Quoting: Caniac2000
Nikishin's fall in the draft I cannot explain. It did not look like a good pick when it was made, I cannot tell you what happened, but it happened.
Would you rather have a player that's the same age, same in skill and contract status that has never played a playoff game, or a player that is the same in skill and contract status that has won the Stanley Cup, has a ton of postseason experience, and can help guide others through what it takes to win? That's why it's important.
Newhook next year will be interesting. he may have the defensive restraints lifted, but in a system like Montreal, I do expect him to be a lot freeer. I could see an offensive outburst instead. Maybe 50-55 points, more if he's on the top line with Suzuki and Caufield. Pinto had better linemates last season than he likely will again after Norris' injuries. I'm just not seeing how he has that kind of explosion.
nikishkin fell because some player take just a bit more time to devellop. you cant just look at the potential at 18 years old and pretend to know their career, ceiling, floor or potential.
as for you question, its assume that they are the same, newhook and pinto, and they are not. there is about a 100 things i would consider while getting a player before ''were they on a team that won the cup''
newhook will for sure have a better offensive season with montreal, he will get more ice team.