SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Unique Ottawa deal

Créé par: Caniac2000
Équipe: 2023-24 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 31 août 2023
Publié: 31 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Stealing the Chatfield to Ottawa idea from this ACGM:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4547616

Kubalik and Thomson were in the original return, which makes no sense for Carolina. Defenseman for defenseman without an AHL affiliate doesn't do anything, and as good as Kubalik is, the wingers are already good enough. So the idea is Pinto. Drury is not much older and could fill the role, Carolina gets a guy who put up 20 last year.

For Pinto's contract, I just gave him Newhook's deal
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
CAR
  1. Pinto, Shane [Droits de RFA]
OTT
  1. Chatfield, Jalen
  2. Drury, Jack
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de PHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2025
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2026
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 841 917 $450 000 $500 000 $658 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 août 2023 à 12 h 42
#1
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
You’re not getting Pinto lmao. That’s like offering that for Jarvis
31 août 2023 à 12 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,109
Mentions "j'aime": 768
Ottawa won’t trade Pinto and the return is too light for them to consider too. Only players I can see them being interested in trading are Joseph, Kubalik and Brannstrom, mainly to clear space to sign Pinto.
AlTintin1122 a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 12 h 44
#3
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: Mike7856
Ottawa won’t trade Pinto and the return is too light for them to consider too. Only players I can see them being interested in trading are Joseph, Kubalik and Brannstrom, mainly to clear space to sign Pinto.


Pinto has very good 2nd line 2 way potential. You don’t move him for spare parts. Even a 1st isn’t enough incentive to move him
31 août 2023 à 12 h 47
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Mike7856
Ottawa won’t trade Pinto and the return is too light for them to consider too. Only players I can see them being interested in trading are Joseph, Kubalik and Brannstrom, mainly to clear space to sign Pinto.


No one is going to touch Joseph's contract. That leaves Kubalik and Brannstrom, but with every team knowing the cap hell the Sens are in, it leaves the organization backed into a hole. Kubalik's value isn't the greatest anyway. Brannstrom's has been falling since the second he got to Ottawa. Even if they could afford him, what are they going to do? His path into a top-six role is completely blocked.
31 août 2023 à 12 h 49
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: AlTintin1122
You’re not getting Pinto lmao. That’s like offering that for Jarvis


Pinto and Jarvis aren't comparables... I like Pinto, his ceiling is not even in the same stratosphere as Jarvis'. This is either a really bad troll job, or you're incredibly anti-Canes
31 août 2023 à 12 h 49
#6
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: Caniac2000
No one is going to touch Joseph's contract. That leaves Kubalik and Brannstrom, but with every team knowing the cap hell the Sens are in, it leaves the organization backed into a hole. Kubalik's value isn't the greatest anyway. Brannstrom's has been falling since the second he got to Ottawa. Even if they could afford him, what are they going to do? His path into a top-six role is completely blocked.


Pinto isn’t getting moved 0 chance. The organization had him as untouchable for Chychrun and others. They’re not moving him.
31 août 2023 à 12 h 49
#7
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: Caniac2000
Pinto and Jarvis aren't comparables... I like Pinto, his ceiling is not even in the same stratosphere as Jarvis'. This is either a really bad troll job, or you're incredibly anti-Canes


Pinto has 2 way 60pt potential. Had 20 goals in his rookie szn after missing a whole year. His ceiling is high
31 août 2023 à 12 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,109
Mentions "j'aime": 768
Quoting: Caniac2000
No one is going to touch Joseph's contract. That leaves Kubalik and Brannstrom, but with every team knowing the cap hell the Sens are in, it leaves the organization backed into a hole. Kubalik's value isn't the greatest anyway. Brannstrom's has been falling since the second he got to Ottawa. Even if they could afford him, what are they going to do? His path into a top-six role is completely blocked.


I can see them holding out for pre season. Teams get unfortunate injuries to Top 6 players for sometimes months on end and need a cheap replacement. Kubalik and Brannstrom on 1 year deals makes them pretty enticing. Brannstrom is incredibly underrated, I think Pierre saying he was the second coming of Karlsson really screwed him. He played extremely well on the bottom pair with next to no PP time. Seems things have clicked for him now. Think they could easily get a 3rd for either of them if needed.
31 août 2023 à 12 h 53
#9
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: Mike7856
I can see them holding out for pre season. Teams get unfortunate injuries to Top 6 players for sometimes months on end and need a cheap replacement. Kubalik and Brannstrom on 1 year deals makes them pretty enticing. Brannstrom is incredibly underrated, I think Pierre saying he was the second coming of Karlsson really screwed him. He played extremely well on the bottom pair with next to no PP time. Seems things have clicked for him now. Think they could easily get a 3rd for either of them if needed.


This is just wishful thinking by an opposing teams fan thinking he can get a great player for spare parts
drambui a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 12 h 53
#10
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,844
Mentions "j'aime": 4,458
If you're going to sign Pinto like Newhook, then you need to trade for Pinto like Newhook.

That means a prospect + low first + high second.

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/alex-newhook



Ottawa will accept Drury + your 2024 1st + the Flyers' 2024 2nd for Pinto.
drambui a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 12 h 57
#11
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: sensonfire
If you're going to sign Pinto like Newhook, then you need to trade for Pinto like Newhook.

That means a prospect + low first + high second.

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/alex-newhook



Ottawa will accept Drury + your 2024 1st + the Flyers' 2024 2nd for Pinto.


No ottawa will not . He’s a core player he’s not going anywhere. They made him untouchable in trades not to move him for futures
gavinray a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 0
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: sensonfire
If you're going to sign Pinto like Newhook, then you need to trade for Pinto like Newhook.

That means a prospect + low first + high second.

https://www.capfriendly.com/trades/players/alex-newhook



Ottawa will accept Drury + your 2024 1st + the Flyers' 2024 2nd for Pinto.


The contract was given to Newhook is what I used for Pinto because otherwise Sens fans are going to complain. In reality, Pinto's trade value isn't as high. Pinto's ceiling isn't the same as Newhooks. He's good, but he's also not been in the NHL as long. Newhook's also already won the Stanley Cup, Pinto hasn't made a playoff appearance. They're from the same draft so age isn't a factor, Newhooks more versatile.... come on. You pay a contract foe what a player is, you trade for someone this young for what they will be, and Pinto won't be in the same realm as Newhook.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 0
#13
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,844
Mentions "j'aime": 4,458
Quoting: AlTintin1122
No ottawa will not . He’s a core player he’s not going anywhere. They made him untouchable in trades not to move him for futures


I don't really want to trade Pinto either.

That's why Ottawa will have to trade Brannstrom, Kubalik or Joseph instead.

The trick is finding a taker that would agree to a trade that's worthwhile for Ottawa.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 2
#14
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: sensonfire
I don't really want to trade Pinto either.

That's why Ottawa will have to trade Brannstrom, Kubalik or Joseph instead.

The trick is finding a taker that would agree to a trade that's worthwhile for Ottawa.


Sign Pinto 1 year with extension
in December like Labanc best thing they can do . They have 15 mill next year and can give him a longterm deal
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 4
#15
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: Caniac2000
No one is going to touch Joseph's contract. That leaves Kubalik and Brannstrom, but with every team knowing the cap hell the Sens are in, it leaves the organization backed into a hole. Kubalik's value isn't the greatest anyway. Brannstrom's has been falling since the second he got to Ottawa. Even if they could afford him, what are they going to do? His path into a top-six role is completely blocked.


This is very poor reasoning for trying to take a very good young player for next to nothing.

This is a bad trade offer. As someone else already said if you're going to pay him like Newhook, pay the organization in a similar way to the Newhook trade. Not to mention that Pinto is better.

Drury and Pinto's potential aren't even in the same stratosphere, Chatfield is a 6/7 on Ottawa and a third is nothing.

How would it feel to have an organization offer a second and a bottom six prospect for Jarvis. Because it amounts to the same thing.
AlTintin1122 et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 9
#16
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: Caniac2000
The contract was given to Newhook is what I used for Pinto because otherwise Sens fans are going to complain. In reality, Pinto's trade value isn't as high. Pinto's ceiling isn't the same as Newhooks. He's good, but he's also not been in the NHL as long. Newhook's also already won the Stanley Cup, Pinto hasn't made a playoff appearance. They're from the same draft so age isn't a factor, Newhooks more versatile.... come on. You pay a contract foe what a player is, you trade for someone this young for what they will be, and Pinto won't be in the same realm as Newhook.


You’re the king of bad takes. He had a 20 goal season as a rookie after missing a whole season. He has very good 2 way 2C potential like Brock Nelson . He’s not getting traded unless it’s a 1 for 1 for a. Very good similar young RD
Hii a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 10
#17
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: Hii
This is very poor reasoning for trying to take a very good young player for next to nothing.

This is a bad trade offer. As someone else already said if you're going to pay him like Newhook, pay the organization in a similar way to the Newhook trade. Not to mention that Pinto is better.

Drury and Pinto's potential aren't even in the same stratosphere, Chatfield is a 6/7 on Ottawa and a third is nothing.

How would it feel to have an organization offer a second and a bottom six prospect for Jarvis. Because it amounts to the same thing.


Pinto hasn’t even had his breakout season yet .
Hii et TheBoyDuddus a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 11
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Hii
This is very poor reasoning for trying to take a very good young player for next to nothing.

This is a bad trade offer. As someone else already said if you're going to pay him like Newhook, pay the organization in a similar way to the Newhook trade. Not to mention that Pinto is better.

Drury and Pinto's potential aren't even in the same stratosphere, Chatfield is a 6/7 on Ottawa and a third is nothing.

How would it feel to have an organization offer a second and a bottom six prospect for Jarvis. Because it amounts to the same thing.


Okay, did you really try to argue Pinto is better than Newhook? That's not even close to being true. They're about the same in quality right now with both having a lot of room to grow offensively. In terms of potential, Newhook blows Pinto away. You then tried to compare Newhook to Pinto which is even funnier because Jarvis' entire gimmick is that he's either going to boom and be a 100 point player or he's going to be in the KHL very quickly.

Pinto's got good 50 point upside, and he's above average defensively. Issue is, Newhook's actually better defensively. Not to mention, Newhooks ability to play wing, the fact he's already got a Stanley Cup ring so he can speak as to the difficulties of winning it, and the fact he's got a FAR higher ceiling. There's a reason Pinto wasn't a 1st rounder, let alone a projected top 10 pick before that draft like Newhook. It's obviously 4 years down the road, but both players are still young enough to say that ceiling is far higher for Newhook.

Chatfield's probably a third-pairing guy in Ottawa as a 5-6 guy, that's probably about fair. The issue with this is that he can play top four minutes, and actually did at times for Carolina. He's also on less than league minimum for the year, and that's a very valuable contract.

TL;DR Maybe it's not enough for Pinto, but you're wildly overrating him here.
HockeyBoy87 a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 11
#19
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: Caniac2000
The contract was given to Newhook is what I used for Pinto because otherwise Sens fans are going to complain. In reality, Pinto's trade value isn't as high. Pinto's ceiling isn't the same as Newhooks. He's good, but he's also not been in the NHL as long. Newhook's also already won the Stanley Cup, Pinto hasn't made a playoff appearance. They're from the same draft so age isn't a factor, Newhooks more versatile.... come on. You pay a contract foe what a player is, you trade for someone this young for what they will be, and Pinto won't be in the same realm as Newhook.


This is hilariously. You're trades already been called out as being incredibly favorable for Carolina. Pinto and Newhook have similar celling's with Pinto having 20 less points in 60 less games played. Newhook was also a passenger on an team that had Nathan MacKinnon et al.

Come on this is copium and you know this.

Also "You pay a contract foe what a player is, you trade for someone this young for what they will be, and Pinto won't be in the same realm as Newhook," if you pay for what a player will be, then you are thinking that Pinto will be a 10-20 goal 3c for his career with limited impact. Not a young 2/3c with significant offensive and defensive upside who could form one of the leagues best center cores in the years to come with Norris and Stutzle.

Also Ellers got a 2nd at the TDL for being a solid 10 goal 3c. That offer is objectively better than the one that you have presented.

For a player that is better. The season that he just had is worth more than you're offer.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 15
#20
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: Caniac2000
Okay, did you really try to argue Pinto is better than Newhook? That's not even close to being true. They're about the same in quality right now with both having a lot of room to grow offensively. In terms of potential, Newhook blows Pinto away. You then tried to compare Newhook to Pinto which is even funnier because Jarvis' entire gimmick is that he's either going to boom and be a 100 point player or he's going to be in the KHL very quickly.

Pinto's got good 50 point upside, and he's above average defensively. Issue is, Newhook's actually better defensively. Not to mention, Newhooks ability to play wing, the fact he's already got a Stanley Cup ring so he can speak as to the difficulties of winning it, and the fact he's got a FAR higher ceiling. There's a reason Pinto wasn't a 1st rounder, let alone a projected top 10 pick before that draft like Newhook. It's obviously 4 years down the road, but both players are still young enough to say that ceiling is far higher for Newhook.

Chatfield's probably a third-pairing guy in Ottawa as a 5-6 guy, that's probably about fair. The issue with this is that he can play top four minutes, and actually did at times for Carolina. He's also on less than league minimum for the year, and that's a very valuable contract.

TL;DR Maybe it's not enough for Pinto, but you're wildly overrating him here.




Pinto's whole hype is that he is good defensively, something you would know if you watched him.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 17
#21
Al-Tintin1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 549
Quoting: Caniac2000
Okay, did you really try to argue Pinto is better than Newhook? That's not even close to being true. They're about the same in quality right now with both having a lot of room to grow offensively. In terms of potential, Newhook blows Pinto away. You then tried to compare Newhook to Pinto which is even funnier because Jarvis' entire gimmick is that he's either going to boom and be a 100 point player or he's going to be in the KHL very quickly.

Pinto's got good 50 point upside, and he's above average defensively. Issue is, Newhook's actually better defensively. Not to mention, Newhooks ability to play wing, the fact he's already got a Stanley Cup ring so he can speak as to the difficulties of winning it, and the fact he's got a FAR higher ceiling. There's a reason Pinto wasn't a 1st rounder, let alone a projected top 10 pick before that draft like Newhook. It's obviously 4 years down the road, but both players are still young enough to say that ceiling is far higher for Newhook.

Chatfield's probably a third-pairing guy in Ottawa as a 5-6 guy, that's probably about fair. The issue with this is that he can play top four minutes, and actually did at times for Carolina. He's also on less than league minimum for the year, and that's a very valuable contract.

TL;DR Maybe it's not enough for Pinto, but you're wildly overrating him here.


Newhook vs Pinto is like comparing Beauvillier and Backlund if they were the same age. Who cares about Stanley cup, he wasn’t a big reason for them winning it. Newhook will be at best a middle 6 winger, where Pinto will be a solid 2 way 2C with very good faceoffs skills and PK. He had 20 goals and 35pts as a rookie after missing a whole year and it wasn’t even his breakout season.
Hii, sensonfire et TheBoyDuddus a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 17
#22
Hii
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,397
Mentions "j'aime": 570
Quoting: AlTintin1122
Pinto hasn’t even had his breakout season yet .


If Norris stays healthy he could have a huge season given the experience that he got last year and the fact that he'll be playing with better linemates and will be playing against a lower level of competition.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 18
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Hii
This is hilariously. You're trades already been called out as being incredibly favorable for Carolina. Pinto and Newhook have similar celling's with Pinto having 20 less points in 60 less games played. Newhook was also a passenger on an team that had Nathan MacKinnon et al.

Come on this is copium and you know this.

Also "You pay a contract foe what a player is, you trade for someone this young for what they will be, and Pinto won't be in the same realm as Newhook," if you pay for what a player will be, then you are thinking that Pinto will be a 10-20 goal 3c for his career with limited impact. Not a young 2/3c with significant offensive and defensive upside who could form one of the leagues best center cores in the years to come with Norris and Stutzle.

Also Ellers got a 2nd at the TDL for being a solid 10 goal 3c. That offer is objectively better than the one that you have presented.

For a player that is better. The season that he just had is worth more than you're offer.


Pinto scored 35 points playing with guys like Giroux, Tkachuk, DeBrincat... Newhook did it playing with Arturri Lehkonen... and Newhook plays wing. You're arguing that Pinto could have a strong offensive and defensive impact, which is half true. He was actually a hindrance offensively. Playing with better linemates like that and still not being above average offensively should be really worrying. He's got the ability to be someone like Jordan Staal, not Patrice Bergeron.

Al7gS5NGXngAAAABJRU5ErkJggg.png?width=741&height=610

And to try and say Lars Eller's deadline move is even remotely relevant here is comical. Eller's a Stanley Cup champion, and he's just better than Pinto across the board. While he's also a lot older, he's the better player right now. Stop it
HockeyBoy87 a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 19
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,816
Mentions "j'aime": 2,507
Quoting: Caniac2000
Okay, did you really try to argue Pinto is better than Newhook? That's not even close to being true. They're about the same in quality right now with both having a lot of room to grow offensively. In terms of potential, Newhook blows Pinto away. You then tried to compare Newhook to Pinto which is even funnier because Jarvis' entire gimmick is that he's either going to boom and be a 100 point player or he's going to be in the KHL very quickly.

Pinto's got good 50 point upside, and he's above average defensively. Issue is, Newhook's actually better defensively. Not to mention, Newhooks ability to play wing, the fact he's already got a Stanley Cup ring so he can speak as to the difficulties of winning it, and the fact he's got a FAR higher ceiling. There's a reason Pinto wasn't a 1st rounder, let alone a projected top 10 pick before that draft like Newhook. It's obviously 4 years down the road, but both players are still young enough to say that ceiling is far higher for Newhook.

Chatfield's probably a third-pairing guy in Ottawa as a 5-6 guy, that's probably about fair. The issue with this is that he can play top four minutes, and actually did at times for Carolina. He's also on less than league minimum for the year, and that's a very valuable contract.

TL;DR Maybe it's not enough for Pinto, but you're wildly overrating him here.


lots of bad argument here. winning a cup has nothing to do newhook potential. he was barely a factor in it and played a.minor role too. the fact he can play wing has more to do that he was not doing the best job as a center. for what thats worth, the fact pinto played well enough to solidify himself as a center is more valuable.

yes pinto was drafted later, doesnt mean squat for his potential. dont forget ( i know people will always brong this to you for the rest of your life) you compared morrow to being better than makar and nikishkin is also the next coming of christ. they both were either second round or late pick. i dont see you argue that their potebtial is low because of draft rank.
AlTintin1122 et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
31 août 2023 à 13 h 19
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: Hii


Pinto's whole hype is that he is good defensively, something you would know if you watched him.


Pinto's mediocre defensively. You know, something you could admit if you weren't biased.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage