Quoting: Hii
This is very poor reasoning for trying to take a very good young player for next to nothing.
This is a bad trade offer. As someone else already said if you're going to pay him like Newhook, pay the organization in a similar way to the Newhook trade. Not to mention that Pinto is better.
Drury and Pinto's potential aren't even in the same stratosphere, Chatfield is a 6/7 on Ottawa and a third is nothing.
How would it feel to have an organization offer a second and a bottom six prospect for Jarvis. Because it amounts to the same thing.
Okay, did you really try to argue Pinto is better than Newhook? That's not even close to being true. They're about the same in quality right now with both having a lot of room to grow offensively. In terms of potential, Newhook blows Pinto away. You then tried to compare Newhook to Pinto which is even funnier because Jarvis' entire gimmick is that he's either going to boom and be a 100 point player or he's going to be in the KHL very quickly.
Pinto's got good 50 point upside, and he's above average defensively. Issue is, Newhook's actually better defensively. Not to mention, Newhooks ability to play wing, the fact he's already got a Stanley Cup ring so he can speak as to the difficulties of winning it, and the fact he's got a FAR higher ceiling. There's a reason Pinto wasn't a 1st rounder, let alone a projected top 10 pick before that draft like Newhook. It's obviously 4 years down the road, but both players are still young enough to say that ceiling is far higher for Newhook.
Chatfield's probably a third-pairing guy in Ottawa as a 5-6 guy, that's probably about fair. The issue with this is that he can play top four minutes, and actually did at times for Carolina. He's also on less than league minimum for the year, and that's a very valuable contract.
TL;DR Maybe it's not enough for Pinto, but you're wildly overrating him here.