SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Culture Change

Créé par: Rotheisler
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 19 juill. 2022
Publié: 19 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
52 250 000 $
2850 000 $
84 750 000 $
83 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
76 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Kyrou, Jordan
  2. Tarasenko, Vladimir
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (STL)
STL
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Tkachuk, Matthew [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
2.
CGY
ARI
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
3.
CGY
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
4.
CGY
  1. Scheifele, Mark
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. Zary, Connor
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (STL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de WPG
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de WPG
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $69 429 166 $0 $200 000 $13 070 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
827 500 $827 500 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
912 500 $912 500 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 juill. 2022 à 4 h 26
#1
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,401
Mentions "j'aime": 11,383
Nope.
19 juill. 2022 à 4 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,330
Mentions "j'aime": 2,388
Jets decline. I’d imagine schiefele to cgy starts with lindholm or andersson. The jets aren’t rebuilding.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 5 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,567
Mentions "j'aime": 19,697
Quoting: arafay
Jets decline. I’d imagine schiefele to cgy starts with lindholm or andersson. The jets aren’t rebuilding.


Both of those players currently have more value than Scheifele though?
soooonk a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 7 h 52
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,627
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Modifié 19 juill. 2022 à 8 h 43
Quoting: mokumboi
Nope.


Wrong - Armstrong says yes before he even blinks

(That being said - Tarasenko is not waiving to go to Calgary)
soooonk a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 11 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: noted
Wrong - Armstrong says yes before he even blinks

(That being said - Tarasenko is not waiving to go to Calgary)


It makes little sense moving Kyrou for Tkachuk. Blues need youth and speed, losing Kyrou (who is nearly a p/g player) who's also one of the fastest in the league deprives them of this. They'd move a prospect and a different forward before Kyrou.
Azz_Aidz a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 11 h 25
#6
Hi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 210
Mentions "j'aime": 52
Quoting: Chopper02
It makes little sense moving Kyrou for Tkachuk. Blues need youth and speed, losing Kyrou (who is nearly a p/g player) who's also one of the fastest in the league deprives them of this. They'd move a prospect and a different forward before Kyrou.


Exactly, him and Thomas arent being moved and quite frankly it's getting ridiculous that people think one them is the starting point for Tkachuk rn given the circumstances.
Chopper02 a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 13 h 25
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,627
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Quoting: Chopper02
It makes little sense moving Kyrou for Tkachuk. Blues need youth and speed, losing Kyrou (who is nearly a p/g player) who's also one of the fastest in the league deprives them of this. They'd move a prospect and a different forward before Kyrou.


Quoting: Azz_Aidz
Exactly, him and Thomas arent being moved and quite frankly it's getting ridiculous that people think one them is the starting point for Tkachuk rn given the circumstances.


It makes all the sense in the world to include Kyrou because that is who Calgary is going to ask for and he’s going to cost $7-8m per year himself after next season. We’ll see how it plays out but I would trade Kyrou for him and think DA would to
19 juill. 2022 à 13 h 59
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: noted
It makes all the sense in the world to include Kyrou because that is who Calgary is going to ask for and he’s going to cost $7-8m per year himself after next season. We’ll see how it plays out but I would trade Kyrou for him and think DA would to


What we should do is move on from Barbashev and aging vet.
19 juill. 2022 à 14 h 12
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,627
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Quoting: Chopper02
What we should do is move on from Barbashev and aging vet.


I’m not disagreeing with you there. Still be really hard to fit ROR and the others next year in this scenario but maybe you are ok with moving on from him. The Blues still need to offer something Calgary would accept in trade. I’m not one of those that think we would get MT in free agency because think he’ll get $11m per that route
19 juill. 2022 à 14 h 14
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,627
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Quoting: noted
It makes all the sense in the world to include Kyrou because that is who Calgary is going to ask for and he’s going to cost $7-8m per year himself after next season. We’ll see how it plays out but I would trade Kyrou for him and think DA would to


You’re entitled to your opinion but there’s a reason Kyrou hasn’t been extended yet and Thomas has in my opinion. MT > Kyrou however you want to slice it. If that’s what it takes, I’d do it
19 juill. 2022 à 14 h 37
#11
Démarrer sujet
Rotheisler
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Just saying the fact that there are two sides that think opposite things, is usually a sign its a reasonable deal. so the fact two sides are so vehemently opposed, means there has to be some fairness. Most people think negotiations are trying to find a deal both are somehow magically 100% happy with. Bias will always interfere with that feeling ever existing. Most good deals leave both feeling a little uncomfortable with what they gave up. With your point about Kyrou going to be in same situation, it isn't the money they are trying to save, they just want someone that wants to be in CGY, and the reality is perhaps bringing in a Canadian, with a year to get him comfortable in his surroundings is probably a positive step. Less proven so he he is more attainable than Blues fans would like him to be. (keep in mind younger and less proven are the same just different semantics used for which side of the argument that you are on).
19 juill. 2022 à 15 h 34
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: noted
I’m not disagreeing with you there. Still be really hard to fit ROR and the others next year in this scenario but maybe you are ok with moving on from him. The Blues still need to offer something Calgary would accept in trade. I’m not one of those that think we would get MT in free agency because think he’ll get $11m per that route


Personally I think we move on from ROR too. Only way yo keep ROR is too trade Schenn but I don't see that happening. Now if we did a Schenn+Bolduc+1st and lesser player (Borts/Mikkola?) for MT, I'd be all for it. This gives Calgary a top 6 gritty forward, a good prospect and a 1st plus clears out space for Tkachuk.
19 juill. 2022 à 15 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 60
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Chopper02
Personally I think we move on from ROR too. Only way yo keep ROR is too trade Schenn but I don't see that happening. Now if we did a Schenn+Bolduc+1st and lesser player (Borts/Mikkola?) for MT, I'd be all for it. This gives Calgary a top 6 gritty forward, a good prospect and a 1st plus clears out space for Tkachuk.


I think we move on from ROR, too. It's tough to see how the finances fit (unless ROR takes a comically big discount), and recent history with Backes/Petro/Perron suggests Army will be unsentimental.
Chopper02 a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 15 h 54
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,627
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Quoting: Chopper02
Personally I think we move on from ROR too. Only way yo keep ROR is too trade Schenn but I don't see that happening. Now if we did a Schenn+Bolduc+1st and lesser player (Borts/Mikkola?) for MT, I'd be all for it. This gives Calgary a top 6 gritty forward, a good prospect and a 1st plus clears out space for Tkachuk.


Call me a moron - but I think Bolduc is going to be better than Kyrou. Can't see Schenn waiving to go there - can dream though.

would you do?:

Edit
STL

Tkachuk, Matthew [RFA Rights]
Hanifin, Noah

FOR

Perunovich, Scott
Parayko, Colton
Neighbours, Jake
2023 1st round pick (STL)
19 juill. 2022 à 16 h 28
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: noted
Call me a moron - but I think Bolduc is going to be better than Kyrou. Can't see Schenn waiving to go there - can dream though.

would you do?:

Edit
STL

Tkachuk, Matthew [RFA Rights]
Hanifin, Noah

FOR

Perunovich, Scott
Parayko, Colton
Neighbours, Jake
2023 1st round pick (STL)


Unfortunately that offer doesn't get both Tkachuk and Hanifin and may not even get Tkachuk by himself. As a Blues fan I probably wouldn't hesitate too quickly.
19 juill. 2022 à 16 h 30
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: chiddie
I think we move on from ROR, too. It's tough to see how the finances fit (unless ROR takes a comically big discount), and recent history with Backes/Petro/Perron suggests Army will be unsentimental.


Agreed and he rightfully should with ROR (should have kept Perron over Leddy). But in order to maintain pace with the Central and West, the Blues need speed and skill and ROR is slow of foot. He would have to be willing to take 5 or less which he'll probably ask for 3 x7mil like Pavelski.
19 juill. 2022 à 16 h 38
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,627
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Quoting: Chopper02
Unfortunately that offer doesn't get both Tkachuk and Hanifin and may not even get Tkachuk by himself. As a Blues fan I probably wouldn't hesitate too quickly.


I'll agree to an extent but if you don't think that gets you Tkachuk - there is no way your package of Schenn+Bolduc+1st and lesser player (Borts/Mikkola does...
19 juill. 2022 à 16 h 48
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Edmonton declines. They have no use at all for Vladar. They'd just lose him to waivers anyhow.
19 juill. 2022 à 16 h 49
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,470
Mentions "j'aime": 1,982
Quoting: noted
I'll agree to an extent but if you don't think that gets you Tkachuk - there is no way your package of Schenn+Bolduc+1st and lesser player (Borts/Mikkola does...


It's less about the value going to Calgary than it is the pieces. They already have Andersson and Tanev on the right sjde. In terms of defensive shutdown defensemen, they already have that so I don't see a fit for Parayko.
19 juill. 2022 à 16 h 58
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,627
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Quoting: Chopper02
It's less about the value going to Calgary than it is the pieces. They already have Andersson and Tanev on the right sjde. In terms of defensive shutdown defensemen, they already have that so I don't see a fit for Parayko.


Gotcha. He's an Alberta boy so was just tinkering
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage