SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who Says No

Créé par: TMLBRIAN
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 29 juin 2022
Publié: 29 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Do either or both teams consider this trade?

Thoughts?

Also... HOLY crap LA is stackkkkedd with prospects.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
2850 000 $
21 250 000 $
2900 000 $
2775 000 $
65 500 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de WPG
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $79 228 334 $637 500 $3 062 500 $3 271 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance262 500 $$262K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,761
Mentions "j'aime": 14,510
LA says no, easily
csick, Engvall_Enjoyer, majormoose007 and 2 others a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 22
#2
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,598
Mentions "j'aime": 6,727
Wow.
csick et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 23
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,100
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
Kings
csick et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 23
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,015
Mentions "j'aime": 600
Blake laughs at that.
csick et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 25
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,511
Mentions "j'aime": 4,170
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
LA says no, easily


Quoting: Theozler
Kings


Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
Wow.


Noted.

Cal Petersons contract is the worst one of this grouping though. His contract is a yikes.

My thought process : LA get a top 4 left dman, Shed cap at goalie and get a pick. Leafs get a different goalie option who will need to bounce back, get a right dman and a gritty 4th line winger.

Leafs would need to believe in Peterson for this to work out.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 26
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
That's a slam dunk W for Leafs and a massive fleece job.
majormoose007 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 28
#7
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,812
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
Kings say no.

The fact they need to give up Petersen for Mrazek makes the answer to your question glaringly obvious.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 30
#8
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,929
Mentions "j'aime": 10,166
Kings
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 32
#9
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,559
Mentions "j'aime": 6,036
Kings no doubt
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 36
#10
Hide yo girl
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 1,636
Mentions "j'aime": 1,131
Kings very easily
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 37
#11
MajorMoose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,425
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Definitely the Kings as they don't want/need Muzzin they're in the market for a younger LHD like Sanheim or Chychrun and while Petersen had a rough season he's capable of bouncing back and is much more reliable than Mrazek.
NickC1988 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 38
#12
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Noted.

Cal Petersons contract is the worst one of this grouping though. His contract is a yikes.

My thought process : LA get a top 4 left dman, Shed cap at goalie and get a pick. Leafs get a different goalie option who will need to bounce back, get a right dman and a gritty 4th line winger.

Leafs would need to believe in Peterson for this to work out.


Cal Petersen is 27. Jake Muzzin is 33. Petersen is much more likely to bounce back than Muzzin. Matt Roy is worth a late 1st, and Lemieux is a filler, you can probably sign him as UFA, he has little value to LA. This trade isn't close for LA, they take 3 steps back with this deal.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 41
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,329
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Did you just forget to click on Matthew Knies and the Leafs 1st round pick?
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 43
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,511
Mentions "j'aime": 4,170
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
Did you just forget to click on Matthew Knies and the Leafs 1st round pick?


Who in this trade is worth the Leafs top prospect?

Based on comments, I am definitely off on the trade. But I assume if that 3rd was the 1st, people would be okay with it.

Not both the 1st and knies.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 57
#15
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,598
Mentions "j'aime": 921
leafs take it and run. kings run away from it
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 57
#16
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,598
Mentions "j'aime": 921
Quoting: PuckLuck_77
Did you just forget to click on Matthew Knies and the Leafs 1st round pick?


im a leafs fan and i approve this message
29 juin 2022 à 22 h 58
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,329
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Who in this trade is worth the Leafs top prospect?

Based on comments, I am definitely off on the trade. But I assume if that 3rd was the 1st, people would be okay with it.

Not both the 1st and knies.


It's more just my automatic response to any Muzzin to LA trade at this point. Leafs fans trying to will something that won't happen into existence, so I figured I might as well do the same. Maybe it might have an effect on the sheer amount of times I have to say "WE DONT WANT MUZZIN AND WE DONT WANT YOUR BAD CONTRACTS." So don't take it too personally.

In all seriousness though, Muzzin and Mrazek are both dumps, plain and simple. In this trade, LA gets the worse, older, more injured goalie. And LA gets the worse, older, more injured defenseman. All while creating a hole on their right side that none of the RD prospects properly fill (they're offensive minded, Roy is the best Kings defense-first guy). In addition, the Kings come out of it with the higher cap hits.

It would take more than just an upgrade to a 1st to bring this trade to fruition because that's going to be the MINIMUM cost to dump your two guys.

You go on about how Cal's contract is bad, but honestly 1 bad year isn't enough for the Kings to give up on who they expect their goalie of the future to be. He just didn't take the reigns last year.

And I, while admittedly biased, will argue till I'm blue in the face that Roy is worth SIGNIFICANTLY more than just "a late first." The dude dragged the Kings to the playoffs playing nearly 25 minutes a night as the #1D with Doughty injured. My stance on him is this: He won't win the Norris, but he'll be the guy Morgan Reilly buys dinner for first after Morgan wins it.
OldNYIfan et majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
29 juin 2022 à 23 h 9
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,294
Mentions "j'aime": 25,196
Petersen has much more value than Mrazek.

Roy has much, much more value than Muzzin and his contract which, I note, is the worst one of the grouping because Petersen could still live up to his, while Muzzin will never be worth that contract again.

The third and Lemieux are probably a wash because Lemieux will probably play three more seasons before that draft pick turns into an actual NHLer, if ever.
29 juin 2022 à 23 h 16
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,361
Mentions "j'aime": 593
This isn’t actually very far off in my opinion the kings get to dump Peterson and his horrible contract for a cheaper cap dump in mrazek and send Roy out for a guy they’re familiar with in the position they desperately need in muzzin. Maybe change the 3rd to a 2nd and just take Lemieux out and I could see it happening
30 juin 2022 à 8 h 34
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,170
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Quoting: Aasen6
This isn’t actually very far off in my opinion the kings get to dump Peterson and his horrible contract for a cheaper cap dump in mrazek and send Roy out for a guy they’re familiar with in the position they desperately need in muzzin. Maybe change the 3rd to a 2nd and just take Lemieux out and I could see it happening


This is more than far off, it's another galaxy off. Kings are not going to dump Peterson, his contract is not horrible. What is horrible is what you think the Kings would trade for from Toronto
30 juin 2022 à 14 h 18
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,361
Mentions "j'aime": 593
Quoting: kingsfaninSD
This is more than far off, it's another galaxy off. Kings are not going to dump Peterson, his contract is not horrible. What is horrible is what you think the Kings would trade for from Toronto


Cal Peterson is a 5m backup. You can’t seriously think that’s a good thing to have, if LA can get rid of him for any kind of return they should, and this return actually makes them a better team
1 juill. 2022 à 8 h 14
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,170
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Quoting: Aasen6
Cal Peterson is a 5m backup. You can’t seriously think that’s a good thing to have, if LA can get rid of him for any kind of return they should, and this return actually makes them a better team


Kings believe Peterson will be the starter going forward otherwise they wouldn't have signed him to that contract. As Colorado just proved, you need two to three good goalies in this league to go far, not just one.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage