SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hellebuyck Trade

Créé par: Tombot97
Équipe: 2023-24 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 2 mai 2023
Publié: 2 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Chicago fans I don't know if you would be willing to take Peterson's contract, I just chose a bad team with a ton of cap space. You seem okay with retaining cap hits and taking on bad contracts.

Jets fans what would you want for Hellebuyck if the team goes into a full rebuild from the Kings? Byfield and Clarke are nonstarters for Rob Blake in any trade and in this scenario Hellebuyck needs to be 50% retained. PLD, Wheeler, Schefflie, and Hellebuyck are all being made available in this scenario so retaining isn't a problem and you would be looking for young players. Peterson has a M-NTC so he won't be involved in the trade as well.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1874 125 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
22 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
85 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Veteran, Big Defensive-Defensemen
11 150 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Madden, Tyler
  2. Petersen, Cal
  3. Spence, Jordan
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
2.
LAK
  1. Hellebuyck, Connor (3 083 333 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Fagemo, Samuel
  2. Turcotte, Alex
  3. Walker, Sean
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de WPG
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 259 126 $0 $3 712 500 $240 874 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 083 334 $3 083 334 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Veteran, Big Defensive-Defensemen
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
845 000 $845 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
787 500 $787 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
847 500 $847 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 16
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,725
Mentions "j'aime": 6,220
I wouldn't do it. Goaltender performance is too dependent on the team they play behind. There's no guarantee that Hellebuyck would be an above average goaltender on the Kings.

That is way too much to spend on one season of what could end up being average goaltending.
Tombot97 a aimé ceci.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,473
Mentions "j'aime": 11,528
CHI declines.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 20
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,186
Mentions "j'aime": 11,205
Hawks say add the '24 2nd to the deal. Kings can keep Madden and Spence if they want. Neither guy has any real value from the Hawks perspective.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 20
#4
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,025
Mentions "j'aime": 24,690
laugh laugh Hellebuyck wants to win a cup now and that's not happening in LA. And no way is Hellebuyck taking any less than 8 x $10,000,000 he wants close to Carey Price money or Sergei Bobrovsky money. And LA doesn’t have the cap space for that. Detroit can beat that offer easily to bring him home
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 21
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,383
Mentions "j'aime": 4,743
Quoting: Garak
CHI declines.


San Jose Accepts! Petersen could rebound and getting. A solid RD and a 2nd to take on a contract that expires before the sharks are good again isn’t a bad deal.
csick, Tombot97 et justaBoss a aimé ceci.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 22
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,025
Mentions "j'aime": 24,690
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
San Jose Accepts! Petersen could rebound and getting. A solid RD and a 2nd to take on a contract that expires before the sharks are good again isn’t a bad deal.


Bro that’s such a good offer to take on Peterson , idk how anyone can say no. I’ve never seen Chicago fans say yes to a trade since they announced their rebuild, must be a depressing mood in Chicago
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 28
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,790
Mentions "j'aime": 31,485
Quoting: csick
Bro that’s such a good offer to take on Peterson , idk how anyone can say no. I’ve never seen Chicago fans say yes to a trade since they announced their rebuild, must be a depressing mood in Chicago


How can you like a post 10 times?
csick, OldNYIfan et Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 28
#8
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,025
Mentions "j'aime": 24,690
Quoting: justaBoss
How can you like a post 10 times?


It’s like Chicago fans are allergic to acquiring good prospects unless they’re top line or top pairing Lmao
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 29
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 83
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I wouldn't do it. Goaltender performance is too dependent on the team they play behind. There's no guarantee that Hellebuyck would be an above average goaltender on the Kings.

That is way too much to spend on one season of what could end up being average goaltending.


Would you resign Korpisalo to a 4-4.5AAV 4 yearish deal, keep Peterson, or trade for someone else like Ullmark? The Kings were top 5 in xGA 5v5 last year so if Helluybuck is elite next year and the team performs again it should workout. I admit there is no guarantee both the Kings and Hellebuyck perform at the same level next year. The deal would probably include a huge extension but i'm not sure about the contract he would sign.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 30
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,725
Mentions "j'aime": 6,220
I don't see the Kings giving up more than a 2nd to dump what amounts to a cumulative $6.85M in cap space over the next 3 years.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 32
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,725
Mentions "j'aime": 6,220
Quoting: Tombot97
Would you resign Korpisalo to a 4-4.5AAV 4 yearish deal, keep Peterson, or trade for someone else like Ullmark? The Kings were top 5 in xGA 5v5 last year so if Helluybuck is elite next year and the team performs again it should workout. I admit there is no guarantee both the Kings and Hellebuyck perform at the same level next year. The deal would probably include a huge extension but i'm not sure about the contract he would sign.


I'd offer Korpisalo no more than 2 years @ $2.5M. I'd probably offer a 2nd and a prospect for Ullmark (Boston probably says no). After that, I'd keep Petersen and run with Copley as the starter, then look for a goaltender at the deadline next Spring.
Tombot97 a aimé ceci.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 37
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,473
Mentions "j'aime": 11,528
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
San Jose Accepts! Petersen could rebound and getting. A solid RD and a 2nd to take on a contract that expires before the sharks are good again isn’t a bad deal.


It's just not enough to take on that contract. Petersen may bounce back, but any player could "bounce back". You don't take on that kind of contract predicated on 'maybes'. He is a pure cap dump and should be treated as such. CHI has no need for Spence or Madden, either. We already have Mitchell who has the same build, plays the same type of game, and is arguably better than Spence, and CHI is probably gonna trade him or let him walk. Why would we would we value those same characteristics in another player? Madden would be an unnecessary redundancy clogging up roster space in the AHL. And what will likely be a late 2nd round pick in 2025 is pretty unappealing.

But yeah. Go ahead and take it SJS.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 37
#13
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Quoting: csick
laugh laugh Hellebuyck wants to win a cup now and that's not happening in LA. And no way is Hellebuyck taking any less than 8 x $10,000,000 he wants close to Carey Price money or Sergei Bobrovsky money. And LA doesn’t have the cap space for that. Detroit can beat that offer easily to bring him home


laugh Wow you catch on quick here dude.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 37
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 83
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I'd offer Korpisalo no more than 2 years $2.5M. I'd probably offer a 2nd and a prospect for Ullmark (Boston probably says no). After that, I'd keep Petersen and run with Copley as the starter, then look for a goaltender at the deadline next Spring.


Sounds good. Korpisalo is probably getting a better deal than that with his advanced stats this year, but I'd love to have him at that number.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 38
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,088
Mentions "j'aime": 14,686
There is almost nothing of value from LA to Winnipeg
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 41
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,473
Mentions "j'aime": 11,528
Quoting: csick
It’s like Chicago fans are allergic to acquiring good prospects unless they’re top line or top pairing Lmao


That is not a good offer for the Petersen cap dump. I don't think you realize the magnitude of that contract and how bad Petersen is. Has nothing to do with being top line or top pairing. It just doesn't make sense for CHI. Regardless, as you well know, Davidson has proven over and over for the most part that he has little interest in other teams prospects. He wants picks. Spence is overrated, Madden is of little interest, and a late 2025 2nd is less than interesting.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 43
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,725
Mentions "j'aime": 6,220
Quoting: Tombot97
Sounds good. Korpisalo is probably getting a better deal than that with his advanced stats this year, but I'd love to have him at that number.


Probably. I wasn't very impressed with him in LA. He wasn't any better than Copley.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 45
#18
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,025
Mentions "j'aime": 24,690
Quoting: Garak
That is not a good offer for the Petersen cap dump. I don't think you realize the magnitude of that contract and how bad Petersen is. Has nothing to do with being top line or top pairing. It just doesn't make sense for CHI. Regardless, as you well know, Davidson has proven over and over for the most part that he has little interest in other teams prospects. He wants picks. Spence is overrated, Madden is of little interest, and a late 2025 2nd is less than interesting.


Spence isn’t overrated. He will be a solid 2nd pair Dman with great PP production
Tombot97 a aimé ceci.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 46
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 83
Mentions "j'aime": 28
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
San Jose Accepts! Petersen could rebound and getting. A solid RD and a 2nd to take on a contract that expires before the sharks are good again isn’t a bad deal.


I thought about the sharks but I know you are in a cap crunch right now. I just checked and I guess you don't need to sign anyone to big deals in the next 2 years. Spence is a great prospect and is only in the AHL because we have 6 RDs capable of being in the NHL. Petersen is a wildcard but he could turn out to be an above average backup.
2 mai 2023 à 18 h 47
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,473
Mentions "j'aime": 11,528
Quoting: csick
Spence isn’t overrated. He will be a solid 2nd pair Dman with great PP production


I'll believe that when I see it.
2 mai 2023 à 19 h 5
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 83
Mentions "j'aime": 28
LOL well that went nowhere. I was not expecting the SJS fan or the Detroit Fans. I forgot they had their own underperforming 4+AAV goalie. Well Kaliyev, Lizotte, Grundstrom, Kupari, F**emo, Turcotte, Pinelli, Laferriere, Chromiak, Durzi, Spence, Bjornfot, Grans, Villalta, Portillo and 1st/2nds would be on the table. If a Jets fan who knows AHL/CHL Kings players want to comment what the Jets would want from us or just in general I'd appreciate it.
2 mai 2023 à 19 h 32
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,383
Mentions "j'aime": 4,743
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I don't see the Kings giving up more than a 2nd to dump what amounts to a cumulative $6.85M in cap space over the next 3 years.


He’s actually owed 11 mil over the next 2 years. That screams 1st plus if you look at history (Marleau was 4.5 actual but 7 cap hit got a 1st, Monahan 5.5 got a 1st)
And both those players were still decent NHL players but had to go for cap purposes. Petersen isn’t NHL caliber and is signed for 2 more years 5 mil cap hit per year.
2 mai 2023 à 19 h 37
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,383
Mentions "j'aime": 4,743
Quoting: Tombot97
I thought about the sharks but I know you are in a cap crunch right now. I just checked and I guess you don't need to sign anyone to big deals in the next 2 years. Spence is a great prospect and is only in the AHL because we have 6 RDs capable of being in the NHL. Petersen is a wildcard but he could turn out to be an above average backup.


Petersen could rebound in a change of scenery and besides him the pick and Spencer fit huge needs for the sharks and the cap wasted even if Petersen doesn’t bounce back isn’t important this year and sharks have like 20 mil off the books for players they are likely not resigning.
2 mai 2023 à 19 h 45
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,725
Mentions "j'aime": 6,220
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
He’s actually owed 11 mil over the next 2 years. That screams 1st plus if you look at history (Marleau was 4.5 actual but 7 cap hit got a 1st, Monahan 5.5 got a 1st)
And both those players were still decent NHL players but had to go for cap purposes. Petersen isn’t NHL caliber and is signed for 2 more years 5 mil cap hit per year.


Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Petersen could rebound in a change of scenery and besides him the pick and Spencer fit huge needs for the sharks and the cap wasted even if Petersen doesn’t bounce back isn’t important this year and sharks have like 20 mil off the books for players they are likely not resigning.


Petersen doesn't need a change of scenery to rebound. He needs a summer of rest, followed by a strong training camp. Even with his substandard play, Petersen still went 5-3-2 in the NHL this season.

Actual dollars isn't important when it comes to trade value. There's only $6.85M in cap dollars on the table that the Kings need to clear, and they're not going to give up a 1st round pick or other quality assets to do so. If that's what it takes, the Kings will just keep Petersen and run him as backup to Copley all season. Then they can pursue a rental goaltender at the deadline again if the tandem isn't getting it done.
2 mai 2023 à 19 h 50
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,145
Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
I would strongly consider the proposed trade with the Hawks once the Kings pay Petersen's Summer bonus. I think once the bonus is paid, Petersen should cost a pair of 2nds (in the mid round range) to move. I think this package is around that range. Late 2nd, Spence a pretty good RHD where the Hawks have really nothing between Regula and Rinzel (who is a while out), and Madden as a change of scenery 3rd peiece is not a bad return. I would prefer switching Spence for Grans and lose the 7th and call it Petersen, 2nd, Grans and Madden for future consideration.
Tombot97 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage