SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Must go by next year

Créé par: mdog98
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 18 oct. 2022
Publié: 18 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
players that must go by start of next season. We know will be entering a rebuild if they do it next year we can avoid a long rebuild and have a quick rebuild.

i think Studnicka can easily be moved for a second
grezlyck can be a good trade piece for a high pick and prospect.
rielly and forbort are must goes
Ullmark is tradeable any where after this season and he would be taking away playing time from swayman when he is clearly heading towards the #1 spot next year.

if we can get some free agents here are my toughts. as you can see
signing some of are reserve list would be a good step aswell as letting the older guys walk.

debrusk is dependant cause if he as an career high season over expectations he can be good to keep or be perfect to get a late first round pick and prospect. but will keep him for this instance.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3850 000 $
3850 000 $
3900 000 $
3900 000 $
3900 000 $
3800 000 $
3800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
2775 000 $
34 000 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
21 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
810 500 000 $
34 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
1775 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
22 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Wilde, Bode [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
NYI
  1. Ullmark, Linus
Détails additionnels:
just move him anywhere swayman will be ready for #1 spot
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Forbort, Derek
Détails additionnels:
retain ($1,000,000)
3.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
4.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VGK)
BUF
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt
Détails additionnels:
fixing the trade as i didnt write what i meant correctly a high second round pick or low third any team and a prospect D not one with expected high talent but one that can fill a third pairing role in the future. this trade can be with any team
5.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de VGK
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BOS
Logo de ARI
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 563 333 $4 500 000 $0 $936 667 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 1
#1
Future GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,712
Mentions "j'aime": 434
Oilers already said Broberg won't be traded for chychrun so he is not gonna be traded for Grzelckyk
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 3
#2
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 30,550
Mentions "j'aime": 11,732
Oh dear... not only do you imagine Grz gets Broberg, but that the Oilers also need to add a '23 2nd? Bruh.
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 3
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 2
well like i said the trade was just saying he can def be traded for a prospect and a pick
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 6
#4
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 884
Mentions "j'aime": 404
Studnicka is no longer worth a 2nd, especially in a great draft
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 10
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: SJSGM
Studnicka is no longer worth a 2nd, especially in a great draft

fair point i guess it depends if they use him this year and he gets something done but i think another team would be interested on taking him for a third. and a team that would use him of course
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 15
#6
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,885
Mentions "j'aime": 594
Quoting: SJSGM
Studnicka is no longer worth a 2nd, especially in a great draft


To second this I don't think there is anything any team could do to get the sharks to give up one of their first two picks in this draft
glarson17 a aimé ceci.
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,647
Mentions "j'aime": 6,498
I know it said "could be any team", cant see it being buffalo. There aren't many teams that are looking for left d. Seems like the markets saturated for left d. I kinda hope that if the Sabres are looking to move on from their undersized depth left d, that they opt to look for a bigger/tougher upgrade.
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 20
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: sabres89
I know it said "could be any team", cant see it being buffalo. There aren't many teams that are looking for left d. Seems like the markets saturated for left d. I kinda hope that if the Sabres are looking to move on from their undersized depth left d, that they opt to look for a bigger/tougher upgrade.


ya the market is saturated i guess we would have to see more in the summer where teams are at and where they feel their teams are heading and how grezlyck performs of course. also I meant for the studnicka trade to be the pick of the 2024 draft
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,647
Mentions "j'aime": 6,498
Quoting: mdog98
ya the market is saturated i guess we would have to see more in the summer where teams are at and where they feel their teams are heading and how grezlyck performs of course. also I meant for the studnicka trade to be the pick of the 2024 draft


The Kings are one of the few teams that could use left d
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 26
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: sabres89
The Kings are one of the few teams that could use left d


that is true the arm chair was more to say that if boston wants a quick rebuild these guys would need to go absolutely cause you cant have a quick rebuild without giving away stronger guys. Rebuilds also require giving rookies ice time to adapt and that has been bostons issue theyre always filled with veterans and these rookies never get a shot at playing which sucks cause studnicka was wasted and is still wasted talent sitting when he can clearly develop in the NHL on a team than can use him. I dont want to see this happen to our top D prospect lohrei so the best thing to do is put him at NHL next year while we basically have a mediocore year but a high pick for 2024
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
18 oct. 2022 à 13 h 28
#11
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 6,065
Mentions "j'aime": 5,174
-Ullmark's NMC makes him a lot harder to move than this. If you're trying to retool, I don't see why you'd drop him off - Swayman is a fine goalie, but no GM has ever complained about having too many good goalies. As long as the vibes are still fine and the guys are fine splitting time, why not keep Ullmark & Swayman together? Especially if you're only gonna get back peanuts for Ullmark - you've got the cap ($4.5M in cap space + that $1.25M you gave Phoenix Copley is more than enough.)

-Forbort's probably a Dmitry Kulikov situation - he's got a 3 team NTC so you can pretty much rule out Arizona as a destination, and I think it's more likely a team with space just takes him on as a free player without Boston needing to retain.

-Mike Reilly has always been worth a 3rd, Dave.

-Huge overpay from the Oilers - Broberg will be a 22 year old LHD with ELC time remaining; Grz will be 29 with $3.7M left. If anyone's adding a pick to that deal, it most certainly wouldn't be Edmonton.

-This trade is the main reason I'm responding to this ACGM: what in the world has Jack Studnicka done to be worth a 2nd rounder? Seriously - he's been fine in the AHL and has done squat in the NHL. You can sign guys like him for under $1M every single summer, so why is a rebuilding team like the Sharks giving up what's most likely a top-40 pick for him??
18 oct. 2022 à 15 h 36
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 158
Mentions "j'aime": 23
"i think Studnicka can easily be moved for a second"

Oh boy....
glarson17 a aimé ceci.
18 oct. 2022 à 15 h 53
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,723
Mentions "j'aime": 3,959
Quoting: SJSGM
Studnicka is no longer worth a 2nd, especially in a great draft


Was he ever? I don’t think he’s worth a 3rd honestly
18 oct. 2022 à 16 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,365
Mentions "j'aime": 13,304
I’d give a 4th for Forbort
18 oct. 2022 à 17 h 19
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 5,519
Mentions "j'aime": 1,528
Why do any of these players have to go? Why is it a known that the Bruins will be entering a rebuild?

Frankly, none of this makes sense aside from moving reilly.
19 oct. 2022 à 13 h 20
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 13
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: DefenseFirst
Why do any of these players have to go? Why is it a known that the Bruins will be entering a rebuild?

Frankly, none of this makes sense aside from moving reilly.


aging offensive group no center depth. dont get me wrong defense is young and solid but only way to get pieces for the future is to trade one of those strong Ds away to get a high pick. mcavoy lindholm are def off the table. at this rate boston will enter a rebuild but a short term one if they can start drafting well and high next season 2024 draft.
19 oct. 2022 à 13 h 57
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 5,519
Mentions "j'aime": 1,528
Quoting: mdog98
aging offensive group no center depth. dont get me wrong defense is young and solid but only way to get pieces for the future is to trade one of those strong Ds away to get a high pick. mcavoy lindholm are def off the table. at this rate boston will enter a rebuild but a short term one if they can start drafting well and high next season 2024 draft.


You moved precisely zero players from the aging forward group out. You moved relatively young defensemen, a goalie in his 20s, and the closest thing the bruins have to an NHL ready young center for….bode Wilde and some lottery tickets? You didn’t get any high picks. Nothing good was acquired. Absolutely horrible.
19 oct. 2022 à 18 h 44
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 5,077
Mentions "j'aime": 1,214
Quoting: koofyslappa
"i think Studnicka can easily be moved for a second"

Oh boy....


You waited too long to get prospect value for Studnicka. He's 23 now guys like that get moved for 5ths
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2022 à 10 h 48
#19
Zach Johnston
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 124
Mentions "j'aime": 27
You do know that NTCs and NMCs exist, right? And Mike Reilly is not worth a 3rd round pick lmao.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage