Hawks easily pass on all three of these trades, but wouldn't mind Bedard at all!

Bedard has to play with someone.

Nice troll job. Pretty much everyone pans your offer yesterday of the Tampa '24 1st, & Ott & NYR 2nds in '23 and you double down with even more absurd of a proposal.

you are a troll.. gtfo

Arizona isn’t moving hayton. 65 point pace on the top line, not finding that with the Tampa pick.

Canucks accept, no take backs!

Really? Boeser is a great goal scorer

Avs aren't accepting that for Girard. Hronek renturn or no thanks.

You forgot:

Makar to the Hawks for Mrazek and the Hawks 7th rounder.

Boeser is a solid 20 goal, 50 point player with the potential to be a 30 goal, 70 point player if he can stay healthy and put all the pieces together. However, he doesn't hold this kind of value. Chicago's 1st in 2024 is guaranteed to be a lottery selection. Will almost certainly be a top 10 pick, with a pretty good chance it's a top 5 pick. That alone is a really valuable piece, but you're also adding on 2 seconds, one of which is pick 35 in an extremely deep draft class. That's a 1st that's pretty much guaranteed top 10, plus an early 2nd and a late 2nd.

If Boeser gets moved out of Vancouver, it's because of their cap situation. Minnesota had the same situation with Fiala last year, having to move him due to their cap situation. He's a better player than Boeser, but only returned pick 19 and a B prospect in Faber. To the right team, Boeser is probably worth a 2nd + B prospect or a late 1st. Personally, I'd be happy with something like Boeser for 2023 2nd (CHI) and a prospect (someone like Vlasic, Del Mastro, Phillips, or Dach). Could also do him straight up for one of the Tampa 1sts. I wouldn't expect too much more than that.

That's an easy no for the Avs.

I think both teams would be content keeping their assets. Hawks need as many chances of hitting on a future core piece in the draft and the Avs won't and shouldn't give up a solid young defenseman. I like Girard a lot but the Hawks are going younger and looking towards the future where they can draft someone 6 years younger and hopefully develop him.

Agreed. It's not enough for Girard. People forget the two seconds the Avs gave for Toews was basically that they had the Isles over a barrel and seem to think that's the going rate to offer. It also doesn't really make sense to the 'hawks with where they are right now. I see it as a total bottom up rebuild for them really and Girard really doesn't fit into that timescale. Like you say the chances to hit future core pieces, even if they only end up being the future depth guys, are more beneficial to them right now.