SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

WINDOW CLOSED - SELL SELL SELL

Créé par: jsmith19895845
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 6 juill. 2021
Publié: 6 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 250 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
3.
4.
BOS
  1. Hanifin, Noah
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $49 634 842 $1 956 507 $872 500 $31 865 158 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
809 167 $809 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
764 167 $764 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juill. 2021 à 15 h 49
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,350
Mentions "j'aime": 10,680
TBH Flames dont really need Marchand. And IMO Hanifin is only available for a better LDman
CJets a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 15 h 50
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 506
Mentions "j'aime": 120
if you think thats anywhere near the ballpark for march you need some help
Propeller09 et KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 15 h 53
#3
Suzukis bathwater
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 826
Mentions "j'aime": 213
I think they're still good, as long as Bergeron and Marchand keep producing like old maniacs and Rask keeps being an elite for them they got a chance I think. Add a good LHD and a decent backup and they still going to contend next year.
6 juill. 2021 à 15 h 55
#4
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
The Calgary trade would be up there as one of the worst in NHL history.
Gmonwy, Propeller09 et KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 15 h 58
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
You gotta think CGY accepts even tho hes a left shot. What would it take for the islanders to get him.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 0
#6
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,350
Mentions "j'aime": 10,680
Quoting: Islesforthecup
You gotta think CGY accepts even tho hes a left shot. What would it take for the islanders to get him.


We don't really need him TBH. Yes he is good but not at the price of one of out best dmen. Also Gaudreau Tkachuk Mangiapane Dube can all play top 6 LW. Tkachuk Lindholm can play RW. We have no one to replace Hanifin with. I doubt this happens
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 0
#7
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Quoting: Islesforthecup
You gotta think CGY accepts even tho hes a left shot. What would it take for the islanders to get him.


No one cares about what way anyone shoots when you’re getting one of the best wingers in the league. Marchand is going to play his entire career in Boston though.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 1
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: Islesforthecup
You gotta think CGY accepts even tho hes a left shot. What would it take for the islanders to get him.


Ya think? The best LW in the game for a underperforming D who is actually not very good.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 2
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: Gmonwy
We don't really need him TBH. Yes he is good but not at the price of one of out best dmen. Also Gaudreau Tkachuk Mangiapane Dube can all play top 6 LW. Tkachuk Lindholm can play RW. We have no one to replace Hanifin with. I doubt this happens


It won't happen because Hanafin isn't good and Marchand is a HOF'er.
Marchand is substantially better than everyone else on your team.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 3
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
No one cares about what way anyone shoots when you’re getting one of the best wingers in the league. Marchand is going to play his entire career in Boston though.


Quoting: Propeller09
Ya think? The best LW in the game for a underperforming D who is actually not very good.


That was my point might not have come across that way tho.
Propeller09 et Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 4
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Gmonwy
We don't really need him TBH. Yes he is good but not at the price of one of out best dmen. Also Gaudreau Tkachuk Mangiapane Dube can all play top 6 LW. Tkachuk Lindholm can play RW. We have no one to replace Hanifin with. I doubt this happens


Youre crazy but no problem. Islanders will be happy to take him.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,683
Quoting: Islesforthecup
You gotta think CGY accepts even tho hes a left shot. What would it take for the islanders to get him.


Flames need for Hanifin is way higher tbh, I would happily pay something else for BM though. Hanifin, Lindholm, and Mangiapane are just simply not available, probably Tkachuk too
Gmonwy a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 6
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: Islesforthecup
That was my point might not have come across that way tho.


If you are really lucky they'll take Barzal for Mangiapone.
Islesforthecup a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 7
#14
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,350
Mentions "j'aime": 10,680
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames need for Hanifin is way higher tbh, I would happily pay something else for BM though


What would we give? Im assuming Tkachuk would be #2 on there list but I don't think we should trade Tkachuk for an basically older less physical version of him
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 7
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames need for Hanifin is way higher tbh, I would happily pay something else for BM though. Hanifin, Lindholm, and Mangiapane are just simply not available, probably Tkachuk too


Lol.
Islesforthecup a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 7
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: Gmonwy
What would we give? Im assuming Tkachuk would be #2 on there list but I don't think we should trade Tkachuk for an basically older less physical version of him


*who scores twice as many points.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 12
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,683
Quoting: Gmonwy
What would we give? Im assuming Tkachuk would be #2 on there list but I don't think we should trade Tkachuk for an basically older less physical version of him


Well he's realistically not gonna be traded, if its for Marchand specifically Tkachuk is not available though as Flames should only consider moving him for a legitimate 1C
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 12
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
@alfie11 help! Youre needed ASAP. Come talk some sense into your boys here.
Propeller09 a aimé ceci.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 52
#19
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
MTL would take Marchand
Draws Penalties , Great on PP and a Pest.

Plus i saw a glimpse of Marchand-Gallagher training at the WC in 2015 i believe it was.
They just had so much chemistry and would be so hard to play against with Danault in the middle

Wouldnt give up the farm for him
Picks , Prospect but we cant afford to move much of our Roster outside Drouin who could retire or come back who knows.

Sadly we're not in a position to over pay for him even though he'd fit our team perfect and we could make the cap work
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 53
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Quoting: Gmonwy
TBH Flames dont really need Marchand. And IMO Hanifin is only available for a better LDman


Are you serious right now?
Flip him then. He’s either the best, or the second best LW in the national hockey league.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 53
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
This is a tremendous disaster.
6 juill. 2021 à 16 h 57
#22
Bruins fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 1,479
Mentions "j'aime": 312
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Flames need for Hanifin is way higher tbh, I would happily pay something else for BM though. Hanifin, Lindholm, and Mangiapane are just simply not available, probably Tkachuk too


So anything of actual value?
6 juill. 2021 à 17 h 13
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,067
Mentions "j'aime": 427
You could get a heck of a lot more for 63
6 juill. 2021 à 17 h 33
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: Gmonwy
What would we give? Im assuming Tkachuk would be #2 on there list but I don't think we should trade Tkachuk for an basically older less physical version of him

Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well he's realistically not gonna be traded, if its for Marchand specifically Tkachuk is not available though as Flames should only consider moving him for a legitimate 1C

Quoting: Islesforthecup
alfie11 help! Youre needed ASAP. Come talk some sense into your boys here.

Strictly speaking, if this exact trade was offered, the Flames obviously accept, and then trade one of Marchand/Tkachuk/Gaudreau for a better LD than Hanifin while laughing about how badly they ripped off the Bruins. But I think everyone realizes this isn’t fair value for Boston, and thus Calgary would be adding, at which point it doesn’t make sense. Framing it as trading Hanifin (our top pair LD on a left side with minimal depth below him until the younger guys develop) in a trade for a left shot winger makes no sense if the deal is actually fair and not a huge win for Calgary, which is where I think the other Flames fans are coming from. If it was a fair trade based around Hanifin for Marchand (with Calgary adding significantly of course) Calgary should avoid that, as it weakens a potential weak point to strengthen their best area. Not that Marchand should be dealt anyway lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage