SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Helping out the Knucks and Leafs

Créé par: ChiHawk
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 25 oct. 2023
Publié: 25 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. Samsonov, Ilya
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Mrázek, Petr (1 900 000 $ retained)
  2. Murphy, Connor (2 200 000 $ retained)
2.
CHI
  1. Myers, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $74 482 624 $0 $6 605 000 $9 017 376 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance325 000 $$325K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 oct. 2023 à 15 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,954
Mentions "j'aime": 10,855
Toronto and the Hawks both decline that first trade. Vancouver declines the 2nd. They won't use their 1st to move Myers. Even with the 2nd coming back.
25 oct. 2023 à 15 h 56
#2
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,574
Mentions "j'aime": 1,090
Its a generous offer for Myers. I doubt it makes sense unless we have another move in mind that significantly improves us and probably is for a contract controlled player. Which seems unlikely.
ChiHawk et Garak a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,460
Mentions "j'aime": 1,021
in what way does this help the leafs tears of joy and youre reaaaaaly helping the canucks
Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 7
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,205
Mentions "j'aime": 9,568
Quoting: Herb_Brooks
in what way does this help the leafs tears of joy and youre reaaaaaly helping the canucks


Mrazek looks hands down better then Samsonov this season so far, if that trend continues it will be significant entering the playoffs. Leafs need another stay at home defender to balance their pairings in the top 4. McCabe is a 3rd liner as you know and there's a gap in the top 4. Explain how this doesn't help the Leafs.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,205
Mentions "j'aime": 9,568
Quoting: BigShoots
Its a generous offer for Myers. I doubt it makes sense unless we have another move in mind that significantly improves us and probably is for a contract controlled player. Which seems unlikely.


The way the Knucks are playing, freeing up $6M will come to good use as they make a run for the playoffs.
Garak a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,205
Mentions "j'aime": 9,568
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Toronto and the Hawks both decline that first trade. Vancouver declines the 2nd. They won't use their 1st to move Myers. Even with the 2nd coming back.


Not sure Toronto declines that. Also, if the Knucks are playing the way they are playing and gunning for the playoffs with their eyes set on filling a gap, they will need cap space and a late 1st to a late 2nd to give them that flexibility is worth it.
JesikaMorris et Garak a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 14
#7
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,506
Mentions "j'aime": 11,419
You're really under-charging the Leafs there, no?
JesikaMorris, Garak, SociallyHawkward and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 14
#8
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,506
Mentions "j'aime": 11,419
Quoting: ChiHawk
Mrazek looks hands down better then Samsonov this season so far, if that trend continues it will be significant entering the playoffs. Leafs need another stay at home defender to balance their pairings in the top 4. McCabe is a 3rd liner as you know and there's a gap in the top 4. Explain how this doesn't help the Leafs.


Not to mention all that retention.
JesikaMorris, Garak et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 86
I don't really see any way Canucks part with such a prime asset to offload a contract that is expiring anyways. As much as this team is oriented for this year, they also want to show Petey that they can be competitive for years to come. Given their logic thus far, I think it is more likely that they wait for the Myers contract to expire, and then trade that 1st for a significant defensive piece that fits their age cohort (see the Hronek trade). I think management is smart enough to not waste such a valuable asset to move one year of money.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 19
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 498
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: ChiHawk
Mrazek looks hands down better then Samsonov this season so far, if that trend continues it will be significant entering the playoffs. Leafs need another stay at home defender to balance their pairings in the top 4. McCabe is a 3rd liner as you know and there's a gap in the top 4. Explain how this doesn't help the Leafs.


Quoting: mokumboi
Not to mention all that retention.


Quoting: Hawksguy81
Toronto and the Hawks both decline that first trade. Vancouver declines the 2nd. They won't use their 1st to move Myers. Even with the 2nd coming back.


Ironically, the Leafs traded Mrazek 2 years ago to Chicago for a cap dump.

All time move if they get a first rounder to trade him back. lol
Newgod77, Garak et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 22
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,031
Mentions "j'aime": 803
Quoting: ChiHawk
Mrazek looks hands down better then Samsonov this season so far, if that trend continues it will be significant entering the playoffs. Leafs need another stay at home defender to balance their pairings in the top 4. McCabe is a 3rd liner as you know and there's a gap in the top 4. Explain how this doesn't help the Leafs.


It’s been 4 games for Samsonov..

People on here always say Leafs fans overreact but look at users like you 😂

This doesn’t help the Leafs. They’re downgrading at goaltending while improving at defence when they don’t have a spot for Murphy. They’d have to move a defender out in order to even have him play so the “upgrade” isn’t really as much as it seems. And with how much of a downgrade Mrazek is it’s not really an upgrade at all.
Newgod77, Herb_Brooks et Garak a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 22
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 1,174
Canucks pass.No chance were using a first to trade Myers.IMHO.
Garak et Synergy a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 25
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,308
Mentions "j'aime": 4,961
I don't think either team does this. Don't love the TOR trade from our perspective either honestly
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 26
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,269
Mentions "j'aime": 732
There will be way better options for Toronto’s first pick than a depth defenseman
Herb_Brooks a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 40
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Toronto accepts so fast you can’t even see it or say goodbye to your players
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 16 h 55
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Modifié 25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 4
Quoting: Newgod77
There will be way better options for Toronto’s first pick than a depth defenseman


Depth defensemen? Hes probably 1RD
SociallyHawkward et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 2
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 2,460
Mentions "j'aime": 1,021
Quoting: ChiHawk
Mrazek looks hands down better then Samsonov this season so far, if that trend continues it will be significant entering the playoffs. Leafs need another stay at home defender to balance their pairings in the top 4. McCabe is a 3rd liner as you know and there's a gap in the top 4. Explain how this doesn't help the Leafs.


Ill take the much larger sample size of a season over 4 games LOL. theres a reason the leafs moved down in the draft to dump him. they can do better with that package
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 5
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
But I do believe there’s no chance Chicago offers this to the leafs
SociallyHawkward et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 6
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,269
Mentions "j'aime": 732
Quoting: JesikaMorris
Depth defensemen? He probably 1RD


He’s under 40% corsi, fenwick, xGF, provides no offense. He’s not even a 1RD on the worst team in the league.
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 6
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: Newgod77
He’s under 40% corsi, fenwick, xGF, provides no offense. He’s not even a 1RD on the worst team in the league.


He’s playing on an awful Chicago team
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 10
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,269
Mentions "j'aime": 732
Quoting: JesikaMorris
He’s playing on an awful Chicago team


He plays the 5th most minutes on that team so he’s a big part of it.
He’s a shot blocking 3rd pair guy on a playoff team
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 10
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,954
Mentions "j'aime": 10,855
Modifié 25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 18
Quoting: ChiHawk
Not sure Toronto declines that. Also, if the Knucks are playing the way they are playing and gunning for the playoffs with their eyes set on filling a gap, they will need cap space and a late 1st to a late 2nd to give them that flexibility is worth it.


For starters, you have Toronto sending the Hawks a $3.5m cap hit and taking back $4.1m. That's an extra $600k cap space they don't have. If the Leafs look to upgrade their goalie, I can't imagine Mrazak is anywhere on that list. Who's advising Trevling? Stan Bowman? They gave up a 1st to dump him, remember? Plus, that return for Murphy and $8m in retention is pretty bad for the Hawks, do they don't make the deal either. And yes, the Canucks will need cap space if they stay in playoff contention. Still don't see them trading away that 1st to move Myers though. I think it's much more likely they move Garland.
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 15
#23
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,506
Mentions "j'aime": 11,419
Quoting: BillytheKid3
Ironically, the Leafs traded Mrazek 2 years ago to Chicago for a cap dump.

All time move if they get a first rounder to trade him back. lol


That 1st doesn't even cover the retention amount.
JesikaMorris, Garak, SociallyHawkward and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 20
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,113
Mentions "j'aime": 10,987
Quoting: BigShoots
Its a generous offer for Myers. I doubt it makes sense unless we have another move in mind that significantly improves us and probably is for a contract controlled player. Which seems unlikely.


Yeah. And if that other move were significant enough to require moving a $6m cap hit, it would probably also require spending VAN's 2024 1st. Which would then make it unavailable for the purpose of dumping a player, and I highly doubt VAN would want to move two first round picks to get one move done.
25 oct. 2023 à 17 h 23
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 498
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: mokumboi
That 1st doesn't even cover the retention amount.


Correct, if you factor in the Murphy contract, 2.2 over a few more seasons, they probably shouldn't retain anymore contracts.

I just think it would be funny, that's all. especially since it's 6 games in to the season.
ChiHawk et Garak a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage