SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

if we suck at the deadline

Créé par: hairyberry
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 4 août 2023
Publié: 4 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just curious to see how much value the Bruins could extract in the best case scenario for their pending UFAs. Obviously not sure which team would pay for each of these players specifically, so don't get caught up on e.g. "Seattle would never do that". It's more just an exercise to see how much the Bruins might get in return if they suck next season.
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Blake, Jackson [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (CAR)
CAR
  1. DeBrusk, Jake (2 000 000 $ retained)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (DET)
3.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
4.
BOS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
5.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt (1 843 750 $ retained)
6.
BOS
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
DET
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
Swapping assumes Boston's pick is top-10
7.
BOS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
FLA
  1. Forbort, Derek (1 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CAR
Logo de BOS
Logo de SEA
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de TBL
Logo de SEA
Logo de CAR
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de PIT
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $80 890 417 $4 500 000 $500 000 $2 609 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 août 2023 à 11 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,574
Mentions "j'aime": 5,047
Canes pass. Carolina do not pay for rentals, especially not B+/A- prospects like Blake.
4 août 2023 à 11 h 46
#2
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,748
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
No chance the Canes do that deal, especially in a trade deadline situation.
Falcon_talon a aimé ceci.
4 août 2023 à 11 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,157
Mentions "j'aime": 167
Really shocked that you didnt just do the same old boring trade where you send Ullmark to NJ. Congratz on actually being different and not doing the same ole panic trade a goalie to the devils.
4 août 2023 à 11 h 58
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 454
Mentions "j'aime": 212
Quoting: Caniac555
No chance the Canes do that deal, especially in a trade deadline situation.


Quoting: Caniac2000
Canes pass. Carolina do not pay for rentals, especially not B+/A- prospects like Blake.


Again, I don't know exactly which teams will make these deals but *someone* will. These teams are basically placeholders. I'm just looking to get a rough estimate of the total value the Bs might get back if they need to sell at the deadline.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,587
Mentions "j'aime": 5,457
Most are fine, but Grzelcyk won't get as much especially because of his size. Anyways, I doubt it happens (just like in 2016). It's the centennial season, Sweeney and Neely will keep them all to try to sneak in the wild card and so, the Jacobs stay happy with the playoffs money. Hope I'm wrong, let's see.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 192
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Nothing against Grzelcyk, and the deal isn't even that bad, but Seattle has a ton of depth at LD. Even if Seattle has injury issues, that's a position that Seattle has depth to cover, so I don't see them being interested.
KrakBirds23 a aimé ceci.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 906
Mentions "j'aime": 218
Quoting: hairyberry
Again, I don't know exactly which teams will make these deals but *someone* will. These teams are basically placeholders. I'm just looking to get a rough estimate of the total value the Bs might get back if they need to sell at the deadline.


I get that. But as they said the canes aren't gonna do that. I understand waht you mean but that's a bit much of a price for a guy like DeBrusk. He is good don't get me wrong he isn't worth a essencially 2 1sts. Why I say 2 is because in this moment Jackson is worth a 16th OVA 1st imo. He is producing at a pace like Fantili. Not saying he will be an equal to Fantili but being at that pace means you have a good future in the NHL. And yes I know that the canes pick from 27-32 but it's still a 1st... And as we've seen late 1sts can become 1st OVA players (aka Pasternak). So I don't belive that DeBrusk is that guy to fetch that price.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 12
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 906
Mentions "j'aime": 218
Quoting: Caniac555
No chance the Canes do that deal, especially in a trade deadline situation.


Blake is at the pace of Fantili right now. idk why I said it but I just thought I'd mention so that people see his worth
4 août 2023 à 12 h 16
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,205
Mentions "j'aime": 456
The most recent comparible to DeBrusk would be Domi in my opinion and he only went for a 2nd. DeBrusk might be worth a bit more, but nothing close to that.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 17
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 454
Mentions "j'aime": 212
Quoting: Shaun80
The most recent comparible to DeBrusk would be Domi in my opinion and he only went for a 2nd. DeBrusk might be worth a bit more, but nothing close to that.


Debrusk is worth more than Domi, he's a much more rounded player and is more of a goal scorer
4 août 2023 à 12 h 23
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,205
Mentions "j'aime": 456
Quoting: hairyberry
Debrusk is worth more than Domi, he's a much more rounded player and is more of a goal scorer


I agree he's better, but not that much. Wingers don't carry a lot of value in the league.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 24
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,972
Canes won’t pay that for a rental. If Debrusk would sign an acceptable extension, something around that price is fine
4 août 2023 à 12 h 30
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 553
Mentions "j'aime": 186
To get the top 10 pick back you have to be worse than the Canucks, Blues, Red Wings, Caps, Flyers, Coyotes, Canadiens, Sharks, Blackhawks, Blue Jackets, or Ducks.

The only teams that got any better that were hovering around the bottom 10 is the Sens and Buffalo. I still think the Bruins are better than the Sens. Boston might be battling for a wild card with Buffalo if they do not add a top 6 center, OR one of the prospects pops (Lysell, Merkulov, Poitras)

This team will be competitive.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 30
#14
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,748
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Let’s be realistic with our prospect evaluations - just take the names away. Canes wouldnt send a decent prospect + 2 picks (including a 1st) for a rental. Blake is good, but it’s not the point.

Quoting: Falcon_talon
Blake is at the pace of Fantili right now. idk why I said it but I just thought I'd mention so that people see his worth
drambui et Falcon_talon a aimé ceci.
4 août 2023 à 12 h 59
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2023
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: hairyberry
Again, I don't know exactly which teams will make these deals but *someone* will. These teams are basically placeholders. I'm just looking to get a rough estimate of the total value the Bs might get back if they need to sell at the deadline.


lil bro's over in carolina don't know how to read I guess.
4 août 2023 à 13 h 2
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,912
Mentions "j'aime": 22,910
Don't know if the Bruins will bad enough to be willing to trade all their upcoming UFAs. But IMO, non playoff teams should be looking to sell their upcoming JUFAs
4 août 2023 à 13 h 20
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 649
Mentions "j'aime": 171
The Detroit deal isn’t necessary because the pick is already to 10 protected
4 août 2023 à 13 h 30
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,840
Mentions "j'aime": 2,515
Quoting: Falcon_talon
Blake is at the pace of Fantili right now. idk why I said it but I just thought I'd mention so that people see his worth


pace of fantilli?????? how many point did he score in the ncaa during his draft year? hint : the answer his 0
4 août 2023 à 13 h 49
#19
Danny B is here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 5,063
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Quoting: Caniac2000
Canes pass. Carolina do not pay for rentals, especially not B+/A- prospects like Blake.


Forget this team and the trade and all of that, can you honestly explain to me how a 4th rounder that barely scored above a PPG in college at 20 years old is an A- prospect? Maybe you score prospects differently but in my mind that a C prospect at best. Just want to see what I’m missing
7 août 2023 à 20 h 42
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 906
Mentions "j'aime": 218
Quoting: Caniac555
Let’s be realistic with our prospect evaluations - just take the names away. Canes wouldnt send a decent prospect + 2 picks (including a 1st) for a rental. Blake is good, but it’s not the point.


Sorry I didn't mean he was that guy what I kinda meant with that post was that he's not as bad as some people say he is.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage