SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blackhawks Mock draft with trades

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 17 juill. 2021
Publié: 17 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
(#11) : Matthew Coronato (RW)
(#39) : Colton Dach (C,LW)
(#44) : Zachary L’Heureux (LW)
(#62) : Aleksi Heimosalmi (RHD)
(#76) : Brett Harrison (C)
(#105) : Henry Nelson (LHD)
(#108) : Joshua Roy (RW)
(#172) : Thomas Milic (G)
(#201) : Shane Lachance (LW)
(#216) : Owen Murray (RHD
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
2022 3rd can become a 2nd if Strome scores 45 points or OTT makes the playoffs.
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Détails additionnels:
Draft day trade. I’m sure Montreal fans will tell me no, but they get a pick in an in person draft.
MTL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
3.
CHI
  1. Boqvist, Jesper
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
NJD
  1. Kurashev, Philipp
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
4.
CHI
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de VGK
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $66 146 714 $452 439 $5 050 000 $15 353 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juill. 2021 à 7 h 59
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,314
Mentions "j'aime": 1,336
Think that’s a fair deal with NJ. Kurashev would be another Swiss addition for us
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 11
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,642
Mentions "j'aime": 9,764
I think these trades are very fair. I don't think L’Heureux drops that far and I also don't think Coronato gets taken that high, but we'll see.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 13
#3
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,348
Mentions "j'aime": 3,351
I dont think MTL fans should be complaining since getting basically the same pick in whats supposed to be a deeper draft isnt a bad thing
Habs4ever a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 14
#4
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,844
Mentions "j'aime": 5,815
Quoting: exo2769
I think these trades are very fair. I don't think L’Heureux drops that far and I also don't think Coronato gets taken that high, but we'll see.


Based loosely on the Athletics mock draft and the positions on here are within reason for what was presented there,
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 19
#5
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,844
Mentions "j'aime": 5,815
Quoting: Subbanator7667
I dont think MTL fans should be complaining since getting basically the same pick in whats supposed to be a deeper draft isnt a bad thing


I mean I agree, but there’s always that one.
Subbanator7667 a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 40
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,493
Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
I don't think Habs fans should complain because of the deeper, in person draft and it will be hosted in Montreal
Kyle_Davidson et Habs4ever a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 53
#7
Evans truther
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,506
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
For Montreal's pick swap usually GMs are playing statistics. If I'm differing my pick a year on out, I want odds of that pick to be better or at least the same. Chicago shouldn't be as bad next year with Toews back healthy so if I'm the GM I'm giving you guys Washington's 3rd rounder (87 instead of 76) to give me at least a decent chance of not moving down too much in next year's draft. Otherwise see last year's Montreal/Tampa pick trade, it was likely that we wouldn't get a better 2nd rounder this year so they've added a 4th to make up for it.

Coronato at 11 is a spicy take, I don't know how good he is on a non stacked team.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 57
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,493
Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
Quoting: exo2769
I think these trades are very fair. I don't think L’Heureux drops that far and I also don't think Coronato gets taken that high, but we'll see.


If L'Heureux is available at 31 I almost guarantee Montreal takes him.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 58
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: Campabee
I don't think Habs fans should complain because of the deeper, in person draft and it will be hosted in Montreal


As a Habs fan, I am sure Bergevin will do it.
Habs4ever a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 8 h 59
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,493
Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
Quoting: Sam_Qc
As a Habs fan, I am sure Bergevin will do it.


Yes espafter the pressure he is getting about not drafting Quebecois players.
17 juill. 2021 à 9 h 17
#11
Habs4ever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 2,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,195
MTL says yes
17 juill. 2021 à 9 h 20
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: Campabee
Yes espafter the pressure he is getting about not drafting Quebecois players.


I agree but this year, there are good players who are playing in the QMJHL like L'Heureux, Bourgault, etc so maybe he will take one of them. I also like Olivier Nadeau this year who will be available with our late 2nd round picks or in the 3rd round.
17 juill. 2021 à 9 h 57
#13
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,642
Mentions "j'aime": 9,764
Stan, I don't want to be a prisoner of the moment...nor do I think SB Nation is by any means the gospel. They came out with a pretty compelling case for Cole Sillinger. Hawks could use another power forward with a snipe, no?

Over a ppg in the WHL as a 16-17 year old. Due to COVID when to the USHL and was on the worst team in the league. Hard to be a playmaker when you're the only one that can make plays. Younger side of the draft. Physical forward.
17 juill. 2021 à 10 h 25
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,587
Mentions "j'aime": 743
Quoting: Campabee
If L'Heureux is available at 31 I almost guarantee Montreal takes him.


He's gotta be like top 3 on their draft board....Maybe they go Scott Morrow if he's there but more than Likely L'Heureux because he's from the Q
17 juill. 2021 à 10 h 33
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,493
Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
Quoting: ggha777
He's gotta be like top 3 on their draft board....Maybe they go Scott Morrow if he's there but more than Likely L'Heureux because he's from the Q


I like Dean, L'Heureux and Robertson at 31st but an off the board pick I really like is Martino. A line of Martino-Suzuki-Caufield would be just deadly. Martino has Suzuki's hockey sense and Drouin's puck skills paired with 2 natural shooters that would be a deadly fast attack line.
17 juill. 2021 à 11 h 55
#16
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
CHI
2021 2nd round pick (SJS)
2022 3rd round pick (OTT)
2022 3rd can become a 2nd if Strome scores 45 points or OTT makes the playoffs.
OTT
Strome, Dylan


Ottawa could conceivably make the playoffs without Strome, with a healthy Murray, so that condition isn't likely, but you could switch it to something like, wins a playoff round.
17 juill. 2021 à 12 h 2
#17
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,844
Mentions "j'aime": 5,815
Quoting: sensibleguy
CHI
2021 2nd round pick (SJS)
2022 3rd round pick (OTT)
2022 3rd can become a 2nd if Strome scores 45 points or OTT makes the playoffs.
OTT
Strome, Dylan


Ottawa could conceivably make the playoffs without Strome, with a healthy Murray, so that condition isn't likely, but you could switch it to something like, wins a playoff round.


I’m not against your revision, but I think the trade is very fair as it is. Maybe we can meet in the middle and say “If Strome is among their top 12 forwards for TOI in the playoffs then the pick upgrades to a 2nd. This way ensures OTT only upgrades the pick due to a meaningful contribution from Strome.
17 juill. 2021 à 12 h 27
#18
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I’m not against your revision, but I think the trade is very fair as it is. Maybe we can meet in the middle and say “If Strome is among their top 12 forwards for TOI in the playoffs then the pick upgrades to a 2nd. This way ensures OTT only upgrades the pick due to a meaningful contribution from Strome.


Sorry, I didn't address the points portion earlier when I should have.

There are too many variables for the point production, that it's more fair to both teams if it's a games played stipulation, say 74 games, which is about 90%, so I would word it, plays in at least 90% of the Senators regular season games.

The playoffs portion probably isn't really necessary, because just playing 90% of the regular season games removes some of the risk, so I'd drop the playoffs portion entirely.
17 juill. 2021 à 12 h 58
#19
Démarrer sujet
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,844
Mentions "j'aime": 5,815
Quoting: sensibleguy
Sorry, I didn't address the points portion earlier when I should have.

There are too many variables for the point production, that it's more fair to both teams if it's a games played stipulation, say 74 games, which is about 90%, so I would word it, plays in at least 90% of the Senators regular season games.

The playoffs portion probably isn't really necessary, because just playing 90% of the regular season games removes some of the risk, so I'd drop the playoffs portion entirely.

As long as there is a fair and possible (read: somewhat likely) chance that the pick can get upgraded I’m all for it.
sensibleguy a aimé ceci.
17 juill. 2021 à 15 h 53
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,039
Mentions "j'aime": 369
Quoting: sensibleguy
CHI
2021 2nd round pick (SJS)
2022 3rd round pick (OTT)
2022 3rd can become a 2nd if Strome scores 45 points or OTT makes the playoffs.
OTT
Strome, Dylan


Ottawa could conceivably make the playoffs without Strome, with a healthy Murray, so that condition isn't likely, but you could switch it to something like, wins a playoff round.


I’d rather shoot bigger with Strome and say if he get 60+, we get their first
17 juill. 2021 à 17 h 34
#21
Serf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,417
Mentions "j'aime": 1,461
Quoting: Breadmanhawks
I’d rather shoot bigger with Strome and say if he get 60+, we get their first


A team shouldn't add points to a pick upgrade condition in a trade, it's too easy to manipulate, Less PP time, worse wingers, or even less ice time in game, and even if a team didn't sabotage the chances at the conditions, it leaves an opening for "expert fans" to speculate they did.

A monetary bonus for a player in a contract would be the only situation you'll see a points condition included, such as in an ELC.

If you can cite one for a pick increase in a trade, post it please.
Breadmanhawks et Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage