SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Transitional Offseason Throughout the Organization

Créé par: koremoo
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 11 avr. 2023
Publié: 12 avr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Front Office:
- Ensure that Gorton remains committed to the Habs. If that means further promoting him or massively raising his salary, so be it. He is an experienced presence that helps make Kent's job far easier.
- Consider bringing in Paul Byron and Carey Price as members of the front office or of the development staff. Byron seems to have already somewhat transitioned into that role, and could be a great liaison between the team and the front office. Price could serve as a mentor to the young goalies in the system; and he would be able to do so from his new home, in British Columbia.

Coaching Staff:
- Revamp the NHL coaching staff, and reconstruct the AHL coaching staff. Notably, let go of Burrows and Letowski, who were hired by Marc Bergevin and haven't been particularly effective in their time here (Burrows' PP is horrendously bad), as well as AHL head coach J-F Houle.
- At the NHL level, the Habs could consider bringing in the up-and-coming Coachella Valley Firebirds assistant coach, Jessica Campbell, and former Hab, Tomas Plekanec, who has expressed interest in becoming a coach, to continue the young team's development.
- One potential option for the AHL head coaching job would be Sherbrooke Phoenix head coach, Stephane Julien, who has won coach of the year and was an assistant coach for Canada's WJC team.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 500 000 $
87 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
2975 000 $
1850 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
2850 000 $
2825 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc [Droits de RFA]
WPG
  1. Kidney, Riley
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
*Conditional 2024 4th round pick (BUF)*: If the Sabres reach the second round of the 2024 Stanley Cup playoffs, they will transfer over the 2024 3rd round pick (BUF) instead.
3.
MTL
    Future Considerations
    CHI
    1. Armia, Joel
    2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    2024
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de EDM
    2025
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $75 999 166 $1 170 000 $4 195 000 $7 500 834 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    975 000 $975 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    828 333 $828 333 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    766 667 $766 667 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    12 avr. 2023 à 13 h 56
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 3,326
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,122
    If the Sabres spend any assets its going to be for a top 4 D, not someone like Edmundson
    Finn2016 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 13 h 57
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 15,836
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,040
    There is no incentive for Winnipeg to trade PLD for less than his rental value.

    The perfect comparable trade is the Horvat deal, so you just need to add a bit to that for PLD being younger, better and having a full year of team control left.

    However, it will be pointless to trade for him if you're trying to get him to sign a lowball extension. Zero chance he signs the extension you have.

    Buffalo isn't giving up that much for Edmundson.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 13 h 59
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 34
    Mentions "j'aime": 20
    I like theses moves!
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 5
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 57
    Mentions "j'aime": 24
    Quoting: Windjammer
    There is no incentive for Winnipeg to trade PLD for less than his rental value.

    The perfect comparable trade is the Horvat deal, so you just need to add a bit to that for PLD being younger, better and having a full year of team control left.

    However, it will be pointless to trade for him if you're trying to get him to sign a lowball extension. Zero chance he signs the extension you have.


    I would argue that the perfect comparable for a potential Dubois deal is the fiala trade both being 24yo at the time of the deal and both having similar stats. You could even argue that Fiala had better stats than Dubois on a worst team, but Dubois is a center. The fiala trade was basically what you're getting here.
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 7
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 204
    Mentions "j'aime": 145
    Quoting: Windjammer
    There is no incentive for Winnipeg to trade PLD for less than his rental value.

    The perfect comparable trade is the Horvat deal, so you just need to add a bit to that for PLD being younger, better and having a full year of team control left.

    However, it will be pointless to trade for him if you're trying to get him to sign a lowball extension. Zero chance he signs the extension you have.

    Buffalo isn't giving up that much for Edmundson.


    Dubois is not better than Horvat - at the time Horvat was traded. That comparable is not in the slightest bit close.
    habs_need_Scoring a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 8
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 715
    Mentions "j'aime": 491
    Quoting: LaCurveASlaf
    I like theses moves!


    Good someone does. Buffalo doesn’t. This is a site continual thread of Edmundson to buffalo
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 9
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 15,836
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,040
    Quoting: alex123
    I would argue that the perfect comparable for a potential Dubois deal is the fiala trade both being 24yo at the time of the deal and both having similar stats. You could even argue that Fiala had better stats than Dubois on a worst team, but Dubois is a center. The fiala trade was basically what you're getting here.


    Other than the Fiala trade not being comparable at all. Minnesota had to trade Fiala as they couldn't possibly keep him due to cap issues. Winnipeg doesn't have that problem. Plus as you said, PLD is a center there is more valuable.

    The Horvat trade was more recent for a similar calibre, albeit older player. As close of a comparable as can be found.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 13
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 204
    Mentions "j'aime": 145
    Quoting: Windjammer
    Other than the Fiala trade not being comparable at all. Minnesota had to trade Fiala as they couldn't possibly keep him due to cap issues. Winnipeg doesn't have that problem. Plus as you said, PLD is a center there is more valuable.

    The Horvat trade was more recent for a similar calibre, albeit older player. As close of a comparable as can be found.


    There is a 3 year age difference. You are treating it as if Horvat is 32.

    Horvat was scoring at insane rates, and was a genuine 1C. Dubois, however, is not.

    A 1st and a mid-tier prospect is right on the money for Dubois worth.
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 23
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 15,836
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,040
    Quoting: probablysleeping
    There is a 3 year age difference. You are treating it as if Horvat is 32.

    Horvat was scoring at insane rates, and was a genuine 1C. Dubois, however, is not.

    A 1st and a mid-tier prospect is right on the money for Dubois worth.


    Objectively over their careers PLD averages 57 points per 82 games while Horvat averages 55 points over their careers. PLD does this with with about one minute less average ice time and being 4 years younger.

    If Horvat is a genuine 1C, then by this same qualifications Dubois is a genuine 1C. You not wanting to evaluate players on a level playing field doesn't change that.

    The Horvat trade is the perfect comparable.
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 23
    #10
    Subbanator
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 7,416
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,384
    Quoting: Windjammer
    Other than the Fiala trade not being comparable at all. Minnesota had to trade Fiala as they couldn't possibly keep him due to cap issues. Winnipeg doesn't have that problem. Plus as you said, PLD is a center there is more valuable.

    The Horvat trade was more recent for a similar calibre, albeit older player. As close of a comparable as can be found.


    You realize Winnipeg can't possibly keep PLD because he doesn't want to be there, right?

    Hence the more comparable trade
    gretzkyghosts et badoob a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 14 h 29
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,834
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,609
    Not nearly enough for CHI to take Armia's contract.
    gretzkyghosts et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 15 h 19
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 204
    Mentions "j'aime": 145
    Modifié 12 avr. 2023 à 15 h 32
    Quoting: Windjammer
    Objectively over their careers PLD averages 57 points per 82 games while Horvat averages 55 points over their careers. PLD does this with with about one minute less average ice time and being 4 years younger.

    If Horvat is a genuine 1C, then by this same qualifications Dubois is a genuine 1C. You not wanting to evaluate players on a level playing field doesn't change that.

    The Horvat trade is the perfect comparable.


    Despite the fact that they don't have the same qualifications.
    Dubois gets sheltered 5v5 and averages 60% offensive zone starts. Add that with a high Quality of teammates and a very low Quality of competition. Dubois is not some "never seen before" superstar. He's your run of the mill, 60pt average, second line center who has below subpar defensive metrics.
    Parroting box scores and points doesn't help your argument if you're not using context. Dubois has been catered, and handed his sheltered minutes on a silver platter.

    There will be no wild, insane return that you seem to think he will get. There's also no competition. He's not going anywhere besides Montreal. No, he will not get traded to another contender, either. He does not want to play anywhere else. He quite literally showed up to the entry draft because he thought he was getting traded to Montreal. And no contender within their right mind will pay you the kings lot for him because they are scared he won't sign there long term, even if he's moved as a rental.

    Horvat was moved with the idea that he'd sign an extension. He was not going to be a rental. The islanders were not moving a 1st and Raty for a rental. Especially NOT Lou Lamoriello. Who has no prior history of making such moves.

    YOU don't want to value players on an equal playing field, because you have a very caveman way of thinking.
    "Dubois get 60 points, Dubois get very big return"

    That's simply not the case. This package, at most, is what you're getting for a very stubborn, sheltered second line center.

    I’ve also seen on your profile you like to suggest Beck returning for PLD? Not happening. Montreal can move a 1st and Beck for a player who can actually play unsheltered 2C minutes lol.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    12 avr. 2023 à 17 h 10
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2022
    Messages: 8,667
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,503
    Hawks aren't taking Armia for less than a 2nd, and with over $8m in actual salary due to him, it might be a 2nd plus.
    12 avr. 2023 à 20 h 42
    #14
    Jet69
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,595
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
    Jets brass may very well like this deal as there is no cap coming back. If Jets go rebuild, they would probably like to keep the roster near the floor.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage