm salary for Johansen next year is probably the biggest part of that deal. Plus it free up $2mm more cap space to add further rentals to improve depth for the cup run this year.
If the Avs don’t need the cap space, then they keep both, and the draft pick is probably lower, unless there’s another team who steps up to pay more.
It’ll be a straight auction unless some team gets creative like this. Time will tell what the highest picked offered ends up being and from who.
MeetYourMakar et Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 52
#10
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Jake Allen is not the goaltender the Kings will be targeting. He's worse than both guys the Kings have already.


We’ve been playing with basically a fully squad of rookie D for 2 years now. Allen’s stats don’t mean much. He’s a good goalie, and his contract for next year is reasonable.
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 54
#11
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: Jah1722
So if we compare the Dach and Newhook trades to a Zegras like you said that would mean you’d have to combine their value to get Zegras. You take the 2 best seasons of Dach and Newhook you get around 50 points. Zegras has two 65 point seasons.

But you already know that’s not even close to getting Zegras.


Easy to get points when you can’t play both sides of the ice, you’re playing on a brutally bad team, you get premium powerplay time, most of the offensive zone opportunities, and the best lines mates.

They’re all from the same draft class. Dach was taken 3rd over all and will probably end up the best of the bunch long term. Downside of Zegras is that now he’s over paid, and he’s only on a short term deal.
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 55
#12
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Jake Allen is not the goaltender the Kings will be targeting. He's worse than both guys the Kings have already.


Neither has a contract for next year. My guess is that would be the main reason. You can’t compare the stats. Habs are throwing our young D right into the fire and having them learn through experience. If Friedman says Kings are looking for a goalie, he’s not pulling that out of thin air.
19 janv. à 13 h 56
#13
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Joke of an offer for a guy who isn’t being shopped nor asked for a trade

Anaheim never answers a Montreal number again


Where there’s smoke, there is often fire.
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 56
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 3,623
Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
Kings probably should have addressed this in the summer rather than spending a bunch of assets and cap on a bottom 6 C.
Wreckless et Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 13 h 57
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,711
Mentions "j'aime": 6,215
Quoting: Wreckless
We’ve been playing with basically a fully squad of rookie D for 2 years now. Allen’s stats don’t mean much. He’s a good goalie, and his contract for next year is reasonable.


He doesn't do anything for the Kings this season, and next season the Kings have $22M+ in cap space. They're not looking to solve next season's problem's now.

They're either going to acquire a rental like Kevin Lankinen, or they're going all in on a guy like Saros or Gibson.
19 janv. à 13 h 58
#16
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: tkecanuck341
He doesn't do anything for the Kings this season, and next season the Kings have $22M+ in cap space. They're not looking to solve next season's problem's now.

They're either going to acquire a rental like Kevin Lankinen, or they're going all in on a guy like Saros or Gibson.


$22mm in cap space to sign 11 players. Including two goalies, and signing or replacing Arvidsson, Matt Roy, & Copley. It goes fast.
Who knows, it’s possible this is all happening because Talbot and Rittich are just asking for way too much.
Lankinen is totally unproven.
I also think Gibson could potentially be an interesting fit in a lot of places. Way more expensive though in what it would cost to get him, and it’s a big cap hit.
19 janv. à 14 h 6
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,916
Mentions "j'aime": 12,249
Quoting: Wreckless
Where there’s smoke, there is often fire.


When was the last time any ‘insider’ was correct on something with Anaheim? I can’t think of a time either
19 janv. à 14 h 12
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,711
Mentions "j'aime": 6,215
Quoting: Wreckless
$22mm in cap space to sign 11 players. Including two goalies, and signing or replacing Arvidsson, Matt Roy, & Copley. It goes fast.
Who knows, it’s possible this is all happening because Talbot and Rittich are just asking for way too much.
Lankinen is totally unproven.
I also think Gibson could potentially be an interesting fit in a lot of places. Way more expensive though in what it would cost to get him, and it’s a big cap hit.


Jake Allen is proven, but he problem is that he has proven to suck everywhere he has played, not just in Montreal. He's not the answer for next season.

Copley was unproven last season, and the Kings did well with him. Talbot was an inexpensive UFA, and the Kings are doing well with him. Rittich has played 6 NHL games this season. Not sure how he's asking for anything.

Lankinen is a solid 1B goaltender that has played well in a backup role, even on bad teams. You can't say the same about Allen. That's the type of short-term guy the Kings want to solidify goaltending this season.

Every team has a reasonable set aside budget for goaltending. The $5M that Saros makes or the $6.4M that Gibson makes is entirely reasonable for a starting goaltender. We're not talking about Bobrovsky's contract here. This season the Kings had to cheap out on goaltending. Next season, they don't have to.
19 janv. à 14 h 12
#19
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: GeneralLandro
When was the last time any ‘insider’ was correct on something with Anaheim? I can’t think of a time either


You do realize that trades don’t usually happen, right?
And you do understand what the point of this website is, right?
You said he’s not being shopped. And that he hasn’t asked for a trade.
Because you haven’t read either of those two things.
As if reading things would even make them a certainty that they be true.
Or their absence thus making either impossible.
You must think that agents and GMs talk about nothing all day then unless a trade happens.
Fair enough. Must be nice living in a headspace with such certainty…

The point of my post was that if a trade were to happen, based on recent experience, what might that look like?
You don’t need to agree with my presupposition. But it’s my post.
I’m spitballing.
R-E-LA-X.
19 janv. à 14 h 13
#20
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Jake Allen is proven, but he problem is that he has proven to suck everywhere he has played, not just in Montreal. He's not the answer for next season.

Copley was unproven last season, and the Kings did well with him. Talbot was an inexpensive UFA, and the Kings are doing well with him. Rittich has played 6 NHL games this season. Not sure how he's asking for anything.

Lankinen is a solid 1B goaltender that has played well in a backup role, even on bad teams. You can't say the same about Allen. That's the type of short-term guy the Kings want to solidify goaltending this season.

Every team has a reasonable set aside budget for goaltending. The $5M that Saros makes or the $6.4M that Gibson makes is entirely reasonable for a starting goaltender. We're not talking about Bobrovsky's contract here. This season the Kings had to cheap out on goaltending. Next season, they don't have to.


“proven to suck” 🤣🤣🤣

You’re entitled to your opinion, dude. Moving on.
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 14 h 19
#21
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,422
Mentions "j'aime": 2,903
Quoting: Wreckless
Easy to get points when you can’t play both sides of the ice, you’re playing on a brutally bad team, you get premium powerplay time, most of the offensive zone opportunities, and the best lines mates.

They’re all from the same draft class. Dach was taken 3rd over all and will probably end up the best of the bunch long term. Downside of Zegras is that now he’s over paid, and he’s only on a short term deal.


lol you just sound dumb at this point.
19 janv. à 14 h 24
#22
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: Jah1722
lol you just sound dumb at this point.


And when the weak minded can’t explain their reasons, they resort to insults, exposing their own insecurity.

Nice talking to you.
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 14 h 38
#23
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,422
Mentions "j'aime": 2,903
Quoting: Wreckless
And when the weak minded can’t explain their reasons, they resort to insults, exposing their own insecurity.

Nice talking to you.


You can’t take trolls fallacy arguments and get butthurt when called dumb. That’s weak minded.
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 16 h 1
#24
Démarrer sujet
Wreckless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,412
Mentions "j'aime": 445
Quoting: Mediumyeet
Kings probably should have addressed this in the summer rather than spending a bunch of assets and cap on a bottom 6 C.


If you think it’s bad now, wait until they’re retaining half his salary to try and move him… 🤣🤣🤣
Andy_Dick a aimé ceci.
19 janv. à 17 h 56
#25
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,239
Mentions "j'aime": 7,025
Quoting: Wreckless
Easy to get points when you can’t play both sides of the ice, you’re playing on a brutally bad team, you get premium powerplay time, most of the offensive zone opportunities, and the best lines mates.

They’re all from the same draft class. Dach was taken 3rd over all and will probably end up the best of the bunch long term. Downside of Zegras is that now he’s over paid, and he’s only on a short term deal.


Zegras isnt overpaid, and Dach won't still be playing by the time he hits 27, he may have had the highest ceiling but the guys been under the knife too many times and missed too many games. Chicago also punted on him because they had mishandled his development.

Colorado didn't have the time to wait for Newhook to develop into what they needed him to be.

This is why Montreal was able to acquire those players for the picks they paid, they were rehabilitation projects. Anaheim hasn't botched Zegras's development, he has a home on the roster that doesn't need to be vacated for someone else, and we don't have a problem making him a winger where he has less defensive responsibility, of which this season he had been playing the best defensive hockey of his career. We're developing him into a better 2 way player, which is a lot easier to do that to develop a two way player into an offensive threat.

And best line mates? You know how often he was put out their with Nick Delories or Sam Carrick? The only top line mate he's been out there with is Troy Terry who's a very good 2nd line winger.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage