SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Just be done with it

Créé par: cheeky3468
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 2 mars 2022
Publié: 2 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Abramov, Mikhail
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
NYI
  1. Kase, Ondrej
  2. Rubins, Kristians
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 004 783 $0 $400 000 $3 495 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 13
#1
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
That's not getting Hagel for the 10th thousand time. If you want to actually talk replace Abramov with Knies
csick, OldNYIfan, exo2769 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
hawks very easily decline
OldNYIfan, exo2769 et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 14
#3
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 5,973
Mentions "j'aime": 5,107
I think the Islanders do that, especially depending on other possible moves. Kase gives them a solid winger, Rubins is someone they can give an audition on the left side if Chara & Greene are moved, and getting a 2nd to go with a roster player is enough to move Mayfield.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 14
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: Beetlejuice
That's not getting Hagel for the 10th thousand time. If you want to actually talk replace Abramov with Knies


you know his value has been boosted by insiders and the media and he isnt worth that right?
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 16
#5
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 5,973
Mentions "j'aime": 5,107
edit: double post
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 17
#6
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Quoting: vr1995
you know his value has been boosted by insiders and the media and he isnt worth that right?


No that's the price Chicago set, Chicago isn't trading Hagel unless for a massive overpayment. Hagel's only 23 and is on pace for 50 points, Why should the Blackhawks trade him for a late 1st round pick that's probably not going to be nearly as good as he is.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 18
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Wadejos123
hawks very easily decline


The talk among insiders is a first and prospect similar to Coleman.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 18
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Beetlejuice
That's not getting Hagel for the 10th thousand time. If you want to actually talk replace Abramov with Knies


The talk among insiders is a first and prospect similar to Coleman.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 21
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,096
Mentions "j'aime": 220
1st + Abruzzese is probably closer.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,028
Mentions "j'aime": 9,330
Quoting: vr1995
you know his value has been boosted by insiders and the media and he isnt worth that right?


You know the chance of hagel getting traded is less then 20% because the Hawks aren't shopping him and have no reason to move him right? Just because teams gave unsolicited offers (that were worth more then what you have here) to the Hawks and they declined, doesn't mean all the sudden it's going to happen because you want it to right?
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 22
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: Beetlejuice
No that's the price Chicago set, Chicago isn't trading Hagel unless for a massive overpayment. Hagel's only 23 and is on pace for 50 points, Why should the Blackhawks trade him for a late 1st round pick that's probably not going to be nearly as good as he is.


nearly as good as he is? he was a 6th rounder, he wasnt even supposed to be what he is, 54 career points by age 23 isnt exactly the toughest standard to meet
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 22
#12
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: cheeky3468
The talk among insiders is a first and prospect similar to Coleman.


Nolan Foote >>> Abramov though.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 23
#13
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,643
Mentions "j'aime": 9,764
Quoting: vr1995
you know his value has been boosted by insiders and the media and he isnt worth that right?


I'm not Kyle Davidson, but the reports are that (4) separate teams have offered a 1st and an A prospect. (Including TOR) KD turned down all 4 teams. The trade above is less than a 1st and an A prospect because Abramov is at best a B prospect.

There's a ton that goes into Hagel's value. His growth on the ice has been incredible. Last year he was Eddie Olczyk's favorite guy to talk about because his motor was non-stop and he made all the plays away from the puck. He drew a ton of penalties and while last year he wasn't converting it was only a matter of time. Well...now in year two he's converting and he's driving the play too. He's not just a recipient of being with good players. He's creating the plays. His contract is insanely team friendly in a cap constrained environment, he's an RFA at the end of the deal.

Hagel isn't getting traded unless a team meets some very high demands. We can get a 1st and Abramov two years from now and pretty easily too.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 24
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Beetlejuice
No that's the price Chicago set, Chicago isn't trading Hagel unless for a massive overpayment. Hagel's only 23 and is on pace for 50 points, Why should the Blackhawks trade him for a late 1st round pick that's probably not going to be nearly as good as he is.


His value is around is around a first and prospect, maybe an additional later pick like goodrow. Not a top prospect and first.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 27
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: ChiHawk
You know the chance of hagel getting traded is less then 20% because the Hawks aren't shopping him and have no reason to move him right? Just because teams gave unsolicited offers (that were worth more then what you have here) to the Hawks and they declined, doesn't mean all the sudden it's going to happen because you want it to right?


im ok with that, you know its not my offer right? to suggest it will need one of our best prospects and a first rounder to pry a former 6th rounder who plays on your 3rd line is ridiculous lmao
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 27
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 13
Quoting: Lenny7
Nolan Foote >>> Abramov though.


Based on what? Abramov is a year younger and a Centre. Both have similar point production in the AHL.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 28
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: exo2769
I'm not Kyle Davidson, but the reports are that (4) separate teams have offered a 1st and an A prospect. (Including TOR) KD turned down all 4 teams. The trade above is less than a 1st and an A prospect because Abramov is at best a B prospect.

There's a ton that goes into Hagel's value. His growth on the ice has been incredible. Last year he was Eddie Olczyk's favorite guy to talk about because his motor was non-stop and he made all the plays away from the puck. He drew a ton of penalties and while last year he wasn't converting it was only a matter of time. Well...now in year two he's converting and he's driving the play too. He's not just a recipient of being with good players. He's creating the plays. His contract is insanely team friendly in a cap constrained environment, he's an RFA at the end of the deal.

Hagel isn't getting traded unless a team meets some very high demands. We can get a 1st and Abramov two years from now and pretty easily too.


then chi is overvaluing him, hes a 3rd liner
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 29
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 13
If the leafs throw in a 3rd will all you dumb hawk fans shut up?
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 30
#19
In Connor We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 2,080
Quoting: vr1995
nearly as good as he is? he was a 6th rounder, he wasnt even supposed to be what he is, 54 career points by age 23 isnt exactly the toughest standard to meet


I'm going to stop this right here and just come to a conclussion that you haven't watch any Blackhawks games. If you have watch any game, you'd realise how good Hagel is and how impactful he is on the ice.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 30
#20
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,643
Mentions "j'aime": 9,764
Quoting: vr1995
then chi is overvaluing him, hes a 3rd liner


That's your opinion which is fine. The point is CHI doesn't really want to trade him. THAT's why it costs so much. If you want to take a piece away from a team that doesn't really want to lose....you pay through the nose. Not just a late 1st and B prospect. The trade above is what AZ is looking for....for Crouse!
AustonMatthews3443 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 31
#21
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,643
Mentions "j'aime": 9,764
Quoting: cheeky3468
If the leafs throw in a 3rd will all you dumb hawk fans shut up?


No way! I'll give you Dach for Matthews...and a middle finger. Stop whining. That's TOR fans right now. AND STOP TRADING MRAZEK TO US!
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 31
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
Quoting: cheeky3468
The talk among insiders is a first and prospect similar to Coleman.


No, wrong. The talk is that the hawks have turned down 4 offers for a 1st and a top prospect. The teams reported to have made offers were the Leafs, Panthers, Devils, and Flames. Hawks likley have already turned down an offer better than this from the leafs
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 31
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 5,265
Mentions "j'aime": 2,154
Quoting: exo2769
No way! I'll give you Dach for Matthews...and a middle finger. Stop whining. That's TOR fans right now.


yeah thats comparable lmao
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 32
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,285
Mentions "j'aime": 4,928
Quoting: Lenny7
Nolan Foote >>> Abramov though.


Coleman at 1.8M x 2 with UFA expiration <<<<<<< Hagel at 1.5M x 3 with RFA expiration
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
2 mars 2022 à 14 h 33
#25
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: cheeky3468
Based on what? Abramov is a year younger and a Centre. Both have similar point production in the AHL.


Sorry, should have elaborated.

At the time, Foote was 6th months removed from being a 1st round pick, was coming off of a solid WJC with Canada, and had put up good numbers in Kelowna. The "recent 1st round pick" thing was a pretty solid base here.

If you were doing something comparable, it'd be something along the lines of 1st+Knies+4th?

Edit: Plus, Hagel has an extra year.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage