PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
hcirtso
Membre depuis
24 mai 2022
Équipe favorite
Canucks de Vancouver
Messages dans les forums
31
Messages par jour
0.0
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 févr. à 13 h 52
Sujet:
late prospects
If I'm Allvin, I'm doing that in a heartbeat. That's a lot less than the reported price for Tanev now (2nd round pick + prospect), and that's not even factoring in that we're asking them to take back Myers, even if the trade is cap hit neutral
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 févr. à 13 h 50
Sujet:
justferfun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Prime_Jimbo</b></div><div>I like the first deal. Adding two other 4th line/13th forwards makes no sense. Especially, for good prospects.</div></div>
I don't. Wennberg has fewer points than Mikheyev in more games played, and a lot more ice time. I get that Mikheyev has often played with Pettersson, but Canucks fans have actually complained about how Pettersson hasn't actively taken over games enough this season, so we can't also say he's mega carried Mikheyev, who is just scoring at a solid middle 6 rate anyway.
Mikheyev is also at least good defensively, and useful on the PK. Wennberg is terrible defensively, and doesn't make up for it with enough offence. I'd rather have a player who is good defensively and can get carried to being competent offensively. It's a lot harder to try to cover for a defensive liability who only scores 40 points. It's why Boudreau was benching Hoglander when he was struggling to score, but playing irresponsible hockey. Wennberg is technically a centre, but he's terrible at face-offs, so he doesn't even add value there
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 janv. à 18 h 9
Sujet:
Looking at Guentzel trade if we cant get a scorer plus acquiring 2 D men
If the Canucks trade for Guentzel, it's either going to be for his expiring contract with retained salary and then they try to re-sign him themselves, or the Penguins would need to take Kuzmenko back to make the salaries work. The Canucks don't have enough cap to take on Guentzel at full cost anymore because they played the "we have cap space" card to get Zadorov for seemingly low cost.
However, Kuzmenko also has another year on his contract, and he's supposed to be a scoring forward. I could maybe see 2024 first round pick + prospect + Kuzmenko for Guentzel as a UFA, and then the Canucks sign him themselves. Once the deadline passes, the Canucks will become the team allowed to offer Guentzel 8 years on a new contract
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 déc. 2023 à 20 h 24
Sujet:
Playoffs
Only the deal with the Blues is worth even trying to do. Everything else is just messing with chem for lateral or worse moves
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 nov. 2023 à 14 h 34
Sujet:
Canucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>AK50</b></div><div>IMO, not much of a need to pay a 1st for guys like Pesce and Tanev. Think the Nucks are better off going for a younger guy like Boqvist, Peeke or Fabbro.</div></div>
Definitely don't want Boqvist unless he's dirt cheap. If the Canucks actually are legit, then if they're going to send out a first round pick for a Pesce sign and trade then it's probably worth it. I wouldn't send out a first for Tanev though.
Especially if they're sending out the 2024 pick, then it would have to be apparent the first rounder isn't going to be a particularly high pick if they're trading for Pesce, even as a rental.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 nov. 2023 à 14 h 27
Sujet:
canucks
Hronek isn't going to sign for only 6 mil after this season.
Garland AND Klimovich for Boqvist is a pretty big step back in value. The Jacket would need to add assets to Boqvist to get Garland. Also the Canucks shouldn't want Boqvist, he's just worse bubble season Hughes. He's not good offensively or defensively
The Canucks could and should be able to get a lot more in the off-season for moving out Garland
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 nov. 2023 à 14 h 24
Sujet:
some moves
Girard isn't an ideal piece in terms of fit, but the value is too good to not take it. Worst case scenario they can sell off Girard down the line since he's still cost controlled as the cap is going up
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 nov. 2023 à 18 h 25
Sujet:
Keep it Simple OR Take a Risk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JuanDamienNebraska</b></div><div>Beauvillier would surely get claimed. I know he makes north of 4 million, but someone would take him.</div></div>
That's fine, getting cap space back is what the Canucks want in the first place. If they have to retain 50% and still only get a mid round pick, that's arguably worse than getting all the cap space back, especially if they're going to try to trade for a RHD that's already under contract.
Say they have to retain 50% on Beauvilier and get like a 4th round pick back. They're going to have to pay more than a 4th round pick to get that 2 mil retained on another player in a trade to improve the RHD, especially again for a guy under contract, because then the salary retained by the original team applies for multiple years. But if they just have the cap space, then they possibly wouldn't need retained salary at all, or only very little
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 nov. 2023 à 18 h 19
Sujet:
Garland no longer on the block
. The Canucks are playing some hard effort reasonably good team defence right now. Those are not things that Domi does well. On the other hand, I could see the Leafs wanting Joshua just on his own since he's still a cap savings over Reaves, if they put him on waivers, and Joshua can play more than 5 minutes a game
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 nov. 2023 à 14 h 7
Sujet:
garland
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jeremyttowne</b></div><div>Rakell had 28 goals and 60 points last year, which is 11 more goals and 14 more points than Garland. That's only with a $50,000 higher cap hit. There's a ton of defense pieces that I'm sure the Pens would be willing to give u[. Yes, most of them are lefties, but most can play their offside.</div></div>
I think that has a lot to do with the fact that Rakell had more than twice the amount of PP time that Garland had. And I'm pretty sure Rakell was PP1 last year.
They both had a 1.8 points/60 at 5v5. Rakell is not a material upgrade on Garland at all. He just had better production because of more favourable deployment, which he wouldn't get in Vancouver. Rakell likely wouldn't crack PP1 here with Boeser and Kuzmenko already as right hand shots on PP1. He might be more productive than Garland on PP2, but it wouldn't justify taking on the longer contract. Garland only has two years left
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 oct. 2023 à 12 h 47
Sujet:
Moves towards 23-24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>remowilliams</b></div><div>Canucks pass.zero need for another goalie.IMHO.</div></div>
They definitely pass. Vladar had really bad numbers last year, and he's been even worse to start the season. I can't possibly see why they would want to trade an asset and take on more cap hit to downgrade from DeSmith
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 oct. 2023 à 18 h 26
Sujet:
Konecny for Lindholm
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MrAicrow2009</b></div><div>What is the problem with the trade?</div></div>
What is the logic behind thinking that Lindholm would end up with the Flyers? I can't see Lindholm wanting to sign and trade to the Flyers, and I can't see the Flyers wanting Lindholm as an expiring UFA if he doesn't.
Unless you're thinking that the Flyers flip Lindholm on a sign and trade of their own which nets them more than they would get for Konency on his remaining term. But that's pretty galaxy brain, even though it could be possible. But they'd be majorly in the hole if Lindholm burns them and walks, because Konency is their best player
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 oct. 2023 à 18 h 51
Sujet:
Trading a paper clip into a car
If the Predators were willing to do a Garland for Fabbro trade like that, I think the Canucks would much rather do it themselves than trade Garland for Joseph. Joseph is a straight up downgrade from Garland, even with the cap savings
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 oct. 2023 à 17 h 15
Sujet:
CBC316
Podkolzin is going to get sent down tomorrow again. He's just a paper transaction. Having him up over Aman gets them closer to the max ACSL, and ensures we get a performance bonus relief pool along with a salary relief pool with Poolman on LTIR
There's a quirk in the CBA that if he starts the season in the AHL, apparently, they would need to clear enough room for his 925k cap hit AND 850k in bonuses to call him up later on
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 sept. 2023 à 23 h 46
Sujet:
Leafs trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GhostGM92</b></div><div>Schenn played the best hockey of his career with Rielly, I'm shocked they didn't sign him. And I don't really think Brodie is very good, at least he wasn't last season.</div></div>
Shocked that they didn't overpay him? 3x2.75 is a terrible contract. Even if you for some reason think Brodie isn't good, at least his contract is expiring. It would a terrible idea to turn that into a bad contract AND add a first round pick on top of it.
Honestly, none of your trades make sense. They're all really lopsided in value and some of them are a real head scratcher in terms of how they'd make the Leafs better
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 sept. 2023 à 23 h 37
Sujet:
Leafs trade deadline
There's no way the Canucks would trade Demko for that
Also what even is the Schenn trade...?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 mars 2023 à 17 h 5
Sujet:
perfect world
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BenningTruther</b></div><div>suzuki just the first guy who came to mind when i thought of RHC prospects with a bit of pro exp</div></div>
Just FYI, Ryan Suzuki is a lefty. His brother Nick is a righty
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 mars 2023 à 17 h 5
Sujet:
perfect world
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Beauvillier doesn't seem like a Carolina fit, he's too shaky defensively.</div></div>
Alternatively, they could see him as someone who can help score goals, and just accept that their overall team structure would make up for it. That's basically the bet they made on DeAngelo. Ryan Suzuki doesn't appear to be that high of an acquisition cost, but I'm only looking at his box stats though
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. 2023 à 18 h 29
Sujet:
Continued retool
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>If Thatcher Demko comes back to form to such an extent that he's Brandt-Clarke-and-a-first-round-pick better than Cal Petersen, why would you want to downgrade to Cal Petersen?</div></div>
It would mean they're fully committed to a re-build. Having Demko on the team through a rebuild would be a total waste of his remaining contract, and possibly means he steal the team some wins. So they capitalize on the value he has with 3x5mil remaining on his contract.
Petersen in this trade serves only to match cap hits, since he's also on a 5mil AAV. He just happens to also be a goalie
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 sept. 2022 à 17 h 39
Sujet:
Presidents Trophy Winner
It'll be a strong roster come playoff time for sure. Sucks that Pacioretty got hurt before he could even play a game for the Canes
Forum:
Armchair-GM
6 sept. 2022 à 20 h 19
Sujet:
Next year Canucks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Hard to imagine the circumstances under which we'd have any interest in Tanner Pearson -- we have veterans Adam Henrique and Frank Vatrano and youngsters Mason McTavish and Max Comtois at LW, and even if we moved one of them into the center, we'd still only be playing Pearson on the third line in preference to Max Jones, which isn't clear.
Buffalo wouldn't trade you the rights to LUKE Tuch for that package, if they had them.</div></div>
It would depend on whether the Ducks could flip Pearson at the deadline. If say they were able to get a second round pick for him at the deadline with retained salary, then they turned a third round pick into a second and a 5th. It's still an upgrade in draft capital.
Otherwise, nothing else they've proposed tradewise makes sense. Suter won't go to Canada, I don't think we could get Tuch's jockstrap for Poolman and a third round pick
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 juin 2022 à 13 h 41
Sujet:
2223 Wild - VAN
The Canucks just don't have cap space for that. Also Dumba just hasn't been the same player since he tore his pec
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 juin 2022 à 15 h 21
Sujet:
Carlson on the move too
As a Canucks fan, I think the Canucks should look at that trade for Eller. They'd probably be able to upgrade on that third by selling him off at the deadline with retained salary
And it provides some centre depth in the meantime if they're selling off Miller
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 juin 2022 à 17 h 16
Sujet:
One can dream
The first trade to Chicago is unncessary if Smith and Keith would just retire anyway. Retiring would wipe their cap hits off the books, and Edmonton would actually benefit if Keith retires, because they'd get a cap credit. Unless that's just for the purposes of armchair GM since there's no "retire a player" function lol
https://twitter.com/PuckPedia/status/1414728523604918274?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1414728523604918274%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Foilersnation.com%2F2021%2F07%2F13%2Fthe-layers-of-the-duncan-keith-trade%2F
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 mai 2022 à 0 h 32
Sujet:
What if No Letang No Malkin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Juiceman</b></div><div>Lol I’m pretty sure 30 other teams would easily beat this offer to acquire a 99 point player regardless of potential cap hit. The fact that you’re trying to defend this is honestly a bit sad
You’re acting like the Canucks have no cap space when in fact they do. They can easily fit in Boeser. Miller even if we keep him only gets a 3 million dollar raise. We can easily ship out 3 million dollars to fit him. Poor justification</div></div>
You either didn't read my comment, or responded to the wrong person. OP says Canucks have a cap crunch, and I'm saying they don't really because Myers can just be dumped when Miller's new deal would actually kick in. He's still got another year at 5.25 mil
I'm saying they would trade Miller if they can get big value, and that he's not a cap dump. So they're not going to trade him for 5 cents on the dollars like OP suggested
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com