i think van says no pretty easily

Yes but it wouldnt take too much to make it work, it would need a top end piece in return, would you do carlo for garland+5th?

I never understand the need of throwing in these late round picks. It is like going buy a car and refusing to buy it unless they throw in a 25 dollar Starbucks card.

That would create too much of a gap in our defense. I could see Boston moving a left defenseman in a deal like that (Grizz + Debrusk/Garland + 4th) but I don't think Van would go for Grizz or Reilly with OEL and Quinn Hughes already there

yeah, and we have rathbone coming up in the pipeline and he looks NHL ready so it would probably be for an RD and it might be in a miller move, I dont think that boeser will be moved due to his family issues

Columbus really doesn’t need another LHD, can’t see them spending another pick on Reilly after drafting him and him refusing to sign in Columbus.

dont see the bruins moving carlo within the next 4 years personally but crazier things have happened.

i feel like at 4 years trocheck gunna be bringing back about 6

not surprised

especially for garland. they have that player in debrusk already on the team. trading debrusk is a simple Left hand - Right hand swap. but really dont see this happening. just like it shouldnt have happened at the tdl. idk why vancouver is linked to move garland but man not a great look to see him keep popping up on acgms.

I would not say that, they play quite differently. Garland is a puckhound and creates plays like there is no tomorrow