Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

gavinray

gavinray
Membre depuis
24 mai 2015
Équipe préférée
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Messages dans les forums
773
Messages par jour
0.36
Sujets de discussion
416
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 11:36 am
Sujet: Retool at the deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TCMonkey</b></div><div>I'm down with quite a bit of this but I don't see the need to trade for Domi when he's UFA at the end of '22. We wouldn't even have him for a full season.
Also not sure about the Dunn trade. I'd rather go after Alec Martinez in free agency and overpay him for 2 years, especially if the right side is going to be so inexperienced! That's crucial to any chance of success.</div></div>

Depends on how he does with Stutzle and Batherson. He could easily bounce back. Worst case we get a pick and prospect back at the deadline next season.

No sure why we'd want a 33 year old Martinez or if he would even be signable as a UFA. Dunn solidifies our left side and lets Brann play his more comfortable right side. The only difference is we lose Zaitsev on the left. We still have Gudbranson.
Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 12:31 pm
Sujet: Eichel overpayment
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockey_Nerd</b></div><div>That's not an overpayment, and Buffalo declines it pretty easily. Eichel would start with Stuetzle. Or Maybe Norris and Sanderson as the starter if Ottawa did some convincing. But if Buffalo is trading a high impact centre, they're getting a young player with that potential back. Colin White isn't and never will be that. Pinto will likely be more of a winger in the NHL than a centre, just doesn't have that dominating ability to stick at centre. Norris is a long shot to convince Buffalo that he could eventually be a true #1 centre, but if Ottawa didn't wanna include Stuetzle then Norris is the next best option (anyone that says Tkachuk is dumb because a team doesn't trade for a guy like Eichel by trading away their best player. They bring Eichel in to play with their best player).

In all reality, Ottawa is a massive long shot to get Eichel.</div></div>

You're not getting Stutzle for Eichel when Tim could easily be a point per game player in a matter of seasons. Maybe a one for one trade would be a consideration, but even then considering 6 years of cap friendly play, its not worth it for the sens.

Sanderson has first pairing potential. His pNHLe right now is 59 points and he's elite defensively.

Shane Pinto just won NCHC player of the year (unanimous decision), NCHC defensive forward of the year, led the the league with a 62% faceoff or something crazy like that and you think he's gonna be a winger? He's got 1st line potential. He's a bluechip prospect. You could swap him out for Norris but I think Pinto is actually the better prospect in terms of potential. Also Josh Norris is 21 and at a 40 point pace in the league after winning AHL player of the year last season. He's a solid prospect.

An unprotected first could easily be the 1st overall pick in this draft. Which may end up being the best player going to Buffalo. Plus with the pick Buffalo already has they have a good chance of getting a lottery selection.

Colin White is for salary and contract purposes but he's a decent two way middle six C.

Buffalo is going to lose any trade involving Eichel but this trade can really flesh out the rebuild.
Forum: Armchair-GM18 mar à 19 h 27
Sujet: Changes
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aedoran</b></div><div>Yes Rasmussen has only 4 assists in 14 games in the NHL but he has 2 goals and 6 points in 7 games in the AHL and 5 goals and 16 points in 18 games in ICEHL Austria's top league. He has averaged almost a point a game in the ICEHL and the AHL. While Brown had 1 assist in 5 games in the AHL.</div></div>

Logan Brown had 28 points in 25 AHL games last season. He was over a point per game at Rasmussen's age. But yes lets only look at his slow start due to injury.
If you look at their pNHLe over their careers, Logan Brown has a higher projected point potential in every year except one since they were drafted.
Logan has a higher ceiling but more risk, while Rasmussen has a lower ceiling and less risk.
I don't care too much for Rasmussen, but Brown isn't getting the chance he deserves and requested a trade.
Forum: Armchair-GM 6 mar à 12 h 06
Sujet: Rasmussen
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aedoran</b></div><div>I wouldn't trade it straight up Ottawa would have to add so far this season in 2 different leagues he is playing at almost a point a game pace and Brown has played 3 games in the AHL and is -2 with 2 pim. Plus Rasmussen is 2yrs younger.</div></div>

They're literally 1 year and a month apart. It's been three games lol Brown started the season with a minor injury.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>Wings pass, Michael Rasmussen &gt; Logan Brown.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>Wings pass</div></div>



If you look at pNHLe, projected production, Brown is consistently better than Rasmussen in each year, including draft year, with the exception of draft +1 year.
Last season when Brown was Rasmussen's current age he had 28 points in 25 AHL games and 8 points in 23 NHL games. That's definitely a better pace than Rasmussen right now.
Not sure where you're getting that Rasmussen is better than Brown.
Brown has requested a trade otherwise I wouldn't really be looking to move him. He never gets the shot he deserves in the NHL.
I think it's a fair trade. If you want to add a 3rd round pick or something on Ottawa side sure lol