PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
2
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
BigShoots
Big Shoots
Membre depuis
17 sept. 2020
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
3570
Messages par jour
2.8
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 14 h 17
Sujet:
Rentals
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>alwaysnextyear</b></div><div>Bold swing for local boy Reinhart! Love that. I'm not sure he'll be worth that contract though, this has been a bit of an outlier offensive season for him (SH% is through the roof compared to his average). But he's also a fantastic possession player, so maybe he would be worth it overall. Sounds like he's really hoping to extend in FLA though.
I can definitely see the team letting Lindholm walk, unless he goes on a crazy run in the playoffs. Personally I'd like to bring back Zadorov at the right price. His physical presence has been massive, and like a bunch of other guys, his overall game has improved a fair bit under Tocchet's system.</div></div>
Reinhart is just not a 10 mil guy despite his PP success this season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars à 14 h 16
Sujet:
A VAN and CAR trade idea - feedback welcome
Why would the Canucks trade Hronek. Especially without replacing him. Not smart.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 mars à 19 h 29
Sujet:
Trying to fill out a roster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cooliny</b></div><div>Why would they dump Mikheyev? They have no spot for Addison on the blueline, and the $4.75M you're freeing up will just go back to a top 6 replacement who's likely very similar to Mikheyev's production.</div></div>
Like no goals (until last night) in what 20+ games production? That can be had for league min. That said i'd expect Mikheyev to be better next season as his injured heals but getting rid of his salary for that cheap would be easy yes.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 mars à 23 h 29
Sujet:
July 1st
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BrockChoy</b></div><div>Him making more than Hughes would be roughhhh</div></div>
Ya true. With that in mind maybe same contract or just under. Under 7 seems unrealistic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 mars à 23 h 14
Sujet:
July 1st
I think Hronek might get 8 per
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars à 12 h 53
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>Crosby isn’t going anywhere. People need to get over that fantasy. Malkin and Tanger don’t have much value now and trading them when Sid wants them to stay in Pittsburgh would be beyond dumb. The likes of Rakell, Pettersson, and Rust should be moved sooner than later.</div></div>
I think the conversation will drastically change next yr if the team is struggling. Crosby could go to decent team and have a chance to win a couple more cups even. The haul Pitt could get would honestly be unreasonable. But its Crosby so someone would pay it. As for Malkin maybe %50 retained he get you something and he'd wanna go if Crosby was out I'd imagine. Letang not so sure. That was a crazy contract they gave him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 mars à 18 h 6
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>Yet as mid as Bunting is he’s still better than Mikheyev who is a pure cap dump. Ponomarev and Koivunen are better prospects for us than what Vancouver was offering.</div></div>
Not at all the point that was being made. No one ever mentioned Mikheyev. And maybe it was more maybe not. Given the eventual return it's not hard to imagine there were better offers turned down early. In the end I think what I said was pretty accurate. When it's your guy you always think he should get you more though.
That said it wasn't even that bad. The reality is, more than likely the Pens are gonna be look to or should be looking to move Crosby and others in the next 12 months. A retool seems far fetched given the age of so many of the guys. I'm sure Dubas will give Cros and co another chance though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mars à 17 h 2
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>again you think the penguins not getting a late 1st and a ceiling 3rd line prospect with a 50% chance is some big loss. It's not.
You have more to lose than the penguins.
I also have no problem with them resigning Jake. They will be rebuilding soon, so no big deal on the end of that contact. They will need cap floor anyway.
I'm not going to speculate on what the CAR could or would be, no one knows. Just talking heads.
All I know is it hurts teams who have a closing window well more than it hurts the penguins. Nothing people like you want to give up is going to help the penguins win. But you lose out on a major piece trying to get a cup.
I could care less if your windows close. So you better make it worth it for me to make a move.</div></div>
So there you have it. Guentzel didn't return any of Carolina's top 5 prospects. Pitt even took back long term money and they still couldn't even pry a top prospect from Carolina (and they have quite a few)
They did end up getting more pieces than I expected but you just don't see top prospects moved in these type of deals. It's always the standard 1st, prospect, roster player (cap dump/reclamation project) thing for any good player and goes a little up or down from there depending on the player.
This is also a lesson for you about a high price. You thought it was up to everyone else to meet it or else. In reality teams clearly moved on to other targets and Pitt was left holding the bag to some degree. I don't think this is an awful deal by any means for PItt but it's probably a C. Depends on what you think of Bunting and how he might fit in.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 23 h 38
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>again you think the penguins not getting a late 1st and a ceiling 3rd line prospect with a 50% chance is some big loss. It's not.
You have more to lose than the penguins.
I also have no problem with them resigning Jake. They will be rebuilding soon, so no big deal on the end of that contact. They will need cap floor anyway.
I'm not going to speculate on what the CAR could or would be, no one knows. Just talking heads.
All I know is it hurts teams who have a closing window well more than it hurts the penguins. Nothing people like you want to give up is going to help the penguins win. But you lose out on a major piece trying to get a cup.
I could care less if your windows close. So you better make it worth it for me to make a move.</div></div>
If you're talking about this offer it's literally two 1sts, a 2nd, and two NHL ready young players. So ya that will not be happening.
In what world do you shop a guy, only to ask too much and not get what you want and then resign him. That is called fantasy.
Please speculate, why not? Are you scared that you'll look foolish? I have made my case as to what the value will likely be and laid it out there. You seem to think I have no clue so share what you think the return is going to be so we see who was closer.
And no it doesn't hurt a team overly to miss out on a rental. Your logic would just then suggest you should rent every player available at the cost of all future assets. You have to weigh the value of the asset the value of the rental.
It's called trade value. If I don't value him at a certain price and someone else does so be it. I still have my blue chip prospect and 6 mil in cap space. It's seems there are about 3-4 moving factors you aren't including in your valuation. Another one is how many rentals come in a win their team a Stanley Cup? I'm sure it happens but it's not a high hit rate.
Should the Sabres just trade you say Owen Power to get Guentzel in? Guentzel is the better player currently.
Anyway if you have any integrity at all put together what you think the return is going to be from Carolina. This is such a unique and fun situation where we know a trade is gonna happen between two teams, whilst we are speculating on the value of the player, and we have a chance to guess what we think the return will be. Love to hear your take.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 19 h 53
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>Your comments are really funny considering what all VAN fans on here were asking for when they were talking about Miller last year. You are making a real 1 sided request. Some real standard capfriendly stuff.
You are not the only team interested in Guentzel and at some point you need to get that through, and realize that what you want to offer vs what others are going to offer is going to push the price.
Now you might not be comfortable with that price, and that's fine. A. your not the decision maker, and B. VAN can waste the last few good years they of a guy like Miller waiting on prospect hope and dreams, that doesn't bother me.
Believe me had this same convo on other threads. No matter what you think the prospect is, it's just hope and dreams till they actually do something. Go look at 2OA Kakko who was suppose to be a top line winger, 30 goal scorer. He's Yakupov 2.0 now. That story is true more than it's not. It's hard to be a Jake Guentzel in the NHL. I don't care what you did in some swiss league or juniors. To actually be something is way more valuable than to one day maybe.
So you can keep saying that but you can look at a team like the NYR. Their core is 32. Panarin and Kreider their two best goal scorers. They aren't getting any younger.
When they go, their window to do anything is closed. They will be a bottom feeder team again. Even with the league helping them out with a 1OA and 2OA for being a big market team.
Because of that the pressure isn't on PIT to move Jake it's on other teams to get him to win a cup. JR understood that in PIT, with an Crosby, Malkin and Letang in their upper 20s and early 30s.
So you can keep comparing the value of Guentzel and saying how some hope and dream prospect who has done all of 0 so far. Is worth more than Jake. But that simply isn't true. The reality is, you still have to develop a swiss player to play on NHL ice. In that time a guy like Miller is going to age and your window is going to close. The pressue is on VAN to make something happen not PIT. PIT already did that part. They could hold Jake and it's no big deal. Not that they will because other teams will realize now or never. As they don't have 2 years to develop guys and get them use to playing on the NHL level.
I'm sure you have had enough bad so called wunderkind prospects come to vancouver to understand that. There is a list of prospects a mile long who were suppose to be the next great thing, oh look what they did in juniors. Clearly the next Gretzky. Good luck with it.
Just remember though Guentzel going to Vegas ain't helping your chances to win while you can. Other teams get the point that you go for it while the chance is there because it might not be in the future.</div></div>
You remember Miller didn't get traded right? Because the like of NYR weren't willing to give up Schneider. That's Braden Schneider.
I am aware other teams are in on him. The price you think it is doesn't bother me. I go of the precedent of previous trades. The problem with the price being so high is if no one meets your ask you end up having to keep Guentzel and he likely walks so there is far more risk on the Pitt side than there is losing out in the Guentzel sweepstakes.
You might not be comfortable with the ultimate return A thats fine B Guentzel could be lost for nothing if you don't take something. As for the Canucks it's precisely ELCs such as Lekerimaki that are how you overcome a potentially poor back side of a contract such as Miller's.
Top prospect hit more often than not but I take the point you are trying to make which is that it's not a sure thing. He could also be better than Guentzel in a couple yrs too. The most predictable part about this though is that 30 yr players tend to decline. Some faster than others. Do you want to pay your team's top prospect for the chance to use Guentzel for a few months? I don't not if the prospect is as good as Lekerimaki has been. He's already playing against men's in the probably the 3-4 best league in the world. I get he's a prospect but he's a dam good one. I can tell you the fans of each team are gonna know their prospects better than other team's fair? If I'd have wanted Guentzel a yr before he made the NHL and offered you 34 yr old Ryan Kesler and said oh Kesler is a Selke guy and Guentzel will likely never make it would you have done it?
If you want to say Guentzel will resign that also isn't that good. 30+ yr old winger taking up 8 mil on the cap for 8 yrs isn't ideal.
You keep going off about prospects not making, again most top prospects do. And Guentzel's best yrs are behind him in all likelihood. And then I'll reiterate the cap situation of signing an ageing winger vs having and up and coming player on an ELC.
Lastly sounds like a deal with the Hurricane might happen. Bunting out of the lineup for Carolina. Care to guess what the return is ? Ill go first
Guentzel for 1st, Morrow, Bunting (maybe with some late picks flying around too)
What do you think it'll be?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 mars à 17 h 20
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>you keep trying to hide behind this "rental"
As if JR doesn't know exactly what he's getting and isn't going to extend him?
FFS Jake played a major role in winning him 2 cups. Or did you forget that part?
Again, there is no one untouchable to JR, and he's going to go get his guy no matter the cost.</div></div>
I said it before. Whether your a rental or a 30 yr old sign long term the value is similar. Both present a serious downside.
Lekkerimaki has put up historic numbers for a 19 yr old in the SHL. He was his teams MVP. He was MVP of the world juniors. He'll be on an ELC for 3 yrs.
We can sign Guentzel to an 8 yr anchor contract for free in June.
And I am not negating that fact he's a great player, who had awesome playoff runs. But you just don't give him young potential stars for aging wingers. And yes 30 is the age players start to decline.
Lek isn't untouchable in general he's just untouchable for 30 yr old winger would isn't signed and who you would want to sign for 8 yrs but would have to.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mars à 18 h 5
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>Lekkerimaki isn't unrealistic.
You think guys are untouchable. He's not.
If JR wants Guentzel he's going to pay the price on him. Otherwise, none of what you are offering is better than what they can get elsewhere. Period.</div></div>
He's untouchable for a rental absolutely. No one is paying that type of price.
Give me an example of what you think youre going to get for Guentzel. Pick say 2 teams and make up a package. And Ill tell you if it's realistic and in a couple days we can see.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mars à 1 h 1
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>Mikheyev is not an ok player. He is a waste and a bad contract. We don’t need to take him to do you a solid.</div></div>
Hahah someone is testy. I never mentioned him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mars à 0 h 55
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>We don’t need a cap dump lol.</div></div>
It's kinda how these trades often work if you want full value. It may seem like an ok player at the time of the trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 mars à 0 h 55
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>the "he's a rental part" doesn't mean anything.
You have no idea if they allowed them to work out a deal before the trade. You are just assuming.
I'm sure PIT knows exactly what Jake wants and can forward that info to who ever is interested.
Fact is it's the "prospect" part you refuse to recognize your own lacking. You don't want to part with a legit prospect.
That's the hold up on your end.
Don't think JR thinks the same way. He will rifle a prospect out.
The 1st is relative. A guy like Lysell is worth no more than the 1st. Simply swapping them is no big deal.
You aren't talking some top 5 pick here. It's like BOS building up Donato or telling everyone Studnicka was going to be the Bergeron replacement.
He's just a mediocre prospect at this point, no different then the 1st he'd be replacing.
Fact is you short the trade unwilling to part with assets. You think, oh I'll dump whatever dud prospect and the other team has to accept it's "a prospect"
But that just isn't how it works.
Bains and Raty just aren't the level of prospect going to get this done. Neither is Pod.
It's not about "5 assets"
It's about getting quality for a quality forward they are sending out.
And a 40 goal guy who puts up that pace regularly is going to get that quality no matter what you think.
You don't get something for nothing. You got to pay to get what you want, like everyone else.
When PIT traded for Kessel it cost their 1st, their best prospect in Kapanan who was well received at that point, and other stuff.
It's no different for you or VAN. And you are getting a better player back, who has none of the drama that surrounded Kessel.
If JR would pay it then, yet you think he won't pay it now? Or that you are too cheap to pay it, well you got another thing coming if you want that chance to win a cup.</div></div>
In all reality whether it's a rental or a long term deal negotiated the return is the same. Rental carries the risk of him leaving, long term contract carriers the late yrs risk. See Horvat and many others as examples.
Lysell is a legit prospect. A 1st is a legit prospect. Raty is a legit prospect. The others are trending to be solid bottom 6 players.
To be fair the proposal is horrible value trading Lindholm away. Should be Lysell and 1st at least. Probably a bit more.
If you think you're getting Willander or Lekkerimaki that's unrealistic. If you think you are getting 5 assets and no cap thats unrealistic.
We are giving up Lindholm in this deal too hahah he just cost a 1st ++
Anyway Guentzel will get a 1st, prospect, and one more thing that has negligible value. That's just what it costs for rentals or 30 yrs old sign long term wingers. no matter that hes a great player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 23 h 33
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>you keep thinking your getting a 40 goal scorer for nothing.
It's a good thing JR makes the decisions in VAN and realizes he has to give assets to get them and not you.
Otherwise VAN would never make a single trade ever.
You can be assured if JR wants Jake, he's giving up the pieces to make it work.</div></div>
I didn't say that. It'll cost a 1st, pospect and cap dumpish roster player/late pick/b prospect. Wing is not a premium position. And it's a rental. You don't get 5 assets for that type of asset.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 23 h 32
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>Pay what? A couple of alright prospects and a 1st for a top 15 winger in the league?</div></div>
You somehow ended up with 5 assets for renting Guentzel. That is not going to happen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 20 h 43
Sujet:
Retain on Lindholm To Make Jake Cheaper
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>Ok then we can trade with Vegas and you can keep Lindholm.</div></div>
Whatever we get from Boston would go to you maybe plus a small piece. You have Guentzel's value too high here. No one would pay that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 20 h 37
Sujet:
How To Fix This Team
Canucks accept
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 20 h 36
Sujet:
big trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>Yes and they don’t want to trade him.</div></div>
Ok Jim
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 19 h 1
Sujet:
big trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Start with Willander or don't bother starting.
<img class="for_img" src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/61/4d/e5/614de537ea516c274f9c95e722fbf9d5.gif" alt="614de537ea516c274f9c95e722fbf9d5.gif"></div></div>
Lekerimaki is our top prospect but ok
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 19 h 0
Sujet:
big trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>lol Canucks fans don’t want to trade their top prospects.</div></div>
Lekerimaki is our top prospect
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 mars à 13 h 22
Sujet:
Canucks next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>nbulger98</b></div><div>sometimes you gotta bite the bullet for the early years of the contract, Zadorov is starting to fit in and the nucks are close w his agent. I think Guentzel prob isn't the right guy but he may be the best option available. I prefer vatrano but I think his price will be way too high</div></div>
Being close with an agent doesn't mean you overpay for a player.
I think that biting the bullet thing is just a common mistake. When has it ever worked out?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 mars à 19 h 30
Sujet:
Canucks next year
Zadorov at 4.5 is rich. I like what he brings and I agree someone might pay him that but in reality he is about a 3 mil dman.
Wouldn't wanna get 30 yr old Guentzel a 7 yr deal either. Target another winger though for sure.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 mars à 20 h 30
Sujet:
NExt SeAsOn
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AC14</b></div><div>Not in recent memory for the caliber of player. But pretty much all it means is there’s no rush. There’s a value to having the player around for an additional year and being able to negotiate in the event that he’ll take a shorter term deal</div></div>
Ya that's probably true. I guess the value is just in what are you willing to give up now to make it worth it rather than st louis just waiting. 2nd or b prospect maybe.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com