SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Moves towards 23-24

Créé par: Hammerwise
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 16 oct. 2023
Publié: 23 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Brännström, Erik
  2. Joseph, Mathieu
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
OTT
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Cates, Noah
  2. Sanheim, Travis (1 250 000 $ retained)
PHI
  1. Joseph, Mathieu
  2. Lindholm, Elias
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (CGY)
3.
4.
CGY
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
5.
CGY
  1. Niemelä, Topi
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Zadorov, Nikita (1 837 500 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de TBL
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $81 352 499 $0 $1 077 500 $2 147 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
856 667 $856 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 oct. 2023 à 6 h 46
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,480
Mentions "j'aime": 19,636
Awful return for Lindholm
Hammerwise, C_LGRW71 et JesikaMorris a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 6 h 54
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,233
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Awful return for Lindholm


Maybe, but Cates was selke candidate in his rookie year who put up 35+ pts on a team that couldn;t score, and sanheim is looking pretty good this year after a bad 23-24, and at 5mil thats the CGY top 4.

The 2nd was an enticement as PHI then HAS TO resign Lindholm.

Gives CGY a solid 2nd pairing dman and a young 2C/3C, signed for less than Lindholm will want/get and Joseph
23 oct. 2023 à 7 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,480
Mentions "j'aime": 19,636
Quoting: Hammerwise
Maybe, but Cates was selke candidate in his rookie year who put up 35+ pts on a team that couldn;t score, and sanheim is looking pretty good this year after a bad 23-24, and at 5mil thats the CGY top 4.

The 2nd was an enticement as PHI then HAS TO resign Lindholm.

Gives CGY a solid 2nd pairing dman and a young 2C/3C, signed for less than Lindholm will want/get and Joseph


Makes no sense at all. Cates is decent but Calgary needs a 1st line center not a 3rd line center. Sanheim is also a fine player but trading for him is counterintuitive if the Flames are selling. Adding a 2nd while is just the cherry on top, your reasoning is irrational too. Plenty of teams would have interest in adding a 1C like Lindholm, "incentivizing" a team to take him is just ridiculous.

Also you are the one who traded for Joseph to begin with, you put Calgary over the cap with that trade so it can't even be made without doing the Zadorov and/or Vladar trades first
GMBL a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 7 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 89
Mentions "j'aime": 0
what would you want for tanev retained from Vancouver?
23 oct. 2023 à 7 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,654
Mentions "j'aime": 1,174
Canucks pass.zero need for another goalie.IMHO.
23 oct. 2023 à 7 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: Hammerwise
Maybe, but Cates was selke candidate in his rookie year who put up 35+ pts on a team that couldn;t score, and sanheim is looking pretty good this year after a bad 23-24, and at 5mil thats the CGY top 4.

The 2nd was an enticement as PHI then HAS TO resign Lindholm.

Gives CGY a solid 2nd pairing dman and a young 2C/3C, signed for less than Lindholm will want/get and Joseph


If they just re-sign Hanifin or (even acquire Girard- don't think COL does that trade), then they don't really have a need for Sanheim (who is not available: was told he wasn't getting traded + he has a NMC). The last top-4 spot can just be left open for a guy like Brannstrom and maybe Niemela and other prospects to compete for along with a veteran FA signing.

Also, as Ledge_And_Dairy pointed out, leaving that gaping hole down the middle still makes no sense just to fill a (self-made) hole in the 2nd pairing on defense.
23 oct. 2023 à 8 h 23
#7
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,581
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Why would Colorado trade a Dman with 3.5 years of term left for a pending UFA? Awful asset management
Xqb15a, MeetYourMakar, M96N29 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 8 h 32
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 114
Mentions "j'aime": 63
Slapping the faces of Flyers fans right there.
GMDannyB a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 8 h 37
#9
Danny B is here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 5,007
Mentions "j'aime": 1,948
Neither team would want that Flyers trade. It’s not great value for Lindholm and at the same time why on earth would we want Joseph and retain on Sanheim for 8 years?
FlyOrDie20 a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 8 h 38
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,439
Mentions "j'aime": 9,074
Yeah COL isn’t doing that
MeetYourMakar, M96N29, TJTwolf and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 12 h 8
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,505
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
Sens most likely do that since that would allow them to sign Pinto and solidify the defense. Chabot would really need a guy like Tanev. It also allows to have one of the big 3 always on the ice.

Sanderson - Zub
Chabot - Tanev
Chychrun - Hamonic
JBD

But that's another anti-climate move for a rebuilding team, acquire an older soon UFA player for 2 young players. Anyway, there's no ideal situation to get out of Dorion's mismanagement
23 oct. 2023 à 12 h 47
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 31
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: remowilliams
Canucks pass.zero need for another goalie.IMHO.


They definitely pass. Vladar had really bad numbers last year, and he's been even worse to start the season. I can't possibly see why they would want to trade an asset and take on more cap hit to downgrade from DeSmith
remowilliams a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 15 h 21
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,602
Mentions "j'aime": 4,583
Why on earth would the Avs even contemplate that?
swissmontana a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2023 à 18 h 23
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
Quoting: canucksdownunder
what would you want for tanev retained from Vancouver?


likely a first and some random prospect/player
23 oct. 2023 à 18 h 24
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 603
Mentions "j'aime": 155
oh man i hope the leafs say no but that’s not a bad price
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage