Éditer l'avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • La grandeur minimale recommandée se veut de 800px par 800px
  • Grandeur maximale: 1MB
Glisser l'image pour repositionner
Sauvegarder
Annuler

earl08

Membre depuis
20 jan 2019
Équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
696
Messages par jour
0.76
Sujets de discussion
106
Forum: Armchair-GM 5 jui à 9 h 49
Sujet: Competitive Flames Team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sabres1973</b></div><div>It’s just not the players we want. We are giving up a great young center (top5-7 center in the league who is 24) and you want us to take back a center who is gonna be 27 in October and will be coming off hip surgery and has had hip surgery before. I like Monahan, he is a great player but just not what the Sabres need now. If we did trade for him I would be ok just not thrilled. It’s definitely a downgrade from eichel. Plus we would also need a forward prospect. We are in a retool mode. It will unfortunately probably take us at least 2 years before we get back to the playoffs so by then he would be 29. His last 2 years he has regressed. Last year he had 28 points in 50 games. Last year Reinhart had almost as many goals as Monahan had points. It’s not that I don’t like him it’s just the wrong time to take a chance that he might rebound</div></div>

It's very close. Duchene returned: Turris, Bowers, a protected 1st, a 3rd, &amp; Hammond. Turris morphed into: Girard, Kamenev, &amp; a 2nd. So the eventual return was: Girard, Bowers, Kamenev, a 1st, a 2nd, a 3rd, &amp; Hammond. The Avs took a chance that one of the three prospects would pan out, and luckily Girard did. But nothing was guaranteed. Bowers is looking like a bottom sixer if he ever makes it. Kamenev already fizzled out.

In the above proposal, CGY is sending back two established, impact players. Given Eichel's status, I think it could use one more decent asset, like a pick or prospect, to be fair value.
Forum: Armchair-GM 4 jui à 22 h 05