Quoting: Lancebmx
I felt like I was reaching quite a bit with that one. Also I forgot to note in the trade but did in the description that an extension would be agreed upon. I wouldn't be opposed to leaving Sharangovich out and possibly replacing him with Haula, not sure if that would be a fit. The idea was more to include a roster player in the package to make room for Bertuzzi. I also don't know much about Sharangovich and what he brings so I might have undervalued him as well. Who could be a roster player other than Johnsson that could possibly be included or would it be better to just take Walsh right out?
I don't think there's any shape of a Bertuzzi trade that works for the Devils.
Noted on the extension, that could resolve the 'not-trading-for-rentals' bit.
But I think trading for a guy like Bertuzzi is the wrong approach for the Devils (and I think management feels similarly) extension or not, as it would mean the Devils would have to part with either 1st rd picks or non-UFA roster forwards to make it work which in turn would make the Devils older and shorten their competitive window.
There's no need for the Devils to trade for a top 6 wing at this point in time, say nothing of when Palat (and Bastian) returns from injury.
And in the off-season there's nothing stopping them to gauge the FA market for any holes in their forward lineup (Kuzmenko, Bunting, Tarasenko etc) while keeping all the assets they'd have to give in a Bertuzzi trade.
It just doesn't make sense for the Devils to trade for Bert, I really hope they don't.