Quoting: stephane_robidas
Colorado adds, considerably. Compher does not have a desirable contract in a flat-cap world. You'll have to add some picks.
Quoting: Easton_H
Why would buffalo ever do this?
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I'll trade mittelstadt, but this does nothing for us
Quoting: coga16
avs arena burning picks on Mittelstadt in his scenario of "a change of scenery" at the deadline to act as competition for a 2C job. It makes 0 sense. If they move Mittelstadt, there is no way he is even playing at a 3C level, so what makes it seem he would have a chance to be a 2C on a cup contender? Also goign into the playoffs Compher is one of the most clutch playoff fwds the avs had.
Why would they burn draft picks to move the proven playoff guy on a reclaim experiment?
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
He'd also an expiring UFA so doesnt help buffalo
Compher doesn't have to be in the trade, I know Colorado would want to keep him, and just add someone. On the other hand, I don't see why Buffalo would just trade Mittelstadt for futures if they are a playoff team.
Why would Buffalo want Compher?
1) To replace Mittelstadt in the line up
2) He brings playoff experience to the team, it doesn't matter that he's a ufa.
3) The intrinsic value in the trade for Buffalo would be getting Compher for the run, the trade value is going to come from the picks.
Why would Colorado "burn" picks?
1) They won't be burning picks although they might be losing value if it doesn't work out. They could move the 2023 1st for a 2023 2nd + 4th (or for the two 2nds picks while adding a 2025 pick) for example. It really depends on how much Mittelstadt's value is going to be. Colorado can use the trade to increase their draft capital in the 2023 draft, and if more is required they give 2025 picks.
2) The trade is assuming that Colorado sees value in adding Mittelstadt for his skill set and potentially filling the 2C role. With his cap hit being 2.5 for the next 2 years, and him being an RFA.