SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs get a 2nd to get Tanev deal done

Créé par: DealFinder67
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 déc. 2023
Publié: 16 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Lajoie, Maxime
  2. Samsonov, Ilya (1 775 000 $ retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 225 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Benoit, Simon
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
3.
TOR
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
CHI
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. Liljegren, Timothy
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
4.
TOR
  1. Reimer, James (750 000 $ retained)
DET
  1. Holmberg, Pontus
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $79 531 450 $0 $0 $3 968 550 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
-1 100 000 $-1 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
750 000 $750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,960
Mentions "j'aime": 3,332
Wow, this is pretty amazing... An even more pathetic Leafs offer for Tanev than usual!
DealFinder67 et Jhmarrio a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 8
#2
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 7,010
Mentions "j'aime": 4,732
Detroit isn't wasting it's only retention slot on Reimer just because Leafs.
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 8
#3
HockeyLeagueThreads
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 558
Mentions "j'aime": 350
The Flames could get a better deal than that, especially if they're retaining.
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 10
#4
Tank it baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 7,010
Mentions "j'aime": 4,732
Quoting: MoxNix
Wow, this is pretty amazing... An even more pathetic Leafs offer for Tanev than usual!


Plus retention. LOL

Here! Eat this grilled Cheese turd sandwich! 🙄
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 12
#5
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Bobrick
The Flames could get a better deal than that, especially if they're retaining.


Quoting: Bobrick
The Flames could get a better deal than that, especially if they're retaining.


Quoting: MoxNix
Wow, this is pretty amazing... An even more pathetic Leafs offer for Tanev than usual!


They are asking for a 2nd for this guy. Since it’s a late 2nd and I added retention, I added Benoit(who has been solid for us) and a 5th rd pick
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 14
#6
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: SharkTank
Detroit isn't wasting it's only retention slot on Reimer just because Leafs.


Didn’t realize they only had one left. May have to get a 3rd team involved for retention and we throw them a pick
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,024
Mentions "j'aime": 20,026
Quoting: DealFinder67
They are asking for a 2nd for this guy. Since it’s a late 2nd and I added retention, I added Benoit(who has been solid for us) and a 5th rd pick


Benoit has zero value lol. And no they are not asking for a 2nd, that is completely baseless.

Why would New Jersey want Sansonov? They want to improve their goaltending not add a 3rd equally as bad goalie
DealFinder67, NJDevils1317 et Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 21
#8
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Benoit has zero value lol. And no they are not asking for a 2nd, that is completely baseless.

Why would New Jersey want Sansonov? They want to improve their goaltending not add a 3rd equally as bad goalie


Don’t see many teams wanting to give a 1st for a 34 year old rental coming off injury. But hey if they get it, good for them
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 27
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,277
Mentions "j'aime": 23,120
You don't think Samsonov is NHL capable, so why would Jersey?
An overpay for Murphy.
Wings are still in a playoff run, so I don't think Reimer is available at least now.
Might be the max I would give for Tanev.
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 30
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,024
Mentions "j'aime": 20,026
Quoting: DealFinder67
Don’t see many teams wanting to give a 1st for a 34 year old rental coming off injury. But hey if they get it, good for them


I mean he's not getting traded any time soon so "coming off injury" is quite an exaggeration, considering he's just day to day and every player in the league would have gotten hurt in his position. Also stating his age and that he's a rental are contradictory arguments. As a rental you are getting exactly what the player he is right now, his age is irrelevant since he won't drop off suddenly in the peak of the season.
DealFinder67 et MoxNix a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 31
#11
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: palhal
You don't think Samsonov is NHL capable, so why would Jersey?
An overpay for Murphy.
Wings are still in a playoff run, so I don't think Reimer is available at least now.
Might be the max I would give for Tanev.


Maybe NJ doesn’t have interest but I Samsonov needs out of this market. Trade or send down to the minors.

I don’t think it’s an overpay for Murphy because he still has 3 years left on his desk at a good AAV
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 34
#12
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I mean he's not getting traded any time soon so "coming off injury" is quite an exaggeration, considering he's just day to day and every player in the league would have gotten hurt in his position. Also stating his age and that he's a rental are contradictory arguments. As a rental you are getting exactly what the player he is right now, his age is irrelevant since he won't drop off suddenly in the peak of the season.


You could be right but I personally would have a hard time adding a 1st for a middle pairing D with no term. We got McCabe for a 1st last year but he came with term and retention
palhal a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 34
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,277
Mentions "j'aime": 23,120
Quoting: DealFinder67
Maybe NJ doesn’t have interest but I Samsonov needs out of this market. Trade or send down to the minors.

I don’t think it’s an overpay for Murphy because he still has 3 years left on his desk at a good AAV


But why trade Liljegren and Jarnkrok for him, who are cheaper combined than Murphy. Liljegren had two pretty good seasons before this one......it's really not more than lateral move, though I know so many Leaf fans think ALL Dmen in the NHL are better than their own Dmen.[
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 38
#14
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: palhal
But why trade Liljegren and Jarnkrok for him, who are cheaper combined than Murphy. Liljegren had two pretty good seasons before this one......it's really not more than lateral move, though I know so many Leaf fans think ALL Dmen in the NHL are better than their own Dmen.[


Needed to send some salary back or wouldn’t be able to afford him and they ain’t giving retention with 3 years left in his deal. I’m sorry but Indont see the upside to Lily. Much smaller, less physical than Murphy. Plus Murphy skates and moves the puck well and comes with veteran leadership for a playoff run. Lily cant clear out the front of the net and has trouble winning puck battles in the corner, he isn’t putting up points. Just don’t see his upside other than being 24 and RH
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 47
#15
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,277
Mentions "j'aime": 23,120
Quoting: DealFinder67
Needed to send some salary back or wouldn’t be able to afford him and they ain’t giving retention with 3 years left in his deal. I’m sorry but Indont see the upside to Lily. Much smaller, less physical than Murphy. Plus Murphy skates and moves the puck well and comes with veteran leadership for a playoff run. Lily cant clear out the front of the net and has trouble winning puck battles in the corner, he isn’t putting up points. Just don’t see his upside other than being 24 and RH

make he
Oh no...the old veteran leadership reason. His nine playoff games doesn't necessarily makes him playoff savvy. Admitting Murphy is playing on poor team, but when he's on the ice, his record of being "positive" player is iffy.
DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 47
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,024
Mentions "j'aime": 20,026
Quoting: DealFinder67
You could be right but I personally would have a hard time adding a 1st for a middle pairing D with no term. We got McCabe for a 1st last year but he came with term and retention


First of all. Tanev is significantly better than McCabe. He's slightly better than Brodie. He's also more than capable of playing 20 minutes a night.

As for the return it completely depends on the market. Tanev should get a pair of 2nd in a buyers market but he could certainly get a 1st in a sellers market.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 49
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,449
Mentions "j'aime": 18,825
If you had two options

1. Give up a 2nd and pay $2.5m to add Maxime Lajoie to your blueline

2. Give up a 2nd (and 5th) to pay $2.25m to add Chris Tanev to your blueline

Which would you do? Now why would NJD do the former?
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 54
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,423
Mentions "j'aime": 11,453
I was actually just thinking of something similar recently. But I had TOR's 2026 1st instead of the 2024 1st, no 2nd going to TOR, 50% retention on Murphy, Donato going to TOR, and CHI taking back Reaves and Samsonov instead of Jarnkrok. So, TOR would be getting even more value than the 2024 2nd. Interesting... Maybe I was going overboard on giving TOR sweeteners, but CHI has a lot longer way to go than some CHI fans seem to think. So, adding more 1st round picks is pretty valuable to our rebuild, IMO. I never hit publish, though. I'd rather critique other peoples ACGM's than deal with critiques on my own. haha

Also, you're probably gonna have to pay more for Tanev. Given that he is a pending UFA rental and I personally think he is a bit overrated, I don't think he is gonna get as much as CGY fans want, but I definitely think he will get more than that. Especially with the retention.
DealFinder67 et RicXX a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 54
#19
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: palhal
make he
Oh no...the old veteran leadership reason. His nine playoff games doesn't necessarily makes him playoff savvy. Admitting Murphy is playing on poor team, but when he's on the ice, his record of being "positive" player is iffy.


A lot more experience than Lily brings for a team ready to win now. Murphy is paying with mostly rookies around him. He has only played on Chi and Arz(unfortunately for him) and I think he would be a good asset on our top pair with Rielly. Lily is a lifetime bottom pair guy.
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 14 h 56
#20
Démarrer sujet
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: Garak
I was actually just thinking of something similar recently. But I had TOR's 2026 1st instead of the 2024 1st, no 2nd going to TOR, 50% retention on Murphy, Donato going to TOR, and CHI taking back Reaves and Samsonov instead of Jarnkrok. So, TOR would be getting even more value than the 2024 2nd. Interesting... Maybe I was going overboard on giving TOR sweeteners, but CHI has a lot longer way to go than some CHI fans seem to think. So, adding more 1st round picks is pretty valuable to our rebuild, IMO. I never hit publish, though. I'd rather critique other peoples ACGM's than deal with critiques on my own. haha

Also, you're probably gonna have to pay more for Tanev. Given that he is a pending UFA rental and I personally think he is a bit overrated, I don't think he is gonna get as much as CGY fans want, but I definitely think he will get more than that. Especially with the retention.


Very curious to see what he goes for. Cgy fans got real quiet in here when Zadorov went for a 3rd and 5th and to a division rival.
Garak a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 15 h 0
#21
FlaminMoe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 82
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Leafs fans - you're not getting Tanev for scraps and garbage.
MoxNix et DealFinder67 a aimé ceci.
16 déc. 2023 à 15 h 3
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 43
Mentions "j'aime": 16
I think Chicago would jump on the chance to unload Murphy ASAP. Getting Liljegren back to fill his spot plus a 1st rounder would be a deal they couldn't pass up. Murphy just seems lost out there. I don't know if it's trying to help bring along younger defensemen this season, but his play has been atrocious. Maybe a change of scenery to a contending team would spark him.
16 déc. 2023 à 15 h 48
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,614
Mentions "j'aime": 4,207
NJD Says No. Easily.
Remove Benoit from that Tanev deal. We need our depth. I assume we would need to give a 2023 2nd and not a 2025 2nd for Tanev.
I severely dislike that Murphy trade. I personally would not take Murphy at his full cap for free. Which I know is a take and a half.
I would do that Detroit deal if we end up trading Sammy somehow.
16 déc. 2023 à 16 h 15
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,347
Mentions "j'aime": 9,830
Quoting: palhal
But why trade Liljegren and Jarnkrok for him, who are cheaper combined than Murphy. Liljegren had two pretty good seasons before this one......it's really not more than lateral move, though I know so many Leaf fans think ALL Dmen in the NHL are better than their own Dmen.[


Funny, because Chicago declines. Lillypad doesn't have much value to Chicago, they have better prospects in the system and giving up Murphy to go from a 2nd round pick to a 1st round pick is not worth it. Jarnkrok doesn't help the Hawks. Keep Lillypad (send him elsewhere) and Jarnkrok and just pony up a 2nd for Murphy and it probably gets it done.
16 déc. 2023 à 17 h 5
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,960
Mentions "j'aime": 3,332
Quoting: NHLfan10506
If you had two options

1. Give up a 2nd and pay $2.5m to add Maxime Lajoie to your blueline

2. Give up a 2nd (and 5th) to pay $2.25m to add Chris Tanev to your blueline

Which would you do? Now why would NJD do the former?


Because Chris Tanev won't be that cheap to acquire. It'll take a 1st +
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage