SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

12 mill in LTIR

Créé par: dgibb10
Équipe: 2023-24 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 7 janv. 2024
Publié: 7 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
2.
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $80 217 500 $422 500 $5 482 500 $3 282 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $ (2 250 000 $$2M2 250 000 $$2M)
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 janv. à 13 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,289
Mentions "j'aime": 663
the 2nd gets you dickinson. Gonna have to add a little more to get mrazek too
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 13 h 38
#2
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: newman23
the 2nd gets you dickinson. Gonna have to add a little more to get mrazek too


I’d throw in a 4th if you’d like but I’ll need 50% retention on Dickinson just in case Siegs can come back before the playoffs. Would give us room to send down smith or miller and bring Siegs back into the lineup
7 janv. à 13 h 43
#3
Devils
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 362
Mentions "j'aime": 75
I’m not sure how interested the leafs are gonna be in moving Brodie with the position they’re in right now. However, if hes available we should go hard for him and move Dougie to LTIR until April.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 13 h 44
#4
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: DevilsFan69
I’m not sure how interested the leafs are gonna be in moving Brodie with the position they’re in right now. However, if hes available we should go hard for him and move Dougie to LTIR until April.


I wouldn’t know either but I’ve heard a lot of complaints from leafs fans and he’d free up cap for them to make other mives
7 janv. à 13 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,183
Mentions "j'aime": 18,356
I’d keep the picks honestly.
We have too many holes.
7 janv. à 13 h 50
#6
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I’d keep the picks honestly.
We have too many holes.


Sell toffoli 50% retained for a 1st+3rd then to get the picks back.

We need D and G this year more than toffoli even if he’s the better player. And it actually would gain us futures here
7 janv. à 13 h 51
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,796
Mentions "j'aime": 8,839
Said it the other day. Grizz for Bastian straight up. Still stands.

Sweeney won’t do it though.

Now if you want to talk Ullmark/Grizz, now would be the time. 🤷🏻‍♂️
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 13 h 53
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Vancouver traded Bouvellier for a 5th, so they could trade for Zadorov without salary going back to Calgary. The Grz deal would be something similar here
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 13 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,183
Mentions "j'aime": 18,356
Quoting: dgibb10
Sell toffoli 50% retained for a 1st+3rd then to get the picks back.

We need D and G this year more than toffoli even if he’s the better player. And it actually would gain us futures here


We needed a dman or two before the injuries. Now we need three. Save our ammo for summer acquisition.
7 janv. à 13 h 58
#10
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: Gofnut999
Said it the other day. Grizz for Bastian straight up. Still stands.

Sweeney won’t do it though.

Now if you want to talk Ullmark/Grizz, now would be the time. 🤷🏻‍♂️


If nosek’s timeline to come back is on track then sure I’d do that.
7 janv. à 13 h 59
#11
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: NHLfan10506
We needed a dman or two before the injuries. Now we need three. Save our ammo for summer acquisition.


So you’d just sell Toff and play for next year then?
7 janv. à 13 h 59
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,289
Mentions "j'aime": 663
Quoting: dgibb10
I’d throw in a 4th if you’d like but I’ll need 50% retention on Dickinson just in case Siegs can come back before the playoffs. Would give us room to send down smith or miller and bring Siegs back into the lineup


not too far off value wise but I think at this point chicago has so many picks stocked up that another 4th doesnt really do anything for them, theyd probably actually prefer to retain on both contracts to try to get max value back and accrue higher picks that they can use to try to trade up at the draft. Ideally I'd maybe want something like both guys at 50% and a 4th for 2 2nds.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 14 h 1
#13
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: newman23
not too far off value wise but I think at this point chicago has so many picks stocked up that another 4th doesnt really do anything for them, theyd probably actually prefer to retain on both contracts to try to get max value back and accrue higher picks that they can use to try to trade up at the draft. Ideally I'd maybe want something like both guys at 50% and a 4th for 2 2nds.


I’d go 2nd+3rd for Dickinson+Mrazek and 2 4ths with no retention on either if you like that?
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 14 h 2
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,183
Mentions "j'aime": 18,356
Quoting: dgibb10
So you’d just sell Toff and play for next year then?


No…wouldn’t pack it in yet. I would try to turn cap space into blueliners (either via waivers, taking cap casualties) or if we buy, make sure it’s someone with term
7 janv. à 14 h 3
#15
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: NHLfan10506
No…wouldn’t pack it in yet. I would try to turn cap space into blueliners (either via waivers, taking cap casualties) or if we buy, make sure it’s someone with term


That’s what I somewhat tried to do here with Brodie and Gryz
7 janv. à 14 h 6
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,183
Mentions "j'aime": 18,356
Quoting: dgibb10
That’s what I somewhat tried to do here with Brodie and Gryz


I like the Grz move. Would like Brodie at same price (grimace).

I do not think I would buy Dickinson or Mrazek. There are better options for less. I’d price em both around 5th round pick.
7 janv. à 14 h 9
#17
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I like the Grz move. Would like Brodie at same price (grimace).

I do not think I would buy Dickinson or Mrazek. There are better options for less. I’d price em both around 5th round pick.


I have Dickinson retained around a 2nd, Mrazek retained around a 3rd.

Without the retention the 3rd goes away
Panic76 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 14 h 11
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,289
Mentions "j'aime": 663
Quoting: dgibb10
I’d go 2nd+3rd for Dickinson+Mrazek and 2 4ths with no retention on either if you like that?


The values fine but if the hawks can retain and get more from another team they do that instead. Especially with all the injuries in chicago I think its gonna take quality over quantity to convinced kyle davidson to ship out his few healthy guys left
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 14 h 12
#19
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: newman23
The values fine but if the hawks can retain and get more from another team they do that instead. Especially with all the injuries in chicago I think its gonna take quality over quantity to convinced kyle davidson to ship out his few healthy guys left


Retaining probably just gets you a 2nd on Dickinson and a 3rd on Mrazek and limits you with no more retention spots on the year
7 janv. à 14 h 23
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,289
Mentions "j'aime": 663
Quoting: dgibb10
Retaining probably just gets you a 2nd on Dickinson and a 3rd on Mrazek and limits you with no more retention spots on the year


Yeah if thats the best they can get they definitely consider that but KD might also prefer to just keep them around. Theres not a lot of pressure to sell this year since the hawks are already a basement team with a bunch of picks and are short on roster players. Really the only other guy you'd use a retention spot on this deadline might be tyler johnson and at 2.5M I dont think he gets you more than dickinson or mrazek at lower cap hits anyway
dgibb10 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 14 h 36
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,531
Mentions "j'aime": 10,376
Hawks have 8 of their top 12 forwards on IR. Dickinson is literally their best F at the moment. He isn't going anywhere until most or all of those 8 guys on IR return - if the Hawks even trade him at all and don't just re-sign him. If the Hawks do end up trading him, it won't be for less than a 2nd. I imagine there will be multiple teams in on him if the Hawks do end up trading him, so Hawks should get their asking price if not a little more.

I'm not even certain the trade you proposed a few days ago would fly now considering the Hawks injury issues.

2nd+3rd+Vanacek for Dickinson and Mrazak (no retention)

But this is probably as good as it gets, and again, it's now going to be much closer to the TDL than now. Hawks just can't afford to lose another F.
dgibb10 et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 14 h 39
#22
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks have 8 of their top 12 forwards on IR. Dickinson is literally their best F at the moment. He isn't going anywhere until most or all of those 8 guys on IR return - if the Hawks even trade him at all and don't just re-sign him. If the Hawks do end up trading him, it won't be for less than a 2nd. I imagine there will be multiple teams in on him if the Hawks do end up trading him, so Hawks should get their asking price if not a little more.

I'm not even certain the trade you proposed a few days ago would fly now considering the Hawks injury issues.

2nd+3rd+Vanacek for Dickinson and Mrazak (no retention)

But this is probably as good as it gets, and again, it's now going to be much closer to the TDL than now. Hawks just can't afford to lose another F.


Absolutely fair. Maybe just a Mrazek for 3rd+Vanacek swap then for now and we revisit the Dickinson move at the deadline?
Hawksguy81 et Panic76 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 14 h 45
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,531
Mentions "j'aime": 10,376
Quoting: dgibb10
Absolutely fair. Maybe just a Mrazek for 3rd+Vanacek swap then for now and we revisit the Dickinson move at the deadline?


Hawks might pull the trigger on that Mrazak deal now. Assuming no other team offers up a 2nd if the Hawks are willing to retain. But I like getting a G back to fill the void in your offer.
7 janv. à 14 h 47
#24
Démarrer sujet
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,897
Mentions "j'aime": 3,134
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Hawks might pull the trigger on that Mrazak deal now. Assuming no other team offers up a 2nd if the Hawks are willing to retain. But I like getting a G back to fill the void in your offer.


Vanacek can certainly eat starts and has some bounce back/flip upside at just 28 years old. If not there’s a tank commander right there
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage