SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This team needs an offensive star

Créé par: NucksnOilers
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 16 mai 2022
Publié: 16 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Step 1 is fire Mcmellan he is great for a veteran lead playoff team but as I saw in edmonton can not develop young players well

You could throw turrcotte in the deal too but I would wanna see how he works out first
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
21 650 000 $
46 250 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2975 000 $
34 150 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
ARI
  1. Walker, Sean
Détails additionnels:
Anywhere
2.
TOR
  1. Kupari, Rasmus
  2. Lizotte, Blake
  3. Vilardi, Gabriel [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de SJS
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $78 817 367 $637 500 $4 695 000 $3 682 633 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance262 500 $$262K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
975 000 $975 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,593
Mentions "j'aime": 6,157
Not for that return they don't. Honestly, drop Vilardi and Lizotte from the trade and LA still says no.
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 52
#2
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
No chance LAK do something like this.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,592
Mentions "j'aime": 18,492
C’mon LA. Ensemble casts are in.
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 53
#4
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,631
Mentions "j'aime": 6,097
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not for that return they don't. Honestly, drop Vilardi and Lizotte from the trade and LA still says no.


🤨
westcoastleaf a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 20
if i'm the kings there's no way i do this.

stay the course, the rebuild is on track.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 54
#6
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,899
Mentions "j'aime": 1,254
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Not for that return they don't. Honestly, drop Vilardi and Lizotte from the trade and LA still says no.


A guy who was a ppg on a 6 million dollar deal?

La does not have room for all their prospects as we have seen and due to that 2 or more out of the 6 of them will be busts(a player just can't develop if he can't play) why not shell a couple of them out for an offensive star

Nylander has 80 points in like 79 games on a 6 million dollar deal. Vilardi won't have any room to develop with that center core being clogged up and kupari doesn't have any room at all. Lizzote sure you could drop but he is only taking a role that could be used for turocette,byfield or kaliyev.

Maybe the trade itself is an overpayment but the idea of La needing to shed some of their prospects for win now players on that left side d or wingers can't be denied, mind as well get some value before a couple of them are forced to become busts
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 57
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,881
Mentions "j'aime": 22,885
I think Nylander is good fit for LA. And it works for the Leafs to get futures, since the Leafs need cap space.
But I Nylander's trade value is that high...when no cap is returned to the Leafs.....not nearly that high. Maybe one of those prospects and third would be the upper limit.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 14 h 57
#8
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,899
Mentions "j'aime": 1,254
Quoting: westcoastleaf
if i'm the kings there's no way i do this.

stay the course, the rebuild is on track.


Same thing I told the other guy

Is there an issue with the deal yeah sure there is but the idea of La shedding some prospects can't be denied

They have no room for any of them as we have seen and a couple of them will become busts just due to not getting playing time which sucks to see

A different deal would be better but you aren't gonna get anything by having these guys as healthy scratches
westcoastleaf a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 15 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 20
Quoting: Drshnuckels91
Same thing I told the other guy

Is there an issue with the deal yeah sure there is but the idea of La shedding some prospects can't be denied

They have no room for any of them as we have seen and a couple of them will become busts just due to not getting playing time which sucks to see

A different deal would be better but you aren't gonna get anything by having these guys as healthy scratches


valid point. i've just watched the canucks f*ck up their rebuild because of the bubble "playoffs" a few years ago. don't want to see the kings make that same mistake.
NucksnOilers et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 15 h 15
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,593
Mentions "j'aime": 6,157
Quoting: Drshnuckels91
Same thing I told the other guy

Is there an issue with the deal yeah sure there is but the idea of La shedding some prospects can't be denied

They have no room for any of them as we have seen and a couple of them will become busts just due to not getting playing time which sucks to see

A different deal would be better but you aren't gonna get anything by having these guys as healthy scratches


The Kings traded Cernak because they had too many defensive prospects and he was the bottom of the food chain at the time. How well did that work out for them?

The Kings aren't in a hurry. This year was considered a transition year, and they made it significantly farther than anyone (themselves included) expected them to.

No one knows which prospects will ultimately work out and which ones will end up as busts. The best way to ensure that you get quality players out of your prospects is to have a lot of top quality prospects. The Kings are still high on both Kupari and Vilardi. Lizotte is the engine of their bottom six and is signed to an incredible value contract for the next couple years.

Two years from now, if the older of the Kings prospects are still struggling, then I'm sure the Kings are prepared to let them move on. Right now, they're still content to develop from within. If your proposal is the cost for Nylander, then the Kings want no part of it.
16 mai 2022 à 15 h 50
#11
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,899
Mentions "j'aime": 1,254
Quoting: tkecanuck341
The Kings traded Cernak because they had too many defensive prospects and he was the bottom of the food chain at the time. How well did that work out for them?

The Kings aren't in a hurry. This year was considered a transition year, and they made it significantly farther than anyone (themselves included) expected them to.

No one knows which prospects will ultimately work out and which ones will end up as busts. The best way to ensure that you get quality players out of your prospects is to have a lot of top quality prospects. The Kings are still high on both Kupari and Vilardi. Lizotte is the engine of their bottom six and is signed to an incredible value contract for the next couple years.

Two years from now, if the older of the Kings prospects are still struggling, then I'm sure the Kings are prepared to let them move on. Right now, they're still content to develop from within. If your proposal is the cost for Nylander, then the Kings want no part of it.


1.Cernak would not have become what he is in the kings system that is the whole point of getting value from them

2. In 2 years Vilardi will be 24,Kapari will be 24 and turrocette will be 23. At that point if they don't product they won't get much value from them
16 mai 2022 à 15 h 55
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,593
Mentions "j'aime": 6,157
Quoting: Drshnuckels91
1.Cernak would not have become what he is in the kings system that is the whole point of getting value from them

2. In 2 years Vilardi will be 24,Kapari will be 24 and turrocette will be 23. At that point if they don't product they won't get much value from them


Don't agree on Cernak. Look at guys like Anderson, Spence, and Durzi. They were all under the radar guys that turned into quality NHL defensemen in the Kings system. There's no reason why they couldn't do the same with Cernak. He was never given the chance.

The reason why guys like Vilardi, Kupari, and Turcotte still have value is because there is still a high probability that they will turn into quality players. There's no reason for the Kings to dump them now. They're contender window hasn't even opened yet. I'd much rather take a chance on them and have them fail than dump them and watch them turn into quality players elsewhere.
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 16 h 0
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Kevin Fiala has entered the chat. I think he makes a lot of sense for LA and LA has a lot of young, talented pieces.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 16 h 24
#14
Démarrer sujet
Save Mcdavid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 2,899
Mentions "j'aime": 1,254
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Don't agree on Cernak. Look at guys like Anderson, Spence, and Durzi. They were all under the radar guys that turned into quality NHL defensemen in the Kings system. There's no reason why they couldn't do the same with Cernak. He was never given the chance.

The reason why guys like Vilardi, Kupari, and Turcotte still have value is because there is still a high probability that they will turn into quality players. There's no reason for the Kings to dump them now. They're contender window hasn't even opened yet. I'd much rather take a chance on them and have them fail than dump them and watch them turn into quality players elsewhere.


Though I personally disagree with your take I understand where your coming from on if they turn out to be all top 6 guys
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
16 mai 2022 à 23 h 25
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,774
Mentions "j'aime": 974
Big Willie Style should flourish as The Man. I could see him becoming an 90pt player on this roster
NucksnOilers a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage